Literature DB >> 32928758

Assessing the Longitudinal Impact of Physician-Patient Relationship on Functional Health.

R Henry Olaisen1,2, Mark D Schluchter3, Susan A Flocke4, Kathleen A Smyth3, Siran M Koroukian3, Kurt C Stange3,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Access to a usual source of care is associated with improved health outcomes, but research on how the physician-patient relationship affects a patient's health, particularly long-term, is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the longitudinal effect of changes in the physician-patient relationship on functional health.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS, 2015-2016). The outcome was 1-year change in functional health (12-Item Short-Form Survey). The predictors were quality of physician-patient relationship, and changes in this relationship, operationalized with the MEPS Primary Care (MEPS-PC) Relationship subscale, a composite measure with preliminary evidence of reliability and validity. Confounders included age, sex, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, insurance status, US region, and multimorbidity. We conducted analyses with survey-weighted, covariate-adjusted, predicted marginal means, used to calculate Cohen effect estimates. We tested differences in trajectories with multiple pairwise comparisons with Tukey contrasts.
RESULTS: Improved physician-patient relationships were associated with improved functional health, whereas worsened physician-patient relationships were associated with worsened functional health, with 1-year effect estimates ranging from 0.05 (95% CI, 0-0.10) to 0.08 (95% CI, 0.02-0.13) compared with -0.16 (95% CI, -0.35 to -0.03) to -0.33 (95% CI, -0.47 to -0.02), respectively.
CONCLUSION: The quality of the physician-patient relationship is positively associated with functional health. These findings could inform health care strategies and health policy aimed at improving patient-centered health outcomes.
© 2020 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical Expenditure Panel Survey; United States; functional health; impact; primary care; relationship

Year:  2020        PMID: 32928758      PMCID: PMC7489969          DOI: 10.1370/afm.2554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  34 in total

Review 1.  Design strategies and innovations in the medical expenditure panel survey.

Authors:  Steven B Cohen
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: a critical review.

Authors:  John W Saultz; Jennifer Lochner
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 3.  Disentangling the Linkage of Primary Care Features to Patient Outcomes: A Review of Current Literature, Data Sources, and Measurement Needs.

Authors:  Ann S O'Malley; Eugene C Rich; Alyssa Maccarone; Catherine M DesRoches; Robert J Reid
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Developing a New Measure of Primary Care Using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

Authors:  R Henry Olaisen; Susan A Flocke; Kathleen A Smyth; Mark D Schluchter; Siran M Koroukian; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review.

Authors:  M A Stewart
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Exploration of the relationship between continuity, trust in regular doctors and patient satisfaction with consultations with family doctors.

Authors:  Richard Baker; Arch G Mainous; Denis Pereira Gray; Margaret M Love
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.581

Review 7.  Defining the future of primary care: what can we learn from patients?.

Authors:  Dana Gelb Safran
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Reliability and validity of the SF-12v2 in the medical expenditure panel survey.

Authors:  Nancy C Cheak-Zamora; Kathleen W Wyrwich; Timothy D McBride
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  A patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in primary care: development and psychometric evaluation.

Authors:  Christina M Van der Feltz-Cornelis; Patricia Van Oppen; Harm W J Van Marwijk; Edwin De Beurs; Richard Van Dyck
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.238

10.  Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs.

Authors:  Ian Shrier; Robert W Platt
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  4 in total

1.  The Relationship Between the Physician-Patient Relationship, Physician Empathy, and Patient Trust.

Authors:  Qing Wu; Zheyu Jin; Pei Wang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 6.473

2.  Factors that contribute to disparities in time to acute leukemia diagnosis in young people: an in depth qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Lucky Ding; Julia E Szymczak; Erica Evans; Emma Canepa; Ashley E Martin; Farah Contractor; Richard Aplenc; Galen Joseph; Lena E Winestone
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Moral Injury during the COVID-19 pandemic: A delphi model survey of family medicine residents.

Authors:  Sean B Ngo; Payson J Clark; Sarah E Parr; Abel R Thomas; Akshat Dayal; Richard Sanker; Burritt W Hess; Dillon C Stull
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Med       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 1.275

Review 4.  Undoing structural racism in dentistry: Advocacy for dental therapy.

Authors:  Tera Bianchi; Kasey Wilson; Albert Yee
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.258

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.