Friederike Reeßing1,2, Mafalda Bispo3, Marina López-Álvarez3, Marleen van Oosten3, Ben L Feringa1,2, Jan Maarten van Dijl3, Wiktor Szymański1,2. 1. Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen 9713GZ, The Netherlands. 2. Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, Groningen 9747 AG, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen 9713GZ, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Optical imaging of microbial infections, based on the detection of targeted fluorescent probes, offers high sensitivity and resolution with a relatively simple and portable setup. As the absorbance of near-infrared (NIR) light by human tissues is minimal, using respective tracers, such as IRdye800CW, enables imaging deeper target sites in the body. Herein, we present a general strategy for the conjugation of IRdye800CW and IRdye700DX to small molecules (vancomycin and amphotericin B) to provide conjugates targeted toward bacterial and fungal infections for optical imaging and photodynamic therapy. In particular, we present how the use of coupling agents (such as HBTU or HATU) leads to high yields (over 50%) in the reactions of amines and IRDye-NHS esters and how precipitation can be used as a convenient purification strategy to remove excess of the targeting molecule after the reaction. The high selectivity of the synthesized model compound Vanco-800CW has been proven in vitro, and the development of analogous agents opens up new possibilities for diagnostic and theranostic purposes. In times of increasing microbial resistance, this research gives us access to a platform of new fluorescent tracers for the imaging of infections, enabling early diagnosis and respective treatment.
Optical imaging of microbial infections, based on the detection of targeted fluorescent probes, offers high sensitivity and resolution with a relatively simple and portable setup. As the absorbance of near-infrared (NIR) light by human tissues is minimal, using respective tracers, such as IRdye800CW, enables imaging deeper target sites in the body. Herein, we present a general strategy for the conjugation of IRdye800CW and IRdye700DX to small molecules (vancomycin and amphotericin B) to provide conjugates targeted toward bacterial and fungal infections for optical imaging and photodynamic therapy. In particular, we present how the use of coupling agents (such as HBTU or HATU) leads to high yields (over 50%) in the reactions of amines and IRDye-NHS esters and how precipitation can be used as a convenient purification strategy to remove excess of the targeting molecule after the reaction. The high selectivity of the synthesized model compound Vanco-800CW has been proven in vitro, and the development of analogous agents opens up new possibilities for diagnostic and theranostic purposes. In times of increasing microbial resistance, this research gives us access to a platform of new fluorescent tracers for the imaging of infections, enabling early diagnosis and respective treatment.
Molecular imaging[1−4] plays a crucial role in modern medicine, and several imaging methods
are routinely applied in the clinic for diagnosis and monitoring of
disease progression and treatment efficacy or for guiding surgical
interventions. These methods include tomographic imaging, e.g., magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), or computed
tomography (CT), which offer the advantage of whole-body imaging but
are limited by different factors, like poor temporal resolution due
to post-acquisition image reconstruction, application of hazardous
radiation (PET), or limited choice of targeted contrast agents (CT
and MRI).[5] Conversely, fluorescence-based
optical imaging overcomes these drawbacks by enabling real-time, high-resolution
visualization in the absence of damaging radiation. Moreover, it stands
out due to its economical and straightforward usage.[6]Optical imaging (OI) relies on the detection of fluorescent
probes
after their excitation with light of an appropriate wavelength using
a fluorescence camera.[7] However, absorption
and scattering of the excitation and emitted light in biological tissues
limit the possible imaging depth.[8] Since
these effects are less pronounced for red or near-infrared (NIR) light,
the development of respective dyes enhances the imaging depth and
