Stefano Falcinelli1, James M Farrar2, Franco Vecchiocattivi1, Fernando Pirani3,4. 1. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile ed Ambientale, Università di Perugia, 06125 Perugia, Italy. 2. Department of Chemistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, United States. 3. Dipartimento di Chimica, Biologia e Biotecnologie, Università di Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy. 4. Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie Chimiche "G. Natta" CNR-SCITEC, 06123 Perugia, Italy.
Abstract
ConspectusMost chemical processes are triggered by electron or charge transfer phenomena (CT). An important class of processes involving CT are chemi-ionization reactions. Such processes are very common in nature, involving neutral species in ground or excited electronic states with sufficient energy (X*) to yield ionic products, and are considered as the primary initial step in flames. They are characterized by pronounced electronic rearrangements that take place within the collisional complex (X···M)* formed by approaching reagents, as shown by the following scheme, where M is an atomic or molecular target: X* + M → (X···M)* → [(X+···M) ↔ (X···M+)]e- →viae-CT (X···M)+ + e- → final ions.Despite their important role in fundamental and applied research, combustion, plasmas, and astrochemistry, a unifying description of these basic processes is still lacking. This Account describes a new general theoretical methodology that demonstrates, for the first time, that chemi-ionization reactions are prototypes of gas phase oxidation processes occurring via two different microscopic mechanisms whose relative importance varies with collision energy, Ec, and separation distance, R. These mechanisms are illustrated for simple collisions involving Ne*(3P2,0) and noble gases (Ng). In thermal and hyperthermal collisions probing interactions at intermediate and short R, the transition state [(Ne···Ng)+]e- is a molecular species described as a molecular ion core with an orbiting Rydberg electron in which the neon reagent behaves as a halogen atom (i.e., F) with high electron affinity promoting chemical oxidation. Conversely, subthermal collisions favor a different reaction mechanism: Ng chemi-ionization proceeds through another transition state [Ne*······Ng], a weakly bound diatomic-lengthened complex where Ne* reagent, behaving as a Na atom, loses its metastability and stimulates an electron ejection from M by a concerted emission-absorption of a "virtual" photon. This is a physical radiative mechanism promoting an effective photoionization. In the thermal regime of Ec, there is a competition between these two mechanisms. The proposed method overcomes previous approaches for the following reasons: (1) it is consistent with all assumptions invoked in previous theoretical descriptions dating back to 1970; (2) it provides a simple and general description able to reproduce the main experimental results from our and other laboratories during last 40 years; (3) it demonstrates that the two "exchange" and "radiative" mechanisms are simultaneously present with relative weights that change with Ec (this viewpoint highlights the fact that the "canonical" chemical oxidation process, dominant at high Ec, changes its nature in the subthermal regime to a direct photoionization process; therefore, it clarifies differences between the cold chemistry of terrestrial and interstellar environments and the energetic one of combustion and flames); (4) the proposed method explicitly accounts for the influence of the degree of valence orbital alignment on the selective role of each reaction channel as a function of Ec and also permits a description of the collision complex, a rotating adduct, in terms of different Hund's cases of angular momentum couplings that are specific for each reaction channel; (5) finally, the method can be extended to reaction mechanisms of redox, acid-base, and other important condensed phase reactions.
ConspectusMost chemical processes are triggered by electron or charge transfer phenomena (CT). An important class of processes involving CT are chemi-ionization reactions. Such processes are very common in nature, involving neutral species in ground or excited electronic states with sufficient energy (X*) to yield ionic products, and are considered as the primary initial step in flames. They are characterized by pronounced electronic rearrangements that take place within the collisional complex (X···M)* formed by approaching reagents, as shown by the following scheme, where M is an atomic or molecular target: X* + M → (X···M)* → [(X+···M) ↔ (X···M+)]e- →viae-CT (X···M)+ + e- → final ions.Despite their important role in fundamental and applied research, combustion, plasmas, and astrochemistry, a unifying description of these basic processes is still lacking. This Account describes a new general theoretical methodology that demonstrates, for the first time, that chemi-ionization reactions are prototypes of gas phase oxidation processes occurring via two different microscopic mechanisms whose relative importance varies with collision energy, Ec, and separation distance, R. These mechanisms are illustrated for simple collisions involving Ne*(3P2,0) and noble gases (Ng). In thermal and hyperthermal collisions probing interactions at intermediate and short R, the transition state [(Ne···Ng)+]e- is a molecular species described as a molecular ion core with an orbiting Rydberg electron in which the neon reagent behaves as a halogen atom (i.e., F) with high electron affinity promoting chemical oxidation. Conversely, subthermal collisions favor a different reaction mechanism: Ng chemi-ionization proceeds through another transition state [Ne*······Ng], a weakly bound diatomic-lengthened complex where Ne* reagent, behaving as a Na atom, loses its metastability and stimulates an electron ejection from M by a concerted emission-absorption of a "virtual" photon. This is a physical radiative mechanism promoting an effective photoionization. In the thermal regime of Ec, there is a competition between these two mechanisms. The proposed method overcomes previous approaches for the following reasons: (1) it is consistent with all assumptions invoked in previous theoretical descriptions dating back to 1970; (2) it provides a simple and general description able to reproduce the main experimental results from our and other laboratories during last 40 years; (3) it demonstrates that the two "exchange" and "radiative" mechanisms are simultaneously present with relative weights that change with Ec (this viewpoint highlights the fact that the "canonical" chemical oxidation process, dominant at high Ec, changes its nature in the subthermal regime to a direct photoionization process; therefore, it clarifies differences between the cold chemistry of terrestrial and interstellar environments and the energetic one of combustion and flames); (4) the proposed method explicitly accounts for the influence of the degree of valence orbital alignment on the selective role of each reaction channel as a function of Ec and also permits a description of the collision complex, a rotating adduct, in terms of different Hund's cases of angular momentum couplings that are specific for each reaction channel; (5) finally, the method can be extended to reaction mechanisms of redox, acid-base, and other important condensed phase reactions.
