Danya Pradeep Kumar1, Christopher Wendel2, Jane Mohler1,2, Kaveh Laksari1,3, Nima Toosizadeh4,5. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Arizona Center on Aging, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. 3. Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA. ntoosizadeh@aging.arizona.edu. 5. Department of Medicine, Arizona Center on Aging, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. ntoosizadeh@aging.arizona.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While sensor-based daily physical activity (DPA) gait assessment has been demonstrated to be an effective measure of physical frailty and fall-risk, the repeatability of DPA gait parameters between different days of measurement is not clear. AIMS: To evaluate test-retest reliability (repeatability) of DPA gait performance parameters, representing the quality of walking, and quantitative gait measures (e.g. number of steps) between two separate days of assessment among older adults. METHODS: DPA was acquired for 48-h from older adults (age ≥ 65 years) using a tri-axial accelerometer. Continuous walking bouts (≥ 60 s) were identified from acceleration data and used to extract gait performance parameters, including time- and frequency-domain gait parameters, representing walking speed, variability, and irregularity. To assess repeatability, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated using two-way mixed effects F-test models for day-1 vs. day-2 as the independent random effect. Repeatability tests were performed for all participants and also within frailty groups (non-frail and pre-frail/frail identified using Fried phenotype). RESULTS: Data was analyzed from 63 older adults (29 non-frail and 34 pre-frail/frail). Most of the time- and frequency-domain gait performance parameters showed good to excellent repeatability (ICC ≥ 0.70), while quantitative parameters, including number of steps and walking duration showed poor repeatability (ICC < 0.30). Among majority of the gait performance parameters, we observed higher repeatability among the pre-frail/frail group (ICC > 0.78) compared to non-frail individuals (0.39 < ICC < 0.55). CONCLUSION: Gait performance parameters, showed higher repeatability compared to quantitative measures. Higher repeatability among pre-frail/frail individuals may be attributed to a reduced functional capacity for performing more intense and variable physical tasks. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The clinical trial was retrospectively registered on June 18th, 2013 with ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01880229.
BACKGROUND: While sensor-based daily physical activity (DPA) gait assessment has been demonstrated to be an effective measure of physical frailty and fall-risk, the repeatability of DPA gait parameters between different days of measurement is not clear. AIMS: To evaluate test-retest reliability (repeatability) of DPA gait performance parameters, representing the quality of walking, and quantitative gait measures (e.g. number of steps) between two separate days of assessment among older adults. METHODS: DPA was acquired for 48-h from older adults (age ≥ 65 years) using a tri-axial accelerometer. Continuous walking bouts (≥ 60 s) were identified from acceleration data and used to extract gait performance parameters, including time- and frequency-domain gait parameters, representing walking speed, variability, and irregularity. To assess repeatability, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated using two-way mixed effects F-test models for day-1 vs. day-2 as the independent random effect. Repeatability tests were performed for all participants and also within frailty groups (non-frail and pre-frail/frail identified using Fried phenotype). RESULTS: Data was analyzed from 63 older adults (29 non-frail and 34 pre-frail/frail). Most of the time- and frequency-domain gait performance parameters showed good to excellent repeatability (ICC ≥ 0.70), while quantitative parameters, including number of steps and walking duration showed poor repeatability (ICC < 0.30). Among majority of the gait performance parameters, we observed higher repeatability among the pre-frail/frail group (ICC > 0.78) compared to non-frail individuals (0.39 < ICC < 0.55). CONCLUSION: Gait performance parameters, showed higher repeatability compared to quantitative measures. Higher repeatability among pre-frail/frail individuals may be attributed to a reduced functional capacity for performing more intense and variable physical tasks. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The clinical trial was retrospectively registered on June 18th, 2013 with ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01880229.
Authors: M Jane Mohler; Mindy J Fain; Anne M Wertheimer; Bijan Najafi; Janko Nikolich-Žugich Journal: Exp Gerontol Date: 2014-02-04 Impact factor: 4.032
Authors: M Jane Mohler; Christopher S Wendel; Ruth E Taylor-Piliae; Nima Toosizadeh; Bijan Najafi Journal: Gerontology Date: 2016-04-30 Impact factor: 5.140
Authors: Claudine J Lamoth; Floor J van Deudekom; Jos P van Campen; Bregje A Appels; Oscar J de Vries; Mirjam Pijnappels Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2011-01-17 Impact factor: 4.262