Yi Zhao1, Yongfeng Lu1, Lu Chen1, Xiaofeng Wei2, Jiefang Zhu3, Yuanhui Zheng1. 1. College of Chemistry, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China. 2. National Engineering Research Center of Chemical Fertilizer Catalyst, Fuzhou University, Gongye Road 523, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China. 3. Department of Chemistry-Ångstrom Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-751 21 Uppsala, Sweden.
Abstract
Cadmium sulfide (CdS) as one of the most common visible-light-responsive photocatalysts has been widely investigated for hydrogen generation. However, its low solar-hydrogen conversion efficiency caused by fast carrier recombination and poor catalytic activity hinders its practical applications. To address this issue, we develop a novel and highly efficient nickel-cobalt phosphide and phosphate cocatalyst-modified CdS (NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi) photocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. The dual-cocatalysts were simultaneously deposited on CdS during one phosphating step by using sodium hypophosphate as the phosphorus source. After the loading of the dual-cocatalysts, the photocurrent of CdS significantly increased, while its electrical impedance and photoluminescence emission dramatically decreased, which indicates the enhancement of charge carrier separation. It was proposed that the NiCoP cocatalyst accepts electrons and promotes hydrogen evolution, while the NiCoPi cocatalyst donates electrons and accelerates the oxidation of sacrificial agents (e.g., lactic acid). Consequently, the visible-light-driven hydrogen evolution of this composite photocatalyst greatly improved. The dual-cocatalyst-modified CdS with a loading content of 5 mol % showed a high hydrogen evolution rate of 80.8 mmol·g-1·h-1, which was 202 times higher than that of bare CdS (0.4 mmol·g-1·h-1). This is the highest enhancement factor for metal phosphide-modified CdS photocatalysts. It also exhibited remarkable stability in a continuous photocatalytic test with a total reaction time of 24 h.
Cadmium sulfide (CdS) as one of the most common visible-light-responsive photocatalysts has been widely investigated for hydrogen generation. However, its low solar-hydrogenconversion efficiency caused by fast carrier recombination and poor catalytic activity hinders its practical applications. To address this issue, we develop a novel and highly efficient nickel-cobalt phosphide and phosphate cocatalyst-modified CdS (NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi) photocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. The dual-cocatalysts were simultaneously deposited on CdS during one phosphating step by using sodium hypophosphateas the phosphorus source. After the loading of the dual-cocatalysts, the photocurrent of CdS significantly increased, while its electrical impedance and photoluminescence emission dramatically decreased, which indicates the enhancement of charge carrier separation. It was proposed that the NiCoPcocatalyst accepts electrons and promotes hydrogen evolution, while the NiCoPi cocatalyst donates electrons and accelerates the oxidation of sacrificial agents (e.g., lactic acid). Consequently, the visible-light-driven hydrogen evolution of this composite photocatalyst greatly improved. The dual-cocatalyst-modified CdS with a loading content of 5 mol % showed a high hydrogen evolution rate of 80.8 mmol·g-1·h-1, which was 202 times higher than that of bare CdS (0.4 mmol·g-1·h-1). This is the highest enhancement factor for metal phosphide-modified CdS photocatalysts. It also exhibited remarkable stability in a continuous photocatalytic test with a total reaction time of 24 h.
Using semiconductor materials to directly convert solar energy
into hydrogen energy is regarded as a promising approach to the storage
of renewable energy.[1−3] The practical application of this technology requires
the design and development of low-cost and highly active photocatalysts,
which usually consist of a semiconductor as a solar light absorber
and a noble metal (e.g., gold, platinum, or palladium) as a hydrogen
evolution cocatalyst.[4−6] During the photocatalytic process, the semiconductor
harvests and converts solar light and generates electron–hole
pairs (i.e., charge carriers) that can be spatially separated by the
in-built electric field at the metal–semiconductor heterojunction.[2] The electrons migrating to the noble metalcocatalyst
are eventually captured by the protons adsorbed on its surface, while
the holes remaining in the semiconductor oxidize sacrificial reagents
in the aqueous solution. Regarding the selection of semiconductor
photocatalysts, cadmium sulfide (CdS) is considered as a model candidate
because of its desirable bandgap (Eg ≈
2.4 eV) for visible-light-driven photocatalysis and appropriate band-edge
potentials for water splitting.[7,8] However, like other
semiconductors, pure CdS suffers from extremely low solar-hydrogenconversion efficiency, because of its low charge-separation efficiency
and poor catalytic activity toward water reduction.[9] As to the choice of hydrogen evolution cocatalysts, earth-abundant
transition metalcompounds, such asmetal oxides,[10−12] metal sulfides,[13−16] metal carbides,[17−19] metalnitrides,[20−22] and metal phosphides
(MP),[23−29] that have relatively high mechanical strength, electrical conductivity,
and chemical stability, have been explored as promising alternatives
to noble-metalcocatalysts.Metal phosphoruscompounds, including
MP and metal phosphates (MPi),
have been widely used ashydrogen evolution reaction (HER) cocatalysts.[23−39] Recently, transition MPs with a large number of unsaturated coordination
surface atoms have attracted particular attention in photocatalytic