.[1]New insights are provided on the electronic adiabatic and nonadiabatic
effects in the stereodynamics of state to state atomic and molecular
collisions, controlling relevant properties of the transition state
of chemi-ionization reactions..[2]Recent developments in the
experimental study of chemi-ionization reactions are presented to
cast light on basic aspects of the stereodynamics of the microscopic
mechanisms involved..[3]A theoretical
approach able to formulate the optical potential for Ne*(.
Introduction
Anisotropic
intermolecular forces, associated with alignment and
orientation effects produced by atomic and molecular polarization,
modulate the fate of molecular collisions. A knowledge of these phenomena
is relevant to control the stereodynamics of elementary processes
occurring in the gas phase and at the gas–surface interface,[4−18] but a general theoretical and computational foundation is still
lacking.This Account focuses on the role of valence atomic
orbital alignment
in determining the selectivity of electronic rearrangements that affect
the stereodynamics of gas-phase chemi-ionization reactions (Penning
ionization phenomena).[19−22] Our study provides complementary information to the nuclear stereodynamics
deeply investigated in seminal works.[23−25] Indeed, present atom–atom
reactions are directly triggered by the electronic rearrangements
and indirectly affected by nuclear motions: possible electronic–nuclear
couplings emerge as Coriolis effects.Chemi-ionization reactions
occur in collisions of open shell species,
electronically excited in energetic metastable states, with neutral
partners, giving rise to spontaneous ejection of electrons and subsequent
ion formation. The reactions proceed without a barrier and are described
by an anisotropic optical potential, W, defined in eq as a combination of a
real (Vt) and an imaginary (Γ) part
that control, respectively, entrance–exit channel trajectories
and disappearance probability of neutral reactants by ionization.[19−22,26,27]The strength of both the real and imaginary
components varies with the center-of-mass separation and relative
orientation of interacting partners. The imaginary component Γ
mediates the passage from neutral reactants to ionic products through
an electronic rearrangement within the reaction transition state (TS).Chemi-ionization processes studied under electronically state-selected
conditions are important for catalysis, plasmas, photodynamics, and
interstellar and low-temperature chemistry and play an important role
in applied research topics such as soft ionization in mass spectrometry.[28−31] Such reactions are the primary step in flames,[32,33] classified here as prototypes of strongly exothermic elementary
oxidation processes, for which the details of the stereodynamics are
provided by Penning ionization energy spectra (PIES) of spontaneously
emitted electrons and by total and partial ionization cross sections.[12,21] These experimental observables are very sensitive probes that highlight
the crucial features of TSs such as geometry and orbital energetics.This Account focuses on reactions of metastable Ne*, with a valence
electron excited to a 3s orbital. Its open-shell ionic core Ne+ exhibits the same electronic configuration, 2p5, of the high electron affinity fluorine atom, with 2P3/2,1/2 fine structure levels. When Ne* approaches an atomic
or molecular target M with sufficient collision energy (Ec), it forms an interacting complex within which a spontaneous
electron jump from one of the HOMOs (highest occupied molecular orbitals)
of M to the open shell ionic core of Ne* can occur, releasing enough
energy to eject the 3s electron with a defined kinetic energy. Therefore,
measured PIES[34,35] provide direct information on
electronic rearrangements occurring inside the TS.[36] Moreover, the ionization probability and PIES are strongly
dependent on symmetry, energy, and relative spatial orientation of
the atomic or molecular orbitals involved in the electron exchange.A number of laboratories including our own fully highlighted the
reaction dependence on the orbital orientation of various molecular
systems.[37−40] However, in the case of the anisotropic Ne* reagent, an important
open question concerns the selective role of the half-filled 2p atomic
orbital within the collision complex the alignment of which affects
the TS structure. To emphasize basic aspects of the stereodynamics
promoted by selective electronic rearrangements, we have focused on
prototype atom–atom reactions between Ne* and the heavier noble
gases (Ng = Ar, Kr, Xe). The limited internal degrees of freedom of
Ng, the absence of fragmentation in Ng+ product, and the
availability of detailed experimental findings such as cross sections,
branching ratios (BRs), and PIES facilitated the investigation.Ours is an innovative theoretical approach based on identification
and modeling of the basic components of the interaction. Their formulation
uses fundamental physical properties as scaling parameters (polarizability,
ionization potential, electronic affinity, spin–orbit (SO)
splitting) of the participating collisional partners, providing a
computational method based on simple-operating interdependent relationships.Our study on Ne*–Kr[1,2] serves as a paradigm
for emphasizing similarities and differences in the reaction stereodynamics
of the complete Ne*–Ng family.The computational method,
which provides an integrated picture