has led to the successful use of OI for different applications, such
as image-guided surgery,[9−13] endoscopy,[14−16] and pathology.[17−19] The first clinically approved
NIR dyes[20] were indocyanine green (ICG)
and methylene blue (MB), but a variety of molecules and nanoparticles
are currently being tested in clinical studies to implement agents
with improved absorptivity or fluorescence quantum yields at even
higher wavelengths or targeted agents, enabling selective imaging
of important biomarkers.[10,14,21−24] Among those, the NIR dye IRdye800CW[25−30] has shown great promise in clinical translation.IRdye800CW
shows a sharp absorption band at λmax = 774–778
nm, high fluorescence quantum yield,[5] and
low nonspecific binding to cellular components.[31] It is mostly applied for the creation of targeted
OI agents in which it is conjugated to molecules that enable its selective
accumulation at the disease spot. This is most prominently exemplified
by proteins. Different antibody-IRdye800CW conjugates show truly promising
results in clinical studies for intraoperative imaging.[19]While the conjugation to macromolecules
has been thoroughly researched
and optimized,[1] the coupling to small molecules
is still rather unexplored. However, synthetic accessibility, stability,
and lower price are substantial advantages of small molecules as targeting
moieties. This is further highlighted by their capacity to provide
well-defined molecular architectures of the final luminescent conjugates
due to the limited number of possible conjugation sites.[32] However, the reports on small molecule-IRDye800CW
conjugates are scarce, and they involve usually simple molecules,
such as vorinostat,[33] 2-deoxyglucose,[34] NOTA chelator,[35] prostate-specific
membrane antigen ligands,[36,37] and simple peptides.[38] To the best of our knowledge, there is only
one report describing a targeted small molecule-IRdye800CW conjugate
for OI that would use a multifunctional structure as a starting point,
namely, vancomycin-IRDye800CW (Vanco-800CW). This molecule was designed
and evaluated for the imaging of infections with Gram-positive bacteria,
showing that it is possible to label the antibiotic vancomycin without
abolishing the binding affinity to its bacterial target.[39]General challenges in labeling small molecules
with IRdye800CW
are the control over the selectivity of modification in a complex
molecular context of the target molecule and the need for nonstandard
reaction conditions and purification methods due to the high polarity
of the dye. To facilitate the development of conjugates for OI, we
introduce here an optimized procedure for the synthesis and facile
purification of small molecule conjugates of IRdye800CW, taking Vanco-800CW
(compound 1) as a reference compound and expanding it
toward other small molecule targets and dyes (compounds 2–4; Figure ), which are potential fluorescent tracers for bacterial
(2) and fungal (3) infections and antimicrobial
photodynamic therapy (aPDT) agents (4). Moreover, we
provide a thorough analysis of the synthesized conjugates, revealing
a revised structure for Vanco-800CW.
Figure 1
(a) Molecular structures of the synthesized
targeted optical imaging
agents: Vanco-800CW (1), Vanco-FL-800CW (2), Ampho-800CW (3), and Vanco-700DX (4).
(b) General synthetic procedure.
(a) Molecular structures of the synthesized
targeted optical imaging
agents: Vanco-800CW (1), Vanco-FL-800CW (2), Ampho-800CW (3), and Vanco-700DX (4).
(b) General synthetic procedure.
Results
and Discussion
With the aim to establish a synthetic method
for conjugation of
IRdye800CW and related IR dyes with small targeting molecules, which
could be easily performed in a standard (bio-) chemistry lab, we started
by exploring the published procedure for the coupling of IRdye800CW-NHS
ester with vancomycin.[39] We were particularly
interested in establishing reaction conditions that are easily reproducible
also on a small scale since often only minimal amounts of the respective
products are required for, e.g., screening of different conjugates,
and the dye molecules are generally quite expensive. The published
method describes the synthesis of Vanco-800CW from IRdye800CW-NHS
ester and vancomycin hydrochloride hydrate in the presence of N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) in DMSO.
