| Literature DB >> 32924060 |
Chie Shimamoto-Mitsuyama1, Akihiro Nakaya1,2, Kayoko Esaki1, Shabeesh Balan1, Yoshimi Iwayama1,3, Tetsuo Ohnishi1, Motoko Maekawa1, Tomoko Toyota1, Brian Dean4,5, Takeo Yoshikawa1.
Abstract
Structural changes in the corpus callosum have been reported in schizophrenia; however, the underlying molecular mechanism remains unclear. As the corpus callosum is high in lipid content, we analyzed the lipid contents of the corpora callosa from 15 patients with schizophrenia and 15 age- and sex-matched controls using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry and identified lipid combinations associated with schizophrenia. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses using extended samples (schizophrenia, n = 95; control, n = 91) showed low expression levels of lipid metabolism-related genes and their potential upstream transcription factors in schizophrenia. Subsequent pathway analysis identified a gene regulatory network where nuclear factor of activated T cells 2 (NFATC2) is placed most upstream. We also observed low gene expression levels of microglial markers, inflammatory cytokines, and colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R), which is known to regulate the density of microglia, in the corpus callosum in schizophrenia. The interactions between CSF1R and several genes in the presently identified gene network originating from NFATC2 have been reported. Collectively, this study provides evidence regarding lipid abnormalities in the corpora callosa of patients with schizophrenia and proposes the potential role of impaired "NFATC2-relevant gene network-microglial axis" as its underlying mechanism.Entities:
Keywords: arachidonic acid; gene expression; liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS); microglia; postmortem brain
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 32924060 PMCID: PMC7727339 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa236
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cereb Cortex ISSN: 1047-3211 Impact factor: 5.357
Demographic data for control and schizophrenia brains
| Sample set 1 | Sample set 2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con ( | SZ ( |
| Con ( | SZ ( |
| |
| Sex (male/female) | 8/7 | 8/7 | – | 71/20 | 70/25 | – |
| Age (years, mean ± SD) | 57.27 ± 12.96 | 57.87 ± 13.67 | 0.927 | 47.88 ± 16.58 | 45.92 ± 17.37 | 0.393 |
| PMI (hours, mean ± SD) | 43.11 ± 17.74 | 42.93 ± 12.81 | 0.798 | 42.08 ± 13.89 | 41.71 ± 13.87 | 0.920 |
| Brain pH (mean ± SD) | 6.34 ± 0.23 | 6.18 ± 0.27 | 0.059 | 6.33 ± 0.21 | 6.26 ± 0.25 | 0.050 |
| History (years, mean ± SD) | – | 24.64 ± 14.25 | – | – | 18.41 ± 14.38 | – |
| CPz.eq (mean ± SD) | – | 706.3 ± 457.8 | – | – | 620.5 ± 575.2 | – |
| Suicide ( | 0 | 3 | – | 1 | 44 | – |
aSamples for lipid analysis.
bSamples for gene expression analyses.
Con, control; CPz.eq, chlorpromazine equivalents; SZ, schizophrenia.
Figure 1Analysis of lipidomic data from patients with schizophrenia and controls. (A) Cluster analysis of lipids with a PLS-DA VIP scores > 1.0. Each column represents a sample, and each row represents a lipid. The color indicates the relative lipid contents of each group. Green and red marks represent controls (Con) and patients with schizophrenia (SZ), respectively. *The existence of other molecular species at the same m/z and retention time. The possibility that control no. 2 was an outlier could not be ruled out. (B) Selection of lipids that can help differentiate between the schizophrenia and control samples. The x-axis and y-axis represent the P values of Mann–Whitney U test and VIP score, respectively. Red marks indicate selected lipids (Mann–Whitney U test, P < 0.05 and PLS-DA VIP score > 1.0) which differentiate between schizophrenia and control. (C) ROC curve to plot the performance of the combination of selected 17 lipids. The x-axis and y-axis represent 1-specificity and sensitivity, respectively. The AUC is shown with 95% confidence limits. (D) Enrichment analysis of the fatty acid side chain(s) of selected lipids that can discriminate between the schizophrenia and control samples. The x-axis represents the log10 of the P values of enriched terms, calculated by Fisher’s exact test.