of the stereodynamics of this series of chemi-ionization reactions,
is based on two important markers, C and C which quantify the Σ character degree in
excited and lowest electronic states, respectively, of the molecular
ion (Ne···Ng)+ coupled by CT. Such markers,
identifying how the molecular symmetry degree of the state-selected
collision complexes (which evolve in the TS ones at the turning point
region) changes with the interatomic distance R,
represent how quantum levels of reagents and products couple during
each collision event. They describe how the SO levels of reagents
and products are perturbed at large R and destroyed
at shorter R by increasing strength and anisotropy
of the electric field associated with the interaction. Only strong
electric fields decouple the electronic orbital angular momentum from
the spin and effectively align valence orbitals along R, promoting the formation of real molecular states.Therefore,
the markers map all reaction dynamics changes as a function
of Ec and concomitant changes in the ranges
of R probed.This approach emphasizes intriguing
microscopic aspects of the
processes that had not been previously considered:Entrance and exit
channels belong
to a manifold of states of the same system, properly coupled by the
configuration interaction. Their characterization provides the correct
sequence in energy of quantum levels accessible, including also those
of the TS, and their dependence on R; the real and
imaginary parts of the optical potential are interdependent, being
related to adiabatic and nonadiabatic effects, respectively, arising from electronic rearrangements occurring
within the collision complex.The microscopic mechanisms triggered
by the selectivity of interaction components have a marked Ec dependence:Subthermal conditions promote reactions
classified as photoionization processes, where only long-range noncovalent
interactions (induction, dispersion, and polarization) are effective.
They determine the formation of weakly bound diatomic adducts [Ne*······Ng]
(the TS in this case) where Ne* behaves as a sodium atom perturbed
by the Ng presence: this breaks the validity of the optical selection
rules, allowing ionization to occur by a concerted emission–absorption
of a “virtual” photon.[3,41]Hyperthermal conditions favor processes
that evolve as chemical oxidation reactions, where the TS is a molecular
complex of which the accessible levels are represented by proper molecular
quantum numbers. In this case, the collision complex [Ne*······Ng]
formed at large R does not ionize and evolves toward
shorter R where the Ne* polarization makes the stronger
ion–dipole interaction effective, trapping the reactants via
the formation of [(Ne···Ng)+] TS:Here, the behavior of neon is dominated by
its ionic core (behaving as a fluorine atom) inducing the oxidation
of the Ng via an electron transfer. Under thermal conditions, the
two types of reactions occur simultaneously, and their relative role
varies with Ec depending on both reaction
channel and Ng characteristics.
Computational Methodology
The proposed methodology
exploits the following steps suggested
by our recent research.[1−3]
Optical Potential Formulation
The
real part, Vt, of eq assumes that each entrance channel is determined
by the weighted
sum of two limiting representations.[1−3] At large R, the system exhibits a substantial isotropic behavior, typical of
an alkaline atom interacting with Ng and promoting a photoionization
(physical) process. At intermediate and short R,
the anisotropy of the ionic core of Ne* emerges, behaving as a F atom,
which promotes an oxidation reaction. The interaction in the entrance
channels must take into account the anisotropic contributions from
the open shell “P” nature of Ne*,[1−3,21,22,41−47] whereas the exit channels are affected by the P nature of the Ng+ product.The investigation of the interaction of open
P shell atoms or ions with a closed shell 1S0 species[47,48] suggests a Vt representation defined in terms of proper quantum numbers that accounts
for the relative alignment or orientation of reagents and products
within the interatomic electric field, which is the proper quantization
axis of the system. The resultant interactions provide effective adiabatic potentials that include VΣ and VΠ contributions
mixed by SO effects. The Σ and Π molecular states are
defined by the electronic quantum number Λ = 0 and Λ =
1, where Λ describes the absolute projection of the orbital
angular momentum decoupled by the spin along R. For a
full description of present anisotropic interactions, it is sufficient
to use[42] a weighted sum of V0 and V2 Legendre-expansion
radial coefficients:[47,48]V0 represents
the isotropic component, with all anisotropic contributions included
in the V2 term. The latter, accounting
for the quantized spatial orientation of valence orbitals of the open
shell species within the interacting complex, controls the sequence
in the manifold of adiabatic potential energy curves[47,48] (PECs) associated with all quantum states accessible, including
their stabilities and anisotropies. Accordingly, for all channels,
the effective PECs have been formulated[3] and indicated as V| (J is the total (orbital + spin) electronic angular
momentum quantum number, while Ω is the absolute projection
of J along R).While the isotropic V0 term is a noncovalent
interaction component, the anisotropic V2 originates primarily from “chemical” contributions.
