Literature DB >> 32927574

Catching flame retardants and pesticides in silicone wristbands: Evidence of exposure to current and legacy pollutants in Uruguayan children.

Steven C Travis1, Diana S Aga1, Elena I Queirolo2, James R Olson3, Mónica Daleiro2, Katarzyna Kordas4.   

Abstract

Children are exposed to many potentially toxic compounds in their daily lives and are vulnerable to the harmful effects. To date, very few non-invasive methods are available to quantify children's exposure to environmental chemicals. Due to their ease of implementation, silicone wristbands have emerged as passive samplers to study personal environmental exposures and have the potential to greatly increase our knowledge of chemical exposures in vulnerable population groups. Nevertheless, there is a limited number of studies monitoring children's exposures via silicone wristbands. In this study, we implemented this sampling technique in ongoing research activities in Montevideo, Uruguay which aim to monitor chemical exposures in a cohort of elementary school children. The silicone wristbands were worn by 24 children for 7 days; they were quantitatively analyzed using gas chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry for 45 chemical pollutants, including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), pesticides, polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs), and novel halogenated flame-retardant chemicals (NHFRs). All classes of chemicals, except NHFRs, were identified in the passive samplers. The average number of analytes detected in each wristband was 13 ±3. OPFRs were consistently the most abundant class of analytes detected. Median concentrations of ΣOPFRs, ΣPBDEs, ΣPCBs, and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and its metabolites (dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE) and dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane (DDD)) were 1020, 3.00, 0.52 and 3.79 ng/g wristband, respectively. Two major findings result from this research; differences in trends of two OPFRs (TCPP and TDCPP) are observed between studies in Uruguay and the United States, and the detection of DDT, a chemical banned in several countries, suggests that children's exposure profiles in these settings may differ from other parts of the world. This was the first study to examine children's exposome in South America using silicone wristbands and clearly points to a need for further studies.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children exposure; Exposome; Halogenated organic pollutant; Organophosphorus flame retardants; Personal monitoring; South America

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32927574     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

Review 1.  Operationalizing the Exposome Using Passive Silicone Samplers.

Authors:  Zoe Coates Fuentes; Yuri Levin Schwartz; Anna R Robuck; Douglas I Walker
Journal:  Curr Pollut Rep       Date:  2022-01-04

Review 2.  Silicone Wristbands in Exposure Assessment: Analytical Considerations and Comparison with Other Approaches.

Authors:  Małgorzata Wacławik; Wojciech Rodzaj; Bartosz Wielgomas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Do Neighborhood Factors Modify the Effects of Lead Exposure on Child Behavior?

Authors:  Seth Frndak; Gabriel Barg; Elena I Queirolo; Nelly Mañay; Craig Colder; Guan Yu; Zia Ahmed; Katarzyna Kordas
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-08-31

Review 4.  A systematic review of the use of silicone wristbands for environmental exposure assessment, with a focus on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).

Authors:  Laila Hamzai; Nicolas Lopez Galvez; Eunha Hoh; Nathan G Dodder; Georg E Matt; Penelope J Quintana
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 5.563

5.  Determining chemical air equivalency using silicone personal monitors.

Authors:  Steven G O'Connell; Kim A Anderson; Marc I Epstein
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 5.563

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.