hydrogen evolution.[23−33] Liu and Rodriguez theoretically predicted that nickel phosphide
(Ni2P) might be the best practical cocatalyst for hydrogen
evolution.[40] So far, many MPs, such asNi2P,[28] CoP,[23,24] FeP,[25,26] Cu3P,[27] and MoP,[29] have been fabricated and coupled
with CdSashydrogen evolution cocatalysts. Their photocatalytic activity
was typically 4–67 times higher than that of bare CdS (see
more comparison details in Table S1).[23−29] Further improvement of photocatalytic activity requires the codeposition
of an oxidation cocatalyst that facilitates the hole scavenging.[41] Metal phosphates (MPi), which have open-framework
structures with large channels and cavities, have been proved to be
good water oxidation catalysts in the electrocatalytic oxygen evolution
reaction. Therefore, metal phosphates (MPi) can be used as oxidation
cocatalysts in photocatalysis.It has recently been demonstrated
that a double-heterojunction
photocatalytic system containing both reduction and oxidation cocatalysts
exhibited better photocatalytic hydrogen evolution performance than
their single-cocatalystcounterparts.[42−45] For example, Yang et al. reported
a dual-cocatalystPt/CdS/PdS system with Pt and PdSas reduction and
oxidation cocatalysts, respectively, which showed activity 1.76 times
higher than that of Pt/CdS.[42] More recently,
Wei et al. developed a new dual-cocatalyst system by replacing precious
metal-containing redox cocatalysts with low-cost carbon dots and NiS,
which exhibited 5.4 time activity enhancement, compared with pristine
CdS.[44]Despite some impressive progress
in the development of dual-cocatalystcontaining photocatalysts, a general drawback of the existing systems
is that they require a stepwise loading for dual-cocatalyst modification
and often suffer from a low catalytic activity enhancement.[42] To address these issues, we explore a new synthetic
route that can simultaneously generate oxidation and reduction cocatalysts
in a one-step phosphating reaction and achieve a highly efficient
dual-cocatalyst-modified CdS photocatalyst, NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi. The
NiCoP-NiCoPi dual cocatalysts were deposited on CdS nanorods via a
bimetalnickel–cobalt hydroxide precursor reacting with the
volatile decomposition products from sodium hypophosphate at 300 °C
and at a low flow rate of the inert carrier gas. The obtained NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi
double heterojunctions were characterized by transmission electron
microscopy (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and Fourier
transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The visible-light-driven hydrogen
production by NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi was tested and compared with CdS and
Pt/CdSas references. The optimal loading content of the cocatalysts
was found to be 5 mol %. The resulting photocatalyst showed a hydrogen
evolution rate of 80.8 mmol·g–1·h–1 under visible light irradiation (>420 nm), 202
times
and 17 times higher than those of pristine CdS (0.4 mmol·g–1·h–1) and Pt/CdS (7.6 mmol·g–1·h–1), respectively.
Experiment
Materials and Chemicals
All chemicals
were of analytical grade, obtained from commercial suppliers and used
without further purification. Cobalt(II) nitrate hexahydrate (Co(NO3)2·6H2O), nickel(II) nitrate hexahydrate
(Ni(NO3)2·6H2O), urea (H2NCONH2), ethylenediamine (C2H8N2), ammonium fluoride (NH4F), and thiourea
(NH2CSNH2) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical
Reagent Co., Ltd (China). Lactic acid, cadmium chloride hemipentahydrate
(CdCl2·2.5H2O), and sodium hypophosphite
(NaH2PO2) were purchased from Aladdin.
Catalyst Preparation
Preparation of CdS Photocatalysts
CdS was prepared via a reported method.[46] In a typical procedure, cadmium chloride hemi-pentahydrate and thiourea
(molar ratio = 1:3) were put into 60 mL of ethylenediamine with continuous
stirring for 30 min. Having been completely dissolved, the mixture
was transferred to a 100 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave
and treated at 160 °C for 48 h. After cooling, the resulting
yellow product was washed with distilled water and ethanol, and collected
via centrifugation at 5000 rpm (Shanghai Anting, TDL-5-A). Then, the
powder was dried at room temperature.
Preparation
of NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi Photocatalysts
500 mg of as-synthesized
CdS was added to 60 mL of deionized watercontaining cobalt(II) nitrate hexahydrate, nickel(II) nitrate hexahydrate,
urea, and NH4F with a molar ratio of 1:1:10:5. Then, the
mixed solution was treated in a 100 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel
autoclave at 120 °C for 10 h. The product wascollected via centrifugation,
washed by distilled water, and dried in vacuum at 60 °C to obtain
the CdS/NiCo(OH) precursor. Finally,
the obtained CdS/NiCo(OH) and an appropriate
amount of NaH2PO2 (molar ratio = 1:10) were
separately placed in two porcelain boats with NaH2PO2 upstream in the furnace, and treated at 300 °C for 2
h under 10 mL·min–1 nitrogen flow. By adjusting
the amount of nickel–cobalt precursor, NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi photocatalysts
with a NiCoP–NiCoPi theoretic loading contents of 1, 3, 5,
7, and 9 mol % were prepared. For comparison, two reference samples
(i.e., NiCoP/CdS and NiCoPi/CdS) were prepared via the reported methods.
The NiCoPi/CdS photocatalyst was prepared by changing the flow rate
of carrier gas to 40 mL/min. Meanwhile, the NiCoP/CdS photocatalyst
was fabricated via slight modification of the method reported by Shi
and Shen[37] Specifically, 500 mg of the
obtained CdS/NiCo(OH) and 300 mg of NaH2PO2 were separately placed in two porcelain boats
with NaH2PO2 upstream in the furnace, and treated
at 150 °C for 2 h under 10 mL·min–1 nitrogen
stream.
