Literature DB >> 32931635

Reproducibility of clinical late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging in detecting left atrial scar after atrial fibrillation ablation.

Roya Kamali1,2,3, Joyce Schroeder4, Edward DiBella4, Benjamin Steinberg2, Frederick Han2, Derek J Dosdall1,2,3,5, Rob S Macleod1,3, Ravi Ranjan1,2,3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to detect postablation atrial scar (PAAS) but its reproducibility and reliability in clinical scans across different magnetic flux densities and scar detection methods are unknown.
METHODS: Patients (n = 45) having undergone two consecutive MRIs (3 months apart) on 3T and 1.5T scanners were studied. We compared PAAS detection reproducibility using four methods of thresholding: simple thresholding, Otsu thresholding, 3.3 standard deviations (SD) above blood pool (BP) mean intensity, and image intensity ratio (IIR). We performed a texture study by dividing the left atrial wall intensity histogram into deciles and evaluated the correlation of the same decile of the two scans as well as to a randomized distribution of intensities, quantified using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC).
RESULTS: The choice of scanner did not significantly affect the reproducibility. The scar detection performed by Otsu thresholding (DSC of 71.26 ± 8.34) resulted in a better correlation of the two scans compared with the methods of 3.3 SD above BP mean intensity (DSC of 57.78 ± 21.2, p < .001) and IIR above 1.61 (DSC of 45.76 ± 29.55, p <.001). Texture analysis showed that correlation only for voxels with intensities in deciles above the 70th percentile of wall intensity histogram was better than random distribution (p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that clinical LGE-MRI can be reliably used for visualizing PAAS across different magnetic flux densities if the threshold is greater than 70th percentile of the wall intensity distribution. Also, atrial wall-based thresholding is better than BP-based thresholding for reproducible PAAS detection.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LGE-MRI; atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; lesion assessment; radiofrequency energy; scar reproducibility

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32931635      PMCID: PMC9205620          DOI: 10.1111/jce.14743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873            Impact factor:   2.942


  21 in total

1.  Interactive Hierarchical-Flow Segmentation of Scar Tissue From Late-Enhancement Cardiac MR Images.

Authors:  Martin Rajchl; Jing Yuan; James A White; Eranga Ukwatta; John Stirrat; Cyrus M S Nambakhsh; Feng P Li; Terry M Peters
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Comparison of left atrial volumes and function by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in patients having catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with persistence of sinus rhythm versus recurrent atrial fibrillation three months later.

Authors:  Nina Ajmone Marsan; Laurens F Tops; Eduard R Holman; Nico R Van de Veire; Katja Zeppenfeld; Eric Boersma; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Automated segmentation of myocardial scar in late enhancement MRI using combined intensity and spatial information.

Authors:  Qian Tao; Julien Milles; Katja Zeppenfeld; Hildo J Lamb; Jeroen J Bax; Johan H C Reiber; Rob J van der Geest
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Relationship between intended sites of RF ablation and post-procedural scar in AF patients, using late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Jason E Taclas; Reza Nezafat; John V Wylie; Mark E Josephson; Jeff Hsing; Warren J Manning; Dana C Peters
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2009-12-13       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Response of atrial fibrillation to pulmonary vein antrum isolation is directly related to resumption and delay of pulmonary vein conduction.

Authors:  Atul Verma; Fethi Kilicaslan; Ennio Pisano; Nassir F Marrouche; Raffaele Fanelli; Johannes Brachmann; Jens Geunther; Domenico Potenza; David O Martin; Jennifer Cummings; J David Burkhardt; Walid Saliba; Robert A Schweikert; Andrea Natale
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Temporal left atrial lesion formation after ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Troy J Badger; Robert S Oakes; Marcos Daccarett; Nathan S Burgon; Nazem Akoum; Eric N Fish; Joshua J E Blauer; Swati N Rao; Yaw Adjei-Poku; Eugene G Kholmovski; Sathya Vijayakumar; Edward V R Di Bella; Rob S MacLeod; Nassir F Marrouche
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  Detection of pulmonary vein and left atrial scar after catheter ablation with three-dimensional navigator-gated delayed enhancement MR imaging: initial experience.

Authors:  Dana C Peters; John V Wylie; Thomas H Hauser; Kraig V Kissinger; René M Botnar; Vidal Essebag; Mark E Josephson; Warren J Manning
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Detection and quantification of left atrial structural remodeling with delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Robert S Oakes; Troy J Badger; Eugene G Kholmovski; Nazem Akoum; Nathan S Burgon; Eric N Fish; Joshua J E Blauer; Swati N Rao; Edward V R DiBella; Nathan M Segerson; Marcos Daccarett; Jessiciah Windfelder; Christopher J McGann; Dennis Parker; Rob S MacLeod; Nassir F Marrouche
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Cardiac magnetic resonance and electroanatomical mapping of acute and chronic atrial ablation injury: a histological validation study.

Authors:  James L Harrison; Henrik K Jensen; Sarah A Peel; Amedeo Chiribiri; Anne K Grøndal; Lars Ø Bloch; Steen F Pedersen; Jacob F Bentzon; Christoph Kolbitsch; Rashed Karim; Steven E Williams; Nick W Linton; Kawal S Rhode; Jaswinder Gill; Michael Cooklin; C A Rinaldi; Matthew Wright; Won Y Kim; Tobias Schaeffter; Reza S Razavi; Mark D O'Neill
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Evaluation of current algorithms for segmentation of scar tissue from late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the left atrium: an open-access grand challenge.

Authors:  Rashed Karim; R James Housden; Mayuragoban Balasubramaniam; Zhong Chen; Daniel Perry; Ayesha Uddin; Yosra Al-Beyatti; Ebrahim Palkhi; Prince Acheampong; Samantha Obom; Anja Hennemuth; Yingli Lu; Wenjia Bai; Wenzhe Shi; Yi Gao; Heinz-Otto Peitgen; Perry Radau; Reza Razavi; Allen Tannenbaum; Daniel Rueckert; Josh Cates; Tobias Schaeffter; Dana Peters; Rob MacLeod; Kawal Rhode
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  2 in total

1.  Left atrial evaluation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: sensitive and unique biomarkers.

Authors:  Dana C Peters; Jérôme Lamy; Albert J Sinusas; Lauren A Baldassarre
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Quantification of left atrial fibrosis by 3D late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation: impact of different analysis methods.

Authors:  Luuk H G A Hopman; Pranav Bhagirath; Mark J Mulder; Iris N Eggink; Albert C van Rossum; Cornelis P Allaart; Marco J W Götte
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 9.130

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.