Xiande Luo1, Kuan Duan1, Renlei Qin1, Yisheng Zhang1. 1. Department of Joint Trauma, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning Guangxi, 530000, P.R.China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the application value of lithotomy position in the treatment of tibial shaft fracture with closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nail fixation. METHODS: The clinical data of 78 patients with tibial shaft fractures treated with closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nail fixation between January 2015 and May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 33 patients were treated with lithotomy position (trial group) and 45 patients were treated with traditional supine position (control group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in general data such as gender, age, the cause of injury, the interval between injury and admission, the interval between injury and operation, and fracture type and site ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, the number of patients with open reduction, postoperative incision infection, and fracture healing were recorded. Pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Harris score were used to evaluate the effectiveness. RESULTS: Both groups of operations were successfully completed. The trial group was superior to the control group in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and the number of patients with open reduction ( P<0.05). Incision infection occurred in 1 case (3.03%) of the trial group and 3 cases (6.67%) of the control group after operation. The difference in the incidence of infection was significant ( χ 2=0.139, P=0.045). The incisions of other patients healed by first intention. X-ray film reexamination showed that the fractures of the two groups healed. The fracture healing time of the trial group was (5.30±1.33) months, while that of the control group was (5.98±1.80) months, with no significant difference ( t=-1.815, P=0.073). There was no significant difference in VAS score, Harris scores of knee joint and ankle joint between the two groups before operation and at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation ( P>0.05). At 3 days after operation, the VAS score was lower in the trial group than in the control group, and the Harris scores of knee joint and ankle joint were higher in the trial group than in the control group, and the differences were significant ( P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Application of lithotomy position in closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nail fixation for tibial shaft fracture is favorable for fracture reduction, with less bleeding, shorter operation time, and fewer fluoroscopy.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the application value of lithotomy position in the treatment of tibial shaft fracture with closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nail fixation. METHODS: The clinical data of 78 patients with tibial shaft fractures treated with closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nail fixation between January 2015 and May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 33 patients were treated with lithotomy position (trial group) and 45 patients were treated with traditional supine position (control group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in general data such as gender, age, the cause of injury, the interval between injury and admission, the interval between injury and operation, and fracture type and site ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, the number of patients with open reduction, postoperative incision infection, and fracture healing were recorded. Pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Harris score were used to evaluate the effectiveness. RESULTS: Both groups of operations were successfully completed. The trial group was superior to the control group in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and the number of patients with open reduction ( P<0.05). Incision infection occurred in 1 case (3.03%) of the trial group and 3 cases (6.67%) of the control group after operation. The difference in the incidence of infection was significant ( χ 2=0.139, P=0.045). The incisions of other patients healed by first intention. X-ray film reexamination showed that the fractures of the two groups healed. The fracture healing time of the trial group was (5.30±1.33) months, while that of the control group was (5.98±1.80) months, with no significant difference ( t=-1.815, P=0.073). There was no significant difference in VAS score, Harris scores of knee joint and ankle joint between the two groups before operation and at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation ( P>0.05). At 3 days after operation, the VAS score was lower in the trial group than in the control group, and the Harris scores of knee joint and ankle joint were higher in the trial group than in the control group, and the differences were significant ( P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Application of lithotomy position in closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nail fixation for tibial shaft fracture is favorable for fracture reduction, with less bleeding, shorter operation time, and fewer fluoroscopy.