In entrance channels, V0 accounts for
the gradual passage of the system, as R decreases,
from neutral–neutral [Ne*······Ng]
to ion–neutral [(Ne···Ng)+], that is, a molecular ion core surrounded
by a Rydberg electron (eq ).[1−3] In exit channels, it is determined by an isotropic Ne···Ng+ ion–neutral interaction. In both cases, V0 depends on size repulsion, polarization, and dispersion/induction
attraction contributions. In contrast, V2 identifies the anisotropic configuration interaction (CI) between
entrance and exit channels differing for one electron exchange. V2 is represented by an exponential decreasing
function of R,[3,47,48] reflecting the “canonical” dependence of the integral
overlap between atomic orbitals exchanging the electron. For entrance
and exit channels, the modulus of the exponential function must be
the same, while its sign is negative for the exit channel and positive
for the entrance channel. The different signs relate to bonding and antibonding effects by charge or electron transfer
(CT) that arise from the CI between entrance and exit channels of
the same symmetry.[1−3,47,48] CI makes entrance and exit channels of each system as belonging
to the same correlated manifold of states. The formulation of the
potential functions is summarized in Supporting Information (SI).For entrance and exit channels of the
same system, this approach
leads to a different correlation between atomic states, representative
of the behavior at long R, where |V2| ≪ SO energy splitting, and molecular states
emerging at short R, where |V2| ≫ SO splitting[48] (Figure and Figure S2). The Σ and Π molecular
character degree associated with each V| curve at all R values
can be evaluated by relations (see SI)
that depend on the ratio between V2 strength
and SO splitting and agree with the following asymptotic conditions
(Figure ): at short R, all PECs must represent states having pure Σ or
Π molecular character, while at large R, where
the SO coupling is dominant, a mixing of molecular characters occurs.
Figure 1
(a) Electronic
features of reagents and collision complex. (b)
CI between states of entrance and exit channels differing for one
electron exchange, defining CT contributions for Σ states. Real
part of W for Ne*–Ar (c) and Ne*–Xe
(d) represented by adiabatic PECs.
(a) Electronic
features of reagents and collision complex. (b)
CI between states of entrance and exit channels differing for one
electron exchange, defining CT contributions for Σ states. Real
part of W for Ne*–Ar (c) and Ne*–Xe
(d) represented by adiabatic PECs.As previously noted, the adoption of C and C coefficients quantifies the Σ character degree in entrance
and exit channels, respectively: emphasizing all basic electronic
rearrangements within the collision complexes, they represent important
markers of the reaction dynamics modulation under different conditions.
Their characterization is important to provide suitable correlation
between atomic and molecular states and to obtain a simple-operating
formulation of the imaginary part Γ of the optical potential
internally consistent with that of the real part Vt. Indeed, the relative role of Σ and Π molecular
character in entrance and exit channels must be properly taken into
account to define their couplings and state-to-state Γ components.
Adiabatic and Nonadiabatic Effects in the Open-Shell Atom Phenomenology
The electronic structure of the Ne* reagent is depicted in Figure , where the “floppy”
cloud of the outer 3s electron and the nature of the open shell of
the ionic core are emphasized. These features determine basic characteristics
of the collision complex with the Ng and of the reaction TS. Electronic
rearrangements driving the reaction arise from polarization of the
3s electron cloud, CT, and modifications of angular momentum couplings
of valence electrons within the collision complex. Such rearrangements
are accompanied by adiabatic and nonadiabatic effects, which play
a crucial role in the collision dynamics.Anisotropic adiabatic
effects arise from the strength and selectivity of CI within the collision
complex, promoted by CT, that couple entrance and exit channels of
the same symmetry. Such effects, determining the anisotropy of Vt, account for the adiabatic conversion of atomic
states, represented by |J,Ω⟩ quantum
numbers, into molecular states of Σ and Π symmetry. While
the atomic states are representative of reagents and products at large
and intermediate R, the molecular states of the interacting
system emerge at chemical bonding length scales. The resulting PECs
for Ne*–Ar and Ne*–Xe systems are plotted in Figure (for Ne*–Kr
see ref (3)). The figure
depicts also CI and CT for Σ states: the corresponding components
for Π states are much smaller[1,2] because of
the reduced overlap integral between atomic half-filled orbitals exchanging
the electron, aligned orthogonal to R. Sequence and stability
of levels, obtained by general guidelines,[48] are consistent with results of Dehmer[49] and the natural bond order method.[50]The components of the imaginary part of the optical potential depend
on the strength and radial dependence of nonadiabatic effects. They
arise from polarization, selective CI, changes in electronic angular
momentum couplings, and SO and Coriolis contributions[1] as determined in the recent analysis of the Ne*–Kr
case.[47] This procedure exploits the characterization
of C and C discussed above. Figure a indicates that at large R such coefficients maintain their asymptotic values and the system
is not reactive. As R decreases, the system is initially
affected by weak noncovalent components of the interaction: the C and C coefficients are slowly varying, with a
perturbation of Ne* sufficient to promote within [Ne*······Ng]
emission–absorption of a “virtual” photon[41] initiating a photoionization mechanism. Conversely,
at short R stronger “chemical” interaction
components promote pronounced changes in angular momentum couplings
with the passage from atomic to molecular states: the TS, [(Ne···Ng)+], becomes a molecular
ion surrounded by a Rydberg electron. In this region, the reactions
become true chemical (oxidation) processes. Therefore, C and C, the important markers controlling the relative
role of reaction mechanisms accounting for the variation with R of the Σ character of the state-selected TS, have
been obtained with a procedure detailed in SI and are shown in Figure a for Ne*–Ar and Ne*–Xe systems. The R interval where they show the fastest variations corresponds
to the region where the interaction anisotropy becomes comparable
to the SO coupling and an emerging transition from atomic and to molecular
states occurs. The behavior of V|2,2⟩ and V|3/2,3/2⟩ curves, effective
in the entrance and exit channels, respectively, is not discussed
in detail since they show at all distances pure Π character.
