Literature DB >> 32922119

Risk Factors of Perinatal Asphyxia Among Newborns Delivered at Public Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Case-Control Study.

Tewodros Mulugeta1, Girum Sebsibe2, Fikirtemariam Abebe Fenta2, Migbar Sibhat1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perinatal asphyxia determines the newborn's future health status and viability with risk factors yet to be completely understood. It measures the status of the healthcare delivery of an organization including antenatal, intranatal, and postnatal care. In Ethiopia, 31.6% of neonatal mortality was attributed to perinatal asphyxia. This study aimed to assess the risk factors of perinatal asphyxia.
METHODS: An unmatched case-control study was conducted on 213 (71 cases selected using lottery method and 142 controls systematically) subjects in Addis Ababa from November 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire through face-to-face interviews, entered to Epi data version 4.4, and exported to SPSS version 25 for analysis. Logistic regression was used for analysis. Variables with p< 0.25 in bivariate analysis were taken to multivariable analysis. Statistical significance was declared at P<0.05 and findings were presented using texts and tables.
RESULTS: A total of 210 newborns (70 cases and 140 controls) and their mothers were included with an overall response rate of 98.5%. Antepartum hemorrhage [AOR=7.17; 95% CI 1.73-29.72], low birth weight [AOR=2.87; 95% CI 1.01-8.13], preterm birth [AOR=3.4; 95% CI 1.04-11.16], caesarean section delivery [AOR=2.75; 95% CI 1.01-7.42], instrumental delivery [AOR=4.88; 95% CI 1.35-17.61], fetal distress [AOR=4.77; 95% CI 1.52-14.92] and meconium-stained amniotic fluid [AOR=9.02; 95% CI 2.96-30.24] were significantly associated with perinatal asphyxia. Hence, efforts ought to go to improve the quality of antenatal and intra-natal services.
© 2020 Mulugeta et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ethiopia; asphyxia; newborn; perinatal; risk factors

Year:  2020        PMID: 32922119      PMCID: PMC7457880          DOI: 10.2147/PHMT.S260788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatric Health Med Ther        ISSN: 1179-9927


Background

Globally, perinatal asphyxia is still one of the leading causes of neonatal mortality and morbidity,1 especially in the first week of life in low and middle-income countries (LMIC).2 It accounts for 28% of the neonatal deaths each year around the world,2,3 and about 29% of early neonatal deaths.4 In developing countries, the prevalence of birth asphyxia is much higher, ranging from 5.1–30.5% with 40% or higher case fatality rates.5,6 In Sub-Saharan Africa, around 338,000 under-five death occur due to birth asphyxia.2 Perinatal asphyxia is the failure of a newborn to initiate and maintain breathing immediately at birth7 which could result in decreased perfusion, ischemia, and organ failure.8 It can be associated with antenatal, intra-natal, and fetal factors.9 Birth asphyxia is diagnosed with APGAR level less than 7 at 5 minutes by the two levels.10 Worldwide, 5–10% of babies require simple stimulation at birth, 3–6% need a bag and mask ventilation, and <1% breath with endotracheal intubation, chest compression, and drugs each year.11 In low-resource settings access to sufficient intrapartum care is inadequate and mortality and long-term damage from intrapartum related neonatal events are highest.11,12 Perinatal asphyxia leads to numerous short and long term complications13 such as HIE14−16, post-traumatic stress disorders (PTSD),17 low cognitive functions,18,19 multi-organ failure,20 and neurological sequel.19,21,22 The sustainable development goal (SDG) sated a plan to keep NMR to at least as low as 12 deaths per 1000 live births and under-five mortality to at least as low as 25 deaths per 1000 live births by 2030 in all countries.23 This could be achieved through better prevention and treatment of the three leading causes, preterm births, severe infections, and perinatal asphyxia as the key.24 Despite different efforts undertaken including focused antenatal care, neonatal mortality remains unacceptably high.25 In Ethiopia, perinatal asphyxia continued as a major cause of under-five mortality and morbidity. In 2015, 31.6% of neonatal deaths were attributed to perinatal asphyxia26 and the prevalence varied from region to region or in different settings ranging from 3.1–32.9%.27,28 Even though researches conducted in the country, reports from different studies that assess risk factors of perinatal asphyxia were inconsistent and contradicting.29−31 This emphasizes the need for further exploration to put the country figure. Furthermore, we could not found a study conducted in Addis Ababa regarding this topic. Thus, this study intended to identify the determinants of perinatal asphyxia among newborns delivered at public hospitals in Addis Ababa.

