Literature DB >> 32928928

Ethanol in Combination with Oxidative Stress Significantly Impacts Mycobacterial Physiology.

Yesha Patel1, Deepika Rai1, Kishore Das2, Subramanian Dhandayuthapani2, Sarika Mehra3.   

Abstract

Here, we investigate the mycobacterial response to the combined stress of an organic oxidant (cumene hydroperoxide [CHP]) and a solvent (ethanol). To understand the interaction between the two stressors, we treated Mycobacterium smegmatis cells to a range of ethanol concentrations (2.5% to 10% [vol/vol]) in combination with a subinhibitory concentration of 1 mM CHP. It was observed that the presence of CHP increases the efficacy of ethanol in inducing rapid cell death. The data further suggest that ethanol reacts with the alkoxy radicals to produce ethanol-derived peroxides. These radicals induce significant membrane damage and lead to cell lysis. The ethanol-derived radicals were primarily recognized by the cells as organic radicals, as was evident by the differential upregulation of the ohr-ohrR genes that function in cells treated with the combination of ethanol and CHP. The role of organic peroxide reductase, Ohr, was further confirmed by the significantly higher sensitivity of the deletion mutant to CHP and the combined stress treatment of CHP and ethanol. Moreover, we also observed the sigma factor σB to be important for the cells treated with ethanol alone as well as the aforementioned combination. A ΔsigB mutant strain had significantly higher susceptibility to the stress conditions. This finding was correlated with the σB-dependent transcriptional regulation of ohr and ohrR In summary, our data indicate that the combination of low levels of ethanol and organic peroxides induce ethanol-derived organic radicals that lead to significant oxidative stress on the cells in a concentration-dependent manner.IMPORTANCE Bacterial response to a combination of stresses can be unexpected and very different compared with that of an individual stress treatment. This study explores the physiological and transcriptional response of mycobacteria in response to the combinatorial treatment of an oxidant with the commonly used solvent ethanol. The presence of a subinhibitory concentration of organic peroxide increases the effectiveness of ethanol by inducing reactive peroxides that destroy the membrane integrity of cells in a significantly short time span. Our work elucidates a mechanism of targeting the complex mycobacterial membrane, which is its primary source of intrinsic resistance. Furthermore, it also demonstrates the importance of exploring the effect of various stress conditions on inducing bacterial clearance.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ohr-ohrR redox system; efficacy; ethanol stress; mycobacteria; oxidative stress; peroxides

Year:  2020        PMID: 32928928      PMCID: PMC7648146          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00222-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  56 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial stress responses as determinants of antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Keith Poole
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Evaluation of the roles that alkyl hydroperoxide reductase and Ohr play in organic peroxide-induced gene expression and protection against organic peroxides in Xanthomonas campestris.

Authors:  Paiboon Vattanaviboon; Wirongrong Whangsuk; Warunya Panmanee; Chananat Klomsiri; Saovanee Dharmsthiti; Skorn Mongkolsuk
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Treatment with oxidizing agents damages the inner membrane of spores of Bacillus subtilis and sensitizes spores to subsequent stress.

Authors:  D E Cortezzo; K Koziol-Dube; B Setlow; P Setlow
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.772

4.  Oxidative stress response genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: role of ahpC in resistance to peroxynitrite and stage-specific survival in macrophages.

Authors:  S S Master; B Springer; P Sander; E C Boettger; V Deretic; G S Timmins
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.777

5.  The response of mycobacterium tuberculosis to reactive oxygen and nitrogen species.

Authors:  Martin I Voskuil; Iona L Bartek; Kevin Visconti; Gary K Schoolnik
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Identification of ROS using oxidized DCFDA and flow-cytometry.

Authors:  Evgeniy Eruslanov; Sergei Kusmartsev
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

7.  Evolutionary potential, cross-stress behavior and the genetic basis of acquired stress resistance in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Martin Dragosits; Vadim Mozhayskiy; Semarhy Quinones-Soto; Jiyeon Park; Ilias Tagkopoulos
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 11.429

8.  Distinct Responses of Mycobacterium smegmatis to Exposure to Low and High Levels of Hydrogen Peroxide.

Authors:  Xiaojing Li; Jun Wu; Jiao Han; Yongfei Hu; Kaixia Mi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Singlet oxygen production in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii under heat stress.

Authors:  Ankush Prasad; Ursula Ferretti; Michaela Sedlářová; Pavel Pospíšil
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Mycobacterial Response to Organic Solvents and Possible Implications on Cross-Resistance With Antimicrobial Agents.

Authors:  Cátia Pacífico; Pedro Fernandes; Carla C C R de Carvalho
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.