Figure 2
(a) Vertical
axes give values of the Σ character in entrance
(C) and exit (C) channels as a function of R. Π character is defined as complement to 1 of the
Σ one. All states accessible to the system are indicated by
|J,Ω⟩ quantum numbers. The |3/2,3/2⟩
states are not included since they exhibit a pure Π character
at all R. Dashed and full lines refer to Ne–Xe
and Ne–Ar systems, respectively. The larger interaction anisotropy
of the Ne+–Xe system makes the variation of C more prominent with respect to Ne+–Ar, while the larger SO coupling of Xe+ with respect
to Ar+ hinders the passage to the molecular state causing
less variation of C. (b) Cartoon representing
the main features of Σ–Σ, Π–Π,
Σ–Π, and Π–Σ couplings promoted
by nonadiabatic effects operative during the collisions.
(a) Vertical
axes give values of the Σ character in entrance
(C) and exit (C) channels as a function of R. Π character is defined as complement to 1 of the
Σ one. All states accessible to the system are indicated by
|J,Ω⟩ quantum numbers. The |3/2,3/2⟩
states are not included since they exhibit a pure Π character
at all R. Dashed and full lines refer to Ne–Xe
and Ne–Ar systems, respectively. The larger interaction anisotropy
of the Ne+–Xe system makes the variation of C more prominent with respect to Ne+–Ar, while the larger SO coupling of Xe+ with respect
to Ar+ hinders the passage to the molecular state causing
less variation of C. (b) Cartoon representing
the main features of Σ–Σ, Π–Π,
Σ–Π, and Π–Σ couplings promoted
by nonadiabatic effects operative during the collisions.
Chemi-ionization Reaction Mechanisms
The nature of
nonadiabatic effects, coupling reagents, and products during collision
events suggests that chemi-ionization reactions occur through two
complementary microscopic mechanisms, illustrated in the right panel
of Figure . They are
classified as:[1]
Figure 3
State-to-state Γ components defined in
terms of |J,Ω⟩ quantum numbers of Ne*(3PJ) reagent and of Ar+(2PJ)
(a) and Xe+(2PJ) (b) products.
direct mechanism (driven
by “chemical” forces), ΔΛ = 0, with coupling
terms called AΣ–Σ and AΠ–Π on the basis of the molecular
character (Σ or Π) of initial and final states;indirect mechanism (controlled by of “physical” forces), ΔΛ=
±1, promoted by electronic polarization, SO, and Coriolis effects
and stimulated by mixing between initial and final states of different
symmetry, whose coupling terms are defined as AΣ–Π and AΠ–Σ.State-to-state Γ components defined in
terms of |J,Ω⟩ quantum numbers of Ne*(3PJ) reagent and of Ar+(2PJ)
(a) and Xe+(2PJ) (b) products.The two mechanisms show different radial dependence,[1−3] and therefore their relative roles vary with Ec. The direct mechanism dominates at shorter distances, accessible
in higher Ec, and arises from the chemical
oxidation of the Ng controlled by the [(Ne···Ng)+] TS, where the Ne* ionic
core behaves like a fluorine atom, while the indirect one emerges
at lower relative energies when the collision probes larger distances
and evolves along PECs dominated by the behavior of Ne* as a sodium
atom. The indirect mechanism includes radiative contributions as proposed
in pioneering works.[27,41,42]All coupling terms AΛ–Λ′ are represented by exponential functions[1−3] given in SI. The couplings AΣ–Σ and AΠ–Π exhibit
a pronounced radial dependence since they, as the V2 component, relate to the variation of valence orbital
overlap integrals with R. However, arising from noncovalent
interaction and Coriolis contributions, AΣ–Π and AΠ–Σ show a less
pronounced radial dependence.[1−3] Coupling with the continuous states
of the emitted electron,[41,42] which slowly varies
with R, is accounted in the pre-exponential factor
of AΛ–Λ′.Strength and radial dependence of state-to-state Γ
terms
have been defined exploiting AΣ–Σ, AΠ–Π, AΣ–Π, and AΠ–Σ terms. Similar to Ne*–Kr,[3] for
the present systems strength and radial dependence of AΣ–Σ and AΠ–Π have been estimated from strength and radial dependence of CI, which
couples and mixes states of the same symmetry to which partial or
full molecular character can be properly assigned.Therefore,
considering the correlation diagram between atomic and
molecular states[3] reported in SI, we obtained explicit relations for state-to-state
Γ| terms of the optical potential (see SI), represented as weighted averages of AΛ–Λ′ couplings, where relative weights
in each channel are given as combination of C and C.Such state-to-state Γ| components, reported
in Figure , exhibit
similar behavior for both systems, although for Ne*–Xe they
are stronger suggesting the occurrence of more efficient chemi-ionization
processes. For the direct mechanism, this is due to the effect of
larger atomic overlap of Xe with respect to Ar, while for the indirect
mechanism, the larger electronic cloud of Xe causes a higher perturbation
on the external electronic configuration of Ne* with subsequently
more probable violation of the selection rules favoring its radiative
decay.