Materials and Methods

An unmatched case–control study was carried out in public hospitals of Addis Ababa Ethiopia from November 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019. There are twelve governmental hospitals in Addis Ababa. Among those, the study was conducted in four randomly selected hospitals (Yekatit 12 hospital, Tirunesh Beijing hospital, St. Petros hospital, and Gandhi memorial hospital) which accommodate more than 23,000 deliveries annually.

Study Population

Cases

All asphyxiated newborns with APGAR scores of <7 at 5 minutes delivered after 28 weeks of gestation in selected public hospitals of Addis Ababa during the study period.

Controls

All newborns delivered after viability with APGAR scores of ≥7 at 5 minutes in selected public hospitals of Addis Ababa during the study period. In the case of twin or triple newborns, one was taken randomly and babies with congenital malformations were excluded from the study.

Sample Size Determinations and Procedure

The sample size was determined using Epi-Info version 7.2 by using instrumental delivery as a determinant variable from previous study31 which yields the maximum sample size by considering 95% level of confidence, power of 80%, OR 3.5, 9.2% proportion of controls, and 1:2 case to control ratio. Finally, by adding 10% non-response rate the total sample size was 213 with 71 cases and 142 controls that were proportionally allocated to each selected hospital with their respective previous 3 months delivery report (Yekatit 12 hospital= 45, Tirunesh Beijing hospital=48, St. Petros hospital=42 and Gandhi memorial hospital=78). Then cases were selected using simple random sampling technique and controls were selected systematically by including every 15 newborns that were obtained by dividing the total estimated number of non-asphyxiated newborns in previous reports from each hospital to the required number of controls to the study.

Operational Definition

Perinatal asphyxia was diagnosed when a newborn with any of the signs of impaired breathing (not breathing or not crying, gasping, and < 30 breaths per minute) at birth with an APGAR score less than 7 at 5 minutes.9,10 Prolonged labor is the labor exceeding 12 hours in primigravida or 8 hours in multipara mothers after the latent phase of the first stage of labor. Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) is the rupture of the membrane of the amniotic sac and chorion that occur >1 hour before the onset of labor. Low birth weight when birth weight is <2500 gm and normal birth weight if ≥2500.

Data Collection Procedures

The data collection tool was adapted from the previous study done at the Tigray region.29 Data were collected using a structured pretested questionnaire by face-to-face interviews. The questionnaire comprised of maternal socio-demographic, antepartum, intrapartum, and neonatal related factors. Maternal height and MUAC were measured during data collection. The data collection was conducted from March 1 to April 30, 2019.

Data Quality Control

English version questionnaire was prepared, translated to Amharic, and converted back to English for consistency. One week before the data collection, the questionnaire was pre-tested on 5% (12 newborns) of the samples taken from Zewditu memorial hospital (4 Cases and 8 controls). One day training was given for 8 data collectors (BSc midwives) and 2 supervisors (MSc students). Data were evaluated and crosschecked for completeness daily.

Data Processing and Analysis

Data were cleaned, coded, and entered using Epi data version 4.4 and it was exported to SPSS version 25 for analysis. Cross-tabulation was done for the exploration of the data, to clear missing values, and to determine the number of expected events per cell. Binary logistic regression was used for the analysis of the data. Multi-collinearity was checked using variance inflation factor and model fitness was checked using Hosmer and Lemeshow test (p=0.223). Variables with p-values < 0.25 in the bi-variable analysis were identified and fitted to the final model to identify the independent effects of each variable to the outcome variable. An Adjusted Odds Ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was computed to identify the presence and strength of associations, and statistical significance will be declared at p <0.05. Finally, the result was presented in the form of text, table, and graph.

