| Literature DB >> 32923785 |
Gopi Kalaiyarasan1, James Joseph2, Pankaj Kumar1.
Abstract
Carbon quantum dots (CQDs), a novel fluorescent nanomaterial, have been extensively employed/explored in various applications, that is, biosensors, bioimaging, nanomedicine, therapeutics, photocatalysis, electrocatalysis, energy storage system, and so forth. In this study, we report the synthesis, characterization, and the application of phosphorus-doped CQDs (PCQDs), synthesized using trisodium citrate and phosphoric acid by the hydrothermal method. The effect of phosphorus doping on optical features and the formation of PCQDs have been explored elaborately by controlling the concentrations of precursors, reaction time, and the temperature. The fluorescent quantum yield for PCQDs was determined to be 16.1% at an excitation/emission wavelength of 310/440 nm. Also, the optical and structural properties of PCQDs were determined by using various spectroscopic and microscopic techniques. Static quenching of fluorescence was determined upon the addition of Fe3+ to PCQDs because of the formation of the fluorescent inactive complex (PCQDs-Fe3+). Hence, this chemistry leads to the development of a new fluorometric assay for the detection of Fe3+. The lower limit of Fe3+ detection is determined to be 9.5 nM (3σ/slope), with the linear fit from 20 nM to 3.0 μM (R 2 = 0.99). We have validated this new assay in the raw, ejected, and purified water samples of the RO plant by the standard addition method. These results suggest the possibility of developing a new commercial assay for Fe3+ detection in blood, urine, and various industrial waste and sewage water samples. Furthermore, recycling the pollutant water into the freshwater using filters that consist of PCQDs offers a great deal.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32923785 PMCID: PMC7482302 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c02627
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Scheme 1Schematic Representation of the Formation of PCQDs
Figure 1(a) Normalized UV–vis absorbance spectra of different PCQDs, (b) PL spectra of various PCQDs at an excitation wavelength of 310 nm, (c) and (d) PL spectra of PCQD 3 and PCQD 11 at different excitation wavelengths ranging from 240 to 440 nm with an interval of 10 nm.
Experimental Condition for the Synthesis of PCQDs with Fluorescence QY
| concentration, M | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| name | TSC | H3PO4 | ratio | time, h | temperature, °C | QY, % |
| PCQD 1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1:1 | 12 | 80 | 0.2 |
| PCQD 2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1:1 | 12 | 110 | 0.7 |
| PCQD 3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1:1 | 12 | 140 | 16.1 |
| PCQD 4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1:1 | 12 | 170 | 6.6 |
| PCQD 5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1:1 | 12 | 200 | 1.3 |
| PCQD 6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1:1 | 6 | 140 | 1.0 |
| PCQD 7 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1:1 | 18 | 140 | 9.1 |
| PCQD 8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1:1 | 24 | 140 | 2.5 |
| PCQD 9 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 1:2 | 12 | 140 | 2.7 |
| PCQD 10 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 2:1 | 12 | 140 | 2.1 |
| PCQD 11 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1:3 | 12 | 140 | 9.1 |
| PCQD 12 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 3:1 | 12 | 140 | 1.0 |
Figure 2(a) UV–vis absorbance, (b) PL spectra of PCQDs at pH 2.0 and 12.0, (c) fluorescence decay curve of PCQDs before and after the addition of 5 μM of Fe3+, (d) fluorescence intensity vs time plot for the stability of PCQDs at an excitation/emission wavelength of 310/440 nm.
Figure 3Deconvoluted high-resolution P(2p), C(1s), and O(1s) XP spectra of (a–c) PCQD 1, (d–f) PCQD 3, (g–i) PCQD 11, and (j–l) PCQDssp.
Figure 4(a) TEM image and (b) SAED pattern of PCQDs. The inset of (a) shows the normal distribution histogram for the sizes of PCQDs.