The use of organic solvent ensures the solubility of both the dye
and the final conjugate. Furthermore, the primary amine of vancomycin
has been proposed as the conjugation site, while it is important to
point out the presence of a secondary amine that could also potentially
act as a nucleophile in the reaction with IRdye800CW-NHS ester (vide infra). Unfortunately, in our hands, the reported procedure
did not yield the desired compound but resulted in hydrolysis of the
NHS ester (Table ,
entry 1). A possible explanation for this outcome is the presence
of water in DMSO since already small amounts can cause hydrolysis,
and we did not take additional precautions to assure dry reaction
conditions. Inspired by conditions optimized for labeling antibodies
with IRdye800CW-NHS ester,[40] we explored
how the reaction proceeds in phosphate buffer at different pH values
(Table , entries 2
and 3). The data presented in Table shows that, at pH > 7.3, hydrolysis is the prevalent
process and no product is formed. In contrast, the reaction in a buffered
medium at pH 6.5–7 gave conversion to 1 but in
a low yield. Aiming to improve this result, we assessed the influence
of different buffer strengths and equivalents of vancomycin on the
reaction outcome (Table , entry 4). It is important to note that the cost of the dye exceeds
that of the antibiotic by several orders of magnitude, which motivates
the use of the latter in excess to promote the conjugation. It was
found that addition of ca. 13 eq of vancomycin boosts conversion,
but additional escalation did not improve it further. Likewise, different
buffer strengths did not have any significant effects on the product
formation. Under all conditions tested, hydrolysis of the NHS ester
to the free acid was the competing reaction.
Table 1
Screened
Reaction Conditions for the
Synthesis of Conjugate 1a
entry
solvent(s)
pH/base
equivalents
of vancomycin
coupling
reagent
conversionb
1
DMSO
DIPEA
2.4
2
DMSO/phosphate buffer (20
mm)
>7.3
2.4
3
DMSO/phosphate buffer (20
mm)
6.5–7
12.4
<10%
4
DMSO/phosphate
buffer (10–1000 mm)
6.95
2.4–24.7
<10%
5
DMSO
DBU (5–13 eq)
13
6
DMSO
DIPEA (13
eq)
13
EDC or DIC
7
DMSO
DIPEA (13
eq)
13
HATU or HBTU
50 −73%
8
DMSO
DIPEA (13 eq)
13
HOBt
11%
Entry 1 presents the published conditions.[39] The reaction medium (DMSO/phosphate buffer),
the base, and equivalents of vancomycin and additives were varied,
leading to entry 7 as the optimized conditions.
The conversion to product 1 was assessed
by analysis of the HPLC trace recorded at 760
nm (see the Supporting Information for
details).
Entry 1 presents the published conditions.[39] The reaction medium (DMSO/phosphate buffer),
the base, and equivalents of vancomycin and additives were varied,
leading to entry 7 as the optimized conditions.The conversion to product 1 was assessed
by analysis of the HPLC trace recorded at 760
nm (see the Supporting Information for
details).To tackle this
problem, we screened different coupling reagents
that would facilitate the formation of the desired amide bond from
the acid liberated upon hydrolysis (Table , entries 6–8).[41] Addition of the commonly used carbodiimide-based coupling
reagents 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) and N,N′-diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIC)
to the reaction mixture containing the substrates and DIPEA in DMSO
did not lead to the desired result (Table , entry 6), whereas 1-[bis(dimethylamino)methylene]-1H-1,2,3-triazolo[4,5-b]pyridinium 3-oxide hexafluorophosphate
(HATU) or (2-(1H-benzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium
hexafluorophosphate (HBTU) successfully provided up to 73% conversion
to 1 (Table , entry 7). Interestingly, we observed that the already hydrolyzed
NHS ester was not consumed in the course of the reaction. Furthermore,
we did not observe the formation of the vancomycin dimer, which could
emerge as a result of the reaction of the amine group in one antibiotic
molecule with the coupling agent-activated carboxylic group in another
molecule. Accordingly, HATU and HBTU did not seem to function as coupling
reagents but rather to promote the product formation in a different
manner. In contrast to EDC and DIC, HATU and HBTU comprise a 1-hydroxybenzotriazole
(HOBt) moiety, which is known to act as a nucleophilic catalyst for
acyl transfer reactions.[41] Therefore, we
were curious to explore the effect of using only HOBt in the conjugation
reaction (Table ,
entry 8). Remarkably, HOBt did not promote amide formation to the
same extent. Considering these results, we attribute the efficient
formation of the product in the HATU- and HBTU-mediated reactions
to their solvent drying effect, which minimizes the competing hydrolysis
of the NHS ester and favors the conversion to the product. We have
further established that, in those reactions, the order of addition
of the reactants does not influence the reaction outcome and no special
instrumental setup or expensive nonstandard chemicals are required.