Ethical Consideration

Ethical clearance was obtained from Addis Ababa University, College of Health Science institutional review board. Then officials at different levels of the selected hospitals had been communicated through cooperation letter written from the School of Nursing and Midwifery. The study was conducted per the declaration of Helsinki. The responsible bodies at each postnatal ward and mothers of neonates were informed about the purpose of the study. Written informed consent was obtained from mothers of newborns to confirm willingness. They were notified that they have the right to refuse or terminate the interview at any time. Confidentiality of the information was secured throughout the study process.

Results

Two hundred ten participants (70 cases and 140 controls) who delivered at public hospitals in Addis Ababa with their mothers were included with an overall response rate of 98.59%.

Socio-Demographic Characteristics

The median age of the mothers of newborns was 27 years, 25% of which were below the age of 23 years. Concerning the marital status of the mothers, 65 (92.9%) of cases and 126 (90%) of controls were married. Ten percent of the asphyxiated neonates were born from mothers who reside in rural areas and 50% of newborns from the asphyxiated group were delivered from mothers who had never attended above grade eight. Among those who diagnosed with perinatal asphyxia, 50% were born from unemployed mothers. Regarding the height of the mother, mothers with short stature (<153) were higher in proportion among cases 9 (12.9%) than controls 11 (7.9%). Five (7.1%) of the asphyxiated neonates and 14 (10%) of controls were born from unmarried women (Table 1).
Table 1

Distribution of Socio-Demographic Characteristics of the Mothers Among Newborns Delivered at Selected Public Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2019 (N = 210)

VariablesCategoryCase(n=70)Control(n=140)Total(n=210)
Count (%)Count (%)Count (%)
Age group<209(12.9)10(7.1)19(9.0)
20–2414(20.0)35(25.0)49(23.3)
25–2928(40.0)52(37.1)80(38.1)
≥3019(27.1)43(30.7)62(29.5)
ReligionOrthodox53(75.7)104(74.3)157(74.8)
Muslim11(15.7)25(17.9)36(17.1)
Protestant6(8.6)11 (7.9)17(8.1)
Marital statusSingle5(7.1)14 (10.0)19 (9.0)
Married65 (92.9)126 (90.0)191 (91.0)
EthnicityAmhara30(42.9)62(44.3)92(43.8)
Oromo20(28.6)45(32.1)65(31.0)
Tigray4(5.7)7(5.0)11(5.2)
Guragghe10(14.3)2014.3)30(14.3)
Others6(8.6)6(4.3)12(5.7)
ResidenceUrban63 (90.0)125 (89.3)188 (89.5)
Rural7 (10.0)15 (10.7)22 (10.5)
Educational statusNo formal education7 (10.0)13 (9.3)20 (9.5)
Primary school28 (40.0)59 (42.1)87 (41.4)
Secondary school24 (34.3)39 (27.9)63 (30.0)
College and above11 (15.7)29 (20.7)40 (19.0)
OccupationHousewife35(50.0)79(56.4)114(54.3)
Governmental employ12(17.1)22(15.7)34(16.2)
Privet employ18(25.7)29(20.7)47(22.4)
Merchant5(7.1)10(7.1)15(7.1)
MUAC<2329(41.4)51(36.4)80(38.1)
≥2341(58.6)89 (63.6)130(61.9)
Height of the mother<1539(12.9)11(7.9)20(9.5)
≥15361(87.1)129(92.1)190(90.5)

Abbreviation: MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference.

Distribution of Socio-Demographic Characteristics of the Mothers Among Newborns Delivered at Selected Public Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2019 (N = 210) Abbreviation: MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference.

