Literature DB >> 3292542

A novel methodology for analysis of cell distribution in chimeric mouse organs using a strain specific antibody.

M Kusakabe1, M Yokoyama, T Sakakura, T Nomura, H L Hosick, Y Nishizuka.   

Abstract

Chimeric animals are very useful for analysis of cell lineage, homeostasis in tissue architecture, and cell-cell interactions during both organogenesis and carcinogenesis. However, there is not a generally effective means for marking cells of chimeric mice. We have therefore developed a polyclonal antibody that is useful for this purpose. This antibody specifically recognizes those cells derived from C3H strain mice. The specificity of this antibody was checked by both immunoblotting and immunoadsorption methods. The antigens were immunohistochemically detected in cytoplasm of both epithelial and mesenchymal cells of C3H/HeN strain mouse in many different organs, but not the corresponding cell types from BALB/c or C57BL/10 or several other mouse strains. The validity of these antibodies as markers for C3H cells was further checked by tissue recombination experiments and in mixed cultures of mouse and rat cells. In each case the antibody recognized only the C3H mouse cells. Next, chimeric mice were prepared between strains C3H/HeN and BALB/c, and C3H/HeN and C57BL/10 mice. Chimeras 2-mo old were examined for antigen distribution using the indirect immunofluorescence method. Many tissues in chimeric mice were composed of cells that were both stained and unstained by the anti-C3H specific antigen. The chimeric patterns were classified into four types, A-D. In well-defined structural units such as intestinal crypts, small intestinal villi, kidney convoluted tubules, exocrine gland acini, ovarian follicles, thyroid gland follicles, stomach glands, adrenal cortex, lingual papillae, etc., (A) each unit was composed entirely of either positive or negative cells, or else (B) in some organs each unit was composed of both types of cells. In the uniform tissues without such distinguishable units, such as stratified squamous epithelium, mesenchymal tissue, corpora lutea, pituitary gland, Islets of Langerhans, adrenal medulla etc., (C) the tissue was composed of definite small cell groups made entirely of either positive or negative cells, or else (D) the tissue was composed of both types of cells which were intermingled with one another. These findings strongly suggest that the chimeric patterns demonstrated here reflect the cell proliferative unit in each tissue. This cell marker system has proven useful for analysis of cell lineage and cell renewal systems in many organs of chimeric mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3292542      PMCID: PMC2115179          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.107.1.257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  34 in total

1.  Patches in the livers of chimaeric mice.

Authors:  J D West
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1976-08

2.  Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  U K Laemmli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Cell migration pathway in the intestinal epithelium: an in situ marker system using mouse aggregation chimeras.

Authors:  G H Schmidt; M M Wilkinson; B A Ponder
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Cell replacement in epidermis (keratopoiesis) via discrete units of proliferation.

Authors:  C S Potten
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  1981

Review 5.  Proliferative units in stratified squamous epithelium.

Authors:  W J Hume; C S Potten
Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.470

6.  Cell lineage analysis of cerebellar Purkinje cells in mouse chimeras.

Authors:  M L Oster-Granite; J Gearhart
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1981-07-15       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  Somatic and germline mosaicism in interspecific chimaeras between Mus musculus and Mus caroli.

Authors:  J Rossant; V M Chapman
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1983-02

8.  H-2 antigens as markers of cellular genotype in chimaeric mice.

Authors:  B A Ponder; M M Wilkinson; M Wood
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1983-08

9.  Histological demonstration of mosaicism in a series of chimeric rats produced between congenic strains.

Authors:  W C Weinberg; J C Howard; P M Iannaccone
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-02-01       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Intercellular transfer of beta-glucuronidase in chimeric mice.

Authors:  K Herrup; R J Mullen
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  6 in total

1.  The change in tenascin expression in mouse uterus during early pregnancy.

Authors:  H Kida; M Taga; H Minaguchi; M Hanazono; T Ohashi; T Sakakura; M Kusakabe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Taste receptor cells arise from local epithelium, not neurogenic ectoderm.

Authors:  L M Stone; T E Finger; P P Tam; S S Tan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Gastric-and-intestinal mixed-type intestinal metaplasia: aberrant expression of transcription factors and stem cell intestinalization.

Authors:  Tetsuya Tsukamoto; Tsutomu Mizoshita; Masae Tatematsu
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Chimeric analysis of EGFP and DsRed2 transgenic mice demonstrates polyclonal maintenance of pancreatic acini.

Authors:  Je-Young Ryu; Antoni Siswanto; Kenichi Harimoto; Yoh-ichi Tagawa
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  Morphology and modes of cell proliferation in earliest signet-ring-cell carcinomas induced in canine stomachs by N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine.

Authors:  H Sugihara; T Hattori; Y Imamura; S Noriki; M Fukuda; K Katsura; Y Tsuchihashi; S Fujita
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Mouse strain susceptibility to diethylnitrosamine induced hepatocarcinogenesis is cell autonomous whereas sex-susceptibility Is due to the micro-environment: analysis with C3H <--> BALB / c sexually chimeric mice.

Authors:  T Tsukamoto; K Inada; H Fukami; M Yamamoto; H Tanaka; M Kusakabe; C E Bishop; M Tatematsu
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  2000-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.