Moreover, it should be emphasized that the reaction does not need
to be carried out under strict anhydrous conditions, making this procedure
easily reproducible. It has to be noted, however, that substrate concentration
plays an important role and dilution of the reaction mixture substantially
slows down the chemical conversion (see below).Next, we proceeded
with the purification of compound 1. The method of choice
for such highly complex and polar compounds
is usually the purification by (semi-) preparative reversed-phase
high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), which is often very
inefficient regarding time and isolated yields.
Hence, we were pleased to achieve a first and straightforward purification
step by addition of an excess of water to the reaction mixture, resulting
in the precipitation of the conjugate, while most of the vancomycin
used in excess in the reaction remained in the solution (Figure ). This measure allowed
a much more efficient removal of the remaining impurities by semipreparative
HPLC. Subsequently, the newly synthesized Vanco-800CW was analyzed
by ultraperformance liquid chromatography−mass spectrometry
(UPLC-MS) and UV–vis
spectrometry to assess its purity and identity, as illustrated in Figure .
Figure 2
Analytical data for the
synthesis and evaluation of Vanco-800CW
(1). (a) UPLC-MS traces (TIC), collected after addition
of water to the reaction mixture, of the supernatant (top), pellet
(middle), and HPLC-purified product (bottom). Peak A corresponds to
vancomycin, and peak B corresponds to Vanco-800CW. (b) Mass spectrum
corresponding to Vanco-800CW (compound 1, peak B from
panel a). (c) UV–vis absorption spectra for
Vanco-800CW (1), (d) IRdye800CW NHS ester, and (e) vancomycin
hydrochloride (2.8 μM, 1% DMSO in water). In panel (c), distinct
bands at λmax = 776 and 232 nm are observed, which
are also present in the spectrum of IRdye800CW NHS ester (λmax = 776 nm, spectrum d) and vancomycin (λmax = 232 nm, spectrum e).
Analytical data for the
synthesis and evaluation of Vanco-800CW
(1). (a) UPLC-MS traces (TIC), collected after addition
of water to the reaction mixture, of the supernatant (top), pellet
(middle), and HPLC-purified product (bottom). Peak A corresponds to
vancomycin, and peak B corresponds to Vanco-800CW. (b) Mass spectrum
corresponding to Vanco-800CW (compound 1, peak B from
panel a). (c) UV–vis absorption spectra for
Vanco-800CW (1), (d) IRdye800CW NHS ester, and (e) vancomycin
hydrochloride (2.8 μM, 1% DMSO in water). In panel (c), distinct
bands at λmax = 776 and 232 nm are observed, which
are also present in the spectrum of IRdye800CW NHS ester (λmax = 776 nm, spectrum d) and vancomycin (λmax = 232 nm, spectrum e).The molecular structure
of vancomycin
bears two amine functionalities—a
primary one on the sugar moiety and a secondary one at the peptide N-terminus—that could possibly undergo the reaction
with an NHS ester to form an amide (Figure a). Generally, coupling to the secondary
amine is more efficient[42] due to its higher
nucleophilicity. Moreover, the fact that the primary amine is positioned
at a tetra-substituted carbon atom increases steric hindrance and
thus impedes reaction at this position. To assess which amine reacts
to form the conjugate, we investigated the identity of the synthesized
product 1 using high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry
(HRMS-MS) (Figure b). Remarkably, the detected fragments correspond to Vanco-800CW
after the loss of one or both sugar moieties, revealing that the dye
is coupled to the secondary amine instead of the primary one, as opposed
to what was suggested in the earlier report.[39] Importantly, the fragmentation that leads to the loss of sugar units
in tandem MS is a common phenomenon, often applied in oligosaccharide
sequence analysis.[43] It remains unclear
what the exact structure of the originally published compound is due
to lacking access to respective analytical data and the fact that
small changes in reaction conditions may influence the regioselectivity,
as shown in an early publication by Staroske and Williams.[44] Of note, an alternative strategy for precise
labeling of vancomycin for imaging purposes, which relies on the thiol–maleimide
reaction, has been published recently.[45]
Figure 3
Structure
determination of 1. (a) Molecular structure
of synthesized compound 1 and of Vanco-800CW published
in the literature.[39] (b) Fragment ions
detected by HRMS-MS correspond to the conjugate of IRdye800CW with
vancomycin after loss of one or both sugar moieties.
