| Literature DB >> 32933085 |
Jianpeng Xie1, Qudratullah Kalwar2, Ping Yan1, Xian Guo2.
Abstract
Yak (Bos grunniens) is an important and remarkable livestock species that survives in the challenging environment of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. However, its growth rate is slower and reproductive potential is generally lower than cattle. Meanwhile, it has been reported that enhanced nutrition improves the reproductive efficiency of animals. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of concentrate supplementation on the miRNA expression profile in the ovaries of yak during the non-breeding season. The study displayed that non-breeding season supplementation significantly improved growth performance, serum biochemical indicators, and reproductive hormone concentrations in yaks. In this study, we also examined the differential expression analysis of miRNA in the ovaries of yak during non-breeding seasons using Illumina Hiseq sequencing technology. As a result, 51 differentially expressed miRNAs were found in the experimental group (CS) and control group (CON). Gene Ontology (go) and Kyoto Genome Encyclopedia (KEGG) analysis of target genes showed that beta-alanine metabolism; tryptophan metabolism; sphingolipid metabolism; alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism; and the inositol phosphate metabolism pathway attracted our attention. Based on qRT-PCR, seven miRNAs were assessed to verify the accuracy of the library database. We predicted and identified potential miRNA target genes, including LEP, KLF7, VEGFA, GNAQ, GTAT6, and CCND2. miRNA and corresponding target genes may regulate yaks' seasonal reproduction through their nutritional status. This study will provide an experimental basis for improving the reproductive efficiency of yaks by supplementation in the non-breeding season.Entities:
Keywords: miRNA; non-breeding season; ovary; yak
Year: 2020 PMID: 32933085 PMCID: PMC7552198 DOI: 10.3390/ani10091640
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Nutritional composition of concentrated feed mixture and hay (%).
| Constituent | Hay (%) | Concentrate Mixture (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Crude protein | 3.65 | 16.74 |
| Crude fat | 1.72 | 3.15 |
| Crude fiber | 68.3 | 6.00 |
| Crude ash | 7.53 | 5.27 |
| Calcium | 0.54 | 0.84 |
| Phosphorus | 0.47 | 0.50 |
MiRNA primers for quantitative real-time PCR.
| miRNA | miRNA Sequence (5′–3′) | Forward Primer Sequence (5′–3′) |
|---|---|---|
| bta-miR-483 | UCACUCCUCUCCUCCCGUCUU | TCACTCCTCTCCTCCCGTCTT |
| bta-miR-449a | UGGCAGUGUAUUGUUAGCUGGU | TGGCAGTGTATTGTTAGCTGGT |
| bta-miR-200b | UAAUACUGCCUGGUAAUGAUG | TAATACTGCCTGGTAATGATG |
| bta-miR-200a | UAACACUGUCUGGUAACGAUGUU | TAACACTGTCTGGTAACGATGTT |
| bta-miR-205 | UCCUUCAUUCCACCGGAGUCUG | TCCTTCATTCCACCGGAGTCT |
| bta-miR-223 | UGUCAGUUUGUCAAAUACCCCA | TGTCAGTTTGTCAAATACCCCA |
| bta-miR-2431-5p | CAGGUCAUAUAAGUGUGGAGUU | CAGGTCATATAAGTGTGGAGTT |
Effect of mixed diet supplementation during the cold season on the growth performance of the yaks.
| Parameter | Groups | SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON (kg) | CS (kg) | |||
| Initial Weight | 171.7 ± 24.83 a | 172.8 ± 31.32 a | 7.20 | 0.901 |
| Final Weight | 170.4 ± 23.88 a | 202.9 ± 31.75 b | 9.57 | 0.037 |
| Average Daily Gain | −0.008 ± 0.01 a | 0.283 ± 0.11 b | 0.034 | ≤0.01 |
a, b values within the row showing dissimilar superscript specify a significant difference at p < 0.01.
Effect of cold season mix diet supplementation on serum biochemical parameters of the yaks.
| Parameter | Days | Groups | SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | CS | ||||
| GLU (mmol/L) | 0 | 2.84 ± 0.25 a | 2.87 ± 0.21 a | 0.06 | 0.761 |
| 106 | 2.69 ± 0.28 a | 3.63 ± 0.31 b | 0.10 | ≤0.01 | |
| TP (g/L) | 0 | 69.60 ± 4.37 a | 70.40 ± 3.27 a | 1.34 | 0.649 |
| 106 | 66.50 ± 3.86 a | 84.00 ± 5.85 b | 1.85 | ≤0.01 | |
| ALB (g/L) | 0 | 22.20 ± 1.03 a | 22.60 ± 1.65 b | 0.32 | 0.523 |
| 106 | 21.00 ± 1.30 a | 32.80 ± 2.57 b | 0.55 | ≤0.01 | |
| TRIG (mmol/L) | 0 | 0.15 ± 0.06 a | 0.13 ± 0.03 a | 0.02 | 0.483 |
| 106 | 0.11 ± 0.03 a | 0.22 ± 0.06 b | 0.01 | ≤0.01 | |
| CHOL (mmol/L) | 0 | 2.27 ± 0.37 a | 2.24 ± 0.31 a | 0.12 | 0.855 |
| 106 | 2.11 ± 0.16 a | 3.59 ± 0.24 b | 0.08 | ≤0.01 | |
a, b values within the row showing dissimilar superscript specify significant difference, p < 0.01 glucose (GLU), total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), triglyceride (TRIG), cholesterol (CHOL).