Expression levels of lipid metabolism-related genes in the corpus callosum
| Gene | Con | SZ | Fold-change |
| FDR q value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 0.979 | 0.246 | 87 | 0.938 | 0.255 | 90 | 0.96 | 0.2057 | 0.2160 |
|
| 1.038 | 0.326 | 87 | 0.898 | 0.262 | 90 | 0.86 | 0.0030** | 0.0074†† |
|
| 0.878 | 0.313 | 85 | 0.806 | 0.255 | 92 | 0.92 | 0.1896 | 0.2144 |
|
| 1.011 | 0.254 | 88 | 1.015 | 0.233 | 91 | 1.00 | 0.9616 | 0.7067 |
|
| 1.060 | 0.428 | 85 | 0.764 | 0.430 | 91 | 0.72 | <0.0001**** | <0.0001†††† |
|
| 0.876 | 0.501 | 80 | 0.947 | 0.668 | 82 | 1.08 | 0.9049 | 0.7001 |
|
| 0.816 | 0.425 | 86 | 0.694 | 0.377 | 90 | 0.85 | 0.0327* | 0.0686‡ |
|
| 1.100 | 0.427 | 88 | 0.766 | 0.415 | 94 | 0.70 | <0.0001**** | <0.0001†††† |
|
| 0.821 | 0.523 | 85 | 0.716 | 0.548 | 91 | 0.87 | 0.0424* | 0.0693‡ |
|
| 0.987 | 0.316 | 85 | 0.811 | 0.289 | 89 | 0.82 | <0.0001**** | 0.0004††† |
|
| 0.979 | 0.179 | 84 | 0.949 | 0.172 | 89 | 0.97 | 0.4391 | 0.4035 |
|
| 1.099 | 0.128 | 84 | 1.012 | 0.165 | 91 | 0.92 | 0.0002*** | 0.0007††† |
|
| 1.067 | 0.109 | 85 | 1.061 | 0.119 | 92 | 0.99 | 0.5985 | 0.4888 |
|
| 0.982 | 0.136 | 84 | 0.951 | 0.136 | 90 | 0.97 | 0.1094 | 0.1462 |
|
| 1.086 | 0.262 | 86 | 0.915 | 0.255 | 90 | 0.84 | <0.0001**** | 0.0004††† |
|
| 1.000 | 0.129 | 81 | 1.039 | 0.177 | 91 | 1.04 | 0.1321 | 0.1618 |
|
| 1.025 | 0.277 | 88 | 0.977 | 0.277 | 93 | 0.95 | 0.2638 | 0.2585 |
|
| 0.977 | 0.406 | 86 | 0.844 | 0.306 | 90 | 0.86 | 0.0390* | 0.0693‡ |
|
| 0.870 | 0.259 | 85 | 0.855 | 0.273 | 91 | 0.98 | 0.5542 | 0.4792 |
|
| 0.892 | 0.341 | 87 | 0.818 | 0.340 | 91 | 0.92 | 0.0802 | 0.1178 |
|
| 0.935 | 0.233 | 86 | 0.970 | 0.258 | 92 | 1.04 | 0.2992 | 0.1571 |
|
| 1.301 | 0.226 | 85 | 1.173 | 0.200 | 92 | 0.90 | 0.0001*** | 0.0001††† |
Values were normalized to GAPDH.*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, †q < 0.05, †††q < 0.001, ††††q < 0.0001, ‡q < 0.1, §Mann–Whitney U test
Candidate transcription factors that potentially bind to the promotor regions of all or more than 5 lipid metabolism-related genes
| Gene symbol | Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| No. of genes regulated by TF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Kruppel like factor 6 | 24 | 16 | 9 | 5 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 10 | 16 | 10/10 |
|
| GTF2I repeat domain-containing 1 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 9/10 |
|
| Transcription factor AP-2 alpha | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9/10 |
|
| Churchill domain containing 1 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 8/10 |
|
| Kruppel-like factor 4 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 8/10 |
|
| Aryl hydrocarbon receptor | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8/10 |
|
| Nuclear factor of activated T cells 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 7/10 |
|
| Inhibitor of growth family member 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7/10 |
|
| Zinc finger and BTB domain containing 14 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 7/10 |
|
| Zinc finger protein 333 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 13 | 4 | 7/10 |
|
| Cone-rod homeobox | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 6/10 |
|
| Myeloid zinc finger 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6/10 |
|
| IKAROS family zinc finger 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5/10 |
|
| Myogenin | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5/10 |
The numbers indicate the number of putative binding sites in the promotor region of each gene.
