| Literature DB >> 32932874 |
Heba Al Housseiny1, Madhu Singh2, Shaneeka Emile3, Marvin Nicoleau4, Randy L Vander Wal2,5, Patricia Silveyra1,3.
Abstract
Air pollution has become the world's single biggest environmental health risk of the past decade, causing millions of yearlyEntities:
Keywords: air pollution; functional groups; lung inflammation; particulate matter; soot
Year: 2020 PMID: 32932874 PMCID: PMC7555766 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines8090345
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicines ISSN: 2227-9059
Figure 1TEM image of a carbon black (A) aggregate and (B) primary particle.
Elemental content measured as atomic percent for samples S1–S4. S1: nascent soot, S2: nitric acid-treated soot, S3: ozone-treated soot, S4: nitric acid and heat-treated soot.
| Soot | Treatment | Measured Atomic 1 % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | O | N | S | ||
| S1 | None | 97.2 | 1.3 | -- | 0.9 |
| S2 | HNO3 | 67.8 | 31.5 | 1.3 | -- |
| S3 | Ozone | 90 | 9.4 | -- | 0.6 |
| S4 | HNO3 + 300 °C | 86.5 | 13.2 | -- | 0.2 |
1 C: carbon, O: oxygen, N: nitrogen, S: sulfur.
Oxygen group percentages for samples S1–S4.
| Soot | Treatment | Oxygen Groups % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-O | C=O | O-C=O | Total O | ||
| S1 | None | -- | -- | -- | 1.3 |
| S2 | HNO3 | 10.2 | 4.9 | 9.4 | 34.0 |
| S3 | Ozone | 2.2 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 8.3 |
| S4 | HNO3 + 300 °C | 7.3 | 3.8 | 0.5 | 12.1 |
Figure 2BEAS-2B cell viability expressed as percentage of viable cells at 6 h after exposure to four different soot preparations (S1–S4). The bars summarize data from three independent experiments (n = 3 replicates per experiment) with results normalized to control (cells exposed to DMSO). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.001 (Dunnett’s post hoc multiple comparisons test). Two-way ANOVA interaction: p < 0.0001, F (21, 40) = 7.640; concentration effect: p < 0.0001, F (7, 40) = 25.67); soot-type effect (p < 0.0001, F (3, 40) = 69.91. For a description of S1–S4, see Section 2.
Figure 3BEAS-2B cell viability expressed as percentage of viable cells after exposure to four different soot preparations for 24 h. The graph summarizes data from three independent experiments (n = 3 replicates per experiment), with results normalized to control cells (exposed to DMSO). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.001 (Dunnett’s post hoc multiple comparisons test). Two-way ANOVA interaction: p < 0.0001, F (21, 36) = 11.59; concentration effect: p < 0.0001, F (7, 36) = 100.4; soot type effect (p < 0.0001, F (3, 36) = 127.6). For a description of S1–S4, see Section 2.
Figure 4Expression of human interleukin-1 mRNA (IL1B) (relative to 18S expression) in BEAS-2B cell after exposure to soot preparations for 6 h. The graph summarizes data from three independent experiments (n = 3 replicates per experiment), with results normalized to controls (exposed to methanol) and expressed as mean ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA interaction: p = 0.0109, F (12, 71) = 2.415; concentration effect: p < 0.0001, F (4, 71) = 30.51; soot type effect (p < 0.0001, F (3, 71) = 15.48). * p < 0.05, different from control (Dunnett’s multiple comparison’s test). For a description of S1–S4, see Section 2.
Figure 5Expression of human interleukin-6 mRNA (IL6) (relative to 18S expression) in BEAS-2B cell after exposure to soot preparations for 6 h. The graph summarizes data from three independent experiments (n = 3 replicates per experiment), with results normalized to controls (exposed to methanol) and expressed as mean ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA interaction: p < 0.0001, F (12, 61) = 5.563 concentration effect: p < 0.0001, F (4, 61) = 36.99; soot type effect (p < 0.0001, F (3, 61) = 22.84). * p < 0.05, different from control (Dunnett’s multiple comparison’s test). For a description of S1–S4, see Section 2.
Figure 6Human IL-1β mRNA (IL1B) expression (relative to 18S expression) in BEAS-2B cells treated with S1–S4 soot at 3.125 µg/mL (A) or 12.5 µg/mL (B) for 6 h. The graphs summarize data from three independent experiments (n = 3 replicates per experiment), with results normalized to controls (exposed to methanol) and expressed as mean ± SEM. a: different from control, b: different from S1 (p < 0.05). One-way ANOVA (p < 0.001, F (4, 20) = 20.47).
Figure 7Human IL-6 mRNA (IL6) expression (relative to 18s) in BEAS-2B cells treated with S1–S4 soot at 3.125 µg/mL (A) or 12.5 µg/mL (B) for 6 h. The graphs summarize data from three independent experiments (n = 3 replicates per experiment), with results normalized to controls (exposed to methanol) and expressed as mean ± SEM. a: different from control and S1 (p < 0.001), b: different from S2 (p < 0.05), c: different from control. One-way ANOVA (p < 0.001, F (3, 8) = 25.7).
Figure 8Expression of oxidative stress genes (relative to 18S expression) in BEAS-2B cells treated with S1–S4 soot at 3.125 ug/mL for 6 h. (A) Superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) mRNA. (B) Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NFE2L2) mRNA. The graphs summarize data from three independent replicates, with gene expression results normalized to controls (exposed to DMSO) and expressed as mean ± SEM. a: different from control, b: different from S1, c: different from S4. One-way ANOVA (p < 0.05).
Figure 9Protein carbonylation levels in BEAS-2B cells treated with S1–S4 soot at 25 ug/mL for 24 h. Results are expressed as nmol/mg of total protein. a: different from S1 and S3. One-way ANOVA (p < 0.001, F (3, 12) = 63.07).