Christine Mehner1,2, Erin Miller2, Alexandra Hockla2, Mathew Coban2, S John Weroha3, Derek C Radisky2, Evette S Radisky4. 1. Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rochester, MN, USA. 2. Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Jacksonville, FL, USA. 3. Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 4. Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Jacksonville, FL, USA. radisky.evette@mayo.edu.
Abstract
A major clinical challenge of ovarian cancer is the development of malignant ascites accompanied by widespread peritoneal metastasis. In ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC), a challenging subtype of ovarian cancer, this problem is compounded by near-universal primary chemoresistance; patients with advanced stage OCCC thus lack effective therapies and face extremely poor survival rates. Here we show that tumor-cell-expressed serine protease inhibitor Kazal type 1 (SPINK1) is a key driver of OCCC progression and metastasis. Using cell culture models of human OCCC, we find that shRNA silencing of SPINK1 sensitizes tumor cells to anoikis and inhibits proliferation. Knockdown of SPINK1 in OCCC cells also profoundly suppresses peritoneal metastasis in mouse implantation models of human OCCC. We next identify a novel autocrine signaling axis in OCCC cells whereby tumor-cell-produced interleukin-6 (IL-6) regulates SPINK1 expression to stimulate a common protumorigenic gene expression pattern leading to anoikis resistance and proliferation of OCCC cells. We further demonstrate that this signaling pathway can be successfully interrupted with the IL-6Rα inhibitor tocilizumab, sensitizing cells to anoikis in vitro and reducing metastasis in vivo. These results suggest that clinical trials of IL-6 pathway inhibitors in OCCC may be warranted, and that SPINK1 might offer a candidate predictive biomarker in this population.
A major clinical challenge of ovarian cancer is the development of malignant ascites accompanied by widespread peritoneal metastasis. In ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC), a challenging subtype of ovarian cancer, this problem is compounded by near-universal primary chemoresistance; patients with advanced stage OCCC thus lack effective therapies and face extremely poor survival rates. Here we show that tumor-cell-expressed serine protease inhibitor Kazal type 1 (SPINK1) is a key driver of OCCC progression and metastasis. Using cell culture models of human OCCC, we find that shRNA silencing of SPINK1 sensitizes tumor cells to anoikis and inhibits proliferation. Knockdown of SPINK1 in OCCC cells also profoundly suppresses peritoneal metastasis in mouse implantation models of human OCCC. We next identify a novel autocrine signaling axis in OCCC cells whereby tumor-cell-produced interleukin-6 (IL-6) regulates SPINK1 expression to stimulate a common protumorigenic gene expression pattern leading to anoikis resistance and proliferation of OCCC cells. We further demonstrate that this signaling pathway can be successfully interrupted with the IL-6Rα inhibitor tocilizumab, sensitizing cells to anoikis in vitro and reducing metastasis in vivo. These results suggest that clinical trials of IL-6 pathway inhibitors in OCCC may be warranted, and that SPINK1 might offer a candidate predictive biomarker in this population.
Patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer face a five-year survival rate of only
47%; this poor survival is driven by early metastatic spread, which is already
present in 70% of patients at time of diagnosis [1-3]. Standard of care
consists of general debulking surgery and chemotherapy with taxanes and platinum
reagents. While patients with the predominant high grade serous histotype have high
initial response rates [4], patients with
ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC), comprising 5-20% of patients depending on the
population, more often present with chemotherapy refractory disease at time of first
treatment, with only ~15% response rate [5-7]. Consequently,
patients with advanced stage OCCC have the lowest overall survival rate among all
ovarian cancers [8]. To improve survival,
these patients are in need of a more disease-focused therapeutic approach, guided by
biomarker expression and specifically directed toward the distinct molecular drivers
of OCCC progression.Early metastatic spread in ovarian cancer is enabled by development of
abdominal malignant ascites, large volumes of fluid containing viable tumor cells
capable of seeding metastatic lesions throughout the peritoneal cavity [2, 9].