Catalyst Characterization
Powder
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the as-prepared photocatalysts
were recorded with a Bruker D8 ADVANCE X-ray diffractometer using
Cu Kα radiation. The morphology and microstructure were studied
using a high-resolution transmission electron microscope (Tecnai model
G2 F20 S-TWIN). Meanwhile, an energy-dispersive spectroscope attached
to the TEM instrument was applied to perform elemental mapping of
the catalysts. XPS analysis was performed on a VG ESCALAB 250 spectrometer
using a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray. FTIR spectroscopy was analyzed
with a FTIR spectrometer (Nicolet iS50, Thermo Fisher Scientific).
The optical absorption of the samples was measured by a UV–vis
diffuse reflectance spectrophotometer (Cary 500, Varian Co.) using
BaSO4as a reflectance. Photoluminescence (PL) was examined
with a FL/FS 920 TCSPC fluorescence spectrophotometer at an excitation
wavelength of 420 nm.
Photoelectrochemical (PEC)
Measurements
PEC measurements were performed on a CHI1030B
electrochemical workstation
using a conventional three-electrode cell with a Ag/AgCl reference
electrode, a Ptcounter electrode, and a prepared working electrode.
To fabricate working electrodes, 10 μL of 10 mg·mL–1 photocatalyst slurry (in dimethylformamide) was dropped
onto a FTO substrate and then dried in air. Photocurrents were measured
in the Na2SO4 (0.5 M) electrolyte solution using
a 300 W xenon lamp with a band-cutoff filter (420 nm) as the light
source. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was measured
over a frequency range from 0.01 to 105 at an applied potential
of 0.5 V using 10 mM K3[Fe(CN)6]/K4[Fe(CN)6] aqueous solution as the electrolyte.
Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution
Photocatalytic hydrogen
evolution was carried out in a Pyrex cell
in a top irradiation mode, and the cell wasconnected to a closed
gas circulation and evacuation system (Perfectlight, Beijing, China).
In a typical process, the catalyst (5 mg) was dispersed in 100 mL
of the aqueous solution containing 10 vol % lactic acidas the sacrificial
reagent with continuous stirring. Before the reaction, the system
was sealed and vacuumed for 30 min. Then, the system was irradiated
with a 300 W xenon lamp equipped with a band-cutoff filter (420 nm).
The amount of evolved hydrogen was monitored using an in situ gas
chromatograph (FULI, GC9790, TCD detector, China) with a thermal conductivity
detector. Apparent quantum efficiency (AQE) was measured under different
wavelength irradiation using band-pass filters (Pyrex, 420–600
nm), and calculated using follow equations (eq )
Results and Discussion
It has previously been reported that sodium hypophosphite can decompose
into low valence state products (e.g., phosphine and phosphorus) and
high valence state products (e.g., pyrophosphates, phosphates, and
metaphosphates) at an elevated temperature of ≥150 °C
via disproportionation reactions.[37] The
thermal decomposition products readily react with transition metaloxides or hydroxides, forming MP and MPi. Shi et al. showed that pure
MP only formed in a reaction temperature range of 150–200 °C
and/or at a high molar ratio (≥3) of hypophosphate to metal
precursor.[34,37] However, at a higher temperature
(≥250 °C) or a lower [hypophosphate]/[metal precursor]
ratio, a mixture of MP and MPi was obtained. The higher the reaction
temperature was, the more MPi was present. Recently, when we applied
this method to the synthesis of NiCoP-decorated CdS photocatalysts,
the flow rate of the inert carrier gas had a key impact on the final
products, and only NiCoPi was obtained at 300 °C with a nitrogen
flow rate of 40 mL·min–1.[34] It is generally accepted that sodium hypophosphate initially
decomposes into phosphine (gas) and disodium hydrogen phosphate (melting
point: ∼250 °C) at 300 °C in an inert atmosphere
through the following reactionThe generated phosphine
gas in eq is swept
away by the inert carrier gas without participation
in any reaction, while the disodium hydrogen phosphate vapor (whose
mobility is much slower than that of phosphine gas) reacts with the
metal oxide or hydroxide precursors, forming MPi.[34] It is easy for disodium hydrogen phosphate to evaporate
at a temperature higher than its melting point. This also explains
the observation of MP only at a low reaction temperature (150–200
°C) and MPi at a high reaction temperature (≥250 °C).
That is to say, by tuning the reaction temperature and the flow rate
of carrier gas, simultaneous formation of MP and MPi is feasible.
Here, we carried out thermogravimetry (TG) and differential scanning
calorimetry (DSC) for sodium hypophosphite, and summarized the decomposition
of sodium phosphate at different temperatures and flow rates of carrier
gas, as shown in Figures S1 and S2 in Supporting Information. MPas an excellent hydrogen evolution electrocatalyst
for water reduction has received much attention in photocatalytic
hydrogen production.[23−33] Many reports have claimed successful syntheses of MP-modified CdS
for hydrogen evolution. Yet, none or only a trace amount of MP was
detected in the XPS analyses. Furthermore, MPi as an excellent water
oxidation catalyst has also been widely investigated for water electrolysis.[34−39] However, the role of the dominant MPi product in the previous MP/CdS
systems wascompletely overlooked in photocatalytic hydrogen evolution.[34]Herein, we demonstrate a dual-cocatalyst-modified
CdS photocatalyst
for hydrogen production, in which NiCoP and NiCoPi acted as reduction
and oxidation cocatalysts, respectively. The fabrication of the photocatalyst
is illustrated in Scheme . First, NiCo(OH) was deposited
on CdS via a hydrothermal reaction. Then, the precursor wasphosphated
using sodium hypophosphateas the phosphorus source at 300 °C
under an inert atmosphere. It was found that the flow rate of inert
gas should be low enough (≤10 mL·min–1) to allow the metal hydroxide precursor to react with both phosphine
and disodium hydrogen phosphate vapors, generating both NiCoP and
NiCoPi cocatalysts on CdS. For a given cocatalyst loading concentration,
the ratio between NiCoP and NiCoPi can be finely tuned by adjusting
the [hypophosphate]/[metal precursor] ratio, which is discussed later.
