| Literature DB >> 32926879 |
Louise-Eva Vandenborght1, Raphaël Enaud2, Charlotte Urien3, Noémie Coron4, Pierre-Olivier Girodet2, Stéphanie Ferreira3, Patrick Berger2, Laurence Delhaes5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The links between microbial environmental exposures and asthma are well documented, but no study has combined deep sequencing results from pulmonary and indoor microbiomes of patients with asthma with spirometry, clinical, and endotype parameters.Entities:
Keywords: Feno; Indoor environment; microbiome; mycobiome; severe asthma; type 2 asthma
Year: 2020 PMID: 32926879 PMCID: PMC7486598 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.08.035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol ISSN: 0091-6749 Impact factor: 10.793
Fig E1Flowchart of the COBRA-ENV (indoor environment analysis of COhort of BRonchial obstruction and Asthma) study and samples distribution across time.
Clinical and biologic characteristics of patients with SA and complete NGS analysis
| Variables | Overall (n = 22) | Type 2–low SA (n = 6) | Type 2–high SA (n = 16) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic features | ||||
| Age (y) | 59.09 (16.84) | 52.33 (19.69) | 61.62 (15.58) | .259 |
| Male sex, no. (%) | 10 (45.5) | 2 (33.3) | 8 (50.0) | .827 |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD) | 26.96 (4.73) | 27.31 (2.98) | 26.83 (5.32) | .838 |
| Respiratory data, mean (SD) | ||||
| FEV1 (% predicted) | 75.36 (27.60) | 79.32 (33.83) | 73.77 (25.89) | .689 |
| FVC (% predicted) | 91.20 (21.99) | 89.18 (28.75) | 92.01 (19.83) | .798 |
| FEV1/FVC (% predicted) | 68.25 (17.04) | 74.84 (15.82) | 65.62 (17.31) | .274 |
| FEF25-75 (% predicted) | 49.24 (31.30) | 61.83 (36.35) | 44.21 (28.85) | .254 |
| F | 43.32 (32.74) | 15.86 (6.26) | 53.62 (32.75) | .012 |
| Clinical features at COBRA visit (no.) | ||||
| Very poorly controlled asthma | 13 | 4 | 9 | .788 |
| SAFS | 10 | 3 | 7 | 1.000 |
| ABPA | 3 | 0 | 3 | .657 |
| Asthma medication used during the last 6 mo | ||||
| ICS | 22 | 6 | 16 | NA |
| LABA | 22 | 6 | 16 | NA |
| LAMA | 16 | 6 | 10 | .222 |
| Continuous OCS | 9 | 3 | 6 | .965 |
| Biotherapy | 9 | 3 | 6 | .965 |
| Gastroesophageal reflux treatment | 8 | 3 | 5 | .752 |
| Azole treatment | 1 | 0 | 1 (VRC) | 1.000 |
| Exacerbations during COBRA-ENV period, mean (SD), no (%) | 6.45 (5.29) | 9.67 (5.32) | 5.25 (4.91) | .081 |
| OCS courses during COBRA-ENV period, mean (SD), no (%) | 5.45 (5.09) | 8.50 (4.89) | 4.31 (4.81) | .085 |
| ATB courses during COBRA-ENV period, mean (SD), no (%) | 4.68 (4.87) | 6.83 (3.87) | 3.88 (5.07) | .213 |
| Biologic data at COBRA visit | ||||
| Blood eosinophil count (/mm3), mean (SD) | 526.82 (1184.46) | 12.00 (90.77) | 679.38 (1367.61) | .336 |
| Total serum IgE (kUI/L), mean (SD) | 308.23 (264.80) | 236.67 (268.59) | 335.06 (267.03) | .451 |
| Sputum microbial cultures (no.) | 19 | 6 | 13 | .657 |
| | 1 | 1 | 0 | .601 |
| | 1 | 1 | 0 | .601 |
| | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 |
| Non | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 |
| | 14 | 6 | 8 | .094 |
| Other yeast | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1.000 |
| | 5 | 3 | 2 | .194 |
| Other | 3 | 2 | 1 | .342 |
| Other mold | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1.000 |
| Indoor fungal contamination | ||||
| Total fungal load (pg/EDC), mean (SD) | 11.39 (9.82) | 11.68 (12.76) | 11.28 (8.98) | .934 |
ABPA, Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis; ATB, antibiotic; BMI, body mass index; COBRA-ENV, indoor environment analysis of COhort of BRonchial obstruction and Asthma; FEF, forced expiratory flow between the 25% and 75% of the FVC; FVC, forced vital capacity; ICS, inhaled corticosteroid; LABA, long-acting β2 agonist; LAMA, long-acting muscarinic antagonist; NA, not available; OCS, oral corticosteroid; SAFS, SA with fungal sensitization; VRC, Voriconazole.
