Literature DB >> 32925688

Cost and Complications of Single-Level Lumbar Decompression in Those Over and Under 75: A Matched Comparison.

Samuel Rosas1, Ziyad O Knio1, Anirudh K Gowd1, T David Luo1, Cynthia L Emory1, Tadhg J O'Gara1,2.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare costs and complication rates following single-level lumbar decompression in patients under age 75 versus patients aged 75 and older. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar decompression is a common surgical treatment for lumbar pathology; however, its effectiveness can be debated in elderly patients because complication rates and costs by age group are not well-defined.
METHODS: The Medicare database was queried through the PearlDiver server for patients who underwent single-level lumbar decompression without fusion as an index procedure. The 90-day complication and reoperation rates were compared between age groups after matching for sex and comorbidity burden. Same day and 90-day costs are compared.
RESULTS: The matched cohort included 89,388 total patients (n = 44,694 for each study arm). Compared to the under 75 age group, the 75 and older age group had greater rates of deep venous thrombosis (odds ratio [OR] 1.443, P = 0.042) and dural tear (OR 1.560, P = 0.043), and a lower rate of seroma complicating the procedure (OR 0.419, P = 0.009). There was no difference in overall 90-day reoperation rate in patients under age 75 versus patients aged 75 and older (9.66% vs. 9.28%, P = 0.051), although the 75 and older age group had a greater rate of laminectomy without discectomy (CPT-63047; OR 1.175, P < 0.001), while having a lower rate of laminotomy with discectomy (CPT-63042 and CPT-63030; OR 0.727 and 0.867, respectively, P = 0.013 and <0.001, respectively). The 75 and older age group had greater same day ($3329.24 vs. $3138.05, P < 0.001) and 90-day ($5014.82 vs. $4749.44, P < 0.001) mean reimbursement.
CONCLUSION: Elderly patients experience greater rates of select perioperative complications, with mildly increased costs. There is no significant difference in overall 90-day reoperation rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 32925688     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  2 in total

1.  The Impact of Perioperative Multimodal Pain Management on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients (Aged 75 and Older) Undergoing Short-Segment Lumbar Fusion Surgery.

Authors:  Shuaikang Wang; Tongtong Zhang; Peng Wang; Xiangyu Li; Chao Kong; Wenzhi Sun; Shibao Lu
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 3.037

2.  Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life in Elderly Patients Treated with a Newly Designed Double Tube Endoscopy for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Lantao Liu; Jian Dong; Dechun Wang; Chao Zhang; Yue Zhou
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.279

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.