Antepartum-Related Characteristics

The finding showed that 20 (28.6%) mothers of cases and 26 (18.6%) of controls did never have ANC service during their pregnancy of the current neonate. Of those having ANC follow-up, only mothers of 16% of the cases and 19.3% of controls followed at hospitals. The proportion of women who got
Table 2

Antepartum Related Characteristics of Mothers of Newborns Delivered at Selected Public Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2019 (N=210)

VariablesCategoryCases(n=70)Controls(n=140)Total(n=210)
Count (%)Count (%)Count (%)
ANC visitYes50 (71.4)114 (81.4)164 (78.1)
No20 (28.6)26 (18.6)46 (21.9)
Number of ANC<425 (50)35 (30.7)60 (37.1)
≥425 (50)79 (69.3)104 (62.9)
ParityPrimipara18 (25.7)25 (17.9)48 (22.9)
Multipara52 (74.3)115 (82.1)162 (77.1)
AbortionYes14 (20.0)28 (20.0)42 (20.0)
No56 (80.0)112 (80.0)168 (80.0)
Number of abortionOne abortion7 (50)17 (60.72)24 (57.14)
Two or more7 (50)11 (39.28)18 (42.86)
HIV test is doneYes66 (94.3)127 (90.7)193 (91.9)
No4 (5.7)13 (9.3)17 (8.1)
Chronic HTNYes5 (7.1)6 (4.3)11 (5.2)
No65 (92.9)134(95.7)199(94.8)
AnemiaYes11 (15.7)12(8.6)23(11.0)
No59 (84.3)128(91.4)187(89.0)
APHYes15 (21.4)5 (3.6)20 (9.5)
No55 (78.6)135 (96.4)190 (90.5)
PIHYes9 (12.90)10 (7.1)19 (9.0)
No61 (87.10)130(92.9)191 (91.0)
DMYes3 (4.3)4(2.9)7 (3.3)
No67 (95.7)136 (97.1)203 (96.7)

Abbreviations: ANC, antenatal care; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HTN, hypertension; APH, antepartum hemorrhage; PIH, pregnancy-induced hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus.

Antepartum Related Characteristics of Mothers of Newborns Delivered at Selected Public Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2019 (N=210) Abbreviations: ANC, antenatal care; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HTN, hypertension; APH, antepartum hemorrhage; PIH, pregnancy-induced hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus.

Intrapartum Related Risk Factors

The proportion of non-vertex presentation among cases 17 (24.3%) was more than 3 folds to controls 10 (7.1%). General anesthesia was used for 33% of mothers of cases and 13% of controls. Moreover, the proportion of newborns delivered through cesarean section and by instruments was higher in cases 27 (38.6%) and 10 (14.3%) than controls 23 (16.4%) and 8 (5.7%) respectively. Maternal hypotension was recorded among mothers of 24.3% of the cases and 12.9% of the controls. Twenty-five (35.7%) of the cases were delivered after induction and it was applied only for 17.9% among the controls. Only one asphyxiated neonate and 3 non-asphyxiated neonates were born with polyhydramnios (Table 3).
Table 3

Distribution of Intrapartum Related Characteristics Among Newborns Delivered at Selected Public Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2019 (N = 210)

VariablesResponseCase (n=70)Control(n=140)Total(n=210)
Count (%)Count (%)Count (%)
Partograph usedYes32(45.7)75(53.6)107(51.0)
No38(54.3)65(46.4)103(49.0)
Mode of deliverySVD33(47.1)109(77.9)142(67.6)
CS27(38.6)23(16.4)50(23.8)
Instrumental delivery10(14.3)8(5.7)18(8.6)
Prolonged laborYes17(24.3)15(10.7)32(15.2)
No53(75.7)125(89.3)178(84.8)
Obstructed laborYes13(18.6)9(6.4)22(10.5)
No57(81.4)131(93.6)188(89.5)
PROMYes13(18.6)10(7.1)23(11.0)
No57(81.4)130(92.9)187(89.0)
Cord strangulationYes4 (5.7)3 (2.1)7 (3.3)
No66 (94.3)137(97.9)203 (96.7)
MSAFYes22 (31.4)8 (5.7)30 (14.3)
No48 (68.6)132 (94.3)180 (85.7)
OlygohydrominousYes8 (11.4)5 (3.6)13 (6.2)
No62(88.6)135(96.4)197(93.8)

Abbreviations: SVD, spontaneous vaginal delivery; CS, cesarean section; PROM, premature rupture of membrane; MSAF, meconium-stained amniotic fluid.