Structure
determination of 1. (a) Molecular structure
of synthesized compound 1 and of Vanco-800CW published
in the literature.[39] (b) Fragment ions
detected by HRMS-MS correspond to the conjugate of IRdye800CW with
vancomycin after loss of one or both sugar moieties.With the purified conjugate in hand, we performed a biological
evaluation to confirm that the newly synthesized regioisomer of 1 shows the same binding affinity toward Gram-positive bacteria
as the earlier reported conjugate. Staphylococcal biofilms, composed of either a Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolate or Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC, were established on the surface of 18 mm chemically resistant
borosilicate glass coverslips. Escherichia coli ATCC was used as a Gram-negative control since vancomycin is known
to target only Gram-positive bacteria.[39] The biofilms were then incubated with Vanco-800CW, and images were
acquired with a fluorescence microscope. As shown in Figure a, Vanco-800CW is capable of
binding to both S. aureus and S. epidermidis with similar affinity. As predicted,
no binding was observed to E. coli,
supporting the view that vancomycin modified with the IRdye800CW retains
its binding selectivity and molecular target. Moreover, a control
experiment with S. epidermidis showed
that the IRdye800CW-carboxylic acid without a targeting moiety does
not bind to Gram-positive bacteria, excluding the unselective staining
(Figure S17).
Figure 4
In vitro detection of bacterial biofilms using
the (a) Vanco-800CW and (b) Vanco-FL-800CW probes. (a) Biofilms of S. aureus, S. epidermidis ATCC, or E. coli ATCC were grown
on microscopy coverslips and were subsequently incubated with Vanco-800CW.
Images recorded by fluorescence microscopy reveal binding of Vanco-800CW
(red) to the Gram-positive bacterial biofilms (S. aureus and S. epidermidis ATCC) but not
to the Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli ATTC). (b) S. epidermidis ATCC was
further selected to investigate the binding of Vanco-FL-800CW. Vanco-FL-800CW
was also able to bind to S. epidermidis ATCC and the BODIPY-FL signal (green) colocalized with the 800CW
signal (red). The colocalization is presented in yellow. Scale bars:
40 μm.
In vitro detection of bacterial biofilms using
the (a) Vanco-800CW and (b) Vanco-FL-800CW probes. (a) Biofilms of S. aureus, S. epidermidis ATCC, or E. coli ATCC were grown
on microscopy coverslips and were subsequently incubated with Vanco-800CW.