These tumor cells survive and proliferate by avoiding cell death protocols that
would normally be initiated upon loss of attachment (anoikis), thus becoming anoikis
resistant [10]. The focus of our
investigation was to identify a therapeutically targetable mechanistic pathway that
interrupts and reverts anoikis resistance to inhibit metastasis in OCCC, building on
work in which we recently demonstrated a role for the serine protease inhibitor
Kazal type 1 (SPINK1) as a critical inducer of anoikis resistance in ovarian cancer
[11].Originally characterized as an inhibitor of pancreatic trypsins [12], SPINK1 is a secreted protein that can be
overexpressed by several tumor types, among them OCCC [13-15]. We
have shown that SPINK1tumor staining is linked to poor patient survival in ovarian
cancers including OCCC [11]. We further
found, using cell culture models of high-grade serous ovarian cancer, that SPINK1
can increase tumor cell survival under attachment free conditions, conferring
anoikis resistance through inhibition of serine proteases [11]. In the present study, we turn our attention to OCCC,
implementing both cell-based and mouse transplantation models to elucidate the role
of SPINK1 in tumor progression and metastasis of this poor prognosis subtype. We
identify SPINK1 as a contributor to OCCC anoikis resistance, proliferation, and
widespread peritoneal metastasis, and further find that SPINK1 expression in OCCC is
regulated by interleukin-6 (IL-6).IL-6 is an important cytokine that regulates pleiotropic functions in diverse
tissue settings. Produced by most stromal and immune cells, it is well known for
immunomodulatory functions as a mediator of the acute phase reaction, a promoter of
T-cell expansion and activation, and an inducer of B-cell maturation [16]. In the tumor microenvironment, IL-6 is
associated with pro-tumor phenotypes and often with poor prognosis [17]. Intriguingly, IL-6 can stimulate SPINK1 expression
in cancer cells. Macrophage conditioned medium and IL-6 were shown to upregulate
expression of SPINK1 in hepatoblastoma cells [18] via an IL-6 response element within the SPINK1 promoter region
[19]. Fibroblast-derived IL-6 was
likewise found to upregulate SPINK1 in colorectal carcinoma cells via the canonical
STAT3 pathway [20].Notably the tumor stroma is not always the only or most significant source of
IL-6. IL-6 can be produced directly by ovarian cancer cells [21, 22],
particularly in OCCC [23]. Loss of tumor
suppressor gene ARID1A combined with an activating mutation of the phosphoinositide
3-kinase catalytic subunit PIK3CA, both frequently mutated in OCCC, drove sustained
tumor overproduction of IL-6 in a mutant mouse model of OCCC [24]. In stage I OCCC, such tumor expression of IL-6 has
been associated with poorer survival [25].
OCCCs also express the IL-6 receptor complex comprised of IL-6Rα and gp130,
and high IL‐6R expression has also been correlated with poor patient survival
in OCCC [26]. These observations suggest the
potential for autocrine IL-6 signaling in OCCC, with possible consequences for
malignant progression that remain to be explored.In this study, we identify an IL-6 – SPINK1 autocrine signaling axis
as a driver of anoikis resistance, proliferation, and metastatic spread of OCCC, and
demonstrate that this axis can be therapeutically targeted using the clinically
established IL-6Rα inhibitor tocilizumab. Our results suggest that IL-6
pathway inhibitors may hold therapeutic value for OCCC, and that activation of the
SPINK1 – IL-6 pathway may predict response.
Results
SPINK1 promotes anoikis resistance and proliferation of OCCC cells.
To determine the impact of SPINK1 on anoikis resistance in OCCC, we made
use of two different OCCC cell lines, JHOC9 and JHOC5. We found that these OCCC
cell lines showed strongly upregulated expression of SPINK1 relative to
immortalized human ovarian surface epithelial cells (HOSE) and relative to the
models of high grade serous ovarian cancer which we have studied previously
[11] (Fig. S1). Notably, SPINK1
upregulation in ovarian cancer cells was independent of expression of trypsin,
the natural target of SPINK1 in the pancreas, and despite high expression of
SPINK1, the OCCC cell lines showed little or no expression of trypsin genes
PRSS1 and PRSS2 (Fig.
S2).We subjected JHOC9 and JHOC5 cells to targeted silencing of SPINK1 using
multiple independent lentiviral knockdown shRNAs (KD) or to transduction with a
nontarget vector control (Fig.
S3a,b).
Cells were then plated on ultra-low attachment plates to induce the anoikis
phenotype. For both cell lines, SPINK1 KD led to a modest but significant and
reproducible reduction in survival, as detected at single time points using flow
cytometry (Fig. 1a–c). These results were corroborated by time course
experiments quantifying apoptotic signal in real time of cells grown under
ultra-low attachment conditions. For both cell lines, this assay revealed a more
striking susceptibility to anoikis of SPINK1 KD cells compared to controls
within the first few hours of culture under detached conditions (Fig. 1d,e and
Fig. S4). The
susceptibility to anoikis of SPINK1 KD cells could be at least partially rescued
by addition of recombinant SPINK1 protein to the media. These experiments
suggest that tumor cell-produced SPINK1 is an important mediator of anoikis
resistance in OCCC cells, as blocking SPINK1 expression increases tumor cell
death under detached conditions.
Figure 1.
SPINK1 knockdown sensitizes OCCC tumor cells to anoikis and inhibits
proliferation.
(a-c) Significantly reduced survival of (a, b) JHOC9 and (c) JHOC5 cells
when transduced with two different shRNA constructs targeting SPINK1 (KD1 and
KD2) and grown on ultra-low attachment conditions, assessed by Annexin V and
propidium iodide (PI) and quantified (b,c) by flow cytometry; data shown
represent the mean and SE of three independent experiments. (One-way Anova). (d,
e) Time course analysis of Annexin V binding to JHOC9 (d) and JHOC5 (e) cells
with knockdown of SPINK1 (red) and rescue of knockdown by addition of 500 nM
recombinant SPINK1 (blue) as compared to nontarget control (black);
quantification at 4 h time point. Data represent mean and SD for triplicate
wells; these experiments were independently repeated with confirmatory results
shown in Fig. S4.