TF, transcription factor.
Expression levels of transcription factors in the corpus callosum
| Gene | Con | SZ | Fold-change |
| FDR q value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD |
| Mean | SD |
| (SZ/Con) | |||
|
| 0.949 | 0.283 | 86 | 0.841 | 0.246 | 89 | 0.89 | 0.0079** | 0.0167† |
|
| 0.984 | 0.229 | 91 | 0.972 | 0.187 | 88 | 0.99 | 0.9673 | 0.6250 |
|
| 0.994 | 0.265 | 90 | 0.908 | 0.245 | 93 | 0.91 | 0.0353* | 0.0423† |
|
| 0.952 | 0.160 | 86 | 0.940 | 0.140 | 92 | 0.99 | 0.6190 | 0.4773 |
|
| 0.964 | 0.520 | 89 | 0.714 | 0.420 | 90 | 0.74 | 0.0004*** | 0.0010†† |
|
| 0.956 | 0.214 | 89 | 0.946 | 0.218 | 90 | 0.99 | 0.7131 | 0.4992 |
|
| 1.025 | 0.253 | 86 | 0.868 | 0.263 | 91 | 0.85 | 0.0003*** | 0.0010†† |
|
| 0.972 | 0.251 | 88 | 0.915 | 0.240 | 90 | 0.94 | 0.1383 | 0.1291 |
|
| 0.946 | 0.318 | 85 | 0.836 | 0.359 | 91 | 0.88 | 0.0101* | 0.0170† |
|
| 0.992 | 0.144 | 84 | 1.044 | 0.173 | 90 | 1.05 | 0.0347* | 0.0423† |
|
| 1.047 | 0.223 | 88 | 1.030 | 0.237 | 91 | 0.98 | 0.6251 | 0.4773 |
|
| 1.064 | 0.443 | 86 | 0.748 | 0.417 | 90 | 0.70 | <0.0001**** | <0.0001†††† |
|
| 0.797 | 0.382 | 86 | 0.711 | 0.413 | 88 | 0.89 | 0.0510 | 0.0536 |
Values were normalized to GAPDH.
* P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, †q < 0.05, †††q < 0.001, ††††q < 0.0001, §Mann–Whitney U test
Figure 2Interactions among identified schizophrenia-related genes. (A) Correlations between lipid metabolism-related genes, transcription factors, and cellular markers are displayed in a circle. The larger the absolute value of the correlation coefficient between two genes, the more the line connecting the genes is placed in front and in red color. (B) Predicted schizophrenia-related gene expression network by ingenuity pathway analysis. Transcription factors, lipid metabolism-related genes, and CSF1R dysregulated in schizophrenia are highlighted in blue, orange, and yellow, respectively. Each interaction is supported by at least one literature reference.
Expression levels of cell marker genes in the corpus callosum
| Gene | Con | SZ | Fold-change |
| FDR q value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD |
| Mean | SD |
| (SZ/Con) | |||
|
| 1.076 | 0.514 | 88 | 0.659 | 0.434 | 93 | 0.61 | <0.0001**** | <0.0001†††† |
|
| 1.135 | 0.509 | 89 | 0.736 | 0.443 | 93 | 0.65 | <0.0001**** | <0.0001†††† |
|
| 0.806 | 0.375 | 84 | 0.710 | 0.296 | 91 | 0.88 | 0.1127 | 0.3157 |
|
| 0.908 | 0.311 | 86 | 0.880 | 0.331 | 92 | 0.97 | 0.6037 | 0.5634 |
|
| 0.932 | 0.298 | 87 | 0.875 | 0.324 | 92 | 0.94 | 0.2796 | 0.5634 |
|
| 1.081 | 0.321 | 87 | 1.141 | 0.399 | 93 | 1.06 | 0.4418 | 0.5634 |
|
| 0.954 | 0.253 | 88 | 0.926 | 0.233 | 91 | 0.97 | 0.4554 | 0.5634 |
|
| 1.042 | 0.288 | 86 | 1.010 | 0.266 | 90 | 0.97 | 0.5997 | 0.5634 |
|
| 1.270 | 0.671 | 90 | 1.360 | 0.724 | 89 | 1.07 | 0.5712 | 0.5634 |
|
| 1.019 | 0.271 | 88 | 1.018 | 0.279 | 91 | 1.00 | 0.8782 | 0.7377 |
Values were normalized to GAPDH.
