Literature DB >> 32930515

Combined and stand-alone XEN 45 gel stent implantation: 3-year outcomes and success predictors.

Kevin Gillmann1, Giorgio Enrico Bravetti1, Harsha L Rao2, André Mermoud1, Kaweh Mansouri1,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the 3-year treatment outcomes of XEN 45 gel stent in open-angle glaucoma patients.
METHODS: In this prospective, single-centre interventional study, consecutive eyes with uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) or signs of disease progression despite medical treatment underwent XEN implantation either alone or combined with phacoemulsification (Phaco + XEN). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgical success was defined as 'complete' when 36-month unmedicated IOP was ≤15 mmHg with a relative IOP reduction ≥ 20% from medicated baseline, while the definition of qualified success allowed no more medications than at baseline. Other definitions of success with different IOP thresholds were also analysed. Secondary outcomes included mean IOP reduction, changes in ocular hypotensive medications and rates of reoperations.
RESULTS: Out of 149 eyes initially included, 92 eyes (61.7%) of 68 patients had complete 3-year data (XEN: n = 26; Phaco + XEN: n = 66) after 38.2% were lost to follow-up. Mean age was 76.3 ± 9.1 years, and 66.2% were female. Mean medicated IOP decreased from 20.8 ± 7.4 mmHg (21.0 ± 7.4 [XEN] vs. 20.0 ± 6.9 mmHg [Phaco + XEN]) at baseline to 13.1 ± 3.4 mmHg (12.9 ± 2.9 [XEN] vs. 12.9 ± 3.4 [Phaco + XEN]) at 3 years (-37.0%; p < 0.001). Medications decreased from 1.9 ± 1.3 (2.4 ± 1.5 [XEN] vs. 1.9 ± 1.2 [Phaco + XEN]) to 0.4 ± 0.9 (0.3 ± 0.8 [XEN] vs. 0.5 ± 0.9 [Phaco + XEN]) (-78.9%; p < 0.001). Complete success and qualified success were achieved in 29.0% and 31.0% of eyes, respectively. Needling revision was performed in 51 eyes (55.4%), and 26.1% underwent reoperations. Risk factors for surgical failure included male gender (odds ratio [OR]:3.6; p = 0.03), diagnosis of POAG (OR: 4.5; p < 0.01) and undergoing needling revision (OR: 4.6; p < 0.01). While the type of procedure had no effect on the outcomes of PEXG, POAG eyes undergoing combined surgery had significantly higher rates of failure (OR: 7.29; p = 0.023). Most patients stable at 12-month remained so through to 3 years.
CONCLUSIONS: At 3 years, XEN gel stent implantation achieved clinically significant IOP and medication reduction despite relatively high rates of needling and reoperations. Identifying patients at risk preoperatively may help optimize surgical outcomes.
© 2020 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MIGS; PEXG; POAG; glaucoma; minimally invasive glaucoma surgery; open-angle; prospective; pseudoexfoliative; surgery

Year:  2020        PMID: 32930515     DOI: 10.1111/aos.14605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  11 in total

1.  Glaucoma Medication and Quality of Life after Phacoemulsification Combined with a Xen Gel Stent.

Authors:  Christian Pahljina; Stephanie Sarny; Lukas Hoeflechner; Thomas Falb; Gernot Schliessleder; Marlene Lindner; Domagoj Ivastinovic; Kaweh Mansouri; Ewald Lindner
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Three-year effectiveness and safety of the XEN gel stent as a solo procedure or in combination with phacoemulsification in open-angle glaucoma: a multicentre study.

Authors:  Herbert Reitsamer; Vanessa Vera; Simon Ruben; Leon Au; Jorge Vila-Arteaga; Miguel Teus; Markus Lenzhofer; Andrew Shirlaw; Zhanying Bai; Mini Balaram; Ingeborg Stalmans
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.988

Review 3.  Microinvasive glaucoma surgery: a review and classification of implant-dependent procedures and techniques.

Authors:  Joanna Jabłońska; Katarzyna Lewczuk; Joanna Konopińska; Zofia Mariak; Marek Rękas
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.988

4.  Comparing the efficacy of trabeculectomy and XEN gel microstent implantation for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma: a retrospective monocentric comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Theresa Theilig; Matus Rehak; Catharina Busch; Caroline Bormann; Marc Schargus; Jan Darius Unterlauft
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Choroidal Detachment after XEN Gel Stent Implantation.

Authors:  Carlo Alberto Cutolo; Letizia Negri; Sara Olivari; Francesca Cappelli; Carlo Enrico Traverso; Michele Iester
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  XEN-Augmented Deep Sclerectomy: Step-by-step Description of a Novel Surgical Technique for the Management of Open-angle Glaucoma.

Authors:  Laëtitia J Niegowski; Kevin Gillmann; J-M Baumgartner
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2021 Sep-Dec

7.  The Outcomes of XEN Gel Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xuan-Zhu Chen; Zhi-Qiao Liang; Kang-Yi Yang; Kun Lv; Yao Ma; Meng-Yang Li; Hui-Juan Wu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-04

8.  The efficacy of XEN gel stent implantation in glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiang Yang; Yang Zhao; Yu Zhong; Xuanchu Duan
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Predictability of success and open conjunctival revision rates in the subsequent eye after XEN45 Gel Stent implantation according to lens status.

Authors:  D Kiessling; C Rennings; M Hild; A Lappas; T S Dietlein; G F Roessler; R A Widder
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.535

10.  Impact of failed ab-interno trabeculectomy (trabectome) on subsequent XEN45 gel stent implantation in pseudophakic eyes.

Authors:  D Kiessling; C Rennings; M Hild; A Lappas; T S Dietlein; G F Roessler; Randolf Alexander Widder
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 2.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.