Distribution of Intrapartum Related Characteristics Among Newborns Delivered at Selected Public Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2019 (N = 210) Abbreviations: SVD, spontaneous vaginal delivery; CS, cesarean section; PROM, premature rupture of membrane; MSAF, meconium-stained amniotic fluid.

Neonatal-Related Factors

More than half (51.4%) of the participants were females. Males were relatively higher in proportion among cases 37 (52.9%) than controls 65 (46.4%). Regarding birth weight, the proportion of low birth weight and prematurity among cases was greater than four times to controls. Additionally, 28.6% of asphyxiated neonates had fetal distress whereas only 5.7% from the control group identified to have fetal distress. Sixty-three (90%) of the case and 137 (97.9%) of the controls who were delivered are singletons.

Risk Factors of Perinatal Asphyxia

Initially we have performed bi-variable analysis. Those variable with p-value <0.25 were transferred to multivariate analysis. Some variables such as ethnicity, maternal DM, cord strangulation, and oligohydrominous were left out of the final model since they have less than 20% expected events per cell. Additionally, obstructed labor was further excluded due to the collinearity effect. Those variables not included in the final model were presented as in . Afterward, the multivariate analysis showed that antepartum hemorrhage, low birth weight, preterm birth, cesarean section delivery, instrumental delivery, fetal distress, and meconium-stained amniotic fluid were independently associated with perinatal asphyxia (Table 4).
Table 4

Bi-Variable and Multivariate Analysis for the Risk Factors of Perinatal Asphyxia Among Newborns Delivered at Public Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2019 (N=210)

VariablesCategoryPerinatal AsphyxiaCrude HR (95% CI)Adjusted HR (95% CI)
CasesControls
Age of the mother (in years)≤199102.04(0.71–5.82)2.32(0.52–10.25)
20–2414350.91(0.398–2.06)0.57(0.18–1.87)
25–2928521.22(0.6–2.48)1.33(0.5–3.54)
≥30194311
ANC followupYes5011411
No20261.75(0.896–3.43)1.14(0.41–3.16)
ParityPrimi-para18251.59(0.8–3.17)2.21(0.79–6.23)
Multi-para5211511
AnemiaYes11121.99(0.83–4.77)2.07(0.61–7.06)
No5912811
APHYes1557.36(2.55–21.25)7.17(1.73–29.72)*
No5513511
PIHYes9101.92(0.74–4.96)1.79(0.44–7.25)
No6113011
Fetal presentationVertex5313011
Non-vertex17104.17(1.79–9.69)2.55(0.78–8.39)
Mode of deliverySVD3310911
CS27233.88(1.97–7.65)2.75(1.02–7.42)*
IVD1084.13(1.51–11.31)4.88(1.35–17.61)*
Duration of laborNormal5312511
Prolonged17152.67(1.24–5.74)1.45(0.44–4.86)
Obstructed laborYes1393.32(1.343–8.21)2.22(0.68–7.32)
No5713111
Maternal hypotensionYes17182.17(1.04–4.543)2.2(0.76–6.39)
No5312211
PROMYes13102.97(1.23–7.16)1.55(0.47–5.09)
No5713011
MSAFYes2287.56 (3.16–18.12)9.02(2.69–30.25)*
No4813211
Birth weight<250027136.13(2.91–12.94)2.87(1.01–8.13)*
≥25004312711
Gestational age<3723106.36(2.82–14.36)3.4(1.04–11.16)*
≥374713011
Fetal distressYes2086.6 (2.73–15.95)4.77(1.53–14.92)*
No5013211

Note: *Statistically significant at 5% level of significance.