Images recorded by fluorescence microscopy reveal binding of Vanco-800CW
(red) to the Gram-positive bacterial biofilms (S. aureus and S. epidermidis ATCC) but not
to the Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli ATTC). (b) S. epidermidis ATCC was
further selected to investigate the binding of Vanco-FL-800CW. Vanco-FL-800CW
was also able to bind to S. epidermidis ATCC and the BODIPY-FL signal (green) colocalized with the 800CW
signal (red). The colocalization is presented in yellow. Scale bars:
40 μm.With the aim to broaden the applicability
of the targeted tracer,
we proceeded with the synthesis of a dual-labeled vancomycin, starting
from commercially available vancomycin BODIPY-FL (Vanco-FL). This
probe bears a fluorescent BODIPY moiety on the primary amine, which
absorbs light of λ = 505 nm and emits at λ = 512 nm. Even
though this wavelength range is not in the optimal window as explained
earlier, functionalizing it with an NIR fluorescent moiety opens up
new possibilities to use one single probe for multimodal imaging and
theranostic approaches (e.g., coupling of Vanco-FL to a photosensitizer
for the diagnosis of bacterial infections and subsequent eradication
with antimicrobial photodynamic therapy). Toward this end, we reacted
Vanco-FL with the IRdye800CW-NHS ester as a model dye using the standard
conditions established before for the synthesis of Vanco-800CW. Due
to the limited availability of Vanco-FL, we used less equivalents
of vancomycin (5 eq compared to 13 eq used before) and a lower substrate
concentration, which resulted in longer reaction times with ca. 60%
conversion to the product after 5 days (Figure S4). The successful formation of the desired dual-labeled vancomycin
(2, Vanco-FL-800CW; Figure ) was confirmed by UPLC-MS and analysis of
the UV–vis spectra recorded on an HPLC system with photodiode
array (PDA) detection (Figure ). To determine whether the binding of vancomycin to Gram-positive
bacteria was affected upon dual labeling, biofilms of S. epidermidis ATCC were incubated with Vanco-FL-800CW
and images were acquired with a fluorescence microscope, as performed
before for Vanco-800CW. As shown in Figure b, Vanco-FL-800CW is capable of binding to S. epidermidis ATCC and the fluorescence signals
from BODIPY-FL and 800CW colocalize with the bacteria. With the successful
preparation of this new molecule, we not only broadened the potential
applicability of vancomycin as a dual-imaging targeting probe but
also supported our findings regarding the molecular structure of Vanco-800CW
(Figure ) since IRdye800CW
was successfully coupled to the free secondary amine of Vanco-FL under
the optimized conditions.
Figure 5
Analytical data for (a, b) Vanco-FL-800CW 2, (c, d)
Ampho-800CW 3, and (e, f) Vanco-700DX 4.
(a) Overlay of the PDA spectra of HPLC peaks corresponding to Vanco-FL
(red), IRdye800CW-NHS ester (yellow), and Vanco-FL-800CW (green).
(b) Mass spectrum of the product peak (Figure S9) recorded on a UPLC-MS device. (c) Overlay of PDA spectra
of the HPLC peak corresponding to amphotericin B (blue), IRdye800CW
NHS ester (yellow), and Ampho-800CW (green). (d) Mass spectrum of
the product peak (Figure S10) recorded
on a UPLC-MS device. (e) Overlay of the UV–vis absorption spectra
of vancomycin (blue), IRdye700DX-NHS ester (orange), and Vanco-700DX
(green). The spectra were obtained of the pure samples in 1% DMSO
in water on a UV–vis spectrophotometer. (f) Mass spectrum of
the product peak (Figure S11) recorded
on a UPLC-MS device.
Analytical data for (a, b) Vanco-FL-800CW 2, (c, d)
Ampho-800CW 3, and (e, f) Vanco-700DX 4.
(a) Overlay of the PDA spectra of HPLC peaks corresponding to Vanco-FL
(red), IRdye800CW-NHS ester (yellow), and Vanco-FL-800CW (green).
