Literature DB >> 32924277

Review on current limits and potentialities of technologies for biomedical ceramic scaffolds production.

Ana Marques1, Georgina Miranda1, Filipe Silva1, Paulo Pinto1, Óscar Carvalho1.   

Abstract

Osseointegration is defined by a stable and functional union between bone and a surface of a material. This phenomenon is influenced by the geometric and surface characteristics of the part where the bone cells will attach. A wide variety of studies proves that ceramic materials are strong competitors against conventional metals in the scope of bone tissue engineering. Ceramic scaffolds, porous structures that allow bone ingrowth, have been studied to enhance the osseointegration phenomenon. Geometric and dimensional parameters of the scaffold have influence in its performance as mechanical and structural supporter of bone growth. However, these parameters are conditioned by the manufacturing process by which these scaffolds are obtained. Several studies focusing on the production process of ceramic scaffolds have been developed, using 3D printing, stereolithography, selective laser sintering, green machining, robocasting, and others. The main purpose of this work is to evaluate and compare the different manufacturing processes by which ceramic scaffolds can be produced. This comparison addresses scaffold parameters like pore size, pore shape, porosity percentage, roughness, and so forth. Additionally, the different materials used in different manufacturing processes are also mentioned and discussed given its influence on a successful osseointegration while simultaneously displaying adequate mechanical properties. After making a screening on the available ceramic scaffolds manufacturing processes, several examples are presented, proving the potential of each of these manufacturing process for a given scaffold geometry.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BTE scaffolds; cellular structures architecture; ceramic; ceramic scaffolds; ceramic technology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32924277     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  7 in total

Review 1.  Characterisation of Selected Materials in Medical Applications.

Authors:  Kacper Kroczek; Paweł Turek; Damian Mazur; Jacek Szczygielski; Damian Filip; Robert Brodowski; Krzysztof Balawender; Łukasz Przeszłowski; Bogumił Lewandowski; Stanisław Orkisz; Artur Mazur; Grzegorz Budzik; Józef Cebulski; Mariusz Oleksy
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 4.967

2.  Fabrication of Microstructured Calcium Phosphate Ceramics Scaffolds by Material Extrusion-Based 3D Printing Approach.

Authors:  Peifang Dee; Sharlene Tan; Hortense Le Ferrand
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2022-02-26

Review 3.  Clinical Applications of Cell-Scaffold Constructs for Bone Regeneration Therapy.

Authors:  Venkata Suresh Venkataiah; Yoshio Yahata; Akira Kitagawa; Masahiko Inagaki; Yusuke Kakiuchi; Masato Nakano; Shigeto Suzuki; Keisuke Handa; Masahiro Saito
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  The Degradation of Synthetic Polymeric Scaffolds With Strut-like Architecture Influences the Mechanics-dependent Repair Process of an Osteochondral Defect in Silico.

Authors:  Martina Tortorici; Ansgar Petersen; Georg N Duda; Sara Checa
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-10

5.  Integrating pore architectures to evaluate vascularization efficacy in silicate-based bioceramic scaffolds.

Authors:  Fanghui Wu; Jun Yang; Xiurong Ke; Shuo Ye; Zhaonan Bao; Xianyan Yang; Cheng Zhong; Miaoda Shen; Sanzhong Xu; Lei Zhang; Zhongru Gou; Guojing Yang
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2021-12-16

6.  Preparation and Properties of Iron Nanoparticle-Based Macroporous Scaffolds for Biodegradable Implants.

Authors:  Aleksandr S Lozhkomoev; Ales S Buyakov; Sergey O Kazantsev; Elena I Senkina; Maksim G Krinitcyn; Valeria A Ivanyuk; Aliya F Sharipova; Marat I Lerner
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.748

7.  Microarchitecture of titanium cylinders obtained by additive manufacturing does not influence osseointegration in the sheep.

Authors:  Louis Rony; Eric Aguado; Bruno Verlee; Florence Pascaretti-Grizon; Daniel Chappard
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2021-06-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.