Predictions and Experimental Results
Present optical potential formulations have been exploited to calculate,
within a semiclassical method,[21,22,26,27] state-to-state ionization cross
sections over a wide Ec range. Such calculations
directly provide also the product BRs, defining the relative probability
of selected channels.[3]Figures , 5, 6, and 7 compare
theoretical predictions with experimental data from several laboratories
including our own. All experimental data have been obtained in high-resolution
molecular beam experiments: our apparatus has been illustrated in
previous papers[31,35] and SI. Therefore, this treatment attempts to give, for the first time
and for all Ne*–Ng systems, an internally consistent rationalization
of most relevant experimental findings[1,3,35,42−45,51]
Figure 4
State-to-state total ionization cross section for Ne*–Ar
as a function of Ec. The comparison with
early experimental results (black points, data from ref (42)) refers to state averaged
conditions and emphasizes differences with respect to state-to-state
results, while their statistical average is consistent with the experimental
determination.
Figure 5
State-to-state total ionization cross section
for Ne*–Xe
as a function of Ec. The comparison with
early experimental results (black points, data from ref (42)) refers to state averaged
conditions and emphasizes differences with respect to state-to-state
results, while their statistical average is consistent with the experimental
determination.
Figure 6
State-to-state associative/Penning ratios predicted
for Ne*–Ar.
The comparison involves experimental results (black points, data from
ref (51)) referred
to state averaged conditions. Recent data, measured with Ne*(3P2) beams state-selected in Ω = 2, 1, 0 quantum
states, are also reported (open circles) for a further comparison
(data from refs (43−45)).
Figure 7
State-to-state associative/Penning ratios predicted
for Ne*–Xe.
The comparison includes only results of recent experiments (open circles).
Data from ref (45).
Pronounced differences
in state-to-state total ionization cross
sections, which directly relate to the different strengths and radial
dependences of Γ| components, are obtained.
Representative experimental results[42] with
non-state-selected reagents in a wide Ec range are reported in Figures and 5 (black points). Good
agreement between theoretical predictions and experimental data, both
in their absolute values and in Ec dependences,
is obtained for values of the cross sections averaged over the statistical
distribution of quantum states accessible in the experimental conditions.[42]State-to-state total ionization cross section for Ne*–Ar
as a function of Ec. The comparison with
early experimental results (black points, data from ref (42)) refers to state averaged
conditions and emphasizes differences with respect to state-to-state
results, while their statistical average is consistent with the experimental
determination.State-to-state total ionization cross section
for Ne*–Xe
as a function of Ec. The comparison with
early experimental results (black points, data from ref (42)) refers to state averaged
conditions and emphasizes differences with respect to state-to-state
results, while their statistical average is consistent with the experimental
determination.Cross section ratios, , representing
the relative formation probability
of the ionic aggregate [Ng+–Ne] (associative
ion) with respect to the Ng+ (Penning
ion), are also determined. The state-to-state BRs for associative
to Penning ionization, , as
a function of Ec, are plotted in Figure with non-state-selected experimental
data (black points) from our laboratory.[51] The experimental data compare well with the statistical average
of the present calculations. However, the most important comparison
is performed in Figures and 7 with data
by the Osterwalder group[43−45] (open circles) recorded using
a state-selected Ne* beam in J = 2 and Ω =
2, 1, 0 sublevels, indicating a good agreement with the state-to-state
selectivity predicted here.State-to-state associative/Penning ratios predicted
for Ne*–Ar.
The comparison involves experimental results (black points, data from
ref (51)) referred
to state averaged conditions. Recent data, measured with Ne*(3P2) beams state-selected in Ω = 2, 1, 0 quantum
states, are also reported (open circles) for a further comparison
(data from refs (43−45)).State-to-state associative/Penning ratios predicted
for Ne*–Xe.
The comparison includes only results of recent experiments (open circles).
Data from ref (45).