Effect of cold season supplementation on serum reproductive hormone of the yaks.
| Parameter | Days | Groups | SEM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | CS | ||||
| GnRH (mIU/mL) | 0 | 8.1875 ± 1.3287 a | 8.5225 ± 1.2386 a | 0.42 | 0.567 |
| 106 | 7.8782 ± 1.8952 a | 15.9439 ± 2.8643 b | 0.59 | ≤0.01 | |
| FSH (mIU/mL) | 0 | 1.1149 ± 0.2541 a | 1.1788 ± 0.1697 a | 0.08 | 0.517 |
| 106 | 0.9870 ± 0.2471 a | 2.6079 ± 0.1806 b | 0.07 | ≤0.01 | |
| LH (mIU/mL) | 0 | 1.0563 ± 0.2505 a | 1.1102 ± 0.2677 a | 0.07 | 0.648 |
| 106 | 0.9431 ± 0.2780 a | 2.6328 ± 0.2877 b | 0.09 | ≤0.01 | |
| E2 (pg/mL) | 0 | 10.2806 ± 4.1495 a | 10.9653 ± 4.2415 a | 0.68 | 0.719 |
| 106 | 6.2496 ± 1.4354 a | 16.1687 ± 2.0088 b | 0.63 | ≤0.01 | |
| P (pmol/L) | 0 | 450.4571 ± 50.2930 a | 458.0429 ± 29.6429 a | 9.37 | 0.686 |
| 106 | 471.1857 ± 44.5153 a | 715.0143 ± 780,343 b | 14.0 | ≤0.01 | |
a,b values within the row showing a dissimilar superscript specify a significant difference, p < 0.01. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estrogen (E2), progesterone (PROG).
Figure 1Length distribution of the sequences. (Different colors represent the distribution of miRNA length).
Distribution of small RNA among differently expressed categories in the library
| Types | CS | CON | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| rRNA | 1425029 | 3.46% | 1800091 | 3.41% |
| snRNA | 130 | 0.00% | 142 | 0.00% |
| scRNA | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% |
| snoRNA | 145152 | 0.35% | 112544 | 0.21% |
| tRNA | 89338 | 0.22% | 72260 | 0.14% |
| Repbase | 131696 | 0.32% | 174194 | 0.33% |
| Unannotated | 59020 | 95.65% | 50568470 | 95.91% |
| Total | 16362355 | 100% | 52727701 | 100% |
CS: The experimental group; CON: Control group.
Figure 2Volcano plot of the differentially expressed miRNAs in the CS and CON groups.
Figure 3MA diagram of differentially expressed miRNA in the CS and CON groups.
Figure 4Heat map of the differentially expressed miRNAs in the CS and CON groups.
Figure 5Validation for the RNA sequencing data by qRT-PCR.RNA-Seq results (A): qRT-PCR results (B): The results are presented as the mean ± SD (p < 0.05).
Figure 6KEGG pathways of differentially expressed miRNA target genes in the CS and CON groups.
The matching results of the differential miRNA and the target gene were obtained by using Target Scan software.
| MiRNA-mRNA | Predicted Consequential Pairing of Target Region (Top) and miRNA (Bottom) | Site Type | Context Score | Context Score Percentile | Weighted Context Score | Conserved Branch Length | PCT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position 1903-1909 of LEP 3′ UTR | 5′ ....AGUAGGGCAGAGGGC | 7mer-m8 | −0.16 | 86 | −0.16 | 0.748 | N/A |
| Position 190-196 of NOTCH1 3′ UTR | 5′ ...UAUUUUACAUGGAAA | 7mer-m8 | −0.49 | 98 | −0.49 | 6.934 | 0.79 |
| Position 2688-2694 of KLF7 3′ UTR | 5′ ...UUAAUUUAAUUUUUG- | 7mer-m8 | −0.21 | 87 | −0.21 | 3.082 | 0.33 |
| Position 1328-1334 of VEGFA 3′ UTR | 5′ ...GAGUAGGGUUUUUUU | 7mer-m8 | −0.23 | 95 | −0.19 | 4.184 | 0.62 |
| Position 4877-4883 of GNAQ 3′ UTR | 5′ ...AACAUUUUUAACUUG | 7mer-m8 | −0.18 | 91 | −0.15 | 3.766 | 0.53 |
| Position 736-743 of GATA6 3′ UTR | 5′ ....UUGCGUUGCAGCAAU | 8mer | −0.43 | 99 | −0.42 | 10.634 | 0.86 |
| Position5142-5148 of CCND2 3′ UTR | 5′ ....ACAAUAAACUCACCU | 7mer-A1 | −0.19 | 91 | 0.00 | 0 | N/A |
Reproduction-related target genes for differentially expressed miRNAs.
| miRNAs | Genes |
|---|---|
| bta-miR-483 |
|
| bta-miR-449a |
|
| bta-miR-223 |
|
| bta-miR-200b |
|
|
| |
| bta-miR-200a |
|
| bta-miR-2431-5p |
|