(b) Mass spectrum of the product peak (Figure S9) recorded on a UPLC-MS device. (c) Overlay of PDA spectra
of the HPLC peak corresponding to amphotericin B (blue), IRdye800CWNHS ester (yellow), and Ampho-800CW (green). (d) Mass spectrum of
the product peak (Figure S10) recorded
on a UPLC-MS device. (e) Overlay of the UV–vis absorption spectra
of vancomycin (blue), IRdye700DX-NHS ester (orange), and Vanco-700DX
(green). The spectra were obtained of the pure samples in 1% DMSO
in water on a UV–vis spectrophotometer. (f) Mass spectrum of
the product peak (Figure S11) recorded
on a UPLC-MS device.Inspired by the positive
results for the synthesis and purification
of compounds 1 and 2, we further investigated
the scope of the established synthetic method. First, we explored
the possibility of using a different targeting agent, namely, amphotericin
B, to provide an optical imaging agent for fungal infections.[46,47] Amphotericin B binds to ergosterol, which is abundant only in the
cell membrane of fungi.[48] We were pleased
to discover that the optimized reaction conditions successfully yield
compound 3 (Ampho-800CW; Figure ). After purification by semipreparative
HPLC, the purity and identity were confirmed by UPLC-MS and UV–vis
analysis (Figure ).
Since amphotericin B only contains one amine functionality as a possible
coupling site, the fragmentation analysis by HRMS was omitted.Next, we explored the generality of the synthetic method with respect
to different dyes by applying the conditions optimized for compound 1 for the conjugation of vancomycin to the NHS ester of IRdye700DX,
an NIR dye that simultaneously functions as a photosensitizer, enabling
its application for antimicrobial photodynamic therapy.[49,50] Also in this case, the desired product (4, Vanco-700DX; Figure ) was obtained and
could be purified in the same way, as described for Vanco-800CW. Subsequently,
the product was analyzed by UPLC-MS and UV–vis spectrometry
to confirm the purity and identity (Figure ). High-resolution tandem mass spectrometry
indicates that, also, this dye couples to the secondary amine at the N-terminus of vancomycin (Figure S16). To investigate whether the ability of IRDye700DX to produce reactive
oxygen species (more specifically, singlet oxygen [1O2]) was affected upon conjugation to vancomycin, a detection
method based on 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF) was applied (see
the Supporting Information, Figure S18). DPBF is photo-oxidized by 1O2, and its absorbance decay can be monitored by UV–vis
spectrophotometry at 415 nm. Irradiation of both IRDye700DX and Vanco-700DX
for 70 s with a high output LED device that emits light at 690 nm,[51] at an irradiance of 10 mW cm–2, resulted in complete photo-oxidation of the DPBF (initial concentration:
100 μM) at similar rates.The conformational changes that
vancomycin might undergo upon labeling
with one or two dyes did not impair its ability to bind to bacteria,
as demonstrated using biofilms grown in vitro (Figure ). However, the conjugation
can affect its antimicrobial activity since IRDye800CW and IRDye700DX
bind to the secondary amine of N-methyl-leucine,
which is an important amino acid in the binding to the target dipeptided-Ala-d-Ala in the bacterial cell wall, thereby influencing
the antimicrobial properties of vancomycin.[52] Thus, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of vancomycin,
Vanco-800CW, and Vanco-700DX against an S. epidermidis strain were assessed in liquid cultures by testing serial dilutions
and by antibiotic disk diffusion assays on agar plates (Supporting Information, Figure S19). The MIC of vancomycin toward S. epidermidis was 2 mg/L, while the MIC of both conjugates was higher than 8 mg/L
(Figure S19). Moreover, 5 μg of diffusion
discs placed on sample agar plates showed no inhibition of bacterial
growth around the discs for Vanco-800CW and Vanco-700DX (Figure S19e). The loss of antimicrobial activity
upon conjugation probably relates to a lowered affinity for the d-Ala-d-Aladipeptide when compared to the unlabeled
vancomycin. Importantly, we regard the absence of antimicrobial activity
as beneficial from a microbiological viewpoint because this makes
it less likely that the repeated usage of the conjugates will elicit
resistance to vancomycin.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we established
an efficient, transferable, and reproducible
method for the synthesis and purification of conjugates of near-infrared
dyes that can potentially be used for the imaging and treatment of
bacterial and fungal infections. The reported research fulfils the
need for selective methods to synthesize adducts of highly functionalized
small molecules with relevant dyes used in medical imaging. It may
substantially facilitate the development of new optical imaging agents
since it offers a straightforward procedure that can be repeated also
in laboratories that are not dedicated to organic synthesis.
