Anna Giulia Pavon1,2,3, Georgios Georgiopoulos4, Gabriella Vincenti1,2, Olivier Muller2, Pierre Monney1,2,5, Gregoire Berchier6, Chiara Cirillo7, Eric Eeckhout2, Juerg Schwitter1,2,5, Pier Giorgio Masci1,2,7. 1. Centre of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance - Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland. 2. Cardiology Division, Heart & Vessels Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland. 3. Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. 4. School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK. georgiopoulosgeorgios@gmail.com. 5. Faculty Biology and Medicine, Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland. 6. Radiology Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland. 7. School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: T2*-weighted (T2*w) is deemed as a reference standard for post-infarction intramyocardial haemorrhage (IMH). However, high proportion of T2* images is affected by off-resonance artefacts hampering image interpretation. Diagnostic accuracy and precision of alternative techniques for IMH diagnosis and quantification have been seldomly investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between April 2016 and May 2017, 50 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients (66% male, 57 ± 17 years) and 15 healthy controls (60% male, 58 ± 13) were consecutively enrolled. Subjects underwent head-to-head comparison of single mid-infarct slice acquired on black-blood T2-weighted short-TI-inversion recovery (T2w-STIR), bright-blood T2prep-steady-state-free precession (T2prep-SSFP), and T2/T1 maps for IMH diagnosis and quantification against T2*w. All images were graded for quality (grade 1: very poor; grade 4: excellent) and diagnostic confidence (Likert scale, 1: very unsure and 5: highly confident). Reduced relaxation time/hypointense region (hypocore) embedded in infarct-related oedema on T2 map, T1 map, and T2w-STIR had the best overall diagnostic accuracy (per-subject: 91%, 86%, and 86%, respectively; per segment: 95%, 93%, and 93%, respectively). By mixed-effects analysis, image quality, and diagnostic confidence were higher for T2 map and T1 maps than T2*w (p < 0.05 for both scores). For IMH quantification, hypocore on T2 map and T1 map strongly correlated (Spearman's r > 0.7, p < 0.001 for both) with IMH extent on T2*w and presented an overall excellent agreement on Bland-Altman analysis. By linear mixed model analysis, absolute hypocore size did not differ among T1-, T2 map, and T2*w. T2/T1 maps had the best intra- and inter-observer reproducibility among CMR techniques. CONCLUSION: Hypocore on T2/T1 map is the best alternative technique to T2*w for diagnosing and quantifying IMH in post-STEMI patients. KEY POINT: • Mapping techniques are the best alternatives for diagnosing post-infarction intramyocardial haemorrhage. • Mapping techniques are valuable tools for imaging intramyocardial haemorrhage.
OBJECTIVES: T2*-weighted (T2*w) is deemed as a reference standard for post-infarction intramyocardial haemorrhage (IMH). However, high proportion of T2* images is affected by off-resonance artefacts hampering image interpretation. Diagnostic accuracy and precision of alternative techniques for IMH diagnosis and quantification have been seldomly investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between April 2016 and May 2017, 50 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients (66% male, 57 ± 17 years) and 15 healthy controls (60% male, 58 ± 13) were consecutively enrolled. Subjects underwent head-to-head comparison of single mid-infarct slice acquired on black-blood T2-weighted short-TI-inversion recovery (T2w-STIR), bright-blood T2prep-steady-state-free precession (T2prep-SSFP), and T2/T1 maps for IMH diagnosis and quantification against T2*w. All images were graded for quality (grade 1: very poor; grade 4: excellent) and diagnostic confidence (Likert scale, 1: very unsure and 5: highly confident). Reduced relaxation time/hypointense region (hypocore) embedded in infarct-related oedema on T2 map, T1 map, and T2w-STIR had the best overall diagnostic accuracy (per-subject: 91%, 86%, and 86%, respectively; per segment: 95%, 93%, and 93%, respectively). By mixed-effects analysis, image quality, and diagnostic confidence were higher for T2 map and T1 maps than T2*w (p < 0.05 for both scores). For IMH quantification, hypocore on T2 map and T1 map strongly correlated (Spearman's r > 0.7, p < 0.001 for both) with IMH extent on T2*w and presented an overall excellent agreement on Bland-Altman analysis. By linear mixed model analysis, absolute hypocore size did not differ among T1-, T2 map, and T2*w. T2/T1 maps had the best intra- and inter-observer reproducibility among CMR techniques. CONCLUSION: Hypocore on T2/T1 map is the best alternative technique to T2*w for diagnosing and quantifying IMH in post-STEMI patients. KEY POINT: • Mapping techniques are the best alternatives for diagnosing post-infarction intramyocardial haemorrhage. • Mapping techniques are valuable tools for imaging intramyocardial haemorrhage.
