Mehdi Jahangiri1, Rosanna Cousins2, Vahid Gharibi1,3. 1. Department of Occupational Health, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. 2. Department of Psychology, Liverpool Hope University, Liverpool, UK. 3. Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The primary response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has been to minimize social contact through lockdown measures. The closure of non-essential businesses to tackle the spread of the coronavirus has had negative consequences for the global economy, production, and employment. OBJECTIVE: To outline how known occupational health principles can be used for preventative management of the coronavirus in workplaces to support resumption of work. METHODS: A discussion of current knowledge of COVID-19, the cost of the lockdown strategy, and preventative biological cycle management. RESULTS: The evidence-based literature indicates that biological cycle management can control the risk of coronavirus infection, provide a suitable and sufficient exit strategy from lockdown, and support getting employees back to work. Adherence to personal protective equipment standards has been insufficient, indicating a need for workplace investment and education. CONCLUSION: Imposed restrictions on workplace operations can be lifted without compromising worker health and safety when a workplace commits to practicing the three principles of biological cycle management.
BACKGROUND: The primary response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has been to minimize social contact through lockdown measures. The closure of non-essential businesses to tackle the spread of the coronavirus has had negative consequences for the global economy, production, and employment. OBJECTIVE: To outline how known occupational health principles can be used for preventative management of the coronavirus in workplaces to support resumption of work. METHODS: A discussion of current knowledge of COVID-19, the cost of the lockdown strategy, and preventative biological cycle management. RESULTS: The evidence-based literature indicates that biological cycle management can control the risk of coronavirus infection, provide a suitable and sufficient exit strategy from lockdown, and support getting employees back to work. Adherence to personal protective equipment standards has been insufficient, indicating a need for workplace investment and education. CONCLUSION: Imposed restrictions on workplace operations can be lifted without compromising worker health and safety when a workplace commits to practicing the three principles of biological cycle management.
Authors: Geraldo Cardoso de Oliveira Neto; Henrricco Nieves Pujol Tucci; Moacir Godinho Filho; Wagner Cezar Lucato; Dirceu da Silva Journal: Process Saf Environ Prot Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 6.158
Authors: Vahid Gharibi; Rosanna Cousins; Hamidreza Mokarami; Mehdi Jahangiri; Mohammad A Keshavarz; Mohammad M Shirmohammadi-Bahadoran Journal: Saf Health Work Date: 2022-05-26