| Literature DB >> 32929336 |
Haohan Wu1,2, Yanni He1,2, Hao Wu2, Meijun Zhou2, Zhili Xu2, Ran Xiong2, Fei Yan2,3, Hongmei Liu1,2.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a common inflammatory disorder of the joints characterized by synovitis and pannus formation, often results in irreversible joint erosion and disability. Methotrexate (MTX) is the first-line drug against RA, but the therapeutic effects are sub-optimal due to its poor retention at the target sites and systemic side effects. Multifunctional nanoparticles are highly promising agents for minimally invasive, traceable and effective targeted therapy.Entities:
Keywords: Echogenic liposomes; Near-infrared fluorescence imaging; Rheumatoid arthritis; Ultrasound-controlled drug release; iRGD
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32929336 PMCID: PMC7481417 DOI: 10.7150/thno.44865
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Figure 1Preparation and characterization of iELPs. (A) Schematics of iELP preparation. (B) TEM micrographs showing iELP morphology. (C) Size distribution of iELPs. (D) Changes in the mean diameter of iELPs following storage at 4°C for varying durations. (E) Fluorescence images of iELPs and free ICG after light exposure and (F) quantification (**P < 0.01).
General properties of iELPs and ELPs
| Liposomes | Diameter (nm) | Zeta potential (mv) | Polydispersity (PDI) | MTX EE (%) | ICG EE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELPs | 98.32 ± 0.72 | -11.23 ± 8.92 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 67.64 ± 0.72 | 98.30 ± 0.56 |
| iELPs | 113.35 ± 4.61 | -10.07 ± 4.28 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | 68.72 ± 0.64 | 99.14 ± 0.82 |
Figure 2Ultrasonic characterization of iELPs. (A) In vitro B-mode and contrast ultrasound images of the agar phantom embedded with iELPs for varying durations without sonication. (B) Gray intensities of the iLPs and iELPs in the absence of sonication (**P < 0.01). (C) In vitro B-mode and contrast ultrasound images of the agar phantom embedded with iELPs before and after sonication. (D) Gray intensities of iELPs before and after sonication (**P < 0.01). (E-G) Amount of MTX released from the iELPs when sonicated at different acoustic pressures (E, F) and for varying durations (G).
Figure 3Targeted cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of iELPs. (A) Confocal fluorescence images in HUVECs showing cellular uptake of ICG after incubation with ELPs, iELPs or iRGD+iELPs. Blue - DAPI and red - ICG. (Scale bar = 20 µm.) (B) Confocal fluorescence images showing cellular uptake of iELPs in different cell types. (Scale bar = 20 µm.) (C) Fluorescence images of differentially-treated MH7A. Viable cells are stained green with calcein-AM, and dead cells are stained red with PI. (Scale bar = 50 µm.) (D) Schematic illustration of assaying in vitro toxic to MH7A. (E, F) Percentage of viable MH7A cells after different treatments (**P < 0.01).
Figure 4Evaluation of (A) Representative images the paws, ankle micro-CT 3D reconstruction, the H&E and immuno-stained articular sections of normal and CIA model mice. (Scale bar = 100 µm.) (B) NIR images of CIA mice at different time points after injection with free ICG, ELPs or iELPs. (C) Biodistribution of iELPs and ELPs in the main organs at 24 h after injection, and (D) comparison of fluorescence intensities in the paws (**P < 0.01). Abbreviations: FL: fluorescence.
Figure 5In vivo distribution of different drugs. in vivo changes of distribution between normal mice and CIA model mice after injection of free ICG, ELPs or iELPs.
Figure 6Evaluation of (A) Schematics of arthritis induction and therapeutic regimen. (B) Time-dependent change in arthritic clinical index in the different treatment groups (**P < 0.01). (C) Macroscopic, micro-CT 3D reconstruction and histological images of joint tissues of normal and CIA mice after 28 days of the different treatments. (Scale bar = 100 µm).
Comparison of the different treatment regimens in CIA mice
| Group (n=6) | Injected contenta | Ultrasonic irradiationb | Clinical index before treatment | Clinical index after treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | Saline | — | 11.17 ± 0.41 | 9.50 ± 0.84 |
| G2 | — | + | 11.00 ± 0.63 | 9.00 ± 0.63 |
| G3 | MTX solution | — | 11.17 ± 0.75 | 7.67 ± 0.52 |
| G4 | iELPs | — | 11.50 ± 0.55 | 5.83 ± 0.41 |
| G5 | ELPs | + | 11.17 ± 0.41 | 6.50 ± 0.55 |
| G6 | iELPs | + | 11.50 ± 0.55 | 4.00 ± 0.63 |
a, The liposomes/MTX were administered in a volume of 0.1 ml by tail vein injection;
b, The arthritic joint was exposed to ultrasonic irradiation for 3 min at 6 h post-injection, and all treatments were repeated 7 days later for 4 times.