Literature DB >> 3292729

Measurement of fundal height.

J L Engstrom1.   

Abstract

Fundal height should not be assessed by comparing the uterus with anatomic landmarks on the maternal abdomen because of the following reasons: 1) the inability to assess fundal growth accurately when the uterus is measured in finger breadths or as a fraction of the distance between two landmarks; 2) biologic variability in the placement of anatomic landmarks on the maternal abdomen; 3) disagreement among clinicians and researchers on the precise relationship between the fundus and anatomic landmarks at each stage of gestation; and 4) variability among women in the number of gestational weeks at which the uterine fundus reaches the umbilicus. A rational basis for continuing the practice of comparing fundal height with anatomic landmarks on the maternal abdomen does not exist. Inexpensive and more accurate techniques of measuring fundal growth are readily available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3292729     DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1988.tb00422.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs        ISSN: 0090-0311


  4 in total

1.  Colorectal and uterine movement and tension of the inferior hypogastric plexus in cadavers.

Authors:  Ian P Johnson
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2012-04-20

2.  Population-based rates, risk factors and consequences of preterm births in South-Asia and sub-Saharan Africa: A multi-country prospective cohort study.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 4.413

3.  Measurement of symphysis fundal height for gestational age estimation in low-to-middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rachel Whelan; Lauren Schaeffer; Ingrid Olson; Lian V Folger; Saima Alam; Nayab Ajaz; Karima Ladhani; Bernard Rosner; Blair J Wylie; Anne C C Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Estimating gestational age at birth from fundal height and additional anthropometrics: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  S J Pugh; A M Ortega-Villa; W Grobman; R B Newman; J Owen; D A Wing; P S Albert; K L Grantz
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 6.531

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.