Literature DB >> 32932050

A survey of American physical therapists' current practice of dry needling: Practice patterns and adverse events.

Eric Gattie1, Joshua A Cleland2, Suzanne Snodgrass3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the proportion of physical therapists currently performing dry needling and report current practices patterns. Secondary aims were to report the numbers of minor and major adverse events and determine if these adverse events were related to therapist characteristics.
METHODS: An anonymous electronic survey was distributed through special interest groups within the United States to physical therapists. Participant demographics and responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Associations between variables were examined using chi-square.
RESULTS: The estimated response rate was 14.4% (n = 865, mean age 39.89, SD 11.73 years). More than half (55.0%, n = 461) of respondents perform dry needling; levels of training varied. Most (78.8%, n = 337) performed 0-3 needling sessions per day, usually lasting < 15 min (67.3% of respondents, n = 288). Therapists commonly performed 3-6 sessions over a patient's course of care (82.0% of respondents, n = 350). Minor adverse events were common; respondents estimated this occurred in 39.6% (SD 31.5) of treatments. Major adverse events were rare, typically not requiring emergency care. Being male (X2 = 8.197, P = 0.004), experienced (>4 years; X2 = 34.635, P < 0.001), and having more training (>61 h; X2 = 8.503, P = 0.004) were associated with reporting a major adverse event occurred during their career.
CONCLUSIONS: Half of physical therapists surveyed performed dry needling. Practice patterns were consistent with expert opinion. The number of adverse events reported suggests further research is needed to quantify the risks of dry needling. Participant characteristics associated with a major adverse event appear to be related to the number of exposures.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events; Dry needling; Practice pattern; Survey

Year:  2020        PMID: 32932050     DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Musculoskelet Sci Pract        ISSN: 2468-7812            Impact factor:   2.520


  3 in total

1.  The posterior/medial dry needling approach of the tibialis posterior muscle is an accurate and safe procedure: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Albert Pérez-Bellmunt; Carlos López-de-Celis; Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz; Shane L Koppenhaver; Daniel Zegarra-Chávez; Sara Ortiz-Miguel; César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 2.  Corticosteroid injection or dry needling for musculoskeletal pain and disability? A systematic review and GRADE evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Luis Fernando Sousa Filho; Marta Maria Barbosa Santos; Gabriel Henrique Freire Dos Santos; Walderi Monteiro da Silva Júnior
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2021-12-02

3.  Cadaveric and Ultrasound Validation of Percutaneous Electrolysis Approaches at the Arcade of Frohse: A Potential Treatment for Radial Tunnel Syndrome.

Authors:  Pedro Belón-Pérez; Laura Calderón-Díez; José Luis Sánchez-Sánchez; Miguel Robles-García; Gustavo Plaza-Manzano; César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.