**** P < 0.0001, ††††q < 0.0001, §Mann–Whitney U test.
Figure 3Expression levels of CSF1R and correlations between the expression levels of CSF1R and microglial markers in the corpora callosa of patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls (A) Box and whisker plots of the expression levels of CSF1R (Con, n = 85; SZ, n = 90). GAPDH was used as an internal control. The horizontal line in the box represents the median value, and the + represents the mean. Whiskers represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, and dots represent outliers. ****P < 0.0001. (B, C) Spearman’s correlation coefficients describing the relationships between the expression levels of CSF1R and microglial markers, AIF1 (B) and CD68 (C). Open circles (left panel) and closed circles (right panel) indicate controls and patients with schizophrenia, respectively.
Expression levels of inflammation cytokines in the corpus callosum
| Gene | Con | SZ | Fold-change | Mann–Whitney | FDR | ANCOVA with brain pH as covariate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | n | Mean | SD | n | (SZ/Con) |
| |||
|
| 0.591 | 0.720 | 90 | 0.383 | 0.386 | 91 | 0.65 | 0.0002*** | 0.0002††† | – |
|
| 0.816 | 0.533 | 87 | 0.672 | 0.478 | 91 | 0.82 | 0.0402* | 0.0281† | 0.1282 |
|
| 0.584 | 0.629 | 89 | 0.910 | 1.125 | 91 | 1.56 | 0.2692 | 0.1413 | – |
|
| 1.023 | 0.320 | 85 | 0.766 | 0.327 | 91 | 0.75 | <0.0001**** | <0.0001†††† | – |
Values were normalized to GAPDH.
* P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, †q < 0.05, †††q < 0.001, ††††q < 0.0001.
Figure 4Potential mechanism of corpus callosum abnormality development in schizophrenia. In schizophrenia, reduced and dysfunctional microglial cells result in abnormal cross-talk with oligodendrocytes via mediators such as IL1B and TGFB1. This leads to transcriptional perturbation caused by impaired schizophrenia-related gene network including NFATC2 and CSF1R, resulting in abnormal lipid metabolism. This disturbs the normal properties and functions of oligodendrocytes and the myelin sheath, causing structural and functional deficits in the corpus callosum.
Expression levels of transcription factors, microglial markers, inflammation cytokines, and CSF1R in the BA8
| Genes | Con | SZ | Fold-change |
| FDR q value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD |
| Mean | SD |
| (SZ/Con) | |||
|
| 1.079 | 0.309 | 90 | 1.053 | 0.286 | 91 | 0.976 | 0.5209 | 0.7520 |
|
| 0.846 | 0.616 | 87 | 0.978 | 0.875 | 92 | 1.156 | 0.4466 | 0.7369 |
|
| 0.954 | 0.576 | 88 | 0.949 | 0.535 | 90 | 0.995 | 0.9093 | 0.8832 |
|
| 0.973 | 0.149 | 89 | 1.039 | 0.223 | 91 | 1.067 | 0.0421* | 0.1620 |
|
| 1.006 | 0.130 | 87 | 0.997 | 0.159 | 89 | 0.991 | 0.5957 | 0.7644 |
|
| 1.115 | 0.485 | 89 | 1.013 | 0.521 | 91 | 0.909 | 0.0813 | 0.1878 |
|
| 0.969 | 0.313 | 89 | 1.042 | 0.485 | 91 | 1.076 | 0.8211 | 0.8832 |
|
| 1.112 | 0.437 | 87 | 0.885 | 0.480 | 92 | 0.795 | 0.0009*** | 0.0100† |
|
| 1.020 | 0.412 | 87 | 0.920 | 0.472 | 91 | 0.902 | 0.0632 | 0.1824 |
|
| 0.760 | 0.954 | 89 | 0.675 | 1.320 | 91 | 0.888 | 0.0105* | 0.0604‡ |
|
| 1.007 | 0.315 | 88 | 1.078 | 0.493 | 92 | 1.071 | 0.9176 | 0.8832 |
|
| 0.862 | 0.368 | 87 | 0.826 | 0.427 | 90 | 0.958 | 0.3978 | 0.7369 |
Values were normalized to GAPDH.
* P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, †q < 0.05, ‡q < 0.1, §Mann–Whitney U test.