Scheme 1
Schematic Illustration of the Formation of a NiCoP–NiCoPi
Dual-Cocatalyst-Modified CdS Photocatalyst: (a) the NiCo(OH)/CdS Precursor was Synthesized through a Hydrothermal
Method (Step 1); and the Double-Heterojunction Photocatalyst was Prepared
through a Vapor Deposition Method Using Sodium Hypophosphate as the
Phosphorus Source (Step 2), (b) the Specific Process in Step 2
The crystal structure of the as-prepared NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi
photocatalysts
with varied loading amounts of NiCoP–NiCoPi cocatalysts from
1 to 9 mol % was analyzed by XRD. As shown in Figure a, all the diffraction peaks of bare CdS
are consistent with the hexagonal structure of CdS (JCPDS card no.
41-1049).[47] However, after the modification
with NiCoP–NiCoPi cocatalysts, no obvious phase change in CdS
is observed and no additional peaks from other phases appear. For
5% NiCoP/NiCoPi/CdS, inductive coupled plasma emission spectrometry
(ICP-ES) (Table S2 in Supporting Information) confirmed that the actual loading content of co-catalysts was 3.52
mol %, being about 30% lower than the theoretical value (Table S3
in Supporting Information). Even when the
theoretical loading is as high as 9 mol %, no other phase is observed
in XRD patterns, indicating that the loaded materials might either
be amorphous, or be too few and too small, which is verified by TEM
analysis.
Figure 1
(a) Powder XRD patterns of as-synthesized CdS, and (x mol %) NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi samples (x = 1, 3, 5, 7,
and 9), and (b) FTIR spectra of pure CdS and 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi
samples.
(a) Powder XRD patterns of as-synthesized CdS, and (x mol %) NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi samples (x = 1, 3, 5, 7,
and 9), and (b) FTIR spectra of pure CdS and 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi
samples.Infrared spectroscopy confirmed
the existence of phosphates in
NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi. Figure b shows the FTIR spectra of bare CdS and 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi
samples. Compared with the bare CdS sample, 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi
photocatalyst shows extra FTIR absorption in the range of 500–1500
cm–1. Specifically, the peaks at 1050 and 907 cm–1 are assigned to the P=O stretching vibration.
The broad absorption in the range of 700–800 cm–1 is attributed to the P=S stretching vibrations. The peak
at 570 cm–1 is characteristic of the P–O
bending vibrations. All of these indicate the successful loading of
phosphates on CdS in NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi.The morphology and microstructure
of the as-prepared bare CdS and
5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi photocatalysts were characterized by TEM.
As shown in Figure a, the pristine CdS nanorods prepared in the first step (Scheme ) have smooth surfaces
with diameters of 30–100 nm. The HRTEM image of a CdS nanorod
further shows its lattice structure and single crystalline nature
(Figure b). It can
be clearly seen that there are uniform lattice fringes with an interplanar
spacing of 0.338 nm, which can be attributed to the (002) plane of
CdS.[48] This result indicates that the nanorods
grew along the direction of [001]. The fast Fourier transform (FFT)
from the square (the inset in Figure b) reveals a structure of hexagonal CdS along the [010]
zone axis. Upon the loading of NiCoP–NiCoPi cocatalysts, the
nanorod morphology of CdS had no significant change, but the surface
of nanorods became rough (Figure c). The FFT pattern obtained from the square area (the
inset in Figure d)
is indexed to the (001), (111), and (110) planes of hexagonal NiCoP
along the [1̅10] zone axis (JCPDS card no. 71-2336), revealing
the existence of crystalline NiCoP nanoparticles.[49] Elemental mapping (Figure f–k) shows that Ni, Co, P, and O are distributed
over the whole surface of the CdS nanorod. The matching of the elemental
distribution with the dark-field TEM image (the inset in Figure e) indicates a good
dispersion of the dual-cocatalysts on CdS. In addition to TEM, we
also studied the morphology and microstructure of CdS and NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi
with SEM. As shown in Figure S3, we did
observe some surface roughness (as indicated with white circle marks)
in NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi, compared to CdS. However, no nanoparticles could
be clearly observed on the surface of CdS upon the loading of NiCoP–NiCoPicocatalysts. This may be because the loading amount was too low, and/or
loaded cocatalysts were too small to be observed with SEM.
Figure 2
(a) TEM image
of bare CdS, (b) HRTEM image of bare CdS (the inset
is the FFT pattern obtained from the square area), (c) TEM image of
5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi, (d) HRTEM image of 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi
(the inset is the FFT pattern obtained from the square area), (e)
EDS spectrum of 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi, and (f–k) elemental
mapping of S, Cd, O, Ni, Co, and P from the dark-field TEM image from
the inset in (e).