Entities:
Keywords:
Magnetic resonance imaging; Myocardial infarction; Myocardial ischemic reperfusion injury
Authors: Rolf Symons; Gianluca Pontone; Juerg Schwitter; Marco Francone; Juan Fernando Iglesias; Andrea Barison; Jaroslaw Zalewski; Laura de Luca; Sophie Degrauwe; Piet Claus; Marco Guglielmo; Jadwiga Nessler; Iacopo Carbone; Giovanni Ferro; Monika Durak; Paolo Magistrelli; Alfonso Lo Presti; Giovanni Donato Aquaro; Eric Eeckhout; Christian Roguelov; Daniele Andreini; Pierre Vogt; Andrea Igoren Guaricci; Saima Mushtaq; Valentina Lorenzoni; Olivier Muller; Walter Desmet; Luciano Agati; Stefan Janssens; Jan Bogaert; Pier Giorgio Masci Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-08-16
Authors: Martin Ugander; Paul S Bagi; Abiola J Oki; Billy Chen; Li-Yueh Hsu; Anthony H Aletras; Saurabh Shah; Andreas Greiser; Peter Kellman; Andrew E Arai Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-06
Authors: Peter Kellman; Anthony H Aletras; Christine Mancini; Elliot R McVeigh; Andrew E Arai Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Lourens F H J Robbers; Elise S Eerenberg; Paul F A Teunissen; Matthijs F Jansen; Maurits R Hollander; Anton J G Horrevoets; Paul Knaapen; Robin Nijveldt; Martijn W Heymans; Marcel M Levi; Albert C van Rossum; Hans W M Niessen; C Bogdan Marcu; Aernout M Beek; Niels van Royen Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Borja Ibanez; Stefan James; Stefan Agewall; Manuel J Antunes; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Héctor Bueno; Alida L P Caforio; Filippo Crea; John A Goudevenos; Sigrun Halvorsen; Gerhard Hindricks; Adnan Kastrati; Mattie J Lenzen; Eva Prescott; Marco Roffi; Marco Valgimigli; Christoph Varenhorst; Pascal Vranckx; Petr Widimský Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-01-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Sebastian J Reinstadler; Thomas Stiermaier; Martin Reindl; Hans-Josef Feistritzer; Georg Fuernau; Charlotte Eitel; Steffen Desch; Gert Klug; Holger Thiele; Bernhard Metzler; Ingo Eitel Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Daniel R Messroghli; James C Moon; Vanessa M Ferreira; Lars Grosse-Wortmann; Taigang He; Peter Kellman; Julia Mascherbauer; Reza Nezafat; Michael Salerno; Erik B Schelbert; Andrew J Taylor; Richard Thompson; Martin Ugander; Ruud B van Heeswijk; Matthias G Friedrich Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2017-10-09 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Heerajnarain Bulluck; Steven K White; Stefania Rosmini; Anish Bhuva; Thomas A Treibel; Marianna Fontana; Amna Abdel-Gadir; Anna Herrey; Charlotte Manisty; Simon M Y Wan; Ashley Groves; Leon Menezes; James C Moon; Derek J Hausenloy Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2015-08-12 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Anna Giulia Pavon; Pier Giorgio Masci; Lorenzo Pucci; Antonio Landi; Amit Bermano; Amir Vaxman; Craig Gotsman; Tobias Rutz; Pierre Monney; Rita Godihno; David Saraiva Rodrigues; Olivier Muller; Marco Valgimigli; Juerg Schwitter Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Aaron T O'Brien; Katarzyna E Gil; Juliet Varghese; Orlando P Simonetti; Karolina M Zareba Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2022-06-06 Impact factor: 6.903