Literature DB >> 32928998

Evaluation of nerve capture using classical landmarks for genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation: 3D cadaveric study.

John Tran1, Philip Peng2, Anne Agur3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Radiofrequency (RF) denervation of the superolateral genicular nerve (SLGN), superomedial genicular nerve (SMGN) and inferomedial genicular nerve (IMGN) is commonly used to manage chronic knee joint pain. However, knowledge of articular branches captured, using classical landmarking techniques, remains unclear. In order to enhance and propose new RF procedures that conceivably capture a greater number of articular branches, more detailed cadaveric investigation is required. The objectives were to (1) determine which articular branches are captured or spared using classical landmarking techniques, and (2) evaluate the anatomical feasibility of classical landmarking techniques using three-dimensional (3D) modeling technology.
METHODS: Ultrasound-guided classical superolateral/superomedial/inferomedial landmarking techniques were used to position RF cannulae in five specimens. The articular branches, bony and soft tissue landmarks, and cannula tip position, were meticulously dissected, digitized and modeled in 3D. Simulated lesions were positioned at the cannula tip, on the 3D models, to determine which articular branches were captured or spared. Capture rates of articular branches were compared.
RESULTS: In all specimens, classical superolateral/superomedial techniques captured the transverse deep branches of SLGN and SMGN, and articular branches of lateral and medial nerve to vastus intermedius, while sparing distal branches of SLGN/SMGN. The inferomedial technique captured anterior branches of IMGN while sparing the posterior and inferior branches.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides anatomical evidence supporting the effectiveness of classical landmarking for genicular nerve ablation; however, each technique resulted in sparing of articular branches. The extensive innervation of the knee joint suggests the use of supplementary landmarks to improve capture rates and potentially patient outcomes. © American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic pain; lower extremity; pain management; ultrasonography

Year:  2020        PMID: 32928998     DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  3 in total

Review 1.  Motor-Sparing Neural Ablation with Modified Techniques for Knee Pain: Case Series on Knee Osteoarthritis and Updated Review of the Underlying Anatomy and Available Techniques.

Authors:  Tony Kwun-Tung Ng; King Hei Stanley Lam; Abdallah El-Sayed Allam
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation Provides Prolonged Pain Relief Compared to Traditional Radiofrequency Ablation: A Real-World, Large Retrospective Clinical Comparison from a Single Practice.

Authors:  Leonardo Kapural; Amela Minerali; Matthew Sanders; Matejic Matea; Simran Dua
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.832

3.  Regional anesthesia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a time to reconsider practices? (Letter #2).

Authors:  Julian Aliste; Fernando R Altermatt; Rous Atton; Daneila Bravo; Sebastian Layera; Pablo Miranda; Italo Pesce
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.713

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.