P value with the Mann-Whitney test used for quantitative variables analysis and the Fisher exact test used for qualitative variables.
Asthma control as per the 7-Item Asthma Control Questionnaire.
NA because all samples were in the same condition regarding these variables.
Fig 1The α- and β-diversities of the EDCs from patients with SA according to T2 endotypes (n = 22). The α-diversity of bacterial (A) or fungal (B) communities from EDCs is shown using Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indexes. C, Correlation between Feno levels and Chao1 fungal diversities. D, The β-diversity of fungal communities. Patients were split according to whether than had T2-high SA (dark gray, circles) or T2-low SA (light gray, triangles).
Fig E2Histograms representing the relative abundance at the genus level of the EDC microbiome.
Fig E3Histograms representing the relative abundance at the genus or species level of the EDC mycobiome.
Fig 2Taxonomic differences between Feno groups with T2 endotypes used as covariables across the 22 EDCs show significant enrichment of specifics taxa at the OTU level. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and effect size analysis identified bacterial (A) and fungal (B) taxa differentially enriched according to an LDA score cutoff at 2. The colors (dark and gray) represent each Feno group (level cutoff at 25 ppb), and the length represents the LDA score, which is the degree of significant difference (in log scale) for a given taxon. As the order of the numerator and denominator when calculating the effect size is determined by alphabetical order, it is possible to obtain an interpretation of the scale of the difference between 2 groups by using the absolute values of the effect size even though the LDA score is negative for a given taxon. Thus, any taxa colored according to the Feno variable may be interpreted as taxa being significantly increased in abundance compared with the other Feno group.
Fig 3Comparison of diversity and composition of both sputum and EDC samples. The bacterial (left) and fungal diversities (right) based on Shannon indexes are presented for sputum and EDC samples (A). The proportion of Basidiomycota (a phylum primarily composed of environmental fungi) was higher in EDCs than in sputa (B). Principal coordinates analysis based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity between sputum (dark gray, squares) and EDC (light gray, diamonds) samples for bacterial (C) and fungal (D) communities showed the highly individual signature of sputa compared with that of EDCs. Proportion of common bacterial (E) or fungal (F) taxa between EDCs and sputa collected at a stable state (STB) or during an exacerbation (EXA). For each OTU, the proportion was expressed as a percentage of the number of reads (ie, relative abundance). PERMANOVA, Permutational multivariate ANOVA.
Fig 4Microbial core shared between the 22 pairs of indoor and respiratory samples. Venn diagrams show the proportion of common bacterial (A) and fungal (B) taxa (at the OTU level) between EDCs (green section) and sputa (SPU) collected either during an exacerbation (EXA) (the SPU were collected during an EXA [red section]) or during a stable state (STB) period (the SPU were collected during an STB [blue section]). Only OTUs present at least in 20% of each group of SPU (clustered according the presence or absence of an EXA when the SPU were collected) and in at least 90% of EDCs were taken into account and represented in the Venn diagrams. The bacterial core (A) showed only 1 OTU corresponding to Sphingomonas spp shared between EDCs and SPU collected during an EXA and 4 OTUs belonging to Streptococcus, Paracoccus, and Haemophilus species were shared independently from the clinical state of the patients. The fungal core (B) was larger than the bacterial core and was composed of 9 OTUs associated with SPU collected during an EXA, 1 OTU (ie, Alternaria brassicae) associated with SPU collected at STB, and 17 OTUs (including several medically relevant fungi, such as Malassezia, Aspergillus, and Cladosporium species) belonging to the fungal core independent from the clinical state.