| Literature DB >> 32923777 |
Hicham Abou Oualid1, Youness Abdellaoui2, Mohamed Laabd3, Mahmoud El Ouardi1,4, Younes Brahmi5, Mohamed Iazza6, Jaouad Abou Oualid6.
Abstract
Biosorption using naturEntities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32923777 PMCID: PMC7482234 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c02311
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 2(A) General growth form of the plant on the rocky coast. (B) Ramification type. (C) Cross section of the apical branch: (M) medullary region, (C) cortex region. (D) Part of the urticle. (E,F) Urticles with gametangia (Gn) and pedicel (P).
Figure 3SEM micrographs of CDA at different scales: (a) 80×, (b) 130×, (c) 1000×, and (d) 2500× μm.
Figure 4(a) Analyzed SEM micrograph and (b) elemental distribution by EDS analysis of CDA.
Figure 5(a) FTIR analysis of dried CDA. (b) TGA and (c) DTG analysis of CDA before and after biosorption of CV and CR dyes.
DTG Details of CDA before and after Biosorption of CV and CR
| material | 1st loss temperature (°C) | 2nd stage loss temperature (°C) |
|---|---|---|
| CDA | 275 | |
| CDA@CR | 256 | 346 |
| CDA@CV | 254 | 344 |
Figure 6Point-of-zero charge (pHPZC) of CDA.
Figure 7Removal efficiencies for the CV and CR dyes on CDA at different pH values. Conditions: dye concentration = 20 mg/L; equilibrium time = 120 min; adsorbent dose =1 g/L; temperature = 25 °C.
Figure 8Removal efficiencies for the CV and CR dyes on CDA at different adsorbent dose values. Conditions: equilibrium time = 120 min; pH = 6; dye concentration = 20 mg/L; temperature = 25 °C.
Figure 9Biosorption kinetics of CV and CR dyes onto CDA. (a) Nonlinear curves of the PFO and PSO models and (b) multilinear plots of the IPD model. Conditions: dye concentration = 20 mg/L; pH = 6; adsorbent dose =1 g/L; temperature = 25 °C.
Constants of Kinetic Models for Biosorption of CV and CR Dyes on the CDA Biosorbent
| kinetic models | parameters | CV | CR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18.34 | 17.80 | ||
| pseudo-first-order | 0.999 | 0.994 | |
| 0.046 | 0.028 | ||
| 18.54 | 18.08 | ||
| pseudo-pseudo-order | 0.976 | 0.983 | |
| 0.0026 | 0.0014 | ||
| 21.40 | 21.55 | ||
| intraparticle diffusion | 2.579 | 3.429 | |
| 0.050 | 1.059 | ||
| 0.040 |
Figure 10Nonlinear regression of Langmuir and Freundlich models for CV and CR dye biosorption onto CDA. Conditions: equilibrium time = 120 min; pH = 6; adsorbent dose =1 g/L; temperature = 25 °C.
Equilibrium Parameters of Langmuir and Freundlich Isotherms for CV and CR Dye Uptake onto CDA
| isotherm | parameters | CV dye | CR dye |
|---|---|---|---|
| Langmuir | 0.986 | 0.984 | |
| 0.014 | 0.012 | ||
| 283.18 | 195.06 | ||
| 0.152 ≤ | 0.172 ≤ | ||
| Freundlich | 0.937 | 0.948 | |
| 1.41 | 1.43 | ||
| 5.79 | 3.63 |
Comparison between Maximum CV and CR Dye Uptake Capacities for CDA and Other Materials Available in the Literature
| maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| adsorbent | CV | CR | ref |
| 131.58 | ( | ||
| diatomite earth and carbon | 87.05 | ( | |
| bone char | 20.42 | ( | |
| chitosan aniline composite | 100.6 | ( | |
| peat | 8.16 | ( | |
| yeast-treated peat | 17.95 | ||
| tea dust | 175.4 | ( | |
| CS-NDIO | 104.66 | ( | |
| IKaol | 5.74 | ( | |
| DDAB-IKao | 83.0 | ||
| polyaniline | 250.01 | ( | |
| polypyrrole | 66.66 | ||
| PANi/Bi2WO6 | 142.92 | ( | |
| banana peel powder | 164.6 | ( | |
| Fe3O4@SiO2-Cu-BTC | 64.4 | ( | |
| natural clinoptilolite | 16.92 | ( | |
| modified clinoptilolite | 200 | ||
| ZnO nanoparticles | 71.4 | ( | |
| ZnCl2 activated carbon | 142.85 | 83.33 | ( |
| CDA | 278.36 | 191.01 | current work |
Figure 11Van’t Hoff plots for CV and CR dye uptake on the CDA suface.