(Unpaired t-test). (f-h) Decreased proliferation as assessed by EdU
incorporation of JHOC9 (f,g) and JHOC5 (h) cells with SPINK1 knockdown; data
shown represent the mean and SE of two independent experiments (One-way Anova).
* p<0.05, ** p<0.01.
We next used a similar SPINK1 knockdown approach to evaluate potential
effects on proliferation of JHOC9 and JHOC5 OCCC cells. We found that SPINK1
knockdown substantially and reproducibly decreased proliferation of both cell
lines (Fig. 1f–h). Given that the process of OCCC metastasis
throughout the peritoneum requires tumor cells to survive in a detached state in
malignant ascites, to colonize peritoneal organs, and to proliferate, our
findings of SPINK1 involvement in both anoikis resistance and proliferation of
OCCC cells suggests a potential role in driving tumor progression and metastatic
spread.
SPINK1 promotes tumor cell survival and metastasis in mouse models of
OCCC.
To assess the impact of SPINK1 expression on the process of OCCC
metastasis, in which shed tumor cells must survive in peritoneal ascites fluid
and seed metastatic lesions, we performed intraperitoneal (IP) injections of
human OCCC cell lines (JHOC9 or JHOC5), comparing cells transfected with
nontarget (control) viruses or SPINK1 KD viruses (Fig. S5); both cell populations
additionally expressed luciferase (Fig. S6) to enable real time
in vivo quantification of tumor burden. We found that
reduction of SPINK1 expression led to significantly reduced tumor growth for
both cell lines (Fig. 2a,b). At the end of the experiment, tumor growth was
evident throughout the abdominal cavity in control mice, and significantly
decreased with knockdown of SPINK1, for both JHOC9 (Fig. 2c,d) and
JHOC5 models (Fig. 2e,f). The persistence of the knockdown was evident in
reduced levels of SPINK1 protein detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
(ELISA) in ascites (Fig.
S7a). Analysis of ascitic fluid revealed reduced ascites volumes with
SPINK1 knockdown for both cell lines (Fig.
2g,i). Evaluation of the ascitic
fluid contents by immunohistochemistry (IHC) revealed extensive tumor spheroid
formation in ascitic fluid in both control groups (Fig. 2h,j top left panels),
while no tumor spheroids were found in either of the SPINK1 KD groups (Fig. 2h,j bottom left panels). IHC analysis also revealed reduced metastatic
growth with SPINK1 knockdown for both cell lines in the omentum and peritoneum
(Fig. 2h,j), and SPINK1 knockdown also reduced tumor spread to the kidneys,
pancreas, mesenterium, pelvic region, and diaphragm (Fig. 2k,l). These
results demonstrate that SPINK1 expression is required for survival and
metastasis of OCCC cell lines.
Figure 2.
SPINK1 knockdown in OCCC tumor cells reduces tumor burden and inhibits
peritoneal metastasis.
(a, b) Time course of tumor growth of JHOC9 (a) and JHOC5 (b) cells
injected IP into NOD/SCID mice assessed using bioluminescent imaging revealed
significantly reduced tumor burden from week 7 and beyond for JHOC9 SPINK1 KD as
compared to nontarget control (NT n=11, KD n=10), and from week 1 and beyond for
JHOC5 SPINK1 KD as compared to nontarget control (NT n=5, KD n=6). (c-f) Reduced
tumor spread with SPINK1 KD of JHOC 9 (c,d) and JHOC5 (e,f) cells at time of
harvest (JHOC9, 15 weeks; JHOC5, 7 weeks), assessed through in
vivo imaging prior to surgery (c,e top; quantified in d,f top) and
ex vivo imaging of the body cavity (c,e bottom; quantified
in d,f bottom). (g-j) Reduced acites volume (g,i) and reduced tumor presence in
ascites and metastasis to omentum and peritoneum (h,j) with SPINK1 KD tumor mice
for both JHOC9 (g,h) and JHOC5 (i,j) cells. (k.l) Scoring extracted tissue for
tumor cell presence (any size lesion) showed reduced presence in multiple organs
with SPINK1 KD for both JHOC9 (k) and JHOC5 (l) tumor models. Mann-Whitney test
* p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001.
Interleukin-6 regulates gene expression of SPINK1 to promote anoikis
resistance and proliferation of OCCC cells.
The SPINK1 gene contains an IL-6 response element within the promoter
region [19]; we therefore reasoned that
IL-6 signaling might regulate SPINK1 expression by OCCC cells. Prior reports
suggest that OCCC tumors and cell lines strongly express IL-6 and its receptor
subunit gp130, whereas a subset also expresses receptor subunit IL-6Rα
[23, 26]. To evaluate the potential for autocrine IL-6 signaling in our
experimental models of OCCC, we assessed tumor staining for IL-6, IL-6Rα,
and gp130 by IHC. We found staining for IL-6 and its receptor components in
tumors from control mice bearing JHOC9 and JHOC5 tumors, and in a representative
OCCC patienttumor (Fig. 3a–c). Notably, staining of adjacent tissue
sections demonstrated colocalization of IL-6 and receptor components in tumor
regions also positive for SPINK1 (Fig.