Experimental
Section
Optimized Procedure for the Synthesis of Compound 1 (Vanco-800CW Conjugate)
Vancomycin hydrochloride (100 mg/mL
in DMSO, 146 μL, 10 μmol), HBTU (25.5 mg/mL in DMSO, 57.6
μL, 3.9 μmol, or equimolar amount of HATU), DIPEA (22.5
mg/mL in DMSO, 57.3 μL, 10 μmol), and IRdye800CW-NHS ester
(5 mg/mL in DMSO, 180 μL, 0.8 μmol) were mixed and left
at room temperature overnight. Subsequently, H2O (2.6 mL)
was added to the reaction mixture and the suspension was centrifuged
for 10 min at rcf = 16.9 × 1000g. The supernatant
was centrifuged again, and the combined pellets were redissolved in
a mixture of DMSO, acetonitrile, and H2O for purification
by semipreparative HPLC (elution gradient from 10 to 70% organic phase).
Authors: Niels J Harlaar; Marjory Koller; Steven J de Jongh; Barbara L van Leeuwen; Patrick H Hemmer; Schelto Kruijff; Robert J van Ginkel; Lukas B Been; Johannes S de Jong; Gursah Kats-Ugurlu; Matthijs D Linssen; Annelies Jorritsma-Smit; Marleen van Oosten; Wouter B Nagengast; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Gooitzen M van Dam Journal: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2016-09-17
Authors: Marleen van Oosten; Tina Schäfer; Joost A C Gazendam; Knut Ohlsen; Eleni Tsompanidou; Marcus C de Goffau; Hermie J M Harmsen; Lucia M A Crane; Ed Lim; Kevin P Francis; Lael Cheung; Michael Olive; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Jan Maarten van Dijl; Gooitzen M van Dam Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Esther de Boer; Jason M Warram; Elmire Hartmans; Peter J Bremer; Ben Bijl; Lucia M A Crane; Wouter B Nagengast; Eben L Rosenthal; Gooitzen M van Dam Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2014-10-14 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jacobus Burggraaf; Ingrid M C Kamerling; Paul B Gordon; Lenneke Schrier; Marieke L de Kam; Andrea J Kales; Ragnar Bendiksen; Bård Indrevoll; Roger M Bjerke; Siver A Moestue; Siavash Yazdanfar; Alexandra M J Langers; Marit Swaerd-Nordmo; Geir Torheim; Madhuri V Warren; Hans Morreau; Philip W Voorneveld; Tessa Buckle; Fijs W B van Leeuwen; Liv-Ingrid Ødegårdstuen; Grethe T Dalsgaard; Andrew Healey; James C H Hardwick Journal: Nat Med Date: 2015-07-13 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Joy L Kovar; William Volcheck; Eva Sevick-Muraca; Melanie A Simpson; D Michael Olive Journal: Anal Biochem Date: 2008-10-07 Impact factor: 3.365
Authors: Marina López-Álvarez; Marjolein Heuker; Frank F A IJpma; Marleen van Oosten; Klaas A Sjollema; Gooitzen M van Dam; Jan Maarten van Dijl Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Youxin Fu; Hugo Helbert; Nadja A Simeth; Stefano Crespi; Gerbren B Spoelstra; Jan Maarten van Dijl; Marleen van Oosten; Luiza Reali Nazario; Dion van der Born; Gert Luurtsema; Wiktor Szymanski; Philip H Elsinga; Ben L Feringa Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2021-06-28 Impact factor: 15.419