Literature DB >> 32926876

Normative Values for Cardiopulmonary Exercise Stress Testing Using Ramp Cycle Ergometry in Children and Adolescents.

Danielle S Burstein1, Michael G McBride2, Jungwon Min3, Alexander A Paridon4, Sarah Perelman5, Erika M Huffman2, Shannon O'Malley2, Julia Del Grosso2, Herman Groepenhoff6, Stephen M Paridon2, Julie A Brothers2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To provide sex, age, and race specific reference values for ramp cycle ergometer cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) in children in the US. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review was conducted of all cardiopulmonary CPET data from our Exercise Physiology Laboratory on healthy children and adolescents (6-18 years) with body mass index between the 5th and 95th percentiles and structurally normal hearts who performed a ramp cycle ergometry stress test between 1999 and 2015. Twenty-eight exercise variables were included: peak oxygen consumption, oxygen consumption at ventilatory anaerobic threshold, peak work rate, resting and peak heart rate and blood pressure, resting pulmonary function testing, and ventilatory responses to progressive exercise using breath-by-breath gas exchange. Owing to the nonlinear association between CPET results and age, fractional polynomials were used in the mixed-effects regression models to describe the sex- and age-specific normative values with 95% CIs, after adjusting for race and body mass index.
RESULTS: We analyzed data on 1829 children (average age, 13.6 ± 2.6 years; 52% male). After 12 years of age, males generally had higher peak values for aerobic capacity and work rate. There were progressive increases with age for both sexes in resting pulmonary function and ventilatory response to exercise, peak aerobic and work rate, and oxygen pulse. Notably, there was an age-related decrease in ventilatory equivalents of oxygen and carbon dioxide at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold.
CONCLUSIONS: Future research using prospective, inclusive, and statistically planned cohorts with standardized laboratory approaches and confirmed interoperability should be considered as a focus for validating normative pediatric CPET values in the future.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32926876     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.09.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  4 in total

1.  Ventilatory responses at submaximal exercise intensities in healthy children and adolescents during the growth spurt period: a semi-longitudinal study.

Authors:  Fenfen Zhou; Xiaojian Yin; Kilian Phillipe; Aya Houssein; Steven Gastinger; Jacques Prioux
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Problems with Bazett QTc correction in paediatric screening of prolonged QTc interval.

Authors:  Irena Andršová; Katerina Hnatkova; Kateřina Helánová; Martina Šišáková; Tomáš Novotný; Petr Kala; Marek Malik
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 2.125

3.  Cardiopulmonary Exercise Performance in the Pediatric and Young Adult Population Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  D S Burstein; J Edelson; S O'Malley; M G McBride; P Stephens; S Paridon; J A Brothers
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 1.838

Review 4.  Blood pressure response to exercise in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Julio Alvarez-Pitti; Vesna Herceg-Čavrak; Małgorzata Wójcik; Dragan Radovanović; Michał Brzeziński; Carl Grabitz; Elke Wühl; Dorota Drożdż; Anette Melk
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.