3a–c). Next, we silenced
IL-6 expression in OCCC cells using lentiviral shRNA constructs (Fig. 3d), and found significant reduction in SPINK1
expression (Fig. 3e, Fig. S8), consistent with a
regulatory role for IL-6. Conversely, cells treated for 48 h with recombinant
IL-6 showed significantly elevated SPINK1 mRNA levels (Fig. 3f). Using an ELISA, we also determined SPINK1
protein levels in conditioned media from OCCC cells following shRNA knockdown of
either SPINK1 or IL-6. Striking reduction in secreted SPINK1 by SPINK1-KD cells
relative to control cells confirmed the efficacy of knockdown at the protein
level, while significant reductions in secreted SPINK1 levels in the IL-6-KD
cells further demonstrate the regulation of SPINK1 expression by IL-6 in these
OCCC cell lines (Fig. 3g, h). Taken together, these results identify an
autocrine signaling axis by which IL-6 regulates SPINK1 expression in OCCC
cells.
Figure 3.
The IL-6 signaling pathway drives SPINK1 expression in OCCC.
(a-c) JHOC9 (a), JHOC5 (b), and human OCCC tumors (c) stained for
SPINK1, IL-6, IL6Rα, and gp130 in adjacent tissue sections demonstrated
colocalization of SPINK1 expression with IL-6 pathway components (size bar
=100μm). (d) JHOC9 cells transduced with lentiviral shRNA IL-6 knockdown
constructs KD1 and KD2 showed significant reduction in IL-6 mRNA expression
assessed by qRT/PCR. (e) Cells from (d) with knockdown of IL-6 also showed
significant reduction of SPINK1 transcript expression (One-way Anova). (f) JHOC9
cells treated with 30 ng/ml recombinant human IL-6 for 48 h showed significantly
increased SPINK1 transcript expression. Results assessed from triplicate wells
(Unpaired t-test). (g, h) Conditioned media of JHOC9 cells (g) or JHOC5 cells
(h) show significantly reduced SPINK1 protein concentration from cells
transduced with SPINK1 or IL-6 knockdown constructs compared to nontarget
control cells, as measured by ELISA. Results assessed in triplicate wells
(One-way Anova). * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001,
****p<0.0001.
To directly assess the impact of IL-6 on anoikis resistance, we next
treated OCCC cells with recombinant IL-6 protein and plated them onto ultra-low
attachment plates. IL-6 treatment led to a significant increase in cell survival
in both cell lines compared to controls (Fig.
4a–c). Conversely, IL-6
knockdown (Fig. S9) led
to significantly reduced cell survival under detached growth conditions in both
cell lines (Fig. 4d–f), reproducing the effect of SPINK1 KD (Fig. 1a–c). Using a time course assay of anoikis, we found that the addition
of recombinant SPINK1 could partially rescue the increased anoikis caused by
IL-6 KD in both cell lines (Fig.
4g–h and Fig. S10). Further, we found that
IL-6 KD significantly impaired proliferation compared to controls (Fig. 4i–k), again reproducing the effect of SPINK1 KD (Fig. 1f–h). Together, these results demonstrate that IL-6 promotes anoikis
resistance and proliferation of OCCC cells at least in part through regulation
of SPINK1 expression, identifying an IL-6 – SPINK1 signaling axis that
may offer plausible points of therapeutic intervention in OCCC.
Figure 4.
IL-6 increases tumor cell survival and tumor cell proliferation through
SPINK1 expression.
(a-c) JHOC9 (a,b) and JHOC5 (c) cells treated with 30 ng/ml recombinant
human IL-6 show significantly increased survival under attachment free
conditions. (d-f) JHOC9 (d, e) and JHOC5 cells (f) with knockdown of IL-6 show
significantly decreased survival relative to nontarget control cells under
attachment-free conditions. Data shown represent the mean and SE of three
independent experiments. (One-way Anova). (g, h) Time course analysis of Annexin
V binding to JHOC9 (g) and JHOC5 (h) cells with knockdown of IL-6 (green) and
rescue of knockdown by addition of 500 nM recombinant SPINK1 (blue) as compared
to nontarget control (black); quantification at 4 h time point. Data shown
represent mean and SD for triplicate wells; these experiments were independently
repeated with confirmatory results shown in Fig. S10. (Unpaired t-test). (i-k)
Decreased proliferation was found in JHOC9 (I,j) and JHOC5 (k) cells with IL-6
knockdown relative to nontarget controls as assessed by EdU incorporation; data
shown represent the mean and SE of two independent experiments (One-way Anova).
* p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001.
SPINK1 and IL-6 are associated with a common protumorigenic expression
profile in OCCC cells
To compare the overall impact of SPINK1 and IL-6 signaling in OCCC cells
we performed transcriptional profiling on JHOC9 and JHOC5 cells expressing
nontarget control, SPINK1 KD, or IL-6 KD constructs. Comparison of SPINK1 KD
samples to nontarget controls identified 2982 differentially expressed
transcripts (p<0.05), which mapped to 2081 genes. Comparison of
publically available datasets with the SPINK1 KD dataset revealed significant
overlap (p=3.0E-16) with comparison of OCCC versus benign ovarian surface
epithelium (Fig. 5a) [27] and six other ovarian cancer datasets (Fig. S11). Comparison of
IL-6 KD samples to nontarget controls identified 2193 differentially expressed
transcripts (p<0.05), which mapped to 1343 genes. Comparison of the
SPINK1 KD dataset and the IL-6 KD dataset identified 422 overlapping transcripts
(p=3.0E-55, Fig. 5b) and broad overlap in
gene expression patterns (Fig. 5c),
including many genes involved in pathway regulation of proliferation and
apoptotic pathways. Among these, we found that expression of BTG
antiproliferation factor 2 (BTG2) is increased in SPINK1 KD and IL-6 KD cells
(Fig. 5d,f); BTG2 is a tumor suppressor that suppresses proliferation and
regulates apoptosis in multiple models [28]. By contrast, expression of riboflavin kinase (RFK), F-box
protein 28 (FBXO28), and microtubule associated serine/threonine kinase-like
(MASTL) were found to be downregulated with both SPINK1 KD and IL-6 KD (Fig. 5e,g). RFK has been shown to correlate with resistance to cisplatin,
while knockdown of the gene was shown to induce apoptosis in prostate cells
[29]; FBXO28 overexpression has been
linked to poor prognosis in breast cancer [30]; and MASTL has direct influence on major oncogenic pathways such
as AKT/mTOR and Wnt/β-catenin [31]. These overlapping gene expression patterns further support an IL-6
– SPINK1 signaling axis functioning to increase malignant potential in
OCCC cancer cell lines.
Figure 5.
Common gene expression patterns with knockdown of SPINK1 and IL-6.
(a) Transcripts regulated by SPINK1 knockdown show significant overlap
(p=3.0E-16) with dataset of ovarian clear cell carcinoma vs benign tissue. (b)
Transcripts regulated by SPINK1 knockdown and IL-6 knockdown show significant
overlap (p=3.0E-55). (c) Heat map of 422 transcripts significantly regulated by
SPINK1 knockdown and IL-6 knockdown (J9, JHOC9; J5, JHOC5; SP1 KD, SPINK1
knockdown; IL-6 KD, IL-6 knockdown). (d-g) Validation via qRT/PCR of common
transcriptional alterations induced by SPINK1 knockdown and IL-6 knockdown. (d,
f) BTG2 was consistently upregulated in both cell lines and in both SPINK1 KD
and IL-6 KD. (e, g) RFK, FBXO28, and MASTL showed consistent reduced expression
with both SPINK1 KD and IL-6 KD in both cell lines. qRT/PCR analysis was
conducted in triplicate wells. One-way Anova ** p<0.01, ***
p<0.001, **** p<0.0001.
Our studies implicating an IL-6 – SPINK1 signaling axis in OCCC
tumor cell proliferation and anoikis resistance suggested that pharmacological
inhibition of IL-6 could have therapeutic benefit in OCCC. We tested the FDA
approved IL-6Rα inhibitor tocilizumab, which binds the IL-6Rα and
thus inhibits the interaction between IL-6 and its membrane receptor, preventing
downstream intracellular signaling. We found that tocilizumab treatment resulted
in dose-dependent reductions of phosphorylation of STAT3 (pSTAT3, an IL-6
pathway target; Fig. 6a,b) and expression of SPINK1 (Fig. 6c). We also found treatment reduced survival of
cells cultured on ultra-low attachment plates, indicating bypass of
SPINK1-induced anoikis resistance (Fig. 6d
and e).
Figure 6.
Tocilizumab targets IL-6 signaling to reduce SPINK1 expression, tumor cell
survival, ascites accumulation and metastasis.
(a,b) JHOC9 cells treated for 48 h with tocilizumab, which targets
IL-6Rα, showed decreased phosphorylation of downstream mediator STAT3 (b,
quantification representing the mean and SE from two independent lysates,
one-way Anova). (c) SPINK1 mRNA expression levels were significantly reduced
after tocilizumab treatment (One-way Anova and unpaired t-test). (d, e) JHOC9
cells treated for 48 h with tocilizumab showed significantly reduced cell
survival as assessed by Annexin V and PI staining (e, quantification represents
the mean and SE of three independent experiments, unpaired t-test). (f-m)
Tocilizumab treatment of JHOC9 (f-i) and JHOC5 (j-m) tumor models resulted in
decreased ascitic fluid (g,k) and reduced metastasis to diaphragm (h,l) and
omentum (i,m), as compared to IgG control. (Unpaired t-test), ** p<0.01,
*** p<0.001.
We next evaluated the efficacy of tocilizumab for inhibition of OCCC
orthotopic tumor growth (Fig. 6f,j). We found significant reduction of ascites
volume in the JHOC9 model with tocilizumab treatment (Fig. 6g), and a similar trend in the JHOC5 model
(Fig. 6k), along with significantly
reduced tumor metastasis to the diaphragm and omentum (Fig. 6h,i,l,m).