Penning Ionization Electron Spectra
Ne*–Kr PIES
experiments[1−3] permitted us to separate contributions of different
entrance and exit channels, referred to specific J levels of the Ne*(3P2,0) reagent and the Kr+(2P3/2,1/2) product. The large SO splitting
in Kr+ and Xe+ allowed individual contributions
to be resolved in the PIES data, measured as a function of Ec for both Ne*–Kr and Ne*–Xe systems.[1] Similar experiments with Ne*–Ar have not
been done, since SO splittings in Ne* reagent (0.097 eV) and in Ar+ product (0.177 eV) are comparable, making it difficult to
separate the contribution of different SO states in entrance and exit
channels.
Dependence of the Observables on Optical Potential Features
The proposed methodology clearly indicates how the various experimental
findings depend on basic features of real and imaginary parts of the
optical potential and how their role is modulated by Ec and the selected channel. While Vt controls the dynamics of reagent approach and product removal
defining the R region mainly probed by the system
at each Ec, Γ determines the reaction
probability for each assumed configuration of the TS in the probed R region. Important selectivity in the reaction dynamics
emerges by deconvoluting from each state-to-state Γ component
the contributions assigned to each Λ and Λ′ quantum
number pair. These pairs describe the molecular symmetry of the system
before and after the electron exchange. The channel |2,2⟩ →|3/2,3/2⟩
always shows the smallest cross sections that tend to vanish at low Ec. This behavior can be rationalized by noting
that this channel is exclusively governed by AΠ–Π, a very weak coupling term effected
by an electron exchange between valence orbitals aligned perpendicularly
to R and the overlap of which is small and rapidly
vanishing with R. For all other channels, the observed
behavior arises from a combined effect of Σ and Π molecular
character in the interaction driving the collision. The Ne*–Ar
system has been considered as representative of the complete phenomenology,
and the analysis has been focused on three different entrance channels,
namely, |0,0⟩, |2,0⟩, and |2,2⟩, and on the same
exit channel, |3/2,1/2⟩. Note that the |2,1⟩ channel
behaves similarly to |2,0⟩. Deconvoluted results, obtained
as a function of R, are plotted in Figure a. We emphasize that small
and large distances identify, respectively, R regions
mainly probed by experiments at high and low Ec, respectively. From the figure, it appears that for the |0,0⟩
entrance channel the direct mechanism of Σ–Σ type
is dominant at short distance, where the system assumes full Σ
molecular character in both the initial and final states. In this
selected quantum configuration, the Ne*–Ar chemi-ionization
is dominated by the electron exchange inside the molecular [(Ne···Ng)+] TS, promoting a chemical
(oxidation) phenomenon. For |2,0⟩, the same mechanism is prevalent
only at intermediate R, where the transition from
atomic to molecular states is emerging and C and C associated with the Ne+ reagent ionic core and
Ar+ product change quickly, as shown in Figure b, since SO couplings are destroyed
in the electric field associated with the anisotropic interaction
potential.
Figure 8
(a) Individual contributions to Γ, associated with different
molecular symmetries Λ and Λ′ of entrance and exit
channels of Ne* + Ar, plotted as a function of R.
(b) Some details of the (0,0 −3/2,1/2) channel: the Σ
character degree in entrance (C) and exit (C) channels (Figure ) are plotted as a function of R. (c) Reaction probability P(b) at each impact parameter b and distance intervals probed at three selected Ec (thermal–hyperthermal range). For Ec < 3–4 meV (subthermal conditions, T ≤ 50 K) mainly probed distances are significantly
larger than 4 Å, where C and C are weakly
perturbed and tend to assume asymptotic-statistical values. Vertical
gray area confines the turning points region for reactive oxidation
collisions.
(a) Individual contributions to Γ, associated with different
molecular symmetries Λ and Λ′ of entrance and exit
channels of Ne* + Ar, plotted as a function of R.
