A Knopf1,2, N Mansour3,4, B Hofauer3,4, F Johnson3, H Bier3, F Wakonig3, S Teutsch3. 1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Killianstraße 5, 79106, München, Deutschland. andreas.knopf@uniklinik-freiburg.de. 2. Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Freiburg, Deutschland. andreas.knopf@uniklinik-freiburg.de. 3. Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Killianstraße 5, 79106, München, Deutschland. 4. Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Freiburg, Deutschland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the functional outcome after transmandibular resection and reconstruction via a radial forearm flap (TMR+RFF) compared to primary chemoradiotherapy (pCRT) in advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). METHODS: The study compared 50 OPSCC patients treated with TMR+RFF to 50 OPSCC patients receiving pCRT. The time taken to swallow water served as the primary endpoint. The Saxon test, maxillomandibular distance, Mallampati score, ratio of height to weight, nasal penetration, tracheostomy/gastral tube requirement, and four validated questionnaires (visual analog scale for xerostomia, Sicca VAS; MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory, MDADI; Voice Handicap Index, VHI; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Head and Neck Cancer, 35 items, QLQ-H&N35) were applied to access functionality and quality of life. RESULTS: Patients after TMR+RFF showed an increased rate of nasal penetration (p < 0.0001), which was associated with a longer water swallowing time (p < 0.05). A modified reconstruction of the soft palate significantly decreased the rate of nasal penetration in comparison to classical reconstruction (p = 0.0001). Patients with pCRT suffered significantly more xerostomia (Saxon test) than patients with TMR+RFF and adjuvant therapy. None of the subjective questionnaires revealed significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: TMR+RFF with modified reconstruction and adjuvant treatment and pCRT showed comparable functional outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the functional outcome after transmandibular resection and reconstruction via a radial forearm flap (TMR+RFF) compared to primary chemoradiotherapy (pCRT) in advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). METHODS: The study compared 50 OPSCC patients treated with TMR+RFF to 50 OPSCC patients receiving pCRT. The time taken to swallow water served as the primary endpoint. The Saxon test, maxillomandibular distance, Mallampati score, ratio of height to weight, nasal penetration, tracheostomy/gastral tube requirement, and four validated questionnaires (visual analog scale for xerostomia, Sicca VAS; MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory, MDADI; Voice Handicap Index, VHI; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Head and Neck Cancer, 35 items, QLQ-H&N35) were applied to access functionality and quality of life. RESULTS: Patients after TMR+RFF showed an increased rate of nasal penetration (p < 0.0001), which was associated with a longer water swallowing time (p < 0.05). A modified reconstruction of the soft palate significantly decreased the rate of nasal penetration in comparison to classical reconstruction (p = 0.0001). Patients with pCRT suffered significantly more xerostomia (Saxon test) than patients with TMR+RFF and adjuvant therapy. None of the subjective questionnaires revealed significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: TMR+RFF with modified reconstruction and adjuvant treatment and pCRT showed comparable functional outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Head neck neoplasms; Quality improvement; Quality of health care; Quality of life; Surgical oncology
Authors: Joanne M Patterson; Anthony Hildreth; Elaine McColl; Paul N Carding; David Hamilton; Janet A Wilson Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Rico N Rinkel; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Ellen J van Reij; Neil K Aaronson; C René Leemans Journal: Head Neck Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Emi J Yoshida; Michael Luu; John M David; Sungjin Kim; Alain Mita; Kevin Scher; Stephen L Shiao; Mourad Tighiouart; Allen S Ho; Zachary S Zumsteg Journal: Head Neck Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 3.147