Analysis of SPINK1 protein in ascites showed a trend toward reduced SPINK1 in
tocilizumab treated mice (Fig.
S7b). These results demonstrate that the IL-6 – SPINK1
signaling axis can be targeted pharmacologically, drastically reducing morbidity
through reduction of ascites and overall tumor cell growth in abdominal
metastatic lesions. Thus, targeting SPINK1-promoted growth and anoikis
resistance through pharmacological inhibition of IL-6 could offer a promising
approach for patients with OCCC tumors that show activation of this pathway.
Discussion
We define here an autocrine signaling axis in which OCCC tumor cell produced
IL-6 induces SPINK1 to effect anoikis resistance and tumor cell proliferation. We
further show that this signaling axis can be therapeutically targeted by
IL-6Rα inhibitors to significantly reduce ascites generation and tumormetastasis; these results strongly suggest that IL-6Rα inhibitors may be
effective for treatment of OCCC patients with tumors expressing IL-6 and SPINK1.SPINK1 detection in serum and immunostaining in tumor tissues have been
identified as poor prognostic factors and potential biomarkers in multiple cancers,
as described in recent review articles [13,
14, 32]. In prostate cancer, high levels of SPINK1 transcript or protein
expression, present in about 10% of all prostate tumors, has been reported as an
independent prognosticator for biochemical recurrence after resection [33]. High levels of SPINK1 immunostaining were
also associated with poor survival in estrogen receptor positive breast cancers
[34]. Ovarian cancer is a particular area
of interest, as increased SPINK1 levels have been detected in urine and cyst fluid
of ovarian cancerpatients and SPINK1 has been investigated as a marker for early
detection [35-37]. We have previously found that SPINK1 immunostaining
in tumors represents an independent prognostic factor for poor survival, with
strongest association in patients with nonserous histological tumor subtypes [11].Investigations of tumor-promoting pathways activated by SPINK1 have
furthermore demonstrated functional roles in cancer progression, implicating SPINK1
as a potential therapeutic target. These studies have identified mechanisms
associated with EGFR signaling and proliferation [14, 38], increased anoikis
resistance [11], resistance to apoptosis
[39, 40], and development of chemoresistance [34, 41]. In ovarian cancer,
SPINK1 significantly impacts tumor cell proliferation and resistance to anoikis
[11]. The present study adds to this
knowledge by identifying the upstream regulator IL-6 as an essential driver of the
SPINK1 induced phenotype specifically in OCCC, and defines this signaling axis as a
promising target of therapeutic intervention.OCCC is a unique disease, likely to be linked to pre-existing endometriosis,
appearance of common mutations in ARID1A and PI3KCA, and is highly chemoresistant
[6, 42, 43]. The current
“one-size-fits-all” approach to treat ovarian cancer is underserving
patients with OCCC, and new strategies are needed to target unique molecular drivers
or vulnerabilities of OCCC. The IL-6 – SPINK1 axis identified here presents a
promising opportunity. Notably, we found consistent evidence for the significance of
this pathway in two diverse models of OCCC, JHOC9 cells which possess ARID1A/PIK3CA
mutations and JHOC5 cells which lack these mutations but possess high level MET
amplification, representative of a different subset of OCCCs [44]. Despite some broad differences between these cell
lines evident in our transcriptional microarray studies, we found in common a
protumorigenic transcriptional profile stimulated in both models by IL-6 –
SPINK1 signaling. Thus, our findings suggest that the IL-6 – SPINK1 axis may
be broadly relevant and of therapeutic interest across a range of OCCCs.
Furthermore, targeting IL-6-mediated induction of SPINK1 allows the use of
established therapeutics, as IL-6 inhibition has been the target of different drugs
in previous clinical trials. While toxicity levels are low [45], phase 2 trials of the anti-IL-6 antibody siltuximab
so far yielded disappointing results in unselected ovarian cancerpatients [46, 47].
Given our preclinical results however, it appears reasonable that such inhibitors
may be more efficacious when targeted to OCCC patients with activated IL-6 –
SPINK1 pathways.Current treatment includes early cytoreductive surgery which is the most
consistent method to increase survival and prolong time to recurrence [48]. However it cannot prevent the development
or progression of malignant ascites and spread of abdominal metastasis. Metastasis
is the leading cause for high morbidity and is a major contributor to mortality in
ovarian cancerpatients, with the majority of patients developing malignant ascites
as part of their metastatic disease [9]. The
occurrence of malignant ascites and abdominal metastasis is currently not
preventable and only palliative measures of intervention are available [49, 50].
Our in vivo studies show that targeted treatment with an
IL-6Rα inhibitor led to reduction of ascites volumes and reduced tumor cell
proliferation and progression, suggesting that this treatment approach could reduce
the ascites volumes and tumor burden in OCCC patients and increase their quality of
life.In summary we show that SPINK1 is a key player in anoikis resistance,
proliferation, and development of metastatic lesions in OCCC. High levels of SPINK1
are driven by tumor cell expressed IL-6 through increased gene expression. The use
of monoclonal antibodies against IL-6Rα significantly reduced SPINK1
expression and tumor cell survival in cell culture models, and in mouse models
significantly reduced ascites volumes and the size of metastatic lesions in the
abdominal cavity. Our work identifies a potential novel treatment option for a
subset of OCCC patients with tumors expressing both IL6 and SPINK1.