Values of Thermodynamic Constants for CV and CR Dye Biosorption onto the CDA Biosorbent
| CV | CR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ΔH° (kJ/mol) | –2.742 | –4.941 | |
| ΔS° (J/mol·K) | 58.72 | 62.57 | |
| ΔG° (kJ/mol) | 298 K | –20.249 | –23.597 |
| 308 K | –20.837 | –24.222 | |
| 318 K | –21.424 | –24.848 | |
| 328 K | –22.011 | –25.474 | |
Effect of Eluent Concentration on the Regeneration Equilibrium Time and Desorption Performances of CV and CR Dyes
| dye | eluent concentration | desorption equilibrium time (min) | desorption performance (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CV | 0.1 M (HCl) | 120 | 83.46 |
| 0.5 M (HCl) | 60 | 94.15 | |
| 1 M (HCl) | 60 | 98.02 | |
| CR | 0.1 M (NaOH) | 120 | 74.82 |
| 0.5 M (NaOH) | 90 | 86.33 | |
| 1 M (NaOH) | 60 | 90.41 |
Figure 12Removal of CV and CR dyes by CDA up to the 4th cycle.
Figure 13(a) Main functional groups by FTIR spectroscopy analysis of CDA before and after biosorption of CV and CR dyes. (b) Schematic presentation of the biosorption mechanism.
ANOVA Results for CV and CR Dye Biosorption onto CDA
| response | source | sum of squares | degree of freedom | mean square | probability (prob > | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV dye removal | model | 7026.00 | 9 | 780.67 | 540.53 | <0.0001 (significant) |
| 826.41 | 1 | 826.41 | 572.20 | <0.0001 | ||
| 4128.68 | 1 | 4128.68 | 2858.67 | <0.0001 | ||
| 553.61 | 1 | 553.61 | 383.32 | <0.0001 | ||
| 0.29 | 1 | 0.29 | 0.2019 | 0.6668 | ||
| 18.97 | 1 | 18.97 | 13.13 | 0.0085 | ||
| 174.50 | 1 | 174.50 | 120.83 | <0.0001 | ||
| 35.16 | 1 | 35.16 | 24.35 | 0.0017 | ||
| 1234.41 | 1 | 1234.41 | 845.70 | <0.0001 | ||
| 9.22 | 1 | 9.22 | 6.38 | 0.0394 | ||
| residual | 10.11 | 7 | 1.44 | |||
| lack-of-fit | 9.79 | 3 | 3.26 | 40.94 | 0.0018 | |
| pure error | 0.32 | 4 | 0.08 | |||
| cor total | 7036.11 | 16 | ||||
| CR dye removal | model | 7677.99 | 9 | 853.11 | 79.62 | <0.0001 (significant) |
| 1348.62 | 1 | 1348.62 | 125.86 | <0.0001 | ||
| 3956.50 | 1 | 3956.50 | 369.25 | <0.0001 | ||
| 1507.01 | 1 | 1507.01 | 140.65 | <0.0001 | ||
| 2.04 | 1 | 2.04 | 0.19 | 0.6754 | ||
| 20.57 | 1 | 20.57 | 1.92 | 0.2085 | ||
| 87.89 | 1 | 87.89 | 8.20 | 0.0242 | ||
| 609.50 | 1 | 609.50 | 56.88 | 0.0001 | ||
| 92.16 | 1 | 92.16 | 8.60 | 0.0219 | ||
| 62.38 | 1 | 62.38 | 5.82 | 0.0466 | ||
| residual | 75.00 | 7 | 10.71 | |||
| lack-of-fit | 72.15 | 3 | 24.05 | 33.66 | 0.0027 | |
| pure error | 2.86 | 4 | 0.71 | |||
| cor total | 7753.00 | 16 | ||||
Figure 14Plots of actual versus predicted values of the removal efficiency for (a) CV and (b) CR dyes on the CDA.
Figure 153D surface plots illustrating binary combined effects of input variables on the dye decoloration percentage: (a) dye concentration and pH (CV); (b) dye concentration and pH (CR); (c) dye concentration and CDA dose (CV); (d) dye concentration and CDA dose (CR); (e) pH and CDA dose (CV) and (f) pH and CDA dose (CR).
Chemical Properties of CV and CR Dyes
Figure 1Process of biological material preparation.
Experimental Levels of Selected Influential Process Parameters and Three-Factor BBD Matrix for CV and CR Dye Removal
| | level | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| variable name | unit | lowest (−1) | middle (0) | highest (+1) |
| mg/L | 20 | 40 | 60 | |
| 4 | 7 | 10 | ||
| g/L | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | |