Literature DB >> 32931187

Economic Analysis of Mandated Protocolized Sepsis Care in New York Hospitals.

Donald S Bourne1, Billie S Davis1, Kristin H Gigli1, Chung-Chou H Chang2,3, Jonathan G Yabes2,3, Grant R Martsolf4,5, Jeremy M Kahn1,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Initial evidence suggests that state-level regulatory mandates for sepsis quality improvement are associated with decreased sepsis mortality. However, sepsis mandates require financial investments on the part of hospitals and may lead to increased spending. We evaluated the effects of the 2013 New York State sepsis regulations on the costs of care for patients hospitalized with sepsis.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using state discharge data from the U.S. Healthcare Costs and Utilization Project and a comparative interrupted time series analytic approach. Costs were calculated from admission-level charge data using hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratios.
SETTING: General, short stay, acute care hospitals in New York, and four control states: Florida, Massachusetts, Maryland, and New Jersey. PATIENTS: All patients hospitalized with sepsis between January 1, 2011, and September 30, 2015.
INTERVENTIONS: The 2013 New York mandate that all hospitals develop and implement protocols for sepsis identification and treatment, educate staff, and report performance data to the state.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The analysis included 1,026,664 admissions in 520 hospitals. Mean unadjusted costs per hospitalization in New York State were $42,036 ± $60,940 in the pre-regulation period and $39,719 ± $59,063 in the post-regulation period, compared with $34,642 ± $52,403 pre-regulation and $31,414 ± $48,155 post-regulation in control states. In the comparative interrupted time series analysis, the regulations were not associated with a significant difference in risk-adjusted mean cost per hospitalization (p = 0.12) or risk-adjusted mean cost per hospital day (p = 0.44). For example, in the 10th quarter after implementation of the regulations, risk-adjusted mean cost per hospitalization was $3,627 (95% CI, -$681 to $7,934) more than expected in New York State relative to control states.
CONCLUSIONS: Mandated protocolized sepsis care was not associated with significant changes in hospital costs in patients hospitalized with sepsis in New York State.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32931187      PMCID: PMC7875140          DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   9.296


  23 in total

1.  Reporting of Sepsis Cases for Performance Measurement Versus for Reimbursement in New York State.

Authors:  Hallie C Prescott; Tara M Cope; Foster C Gesten; Tatiana A Ledneva; Marcus E Friedrich; Theodore J Iwashyna; Tiffany M Osborn; Christopher W Seymour; Mitchell M Levy
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  State Sepsis Mandates - A New Era for Regulation of Hospital Quality.

Authors:  Tina B Hershey; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The cost-effectiveness ratio of a managed protocol for severe sepsis.

Authors:  Murillo Santucci Cesar Assuncao; Vanessa Teich; Sandra Christina Pereira Lima Shiramizo; Denizart Vianna Araújo; Renato Melli Carrera; Ary Serpa Neto; Eliezer Silva
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.425

4.  Cost-effectiveness of an emergency department-based early sepsis resuscitation protocol.

Authors:  Alan E Jones; Jennifer L Troyer; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Association Between State-Mandated Protocolized Sepsis Care and In-hospital Mortality Among Adults With Sepsis.

Authors:  Jeremy M Kahn; Billie S Davis; Jonathan G Yabes; Chung-Chou H Chang; David H Chong; Tina Batra Hershey; Grant R Martsolf; Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Administrative and claims records as sources of health care cost data.

Authors:  Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  The costs and cost-effectiveness of an integrated sepsis treatment protocol.

Authors:  Daniel Talmor; Dan Greenberg; Michael D Howell; Alan Lisbon; Victor Novack; Nathan Shapiro
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Economic implications of an evidence-based sepsis protocol: can we improve outcomes and lower costs?

Authors:  Andrew F Shorr; Scott T Micek; William L Jackson; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Sepsis Among Medicare Beneficiaries: 1. The Burdens of Sepsis, 2012-2018.

Authors:  Timothy G Buchman; Steven Q Simpson; Kimberly L Sciarretta; Kristen P Finne; Nicole Sowers; Michael Collier; Saurabh Chavan; Ibijoke Oke; Meghan E Pennini; Aathira Santhosh; Marie Wax; Robyn Woodbury; Steve Chu; Tyler G Merkeley; Gary L Disbrow; Rick A Bright; Thomas E MaCurdy; Jeffrey A Kelman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Epidemiology and Costs of Sepsis in the United States-An Analysis Based on Timing of Diagnosis and Severity Level.

Authors:  Carly J Paoli; Mark A Reynolds; Meenal Sinha; Matthew Gitlin; Elliott Crouser
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  1 in total

1.  Patient and economic impact of implementing a paediatric sepsis pathway in emergency departments in Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Robin Blythe; Paula Lister; Robert Seaton; Amanda Harley; Luregn J Schlapbach; Steven McPhail; Bala Venkatesh; Adam Irwin; Sainath Raman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.