Figure 5(a) PL spectra of PCQDs in the presence/absence of Fe3+ ion concentration ranging from 20 nM to 16 μM and its (b) Stern–Volmer plot, (c) PL intensities of PCQDs in the presence/absence of 500 μM of various metal ions and 5 μM of Fe3+ ions at an excitation/emission wavelength of 310/440 nm.
List of Materials, Methods, Linearity, LOD, and Real Sample Analyses for the Detection of Fe3+
| sr. no. | method | materials | linear range, (M) | LOD, (M) | real sample analysis | advantages | disadvantages | references |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | fluorimetric | nitrogen-doped carbon dots | 1.0 × 10–8 to 1.0 × 10–5 | 5.0 × 10–9 | blood serum, water | high sensitivity, nontoxic | indistinguishable, Fe3+ from Fe2+ | ( |
| 2 | colorimetric | 5.0 × 10–8 to 1.2 × 10–5 | 1.2 × 10–8 | |||||
| 3 | fluorimetric | nitrogen-doped carbon dots | 5.0 × 10–7 to 1.0 × 10–3 | 7.9 × 10–8 | lake water | nontoxic | relatively poor selectivity | ( |
| 4 | colorimetric | ion-pair crystal violet cation/PVC | 4.0 × 10–8 | blood serum, water | high sensitivity, sample pretreatment not required | use of plastic, toxic | ( | |
| 5 | amperometric | PtNPs/PANI/MWCNT/GCE | 1.0 × 10–3 to 2.5 × 10–2 | 3.0 × 10–9 | polluted soil | inexpensive, rapid | sample pretreatment required | ( |
| 6 | fluorimetric | graphene quantum dots | 3.5 × 10–6 to 6.7 × 10–4 | 1.6 × 10–6 | tap water | inexpensive, selectivity | relatively poor sensitivity | ( |
| 7 | fluorimetric | gold nanoclusters | 5.0 × 10–6 to 1.3 × 10–3 | 3.5 × 10–6 | tap, lake water, tablets | good recovery in spiked real samples | relatively poor sensitivity, selectivity, expensive probe | ( |
| 8 | fluorimetric | gold nanoclusters | 5.0 × 10–6 to 2.0 × 10–3 | 2.0 × 10–6 | blood serum | selectivity, good accuracy | relatively poor sensitivity, expensive | ( |
| 9 | fluorimetric | Fe3O4@ZnO nanoparticles | 1.0 × 10–8 to 1.3 × 10–4 | 3.0 × 10–9 | blood serum, waste water | high sensitivity, good recovery | fluorescence not stable beyond pH 8.0 | ( |
| 10 | fluorimetric | Mg–Al layered double hydroxide | 7.0 × 10–8 to 1.0 × 10–4 | 2.6 × 10–8 | blood serum | selectivity, good recovery | multistep fabrication, sample pretreatment required | ( |
| 11 | fluorimetric | fluorescein-based aromatic framework | 5.0 × 10–5 to 2.0 × 10–4 | 3.8 × 10–5 | selectivity | short linearity, sensitivity | ( | |
| 12 | fluorimetric | MBTBA-Fe3O4@SiO2 nanocomposite | 1.9 × 10–9 to 1.1 × 10–7 | 1.6 × 10–8 | water | high sensitivity, good selectivity | multiple fluorescence may affect the detection | ( |
| 13 | fluorimetric | PCQDs | 2.0 × 10–8 to 3.0 × 10–6 | 9.5 × 10–9 | various water samples | high sensitivity, selectivity, nontoxic, inexpensive | store with care due to hygroscopic nature | this work |
Figure 6Deconvoluted high-resolution XPS spectra of (a) P(2p), (b) C(1s), (c) O(1s), and (d) Fe(2p) of the PCQDs–Fe3+ complex.
Figure 7(a) TEM image, EDXS color mapping of (b) carbon, (c) oxygen, (d) phosphorus, and (e) iron, (f) overlapped image of (b–e) of the PCQDs–Fe3+ complex.