| Literature DB >> 32922897 |
Qian Li1,2, Pengwei Lu1,2, Yanzhu Fan1,2, Lei Wang1,2, Fei Yao1,2, Diya Su1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Facial nerve paralysis in patients occurs in varying degrees of self-image disorders, both physically and mentally, resulting in low self-esteem, anxiety, depression, and even suicide; however, there were few researches on psychological problems in facial palsy patients at home and abroad. This study's objective was to investigate post-traumatic growth (PTG) in facial nerve palsy patients and analyze its influencing factors.Entities:
Keywords: Coping style; Facial nerve palsy; Post-traumatic growth; Social support
Year: 2018 PMID: 32922897 PMCID: PMC7398372 DOI: 10.1186/s41016-018-0145-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Neurosurg J ISSN: 2057-4967
Demographic and medical characteristics (n = 47)
| Variables | |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Female | 26 (55.3) |
| Male | 21 (44.7) |
| Education level | |
| Low education (illiteracy/primary school) | 7 (14.9) |
| Secondary education (secondary school/high school) | 14 (29.8) |
| Higher education (university and above) | 26 (55.3) |
| Religious belief | |
| Yes (Christian/Buddhism) | 6 (12.8) |
| No | 41 (87.2) |
| Marital status | |
| Married | 37 (78.7) |
| Divorced, widowed, single | 10 (21.3) |
| Monthly income | |
| Low income (RMB: 1000-3000) | 25 (53.2) |
| Medium income (RMB:3001-5000) | 11 (23.4) |
| High income (RMB: > 5001) | 11 (23.4) |
| Residence | |
| City | 29 (61.7) |
| Countryside | 18 (38.3) |
| Personality type | |
| Extrovert | 12 (25.5) |
| Middle | 23 (48.9) |
| Introvert | 12 (25.5) |
| Event | |
| Yes (accident/chronic disease/family misfortune) | 6 (12.8) |
| No | 41 (87.2) |
| Cause of facial paralysis | |
| Tumor in CPA area | 26 (55.3) |
| Non-tumor (facial neuritis/trauma/other) | 21 (44.7) |
| Time since diagnosis | |
| ≤ 1 year | 12 (25.5) |
| > 1 year | 35 (74.5) |
| Degree | |
| Mild and moderate (level II/III/IV) | 24 (51.1) |
| Severe (level V/VI) | 23 (48.9) |
| Surgery | |
| Yes | 37 (78.7) |
| Postoperative time < 1 year | 15 (31.9) |
| Postoperative time 1–2 years | 13 (27.7) |
| Postoperative time > 2 years | 9 (19.1) |
| No | 10 (21.3) |
| Self-care level | |
| Yes | 46 (97.9) |
| No | 1 (2.1) |
| Whether returned to work after rehabilitation | |
| Yes | 32 (68.1) |
| No | 15 (31.9) |
Fig. 1Post-traumatic growth total score for patients with facial nerve paralysis and five dimension score (n = 47, M, SD, score)
Comparison of post-traumatic growth of nerve palsy patients under different conditions (n = 47)
| Variables | PTGI total score (M, SD) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.701 | |
| Female | M = 62.2, SD = 20.03 | |
| Male | M = 64.4, SD = 18.39 | |
| Education level | 0.619 | |
| Low education | M = 69.7, SD = 10.52 | |
| Secondary education | M = 61.3, SD = 24.48 | |
| Higher education | M = 62.4, SD = 17.93 | |
| Religious belief | 0.892 | |
| Yes | M = 62.2, SD = 20.98 | |
| No | M = 63.3, SD = 19.13 | |
| Marital status | 0.529 | |
| Married | M = 62.2, SD = 19.56 | |
| Divorced, widowed, single | M = 66.6, SD = 18.06 | |
| Monthly income | 0.764 | |
| Low income | M = 64.6, SD = 20.96 | |
| Medium income | M = 63.6, SD = 13.44 | |
| High income | M = 59.5, SD = 20.73 | |
| Residence | 0.633 | |
| City | M = 62.1, SD = 18.15 | |
| Countryside | M = 64.9, SD = 21.06 | |
| Personality type | 0.024* | |
| Extrovert | M = 74.3, SD = 16.57 | |
| Middle | M = 62.5, SD = 17.83 | |
| Introvert | M = 53.4, SD = 19.57 | |
| Event | 0.343 | |
| Yes | M = 56.2, SD = 22.20 | |
| No | M = 64.2, SD = 18.74 | |
| Cause of facial paralysis | 0.087 | |
| Tumor in CPA area | M = 67.5, SD = 19.28 | |
| Non-tumor | M = 57.9, SD = 18.01 | |
| Time since diagnosis | 0.034* | |
| ≤ 1 year | M = 53.2, SD = 21.90 | |
| > 1 year | M = 66.6, SD = 17.12 | |
| Degree | 0.158 | |
| Mild and moderate (level II/III/IV) | M = 59.3, SD = 18.00 | |
| Severe (level V/VI) | M = 67.2, SD = 19.84 | |
| Surgery | 0.016* | |
| Yes | M = 66.6, SD = 18.02 | |
| Postoperative time < 1 year | M = 63.3, SD = 23.57 | 0.030* |
| Postoperative time 1–2 years | M = 73.9, SD = 9.76 | |
| Postoperative time > 2 years | M = 61.7, SD = 14.60 | |
| No | M = 50.4, SD = 18.53 | |
| Whether returning to work after habilitation | 0.778 | |
| Yes | M = 63.7, SD = 16.68 | |
| No | M = 62.0, SD = 24.20 | |
| Self-care level | 0.802 | |
| Yes | M = 63.1, SD = 19.34 | |
| No | M = 68.0 |
*: p < 0.05
Fig. 2Correlation analysis of coping style and social support in facial nerve paralysis patients (n = 47, r)
Multiple linear regression analysis
| Independent variable | Data input method |
|---|---|
| Education level | Low education = 1, secondary education = 2, higher education = 3 |
| Age | According to the survey data entered |
| Marital status | Married = 1, divorced, widowed, single = 2 |
| Personality type | Extrovert = 1, middle = 2, introvert = 3 |
| Event | Yes = 1, no = 2 |
| Causes of facial paralysis | Tumor in CPA area = 1, non-tumor = 2 |
| Time since diagnosis | ≤ 1 year = 1, > 1 year = 2 |
| Degree | Mild and moderate = 1, severe = 2 |
| Surgery | Yes = 1, no = 2 |
| Postoperative time | < 1 year = 1, 1–2 years = 2, > 2 years = 3, no surgery = 4 |
| Whether returning to work after rehabilitation | Yes = 1, no = 2 |
| Coping styles for each dimension score | According to the survey data entered |
| Total score | According to the survey data entered |
Regression analysis of influencing factors of post-traumatic growth in patients with facial nerve palsy (n = 47)
| Variables |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Personality type | − 4.331 | − 0.190 | − 2.401 | 0.027 |
| Time since diagnosis | 8.880 | 0.204 | 2.570 | 0.014 |
| Coping style (change the original practices or some of their problems) | ||||
| 7.884 | 0.390 | 3.671 | 0.001 | |
| Coping style (pursue hobbies and actively participate in recreational activities) | ||||
| 2.915 | 0.182 | 1.954 | 0.058 | |
| Coping style (learn how to respond to similar challenging situations) | ||||
| 6.940 | 0.292 | 2.718 | 0.010 | |
| Coping style (there may be some miracle that will change the status quo) | ||||
| 3.064 | 0.194 | 2.288 | 0.027 | |
Note: The model R2 = 0.753, adjusted R2 = 0.716, F = 10.195, and P < 0.01