(a) TEM image
of bare CdS, (b) HRTEM image of bare CdS (the inset
is the FFT pattern obtained from the square area), (c) TEM image of
5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi, (d) HRTEM image of 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi
(the inset is the FFT pattern obtained from the square area), (e)
EDS spectrum of 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi, and (f–k) elemental
mapping of S, Cd, O, Ni, Co, and P from the dark-field TEM image from
the inset in (e).The chemical composition
and surface electronic states of the as-prepared
bare CdS and 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi photocatalysts were characterized
using XPS. The corresponding XPS spectra calibrated using C 1s (284.8
eV) as a reference are shown in Figure . Both pristine CdS and NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi samples show
two C 1s peaks of physically adsorbed carbon species (284.8 and 286.5
eV) (see Figure S4). The fine scan XPS
spectra of CdS before and after NiCoP–NiCoPi loading are compared
for S 2p, Cd 3d, and O 1s (Figure a–c). In the S 2p and Cd 3d spectra (Figure a,b), the binding
energies of both S 2p and Cd 3d in NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi are positively
shifted, compared with those in CdS. The binding energies of S 2p
shift from 161.33 and 162.52 to 161.53 and 162.75 eV, respectively;
while the binding energies of Cd 3d shift from 404.98 and 411.74 to
405.07 and 411.87 eV, respectively. This result suggests that partial
electrons were transferred from CdS, contributing to the formation
of P=S, which indicates the electronic interaction between
CdS and cocatalysts. For the O 1s spectra, the bare CdS only shows
a weak XPS peak at 532.2 eV, which is assigned to physically adsorbed
oxygen species (Figure c). However, after the loading of the cocatalysts, a new intense
peak at 531.1 eV is observed, which corresponds to the oxygen species
in the phosphates.[50,51] Lattice oxygen from nickel and
cobalt oxides with a binding energy of about 529.0 eV cannot be found,[52−54] indicating the absence of nickel and cobalt oxides in the sample.
Figure 3
XPS fine
scan spectra of (a) S 2p, (b) Cd 3d, (c) O 1s of as-synthesized
bare CdS and 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi, (d) Ni 2p, (e) Co 2p, and (f)
P 2p of 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi.
XPS fine
scan spectra of (a) S 2p, (b) Cd 3d, (c) O 1s of as-synthesized
bare CdS and 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi, (d) Ni 2p, (e) Co 2p, and (f)
P 2p of 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi.For 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi, the Ni 2p, Co 2p, and P 2p XPS spectra
were also analyzed (Figure d–f). For the Ni 2p spectrum (Figure d), the intense peaks for Ni 2p3/2 are located at 853.4 and 856.5 eV, corresponding to Ni1+ and Ni2+ species, respectively.[20] The Ni 2p1/2 region also shows two peaks at 869.6 and
874.8 eV because of the coexistence of Ni1+ and Ni2+, respectively. The XPS peaks at higher binding energies
of 862.3 and 881.3 eV were assigned to the nickel satellite peaks.
For the Co 2p spectrum (Figure e), a pair of XPS peaks with binding energies of 781.9 and
797.8 eV is attributed to Co2+; and the other pair at 777.9
and 793.0 eV is attributed to Co3+.[55] The cobalt satellite peaks are found at 787.15 and 802.73
eV. In the P 2p XPS spectrum (Figure f), three peaks located at 129.1, 133.1, and 134.0
eV can be ascribed to P3–, PO43– (P5+), and PO3– (P5+),[56,57] respectively, which confirms the simultaneous formation of phosphide
and phosphate. Meanwhile, we also tested XPS for the used samples
after three consecutive cycles (as shown in Figure S5). According to the atomic ratio from XPS before and after
the reaction (Table S4), the relative content
of P3– is basically unchanged after the
reaction, while the contents of P5+, Ni, and Co become
lower. This means that NiCoPi was partially photocorroded. The unchanged
peak area for NiCoP indicates higher stability than that of NiCoPi.
The distribution of the dual cocatalysts on CdS before and after the
cycling test is schematically illustrated in Figure S6b. For dual-cocatalyst-loaded photocatalysts, photocatalytic
activity was determined by the minority (i.e., NiCoP). Because NiCoPi
was excessive, the partial loss of NiCoPi had little effect on hydrogen
production. This probably explains that photocatalytic hydrogen evolution
by NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi did not decay after three consecutive cycles.The optical absorption of as-prepared bare CdS and 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi
samples was evaluated using UV–visible diffuse-reflectance
spectroscopy (UV–vis DRS). Figure a shows that both samples display a similar
absorption edge around 500 nm, which corresponds to a band gap of
2.43 eV for pure CdS. In addition, the NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi photocatalyst
shows stronger absorption in the visible light range than bare CdS.
This is consistent with the color change of the sample from yellow
to green (the inset in Figure a), which is another evidence for the successful loading of
the NiCoP–NiCoPi cocatalysts.
Figure 4
Optical and electrochemical analyses of
bare CdS and 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi
samples: (a) UV–vis absorption spectra, (b) PL spectra, (c)
Nyquist plots from EIS, and (d) periodic on/off photocurrent response.
Optical and electrochemical analyses of
bare CdS and 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi
samples: (a) UV–vis absorption spectra, (b) PL spectra, (c)
Nyquist plots from EIS, and (d) periodic on/off photocurrent response.PL ES was used to investigate photogenerated electron–hole
recombination. Figure b shows the PL spectra of bare CdS and 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi samples,
measured at an excitation wavelength of 420 nm. Specifically, bare
CdS nanorods show two strong emission peaks at 503 and 534 nm, assigned
to the intrinsic and extrinsic emissions, respectively. After loading
NiCoP–NiCoPi cocatalysts, there is no significant change in
the positions of the emission peaks, while the intensity of these
two peaks shows a dramatic decrease. The remarkable quenching of PL
reveals that the cocatalysts had a striking effect on inhibiting the
recombination of photogenerated electron–hole pairs. When photogenerated
electron–hole pairs were generated in CdS, NiCoP and NiCoPi
on the CdS surface acted as electron and hole capturers, respectively,
alleviating the recombination of photogenerated charge carriers in
CdS.Electrochemical measurements were performed to further
investigate
the interface electron transfer and charge separation in bare CdS
and 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi (Figure c). EIS was carried out to test the surface resistance
of two samples. In general, the smaller the radius of the arc in the
EIS Nyquist plot, the lower the electron transfer resistance of the
tested material, meaning that the interface charge transfer is faster.