Materials and Methods
Cells, reagents, and general methods
JHOC9 and JHOC5 cells were purchased from RIKEN BioResource Research
Center (Ibaraki, Japan). Recombinant SPINK1 bearing a C-terminal
10×His-tag [51] was expressed from
HEK293-FreeStyle cells following the protocol from Portolano et al. [52] and purified as previously described
[11]. IL6 recombinant protein was
purchased from Sino Biological (Wayne, PA), resuspended in 0.1% BSA DPBS (stock
30 μg/ml), and aliquots stored at −20 °C. SPINK1/TATI
PicoKine ELISA kit (#EK1241) was purchased from Boster Biological (Pleasanton,
CA). Antibodies for Western blot were: pSTAT3 – CST #9145; tSTAT3
– CST #9139 (Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA); actin – SC
#1616 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX). Antibodies for
immunohistochemistry were: SPINK1 – 4D4, H00006690-M01 (Novus
Biologicals, Centennial, CO), IL-6 – ab9324 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK),
IL-6Rα – #B6362 (LS Bio, Seattle, WA) and gp130 –
#HPA010558 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Details of cell culture, lentiviral
knockdown, quantitative real-time PCR, Western blot, and ELISA procedures are
described in the Supplementary
Materials and Methods.
Anoikis resistance assay
For flow cytometry quantified anoikis resistance assays,
1x105 cells were plated in serum free media in 6-well ultra-low
attachment plates to observe anoikis. JHOC9 cells were then incubated for 10 h
and JHOC5 for 4 h (positive control: staurosporine). Thereafter, cells were
harvested and apoptosis was determined using the Apoptosis Kit including Annexin
V Alexa Fluor 488 and Propidium Iodide (PI) (V13241, Thermo Fisher) following
the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, cells were washed with PBS, and
incubated for 15 min at room temperature with Annexin V/PI. Samples were
analyzed using the Attune NxT flow cytometer (lasers: BL1, YL1). Samples were
gated for positivity for both Annexin V binding and PI integration. Analysis was
performed using FCS Express 5, determining ratio of live cells. All experiments
reported represent three biological replicates, with quantification displayed in
bar graphs representing the average and standard error of the mean for the three
independent experiments. For plate reader quantified anoikis resistance assays,
5x103 cells (JHCO9, JHOC5) were plated in complete media in
luminescence supporting 96-well plates and recombinant proteins were added where
applicable. Each condition was repeated in triplicate wells. RealTimeGlo
Apoptosis and Necrosis Assay (#JA1011, Promega) was added according to the
manufacturer’s protocol. Resistance to cell death was determined over a
time course via luminescence (apoptosis signal) using a plate reader (Veritas,
Turner BioSystems). Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 8.0.
EdU proliferation assay
The 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation assay was used
to determine the amount of cells actively undergoing DNA synthesis. JHOC9 and
JHOC5 cells (1×105), subjected to shRNA knockdown of SPINK1 or
IL6, were seeded in 6-well plates and cultured in complete media for 18h at
37°C and humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. Fresh,
pre-equilibrated complete media containing EdU was added to the cells for 2 h
for incorporation. Subsequent washes and staining were performed following the
manufacturers instruction for the Click-iT EdUAlexa Fluor 488 kit (C10632,
Thermo Fisher). Fixed and permeabilized cells were treated with Click-iT
reaction cocktail, counter stained with PI for visualization, and analyzed using
the Attune NxT flow cytometer. All experiments shown represent two biological
replicates, with quantification displayed in bar graphs representing the average
and standard error of the mean for the two independent experiments. Data
analysis was performed using FCS Express 5.
Tocilizumab studies
To determine effects of tocilizumab on SPINK1 mRNA expression, cells
(1x105) were plated in a 6 well plate overnight followed by
treatment with tocilizumab (1 μg/ml, 10 μg/ml) for 48 h. Cells
were washed and RNA isolated using the TRIzol method and analyzed by qRT/PCR for
SPINK1 as above.To assess tocilizumab effect on cell survival, cells (1x105)
were seeded in a 6-well plate, cultured overnight, and treated with tocilizumab
for 48 h. Cells were then transferred onto 6-well ultra-low attachment plates
for 10 h before staining with Annexin V and PI as described above. All
experiments were repeated in three independent biological replicates; analyses
reflect the pooled results, mean+SE. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism
8.0.
Microarray
RNA from three independent SPINK1 KD experiments with nontarget controls
and from three independent IL-6 KD experiments with nontarget controls were
extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen) and evaluated for differences in gene
expression using the Affymetrix human transcriptome Array v2.0. Results were
analyzed using GeneSpring 14.9.1 (Agilent), as described previously [53, 54]. Briefly, data were processed using GCRMA and filtered to remove
entities (transcripts) with raw data values below 50 in more than 75% of the
samples, and moderated t-tests were used to identify differentially expressed
entities when comparing knockdown samples (combining all JHOC9 and JHOC5
knockdown samples) vs controls (combining all JHOC9 and JHOC5 nontarget control
samples) which were mapped to genes and compared as genesets to publically
available databases using Illumina Correlation Engine. Gene expression profiles
have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE140179).