Abbreviations: ANC, antenatal care; APH, antepartum hemorrhage; PIH, pregnancy-induced hypertension; SVD, spontaneous vaginal delivery; CS, cesarean section; IVD, instrumental vaginal delivery; PROM, premature rupture of membrane; MSAF, meconium-stained amniotic fluid.

Bi-Variable and Multivariate Analysis for the Risk Factors of Perinatal Asphyxia Among Newborns Delivered at Public Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2019 (N=210) Note: *Statistically significant at 5% level of significance. Abbreviations: ANC, antenatal care; APH, antepartum hemorrhage; PIH, pregnancy-induced hypertension; SVD, spontaneous vaginal delivery; CS, cesarean section; IVD, instrumental vaginal delivery; PROM, premature rupture of membrane; MSAF, meconium-stained amniotic fluid. The multivariable analysis result showed that those mothers of newborns who have had antepartum hemorrhage were about 7.17 times to have newborns suffered from perinatal asphyxia compared with their counterparts [AOR=7.17, 95% CI (1.73–29.72)]. The odds of newborns delivered via cesarean section to acquire asphyxia was 2.75 times higher than those neonates delivered via SVD [AOR=2.75, 95% CI (1.02–7.42)] whereas newborn delivered through instrumental delivery were 4.88 times [AOR=4.88, 95% CI (1.35–17.61)] more likely to develop perinatal asphyxia than those delivered via SVD. Intrapartum fetal distress was also significantly associated with perinatal asphyxia. Neonates with intrapartum fetal distress were 4.77 times more likely to have perinatal asphyxia when compared with their counterparts [AOR=4.77, 95% CI (1.53–14.92)]. Furthermore, the odds of preterm newborns was 3.4 times greater than term neonates did [AOR=3.4, 95% CI (1.04–11.16)]. Neonates delivered with meconium-stained amniotic fluid were 9.02 times [AOR=9.02, 95% CI (2.69–30.25)] more likely to develop perinatal asphyxia compared to their counterparts. Neonates with low birth weight were at three folds increased risk to acquire perinatal asphyxia than normal birth weight newborn did [AOR=2.87, 95% CI (1.01–8.13)] (Table 4).

Discussion

Prevention of perinatal asphyxia and its complications is dependent on the early identification of risk factors during pregnancies along with the appropriate provision of intervention. In this study antepartum hemorrhage, low birth weight, cesarean section delivery, instrumental delivery, fetal distress, preterm birth, and meconium-stained amniotic fluid were identified as risk factors of perinatal asphyxia. Newborns delivered from the mother with antepartum hemorrhage were approximately seven times more likely to have perinatal asphyxia compared with their counterparts. This finding is consistent with the study conducted at Tigray, Ethiopia,29 and Indonesia.32 This could be due to the decreased placental blood flow secondary to antepartum hemorrhage that will lead to fetal hypoxemia and perinatal asphyxia. Newborns delivered through instrumental delivery were 4.88 times more at risk for perinatal asphyxia than neonates who were delivered spontaneously. This finding was harmonious with the study conducted at Dessie, Ethiopia,31 and India.33 The possible justification could be that instrumental delivery can cause birth trauma (skull fracture, intracranial hemorrhage, subgaleal hemorrhage) which can further lead to perinatal asphyxia.34 On the contrary, the study done in Hong Kong, China showed that there was a significant decrease in birth asphyxia related to instrumental delivery.35 This could be due to the Hawthorne effect (tendency to improve performance because of awareness of being studied) in that study. Likewise, neonates delivered by cesarean section were nearly three times more likely to develop perinatal asphyxia compared with neonates delivered spontaneously per vagina. This finding was congruent with the study conducted in Indonesia,32 Pakistan,13 Nigeria,5 and Iran.36 The possible justification might be unlike vaginal delivery, cesarean section delivery did not involve vaginal squeeze and thus could not cause chest compression and are at greater risk for respiratory distress.37 Additionally, newborns delivered with meconium-stained amniotic fluid were 9 times more likely to have perinatal asphyxia compared with that clear amniotic fluid. This finding is in line with studies from Jimma,28 Thailand,38 Uganda,39 and India.33 The reason for this might be that newborns delivered from mothers with meconium-stained amniotic fluid were prone to aspiration, which can predispose to lung inflammation, obstruction, and limited lung compliance.9,40 The current study revealed that prematurity was significantly associated with perinatal asphyxia (AOR=3.4). This finding was supported by studies conducted at Tigray, Ethiopia,29 Karachi,41 and Jakarta.40,42 This could be explained as the immaturity of organ systems mainly of the pulmonary function especially those who were born before 34 weeks of gestation lack surfactant and may suffer to maintain breathing and tissue perfusion after birth. Preterm neonates are also prone to co-morbidities that will impair normal functioning in the extra-uterine life.40 Again, newborns with low birth weight were three times more at risk to develop perinatal asphyxia than newborns with normal birth weight. This finding was conformable with previous African and Asian studies.29,36,38 This might be due to the possibility that most of the low birth weight babies might be preterm babies that they might not able to produce enough amount of surfactant that further leads to the difficulty of breathing and consequently develop perinatal asphyxia.40 Besides, having intrapartum fetal distress was found to be independently associated with perinatal asphyxia (AOR=4.77). This finding was compatible with studies from Gonder, Ethiopia,30 Karachi,41 and Al-Diwaniya.43 The possible explanation is fetal distress mainly result from insufficient placental perfusion or any factor during labor that will impair fetal oxygenation so that this can further cause difficulty to initiate and sustain breathing after birth end up with asphyxia.