Obviously, 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi shows a smaller surface resistance
(i.e., a smaller EIS arc radius) than that of bare CdS, indicating
that the loading of NiCoP–NiCoPi cocatalysts is beneficial
for the separation and transfer of photogenerated electrons and holes.
Meanwhile, a photocurrent test was performed in a three-electrode
cell using bare CdS and 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPias working electrodes
under the irradiation of 420 nm light (Figure d). The photocurrent response of pristine
CdS was very low, while that of NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi was intensively enhanced,
indicating that the modification of NiCoP and NiCoPi largely contributed
to photogenerated carrier transportation and separation. What is more,
EIS and photocurrent of NiCoP were also tested for comparison, as
shown in Figure S7 in Supporting Information. The result shows that NiCoP had a higher electron transfer resistance
and lower photocurrent, compared with CdS and NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi.Photocatalytic hydrogen production by prepared samples was carried
out under the irradiation of a 300 W xenon lamp equipped with a band
cutoff filter (420 nm), using lactic acidas the sacrificial reagent.
Lactic acid shows a higher hydrogen production efficiency than other
sacrificial agents, such asTEOA and Na2S/Na2SO3 (see Figure S8). To confirm
that the dual-cocatalysts, NiCoP and NiCoPi, synergistically contributed
to photocatalytic activity, single-cocatalystNiCoP or NiCoPi-modified
CdS photocatalysts were prepared according to the method reported.[37] Pure CdS and Pt loaded CdS samples were also
used as reference for comparison. When a theoretical Pt loading content
in Pt/CdS was 10 mol % (see Table S5 in Supporting Information), an actual loading content was measured to be
3.9 mol %. As shown in Figure a, the hydrogen evolution rate of NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi (80.8 mmol·g–1·h–1) is about 202, 11, 4.7,
and 7 times higher than that of CdS (0.4 mmol·g–1·h–1), Pt/CdS (7.6 mmol·g–1·h–1), 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS (17.1 mmol·g–1·h–1), and 5 mol % NiCoPi/CdS
(11.9 mmol·g–1·h–1),
respectively, indicating that the dual-cocatalystsplayed a more important
role in photocatalytic hydrogen production than the single ones. Although
various MP-decorated CdS photocatalysts have been investigated, to
the best of our knowledge, the enhancement factor reported here (using
pristine CdSas a reference) is extremely high (see Table S1 in Supporting Information).[26] Interestingly, the HER rate of the NiCoPi/CdS/NiCoPcomposite was much higher than the sum of those of NiCoP/CdS and NiCoPi/CdS.
As we all know, only when photogenerated electrons and holes can be
consumed equally and efficiently, considerable photocatalytic activity
can be achieved. Therefore, a good photocatalytic system needs both
oxidation and reduction cocatalysts. If there exists only a reduction
cocatalyst that facilitates the consumption of photogenerated electrons,
photogenerated holes are accumulated in CdS. These holes can easily
combine with the electrons photogenerated later in CdS, or vice versa.
Therefore, the coexistence of oxidation and reduction cocatalysts
can have a synergetic effect in photocatalysis.
Figure 5
Photocatalytic performance:
(a) hydrogen evolution rates of different
samples (S1 = NiCoP, S2 = CdS, S3 = 3.9% Pt/CdS, S4 = 5% NiCoP/CdS,
S5 = 5% NiCoP/CdS, and S6 = 5% NiCoPi/CdS/NiCoPi), (b) cocatalyst
content (x mol %, x = 0, 1, 3, 5,
7, and 9)-dependent hydrogen evolution rates of the NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi
samples under visible light irradiation (λ > 420 nm), (c)
AQE
of 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi under different wavelengths of monochromatic
light irradiation, and (d) cyclic photostability of the 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi
photocatalyst with prolonged visible light irradiation (λ >
420 nm) for 32 h.
Photocatalytic performance:
(a) hydrogen evolution rates of different
samples (S1 = NiCoP, S2 = CdS, S3 = 3.9% Pt/CdS, S4 = 5% NiCoP/CdS,
S5 = 5% NiCoP/CdS, and S6 = 5% NiCoPi/CdS/NiCoPi), (b) cocatalystcontent (x mol %, x = 0, 1, 3, 5,
7, and 9)-dependent hydrogen evolution rates of the NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi
samples under visible light irradiation (λ > 420 nm), (c)
AQE
of 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi under different wavelengths of monochromatic
light irradiation, and (d) cyclic photostability of the 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi
photocatalyst with prolonged visible light irradiation (λ >
420 nm) for 32 h.To explore the synergy
between NiCoP and NiCoPi, the effect of
NiCoP/NiCoPi ratio on photocatalytic activity was investigated for
a fixed theoretical loading content of cocatalysts (i.e., 5 mol %
NiCoP/NiCoPi). According to eq , more phosphine is generated from the phosphating reaction
shown in Scheme ,
if more sodium hypophosphate is fed. By simply adjusting the [hypophosphate]/[metal
precursor] ratio, the NiCoP/NiCoPi ratio was finely tuned. The ratio
of NiCoP to NiCoPi (P3–/P5+) in the different
samples measured by XPS increased gradually with the dose of sodium
hypophosphate (see Figure S9a–d in Supporting Information). Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution was tested
for NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi prepared with varied [hypophosphate]/[metal precursor]
molar ratios from 10 to 40. Photocatalytic activity increased first
and then decreased with the increasing phosphide/phosphate ratio (P3–/P5+) (Figure S9e). The reason can be explained as follows. When a cocatalyst (NiCoP–NiCoPi)
loading amount was too small, the hydrogen evolution activity increased
with the cocatalysts loaded because of an increase of catalytic active
spots, as illustrated in the first three panels of Figure S9f. However, photocatalytic activity decreased when
the ratio of P3–/P5+ was increased to
30. This is because the excessive coverage of the cocatalystscould
cause the direct contact between the reduction cocatalyst (NiCoP)
and the oxidation cocatalyst (NiCoPi), forming recombination centers
(as illustrated in the last panel of Figure S9f). In addition, the overloading of cocatalysts also blocked incident
light, hindering the excitation and generation of photogenerated charge
carriers.Figure b shows
the effect of the amount of dual-cocatalysts on photocatalytic activity.