Animal models and bioluminescence imaging
Animal studies were conducted in accordance with the guidelines and
approval by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)
(protocol A00002844-17). This study used 6-8 week old female Nod/SCIDmice for
tumor cell injection; mice were distributed among experimental groups so as to
achieve a similar age distribution within each group. Studies including SPINK1
KD used lentiviral shRNA transduced cells that were subsequently transduced with
luciferase lentivirus for in vivo imaging. Knockdown efficiency
was confirmed by qRT/PCR (Fig.
S5 a,b).
Imaging of titrated cells (see Supplementary Materials and Methods) taken immediately prior to
injection showed equal intensity of bioluminescence for all experimental
conditions (Fig. S6
a,b). JHOC9
cells (2x106) or JHOC5 cells (5x105) transduced with
either NT (control) or SPINK1 KD virus were injected IP into the lower right
quadrant of the abdomen. Cell injection was followed by luciferin IP injection
(150 mg/kg of D-luciferin) and then mice were imaged for bioluminescent signal
after 8 min (IVIS Spectrum 3D imaging system, Caliper Life Sciences). JHOC9
cohorts were euthanized at 15 weeks, and JHOC5 cohorts at 7 weeks due to tumor
growth kinetics and moribund endpoints. Mice in studies investigating the impact
of IL-6 inhibitor tocilizumab received 2x106 JHOC9 or
5x105 JHOC5 cells transduced with luciferase lentivirus. After 24
h mice were assigned to treatment or control groups, such that distribution of
day 1 pre-treatment luciferase imaging signal intensity was comparable between
groups. Subsequently, the treatment group received tocilizumab 20 mg/kg
(Actemra, Genentech), and the control group received IgG control 20 mg/kg
(Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA). Treatment and control mice were
injected every 48 h (JHOC9) or every 72 h (JHOC5) IP. Mice were imaged weekly to
monitor tumor cell development and expansion, and were subsequently euthanized
at 12 weeks (JHOC9) or 7 weeks (JHOC5).For all mouse experiments, the bioluminescent signal was imaged and
quantified by EM and analyzed by CM. Immediately before harvest mice were
injected with luciferase as above and a final in vivo image
obtained. Mice were then euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation. Ascitic
fluid was retrieved from the abdominal cavity and quantified. Evaluation of
ascitic fluid was conducted in a manner blinded to the investigator. The opened
body cavity was imaged ex vivo for detection of bioluminescent
signal. Tissues were then formalin fixed and embedded for immunohistochemistry.
Ascitic fluid was centrifuged to pellet the cellular component. Cells contained
in the ascitic fluid were formalin fixed and embedded into histogel (VWR, Thermo
Scientific) followed by paraffin embedding for immunohistochemistry. Power
calculations are detailed in Supplementary Materials and Methods.
Authors: Michael S Anglesio; Joshy George; Hagen Kulbe; Michael Friedlander; Danny Rischin; Charlotte Lemech; Jeremy Power; Jermaine Coward; Prue A Cowin; Colin M House; Probir Chakravarty; Kylie L Gorringe; Ian G Campbell; Aikou Okamoto; Michael J Birrer; David G Huntsman; Anna de Fazio; Steve E Kalloger; Frances Balkwill; C Blake Gilks; David D Bowtell Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-02-22 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Kimberly C Wiegand; Sohrab P Shah; Osama M Al-Agha; Yongjun Zhao; Kane Tse; Thomas Zeng; Janine Senz; Melissa K McConechy; Michael S Anglesio; Steve E Kalloger; Winnie Yang; Alireza Heravi-Moussavi; Ryan Giuliany; Christine Chow; John Fee; Abdalnasser Zayed; Leah Prentice; Nataliya Melnyk; Gulisa Turashvili; Allen D Delaney; Jason Madore; Stephen Yip; Andrew W McPherson; Gavin Ha; Lynda Bell; Sian Fereday; Angela Tam; Laura Galletta; Patricia N Tonin; Diane Provencher; Dianne Miller; Steven J M Jones; Richard A Moore; Gregg B Morin; Arusha Oloumi; Niki Boyd; Samuel A Aparicio; Ie-Ming Shih; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; David D Bowtell; Martin Hirst; Blake Gilks; Marco A Marra; David G Huntsman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-09-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael S Anglesio; Kimberly C Wiegand; Nataliya Melnyk; Christine Chow; Clara Salamanca; Leah M Prentice; Janine Senz; Winnie Yang; Monique A Spillman; Dawn R Cochrane; Karey Shumansky; Sohrab P Shah; Steve E Kalloger; David G Huntsman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jacob P Veenstra; Lucas Felipe Fernandes Bittencourt; Katherine M Aird Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 5.282