Conclusion

Perinatal asphyxia is one of the worldwide problems of neonates. The current study identified different antepartum, intrapartum, and neonatal factors that were significantly associated with perinatal asphyxia. Antepartum hemorrhage, cesarean section delivery, instrumental delivery, fetal distress, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, low birth weight, and preterm birth were identified as independent risk factors of perinatal asphyxia.
  20 in total

1.  Continued reduction in the incidence of birth trauma and birth asphyxia related to instrumental deliveries after the study period: was this the Hawthorne effect?

Authors:  W C Leung; B C P Chan; G Ma; K W Lam; K Y Leung; T C Pun; T T Lao; C P Lee
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 2.  Cardiovascular Alterations and Multiorgan Dysfunction After Birth Asphyxia.

Authors:  Graeme R Polglase; Tracey Ong; Noah H Hillman
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.430

3.  4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why?

Authors:  Joy E Lawn; Simon Cousens; Jelka Zupan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Mar 5-11       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Neonatal resuscitation in low-resource settings: what, who, and how to overcome challenges to scale up?

Authors:  Stephen N Wall; Anne C C Lee; Susan Niermeyer; Mike English; William J Keenan; Wally Carlo; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Abhay Bang; Indira Narayanan; Iwan Ariawan; Joy E Lawn
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  "Risk factors of birth asphyxia".

Authors:  Hafiz Muhammad Aslam; Shafaq Saleem; Rafia Afzal; Umair Iqbal; Sehrish Muhammad Saleem; Muhammad Waqas Abid Shaikh; Nazish Shahid
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 2.638

6.  Risk factors of birth asphyxia among newborns in public hospitals of Central Zone, Tigray, Ethiopia 2018.

Authors:  Hagos Tasew; Micheal Zemicheal; Girmay Teklay; Teklewoini Mariye; Ebud Ayele
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-07-20

7.  Determinants of birth asphyxia among live birth newborns in University of Gondar referral hospital, northwest Ethiopia: A case-control study.

Authors:  Lisanu Wosenu; Abebaw Gebeyehu Worku; Destaw Fetene Teshome; Abebaw Addis Gelagay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Association of Apgar score at five minutes with long-term neurologic disability and cognitive function in a prevalence study of Danish conscripts.

Authors:  Vera Ehrenstein; Lars Pedersen; Miriam Grijota; Gunnar Lauge Nielsen; Kenneth J Rothman; Henrik Toft Sørensen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group.