The optimal loading amount of the cocatalysts was 5 mol %, showing
an average hydrogen evolution rate of 80.8 mmol·g–1·h–1. We also investigated the effect of the
Ni–Co ratio on the hydrogen generation (Figure S10 in Supporting Information). When the Ni–Co
ratio was changed from 1:2 to 2:1, the hydrogen production activity
increased first and then dropped. The optimal Ni–Co ratio was
around 1:1.Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution by 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi
photocatalyst
was tested under different wavelengths of monochromatic light. The
irradiation wavelength-dependent AQE was calculated according to eq . The AQE of Pt-loaded
CdS was also tested for comparison, and the quantum efficiency of
3.95% (actual loading content) Pt/CdS was 1.93% at 420 nm. The AQE
of NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi at 420, 450, and 500 nm was 45, 37, and 19%, respectively
(Figure c). When the
energy of incident light was smaller than the bandgap of CdS, the
AQE became negligible, indicating that the absorption by the dual-cocatalysts
in the range of 500–800 nm (Figure a) had little contribution to the hydrogen
evolution.It is well known that the durability of photocatalysts
is essential
for their practical application. Therefore, the cyclic stability of
the photocatalyst was studied (Figure d). 5 mol % NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi photocatalyst was subjected
to three consecutive cycles of photocatalytic measurement, with each
cycle lasting for 8 h. The experimental results showed that the catalyst
still exhibited considerable hydrogen production activity during 24
h of testing. The decrease in activity during the second and third
cycles is suspected to originate from the consumption of the sacrificial
agent. A similar phenomenon was also observed for the bare CdS photocatalyst
(Figure S11 in Supporting Information).
To confirm this assumption, the photocatalyst wascollected after
the third cycle and a fresh sacrificial agent solution with the same
concentration was used for a new cycle measurement. It was found that
the hydrogen production recovered to the same level as the first cycle.
However, for bare CdS, approximately 13% of photocatalytic hydrogen
evolution activity could not be recovered because of the photocorrosion
of CdS.[58,59] All the above tests showed that NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi
exhibited both superior activity and stability to bare CdS.To test the universality of the dual-cocatalyst system (NiCoP–NiCoPi),
we performed the hydrogen production by the (NiCoP–NiCoPi)
cocatalysts on another substrate, g-C3N4. As
shown in Figure S12, by loading 5% cocatalysts
(NiCoP–NiCoPi) on g-C3N4, the hydrogen
production by NiCoP/g-C3N4/NiCoPi was also greatly
improved (from 0 to 175 μmol·g–1·h–1).It is generally accepted that freshly synthesized
MPs experience
a surface passivation after being stored in air, forming a thin layer
of metal phosphates.[60] Such a passivation
layer can protect the MPs from further oxidation, and it can also
be reversibly converted to their original state through reduction
(so called surface activation) (Figure a). The hydrogen evolution mechanisms of the single-
and dual-cocatalyst-modified CdS photocatalysts are proposed in Figure b,c, respectively.
For the single-cocatalyst-modified CdS, the surface passivation layer
is reduced by photogenerated electrons at the beginning of the photocatalytic
process (step 1, Figure b). The activated NiCoP nanoparticles act as electron acceptors and
hydrogen evolution sites. During the photocatalytic process, electrons
that flow continuously from CdS to NiCoP nanoparticles will be eventually
captured by protons adsorbed on the surfaces of the cocatalyst, generating
hydrogen (Figure b),
while the photogenerated holes left on the CdS surface will oxidize
lactic acid (the sacrificial agent). This explains the performance
enhancement of NiCoP/CdS, compared with bare CdS. Therefore, photocatalytic
activity of the single-cocatalyst-modified CdS system is normally
limited by sacrificial agent oxidation, which can be enhanced by the
deposition of an oxidation cocatalyst (e.g., NiCoPi). The simultaneous
loading of NiCoP and NiCoPi on the CdS forms a dual-cocatalyst-modified
photocatalyst (Figure c), further promoting the photogenerated carrier separation. NiCoP
nanoparticles act as the electron acceptor and hydrogen evolution
cocatalyst, while NiCoPi electron donor and the cocatalyst for sacrificial
agent oxidation. Only when the proton reduction rate matches the oxidation
rate of the sacrificial agent, the hydrogen evolution will be maximized.
This can be achieved by tuning the ratio between the reduction cocatalyst
and the oxidation cocatalyst (see Figure S9).
Figure 6
Diagram illustrating (a) surface passivation and activation of
metal–phosphide, and photocatalytic hydrogen evolution by (b)
single- and (c) dual-cocatalyst-modified CdS photocatalysts.
