Literature DB >> 32929454

Comparing mortalities of the first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and of the 1918-19 winter pandemic influenza wave in the USA.

David J Muscatello1, Peter B McIntyre2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-1; age group; influenza; mortality

Year:  2020        PMID: 32929454      PMCID: PMC7543530          DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyaa186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


× No keyword cloud information.
It has been argued that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality rates exceed those from the influenza pandemic in 1918–19, but comparisons can be misleading unless marked differences in age-specific mortality and changes in population age structure in the past century are taken into account. The need for application of fundamental epidemiological approaches in understanding COVID-19 has also been recognized. We used indirect age standardization to calculate standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for the 1918–19 winter influenza pandemic wave, with the reference mortality rate being COVID-19 death rates for New York City. Population estimates were obtained from the United States (US) Census Bureau website and interpolated between censuses where necessary. Mortality in New York City for the 1918–19 winter pandemic influenza wave was obtained from Olson et al. (2005). We also used published US influenza mortality data for the 1918–19 and 2009 pandemics and the severe 2017–18 season as comparators.,, This study used only aggregate statistics from public websites and published literature and was therefore exempt from ethics review by our institution. Of 21,649 cumulative confirmed and probable COVID-19 deaths in New York City as at 2 June 2020, 21,450 (99%) had a known age at death, of which 0.065%, 3.7%, 22%, 24% and 49% were in the ≤17, 18–44, 45–64, 65–74 and ≥75 year age groups, respectively. The corresponding death rates per 100 000 population were 0.80, 24, 230, 740 and 2000, respectively, making crude, all-age mortality of 258 per 100 000 population almost uninterpretable for younger and older age groups. In New York City, the age-adjusted, all-age mortality rate for the 1918–19 winter wave of the influenza pandemic was 6.7 times higher than COVID-19 cumulative mortality rates to 2 June 2020. In <45-year-olds, the SMR was 42; that is, 42 times higher for influenza in 1918–19 than for COVID in 2020. In ≥45-year-olds, the SMR was 0.56; that is, 44% lower in 1918–19 than for COVID in 2020 (Table 1).
Table 1

Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) of the 1918–19 winter wave of pandemic influenza relative to the first 2020 wave of COVID-19 infection in New York City

Age group (years)Observed deathsExpected deathsCrude mortality ratioSMR
All ages29 20043722.16.7
<4526 2006293842
≥45210037430.330.56

2020 COVID-19 confirmed and probable death rates by age (as at 2 June 2020). Of 21 649 deaths, 1 (0.0046%) death with unknown age and 198 (0.91%) with incomplete age information were excluded.

Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) of the 1918–19 winter wave of pandemic influenza relative to the first 2020 wave of COVID-19 infection in New York City 2020 COVID-19 confirmed and probable death rates by age (as at 2 June 2020). Of 21 649 deaths, 1 (0.0046%) death with unknown age and 198 (0.91%) with incomplete age information were excluded. Applying these methods to more contemporary influenza data, the SMR for children (aged ≤17 years) for the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic in the USA is 2.1; that is, double the mortality for COVID-19 in New York City in the first 2020 wave. For older age groups, the SMR is less than 0.05, or more than 20-fold lower (Table 2).
Table 2

Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) of comparator pandemics and epidemics in the USA relative to the first 2020 wave of COVID-19 infection in New York City

PeriodOutcomeAge group (years)Observed deathsExpected deathsCrude mortality ratioSMR
1918–192Estimated influenza pandemic excess pneumonia and influenza deathsAll ages546 000102 1942.15.3
<65538 00048 9147.011
≥65800053 2800.130.15
April 2009- April 20107Estimated pandemic influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 deathsAll ages12 469730 9560.0160.017
≤1712825972.12.1
18-649565212 4730.0480.045
≥651621517 8860.00320.0031
2017–18 influenza season8Estimated (preliminary) seasonal influenza deathsAll ages61 099857 5050.0730.071
≤176435921.11.1
18-649554222 4000.0460.043
≥6550 903634 5130.0790.080

2020 COVID-19 confirmed and probable death rates by age (as at 2 June 2020). Of 21 649 deaths, 1 (0.0046%) death with unknown age and 198 (0.91%) with incomplete age information were excluded.

Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) of comparator pandemics and epidemics in the USA relative to the first 2020 wave of COVID-19 infection in New York City 2020 COVID-19 confirmed and probable death rates by age (as at 2 June 2020). Of 21 649 deaths, 1 (0.0046%) death with unknown age and 198 (0.91%) with incomplete age information were excluded. In New York City, all-age COVID-19 mortality rates remain substantially lower than those documented in the 1918–19 influenza pandemic, recognizing that 1918–19 mortality was inflated by lack of now routine treatments, such as antibiotics, supplemental oxygen and ventilatory support. In children, recent severe seasonal influenza mortality was similar to, and 2009 pandemic mortality double, that documented in the first 3 months of the COVID-19 epidemic. In older people, COVID-19 mortality is more than 10-fold higher than a severe influenza season, and more than 300-fold higher than the 2009–10 influenza pandemic. Limitations of this study include that deaths from COVID-19 in New York City continue to be reported, so SMRs may change, and ascertainment of COVID-19 deaths may have been reduced by insensitivity of earlier COVID-19 diagnostics, with evidence of under-ascertainment of COVID-19-attributable deaths by routine surveillance. It is also unknown whether changes in exposure and consequent immunity over time and by place will have an impact on the age-specific risk of severe illness, if infection by this new human coronavirus is sustained in human populations. Observed differences in clinical severity and mortality risk by age among emerging pandemic strains or coronaviruses or influenza viruses may reflect herd immunity conferred on different age cohorts by exposure to previously circulating strains of the same virus. In New York City in 1918–19, measures invoked included isolation of infected individuals, enhanced disease surveillance, and education campaigns but, unlike in 2020, not school closures., Comparisons with 1918–19 must also take into account the prominent role of secondary bacterial infection in influenza mortality and the lack of now routine treatments. However, it seems unlikely that these factors could fully explain a 40-fold lower mortality below 45 years of age for COVID-19 in New York City. Notwithstanding the substantial burden of less severe infections due to both influenza and COVID-19 in different age groups, and the possibility that risk of death may vary over time, the higher age-specific mortality in the young in both the 1918–19 and 2009 influenza pandemics compared with COVID-19 is an important factor for decisions about whole-of-population versus age-targeted vaccination strategies.

Funding

No specific funding was received for this project.
  9 in total

1.  The 1918 influenza epidemic in New York City: a review of the public health response.

Authors:  Francesco Aimone
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Epidemiological evidence of an early wave of the 1918 influenza pandemic in New York City.

Authors:  Donald R Olson; Lone Simonsen; Paul J Edelson; Stephen S Morse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Pandemic versus epidemic influenza mortality: a pattern of changing age distribution.

Authors:  L Simonsen; M J Clarke; L B Schonberger; N H Arden; N J Cox; K Fukuda
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Estimating the burden of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in the United States (April 2009-April 2010).

Authors:  Sundar S Shrestha; David L Swerdlow; Rebekah H Borse; Vimalanand S Prabhu; Lyn Finelli; Charisma Y Atkins; Kwame Owusu-Edusei; Beth Bell; Paul S Mead; Matthew Biggerstaff; Lynnette Brammer; Heidi Davidson; Daniel Jernigan; Michael A Jhung; Laurie A Kamimoto; Toby L Merlin; Mackenzie Nowell; Stephen C Redd; Carrie Reed; Anne Schuchat; Martin I Meltzer
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Interpreting Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Nandini Sethuraman; Sundararaj Stanleyraj Jeremiah; Akihide Ryo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Preliminary Estimate of Excess Mortality During the COVID-19 Outbreak - New York City, March 11-May 2, 2020.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 17.586

7.  Comparisons between countries are essential for the control of COVID-19.

Authors:  Neil Pearce; Deborah A Lawlor; Elizabeth B Brickley
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  Extraordinary diseases require extraordinary solutions.

Authors:  Stanley A Plotkin; Arthur Caplan
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.641

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Delayed access to care and late presentations in children during the COVID-19 pandemic New Zealand-wide lockdown: A New Zealand Paediatric Surveillance Unit study.

Authors:  Mavis Duncanson; Benjamin J Wheeler; Timothy Jelleyman; Stuart R Dalziel; Peter McIntyre
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 1.929

2.  Validation of a simplified comorbidity evaluation predicting clinical outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 - A multicenter retrospective observation study.

Authors:  James P d'Etienne; Naomi Alanis; Eric Chou; John S Garrett; Jessica J Kirby; David P Bryant; Sajid Shaikh; Chet D Schrader; Hao Wang
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.093

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.