Authors:  Leontine Alkema; Doris Chou; Daniel Hogan; Sanqian Zhang; Ann-Beth Moller; Alison Gemmill; Doris Ma Fat; Ties Boerma; Marleen Temmerman; Colin Mathers; Lale Say
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Impact of perinatal asphyxia on parental mental health and bonding with the infant: a questionnaire survey of Swiss parents.

Authors:  Antje Horsch; Ingo Jacobs; Leah Gilbert; Céline Favrod; Juliane Schneider; Mathilde Morisod Harari; Myriam Bickle Graz
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2017-09-11
View more
  8 in total

1.  The effect of gestational age, low birth weight and parity on birth asphyxia among neonates in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis: 2021.

Authors:  Masresha Asmare Techane; Tewodros Getaneh Alemu; Chalachew Adugna Wubneh; Getaneh Mulualem Belay; Tadesse Tarik Tamir; Addis Bilal Muhye; Destaye Guadie Kassie; Amare Wondim; Bewuketu Terefe; Bethelihem Tigabu Tarekegn; Mohammed Seid Ali; Beletech Fentie; Almaz Tefera Gonete; Berhan Tekeba; Selam Fisiha Kassa; Bogale Kassahun Desta; Amare Demsie Ayele; Melkamu Tilahun Dessie; Kendalem Asmare Atalell; Nega Tezera Assimamaw
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.288

2.  Determinants of birth asphyxia among newborn live births in public hospitals of Gamo and Gofa zones, Southern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Kebebew Lemma; Direslgne Misker; Mekidim Kassa; Hanan Abdulkadir; Kusse Otayto
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.567

3.  Adverse Neonatal Outcome are More Common among Babies Born by Cesarean Section than Naturally Born Babies at Public Hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia: A Comparative Prospective Follow-Up Study at Eastern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Maleda Tefera; Nega Assefa; Kedir Teji Roba; Letta Gedefa
Journal:  Glob Pediatr Health       Date:  2021-05-25

4.  Preparedness for neonatal emergencies at birth and associated factors among healthcare providers working at hospitals in northwest Ethiopia: A multi-center cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Azmeraw Ambachew Kebede; Birhan Tsegaw Taye; Kindu Yinges Wondie; Agumas Eskezia Tiguh; Getachew Azeze Eriku; Muhabaw Shumye Mihret
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-12-20

5.  Perinatal Asphyxia and Its Associated Factors among Live Births in the Public Health Facilities of Bahir Dar City, Northwest Ethiopia, 2021.

Authors:  Magarsa Lami Dabalo; Simachew Animen Bante; Getahun Belay Gela; Selamawit Lake Fanta; Lemesa Abdisa Sori; Wondu Feyisa Balcha; Yomilan Geneti Muse; Tigist Derebe Tesfahun
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2021-11-08

6.  Determinants of birth asphyxia among newborns in Debre Berhan referral hospital, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia: a case-control study.

Authors:  Sisay Shine Tegegnework; Yeshfanos Tekola Gebre; Sindew Mahmud Ahmed; Abrham Shitaw Tewachew
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.125

7.  Determinants of low fifth minute Apgar score among newborns delivered by cesarean section at Wolaita Sodo University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Southern Ethiopia: an unmatched case control study.

Authors:  Bahiru Darma Ajibo; Eskinder Wolka; Andualem Aseffa; Mitiku Ayele Nugusu; Abdi Oumer Adem; Mebratu Mamo; Ashagrie Sintayehu Temesgen; Getachew Debalke; Negeso Gobena; Mohammad Suleiman Obsa
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.105

8.  Perinatal maternal characteristics predict a high risk of neonatal asphyxia: A multi-center retrospective cohort study in China.

Authors:  Yi Yu; Jinsong Gao; Juntao Liu; Yabing Tang; Mei Zhong; Jing He; Shixiu Liao; Xietong Wang; Xinghui Liu; Yinli Cao; Caixia Liu; Jingxia Sun
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.