Diagram illustrating (a) surface passivation and activation of
metal–phosphide, and photocatalytic hydrogen evolution by (b)
single- and (c) dual-cocatalyst-modified CdS photocatalysts.In the field of electrocatalysis, MPs and metalphosphates are
efficient hydrogen evolution electrocatalysts and oxygen evolution
electrocatalysts, respectively.[23−39] Using MPs for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution has been well established.[23−33] Whether metal phosphates can act asoxygen evolution catalysts in
photocatalytic systems is not clear. To answer this, overall photocatalytic
water splitting was performed by using NiCoP/CdS and NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi
photocatalysts. It was found that NiCoP/CdS did not show any hydrogen
evolution activity. This is because the reduction half reaction would
be restrained without the participation of the oxidation half reaction.
However, for the dual-cocatalyst system, a hydrogen evolution rate
of 233 μmol·g–1·h–1 was observed, indicating that NiCoPias an oxidation cocatalyst
was important in water splitting (see Figure S13 in Supporting Information).To better explain the above
experimental results and propose the
photocatalytic mechanism of NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi, the electronic band
structure of NiCoP, NiCoPi, and CdS was studied. As shown in Figure
S14 in Supporting Information, the bandgap
energy (2.42 eV) of NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi and CdS was obtained by UV–vis
absorption spectroscopy. As shown in Figure S15 in Supporting Information, the conduction band (CB) of CdS, obtained
from Mott–Schottky plots, was −0.72 V versus Ag/AgCl
(−0.52 V vs NHE). According to EVB = ECB + Eg, the VB of CdS was −6.4
eV (vs vacuum level). Theoretical computation using density functional
theory wasconducted to derive the band structure and work function
of NiCoP, from which NiCoP had metallic characteristic with nonzero
density of states (DOS) crossing the Fermi energy level (see Figure
S16 in Supporting Information). Then, the
work function was calculated to reveal the charge injection at the
NiCoP/CdS interface. In our model system, the work function of the
metallic NiCoP (111) and CdS (002) surface was 4.86 and 5.00 eV, respectively.
Therefore, photogenerated electrons in the CB of CdS can be transferred
to NiCoP, which acted as the active sites for proton reduction. Meanwhile,
the Kelvin probe system was applied to detect the work function of
NiCoPi (5.44 eV), less positive than the valence band (VB) of CdS
(−6.4 eV vs vacuum level). Thus, the holes in the VB of CdS
can be trapped by NiCoPi.Figure shows the
plausible charge separation at the interfaces of NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi.
Before contact, CdS (ø = 5 eV), NiCoP (ø = 4.86 eV), and NiCoPi (ø =
5.44 eV) are independent of each other, without any interaction (Figure a-1). When they contact
with each other (i.e., the formation of double-heterojunction NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi),
the built-in electric field would form at the interfaces (Figure a-2). The built-in
electric field drives the electrons to migrate through heterojunctions,
eventually reaching thermal equilibrium and forming a new Fermi energy
level at −5 eV (vs the vacuum energy level) (Figure a-2). Under sunlight irradiation,
CdS nanorods generate photogenerated electron–hole pairs. Then,
because of the lower reduction potential of NiCoP, electrons are transferred
from CdS to NiCoP. At the same time, the holes preferably migrate
from CdS to NiCoPi because of the lower oxidation potential of NiCoPi
(Figure a-3). Thereafter,
the reduction of protons and the oxidation of a sacrificial agent
take place on the surface of the cocatalysts, and continuous and stable
hydrogen evolution is realized, as illustrated in Figure b,c.
Figure 7
Diagram illustrating
the charge separation and transfer at the
interfaces of NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi: (a) band structures of NiCoPi, CdS,
and NiCoPi (1), NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi heterojunctions under thermal equilibrium
(2), and at the beginning of the photocatalytic process (3); (b) and
(c) schemes of photocatalytic hydrogen production.
Diagram illustrating
the charge separation and transfer at the
interfaces of NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi: (a) band structures of NiCoPi, CdS,
and NiCoPi (1), NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi heterojunctions under thermal equilibrium
(2), and at the beginning of the photocatalytic process (3); (b) and
(c) schemes of photocatalytic hydrogen production.
Conclusions
In summary, we developed a novel
and efficient NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi
photocatalyst that incorporated both reduction and oxidation cocatalysts
for photocatalytic hydrogen generation. The NiCoP–NiCoPi dual-cocatalysts
were simultaneously deposited on CdS via a simple phosphating step
using volatile decomposition products from sodium hypophosphateas
the phosphorus source. The two distinct cocatalysts in contact with
CdS facilitated electron and hole transfer to the corresponding acceptors.
The photocurrent of NiCoP/CdS/NiCoPi enlarged significantly, compared
with bare CdS, while its electrical impedance and PL emission decreased
dramatically. The dual cocatalysts acted as reduction and oxidation
sites for hydrogen evolution and sacrificial reagent oxidation, respectively.
Upon the loading of dual cocatalysts, the visible-light-driven hydrogen
evolution by CdS was greatly enhanced. The modified CdS with a cocatalyst
loading content of 5 mol % showed a hydrogen evolution rate of 80.8
mmol·g–1·h–1, which
was 202 times higher than that of bare CdS (0.4 mmol·g–1·h–1). It also exhibited remarkable durability
for a continuous photocatalytic test with a total reaction time of
24 h. Finally, the work described here integrating a visible-light
absorbing semiconductor with noble-metal-free reduction and oxidation
cocatalysts opens up a viable strategy to the design of simple, robust,
and cost-effective photocatalysts for solar fuel production.