(b) Some details of the (0,0 −3/2,1/2) channel: the Σ
character degree in entrance (C) and exit (C) channels (Figure ) are plotted as a function of R. (c) Reaction probability P(b) at each impact parameter b and distance intervals probed at three selected Ec (thermal–hyperthermal range). For Ec < 3–4 meV (subthermal conditions, T ≤ 50 K) mainly probed distances are significantly
larger than 4 Å, where C and C are weakly
perturbed and tend to assume asymptotic-statistical values. Vertical
gray area confines the turning points region for reactive oxidation
collisions.For all channels considered here,
including the |2,2⟩ entrance
one, the Π–Π direct (exchange-oxidation) mechanism
plays a minor role at short R, since the exit channel
tends to assume pure Σ symmetry. Contrarily, in all cases indirect
Σ–Π and Π–Σ mechanisms become
dominant for R ≥ 3.5 Å, where small changes
in C and C, induced by weak interactions, tend
to reduce the validity of the optical selection rules stimulating
radiative effects.[41,42]By exploitation of semiclassical
cross section calculations, it
is possible to characterize the R regions mainly
probed at each Ec. Figure b,c reports this information for the (0,0
−3/2,1/2) channel and clearly confirms that, under hyperthermal
conditions, the direct mechanism (chemical-oxidation) is dominant
(lower R), while under thermal conditions direct
and indirect mechanisms become competitive (intermediate R). Under subthermal conditions, where only a full quantum mechanical
cross section calculation is appropriate, only the indirect mechanism
(radiative-physical) is effective (larger R), being
driven exclusively by weak isotropic long-range interactions. Figure b,c also shows the
turning point region where oxidation collisions show the greatest
reactivity.Experimental findings related to ratios (Figures and 7) probe other
details of state-to-state components of the optical potential. In
particular, the highest value
for the |2,2⟩ entrance channel
at low and intermediate Ec arises from
the softer repulsive wall of V|2,2⟩, emerging at intermediate R highlighted in Figure c,d, which allows
a more prominent approach of reactants that favors the trapping in
the potential well of the exit channels. This observation represents
a stereodynamical feature clearly evident in experiments of the Osterwalder
group.[43−45] At high Ec, the associative/Penning
ionization ratio, , falls
off fast, as experimentally observed,[51] since the reactions provide ionic products confined
in the repulsive wall of the exit channels, which lead to dissociated
ions. At very low Ec, ratios are
affected by the weak long-range
attraction, where the anisotropic nature of the Ne+ core
is shielded by the isotropic behavior of the excited 3s electron.Finally, the most important evidence of reaction mechanism modulation
is provided by the Ec dependence of measured
PIES, resolved for J levels of entrance and exit
channels. Specifically, very low Ec leads
to the exclusive formation of diatomic adducts [Ne*······Ng]
(eq and Figure a), binding by weak noncovalent
interactions, and the observables are consistent with those of pure
photoionization spectra (PES) generated by a radiative (physical)
phenomenon (Figure b). At high Ec, the appearance of chemical
interaction components modifies the TS in the molecular [(Ne···Ng)+] structure (Figure a), where Ne+–Ng and Ne–Ng+ configurations couple
by CT. Consequently, significant changes in peak shape and position
appear in measured PIES with respect to PES (Figure b), indicating the emergence of a chemical-oxidation
reaction. Figure emphasizes
these changes for Ne*–Kr pointing out the main characteristics
of the two mechanisms discussed for chemi-ionization reactions (for
Ne*–Xe, see details in SI).
Figure 9
(a) Schematic
view of two mechanisms in chemi-ionizations. (b)
Ne*–Kr PIESs where vertical blue lines indicate peak positions
from Ne(I) photoionization spectrum (PES): at higher Ec electron spectra are very different from PES indicating
a chemical interaction inside the formed [(Ne···Ng)+] TS (oxidation mechanism),
while at very low Ec, they become very
similar to PES since the [Ne*······Kr]
TS evolves via a photoionization process.
(a) Schematic
view of two mechanisms in chemi-ionizations. (b)
Ne*–Kr PIESs where vertical blue lines indicate peak positions
from Ne(I) photoionization spectrum (PES): at higher Ec electron spectra are very different from PES indicating
a chemical interaction inside the formed [(Ne···Ng)+] TS (oxidation mechanism),
while at very low Ec, they become very
similar to PES since the [Ne*······Kr]
TS evolves via a photoionization process.
Conclusions
This new treatment provides unique information
on the stereodynamics
of chemi-ionization reactions, which are relevant in flames, astrochemistry,
plasmas, and nuclear fusion.[1−3,53−56] Electronic angular momentum couplings and orbital alignment are
properly accounted for to describe the selectivity of each state-to-state
channel. Since collision complexes are rotating adducts, their features
must be consistent with angular momentum couplings confined in specific
Hund’s cases.[52] The emergence of
the direct (exchange-oxidation) mechanism corresponds to the passage
from Hund’s case c to Hund’s case a, while the indirect
(radiative) mechanism operates when the transition concerns Hund’s
e to Hund’s c cases.The proposed methodology (i) identifies
two important markers (C and C), which
permit a description of adiabatic and nonadiabatic effects through
the use of simple phenomenological equations, (ii) includes previous
theoretical descriptions since 1970,[27,41,42] (iii) is a simple and general treatment reproducing
experimental results from our and other laboratories since 1981,[1,3,42−45,51,53,54] (iv) clarifies
that exchange and radiative mechanisms are not alternative but simultaneously
operative with a relative weight that changes with Ec and depends on the investigated state-to-state channel,
and (v) clarifies for the first time that chemi-ionizations are prototype
gas phase elementary oxidation processes that can be probed by PIES,
a spectroscopy of TS not allowed in the condensed phase.
Authors: Justin Jankunas; Benjamin Bertsche; Krzysztof Jachymski; Michał Hapka; Andreas Osterwalder Journal: J Chem Phys Date: 2014-06-28 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Sean D S Gordon; Junwen Zou; Silvia Tanteri; Justin Jankunas; Andreas Osterwalder Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Stefano Falcinelli; Fernando Pirani; Pietro Candori; Brunetto G Brunetti; James M Farrar; Franco Vecchiocattivi Journal: Front Chem Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 5.221