| Literature DB >> 32927838 |
Xiang You1,2, Zhiyu Wang1,2, Xiafang Zhou1, Zifeng Liu1, Ruijuan Jiang3, Weiming Gai3.
Abstract
This paper presents an experimental study on the fatigue life estimation of off-centrally cracked aluminum plates. Typical theoretical equations for off-central, central and edge cracks were reviewed and compared in terms of their sensitive parameters and applicability. A finite element model has been validated in its capacity in modelling the influences of eccentricity and crack size on the boundary correction coefficients. The Forman equation has been employed along with numerical results for the prediction of fatigue lives. Based on the test data, the fatigue life results of aluminum plates with and without patched laminate repair have been compared with codified fatigue classes. It is demonstrated that the repair at the crack tip close to the plate edge is effective in the fatigue life improvement for off-centrally crackedaluminum plates.Entities:
Keywords: fatigue life; fracture mechanics; off-central crack; stress intensity factor
Year: 2020 PMID: 32927838 PMCID: PMC7558536 DOI: 10.3390/ma13184014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Off-central crack in a typical tension clamp.
Figure 2Crack modes in a tension strip.
Figure 3Analytical illustration of an off-centrally cracked strip.
Mechanical properties of test materials.
| Material | Yield Strength (MPa) | Ultimate Strength (MPa) | Elastic Modulus (MPa) | Elongation (%) | Critical Stress Intensity Factor (MPa·mm0.5) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aluminum | 307 | 445 | 7.2 × 105 | 15 | 1181 |
| Carbon Fiber | - | 4216 | 2.52 × 105 | 1.76 | - |
| Adhesive | - | 30 | 4.5 × 103 | 0.9 | - |
List of test specimens.
| Specimen Series | Test Number | Crack Mode | Repair | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 9 | Centrally | × | 0 | 0.15–0.45 |
| T2 | 4 | Centrally | √ | 0 | 0.3 |
| T3 | 4 | Off-Centrally | × | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| T4 | 4 | Off-Centrally | √ | 0.5 | 0.3 |
Figure 4Test set-up and fracture mode.
Figure 5Typical FE model.
Figure 6Stress concentration at crack tip.
Figure 7Comparison of referred calculations of stress intensity factors (SIF) at A and B.
Figure 8Off-central crack in tension clamp.
Figure 9Crack modes in a tension strip.
Figure 10Comparison of fatigue live results between centrally and off-centrally cracked plates.
Figure 11Comparison of fatigue live results between unrepaired and repaired plates.
Figure 12Comparison of fatigue lives of cracked plates under three typical stress ranges.