Literature DB >> 32929562

Current methods in translational cancer research.

Michael W Lee1,2,3, Mihailo Miljanic2,3, Todd Triplett2,3, Craig Ramirez2,3, Kyaw L Aung2,3, S Gail Eckhardt2,3, Anna Capasso4,5.   

Abstract

Recent developments in pre-clinical screening tools, that more reliably predict the clinical effects and adverse events of candidate therapeutic agents, has ushered in a new era of drug development and screening. However, given the rapid pace with which these models have emerged, the individual merits of these translational research tools warrant careful evaluation in order to furnish clinical researchers with appropriate information to conduct pre-clinical screening in an accelerated and rational manner. This review assesses the predictive utility of both well-established and emerging pre-clinical methods in terms of their suitability as a screening platform for treatment response, ability to represent pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic drug properties, and lastly debates the translational limitations and benefits of these models. To this end, we will describe the current literature on cell culture, organoids, in vivo mouse models, and in silico computational approaches. Particular focus will be devoted to discussing gaps and unmet needs in the literature as well as current advancements and innovations achieved in the field, such as co-clinical trials and future avenues for refinement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; GEMMs; PDX; Translational research; Xenograft; tumor immunology

Year:  2020        PMID: 32929562      PMCID: PMC7897192          DOI: 10.1007/s10555-020-09931-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev        ISSN: 0167-7659            Impact factor:   9.264


  149 in total

1.  The clinical relevance of cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Gillet; Sudhir Varma; Michael M Gottesman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Clonal Heterogeneity and Tumor Evolution: Past, Present, and the Future.

Authors:  Nicholas McGranahan; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Bioassayable luteinizing hormone during childhood and adolescence and in patients with delayed pubertal development.

Authors:  E O Reiter; I Z Beitins; T Ostrea; J P Gutai
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 4.  Intratumoral Heterogeneity: More Than Just Mutations.

Authors:  Kunihiko Hinohara; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 20.808

5.  A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Richard M Neve; Koei Chin; Jane Fridlyand; Jennifer Yeh; Frederick L Baehner; Tea Fevr; Laura Clark; Nora Bayani; Jean-Philippe Coppe; Frances Tong; Terry Speed; Paul T Spellman; Sandy DeVries; Anna Lapuk; Nick J Wang; Wen-Lin Kuo; Jackie L Stilwell; Daniel Pinkel; Donna G Albertson; Frederic M Waldman; Frank McCormick; Robert B Dickson; Michael D Johnson; Marc Lippman; Stephen Ethier; Adi Gazdar; Joe W Gray
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 6.  How Darwinian models inform therapeutic failure initiated by clonal heterogeneity in cancer medicine.

Authors:  M Gerlinger; C Swanton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing.

Authors:  Marco Gerlinger; Andrew J Rowan; Stuart Horswell; James Larkin; David Endesfelder; Eva Gronroos; Pierre Martinez; Nicholas Matthews; Aengus Stewart; Charles Swanton; M Math; Patrick Tarpey; Ignacio Varela; Benjamin Phillimore; Sharmin Begum; Neil Q McDonald; Adam Butler; David Jones; Keiran Raine; Calli Latimer; Claudio R Santos; Mahrokh Nohadani; Aron C Eklund; Bradley Spencer-Dene; Graham Clark; Lisa Pickering; Gordon Stamp; Martin Gore; Zoltan Szallasi; Julian Downward; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity.

Authors:  Jordi Barretina; Giordano Caponigro; Nicolas Stransky; Kavitha Venkatesan; Adam A Margolin; Sungjoon Kim; Christopher J Wilson; Joseph Lehár; Gregory V Kryukov; Dmitriy Sonkin; Anupama Reddy; Manway Liu; Lauren Murray; Michael F Berger; John E Monahan; Paula Morais; Jodi Meltzer; Adam Korejwa; Judit Jané-Valbuena; Felipa A Mapa; Joseph Thibault; Eva Bric-Furlong; Pichai Raman; Aaron Shipway; Ingo H Engels; Jill Cheng; Guoying K Yu; Jianjun Yu; Peter Aspesi; Melanie de Silva; Kalpana Jagtap; Michael D Jones; Li Wang; Charles Hatton; Emanuele Palescandolo; Supriya Gupta; Scott Mahan; Carrie Sougnez; Robert C Onofrio; Ted Liefeld; Laura MacConaill; Wendy Winckler; Michael Reich; Nanxin Li; Jill P Mesirov; Stacey B Gabriel; Gad Getz; Kristin Ardlie; Vivien Chan; Vic E Myer; Barbara L Weber; Jeff Porter; Markus Warmuth; Peter Finan; Jennifer L Harris; Matthew Meyerson; Todd R Golub; Michael P Morrissey; William R Sellers; Robert Schlegel; Levi A Garraway
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Subclonal cooperation drives metastasis by modulating local and systemic immune microenvironments.

Authors:  Michalina Janiszewska; Doris P Tabassum; Zafira Castaño; Simona Cristea; Kimiyo N Yamamoto; Natalie L Kingston; Katherine C Murphy; Shaokun Shu; Nicholas W Harper; Carlos Gil Del Alcazar; Maša Alečković; Muhammad B Ekram; Ofir Cohen; Minsuk Kwak; Yuanbo Qin; Tyler Laszewski; Adrienne Luoma; Andriy Marusyk; Kai W Wucherpfennig; Nikhil Wagle; Rong Fan; Franziska Michor; Sandra S McAllister; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 10.  Classifying the evolutionary and ecological features of neoplasms.

Authors:  Carlo C Maley; Athena Aktipis; Trevor A Graham; Andrea Sottoriva; Amy M Boddy; Michalina Janiszewska; Ariosto S Silva; Marco Gerlinger; Yinyin Yuan; Kenneth J Pienta; Karen S Anderson; Robert Gatenby; Charles Swanton; David Posada; Chung-I Wu; Joshua D Schiffman; E Shelley Hwang; Kornelia Polyak; Alexander R A Anderson; Joel S Brown; Mel Greaves; Darryl Shibata
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 60.716

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The In Vivo Selection Method in Breast Cancer Metastasis.

Authors:  Jun Nakayama; Yuxuan Han; Yuka Kuroiwa; Kazushi Azuma; Yusuke Yamamoto; Kentaro Semba
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 2.  Modeling the Tumor Microenvironment of Ovarian Cancer: The Application of Self-Assembling Biomaterials.

Authors:  Ana Karen Mendoza-Martinez; Daniela Loessner; Alvaro Mata; Helena S Azevedo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 3.  Modeling the Role of Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts in Tumor Cell Invasion.

Authors:  Stephanie Poon; Laurie E Ailles
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Correlation between Patient-Derived Xenograft Modeling and Prognosis in Osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Mengxiong Sun; Zongyi Wang; Wei Sun; Ming Chen; Xiaojun Ma; Jiakang Shen; Zeze Fu; Dongqing Zuo; Gangyang Wang; Hongsheng Wang; Chongren Wang; Fei Yin; Zhuoying Wang; Chuanying Zhang; Yingqi Hua; Zhengdong Cai
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.