OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a structured peer support program to address the needs of providers involved in obstetric adverse outcomes. METHODS: In this pilot randomized controlled trial, participants were providers who experienced an obstetric-related adverse outcome. Providers were randomly assigned to routine support (no further follow-up) or enhanced support (follow-up with a trained peer supporter). Participants completed surveys at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The primary outcome was the use of resources and the perception of their helpfulness. Secondary outcomes were the effect on the recovery stages and the duration of use of peer support. RESULTS: Fifty participants were enrolled and randomly assigned 1:1 to each group; 42 completed the program (enhanced, 23; routine, 19). The 2 groups were not significantly different with respect to event type, demographics, or baseline stage; in both groups, most participants started at the stage 6 thriving path. Most participants required less than 3 months of support: 65.2% did not need follow-up after the first contact, and 91.3% did not need follow-up after the second contact. Participants who transitioned from an early stage of recovery (stages 1-3) to the stage 6 thriving path reported that they most often sought support from peers (P = 0.02) and departmental leadership (P = 0.07). Those in the enhanced support group were significantly more likely to consider departmental leadership as one of the most helpful resources (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: For supporting health care providers involved in adverse outcomes, structured peer support is a practicable intervention that can be initiated with limited resources.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a structured peer support program to address the needs of providers involved in obstetric adverse outcomes. METHODS: In this pilot randomized controlled trial, participants were providers who experienced an obstetric-related adverse outcome. Providers were randomly assigned to routine support (no further follow-up) or enhanced support (follow-up with a trained peer supporter). Participants completed surveys at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The primary outcome was the use of resources and the perception of their helpfulness. Secondary outcomes were the effect on the recovery stages and the duration of use of peer support. RESULTS: Fifty participants were enrolled and randomly assigned 1:1 to each group; 42 completed the program (enhanced, 23; routine, 19). The 2 groups were not significantly different with respect to event type, demographics, or baseline stage; in both groups, most participants started at the stage 6 thriving path. Most participants required less than 3 months of support: 65.2% did not need follow-up after the first contact, and 91.3% did not need follow-up after the second contact. Participants who transitioned from an early stage of recovery (stages 1-3) to the stage 6 thriving path reported that they most often sought support from peers (P = 0.02) and departmental leadership (P = 0.07). Those in the enhanced support group were significantly more likely to consider departmental leadership as one of the most helpful resources (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: For supporting health care providers involved in adverse outcomes, structured peer support is a practicable intervention that can be initiated with limited resources.
Authors: Vanessa E Torbenson; Kirsten A Riggan; Amy L Weaver; Margaret E Long; Robyn E Finney; Megan A Allyse; Enid Rivera-Chiauzzi Journal: South Med J Date: 2021-04 Impact factor: 0.954
Authors: Robyn E Finney; Vanessa E Torbenson; Kirsten A Riggan; Amy L Weaver; Margaret E Long; Megan A Allyse; Enid Y Rivera-Chiauzzi Journal: J Nurs Manag Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 4.680
Authors: Irene Santana-Domínguez; Héctor González-De La Torre; José Verdú-Soriano; Miriam Berenguer-Pérez; Juan José Suárez-Sánchez; Alicia Martín-Martínez Journal: Nurs Open Date: 2022-05-28