| Literature DB >> 32921790 |
Johannes Stelwagen1, Sjoukje Lubberts1, Lars C Steggink1, Gerrie Steursma1, Lara M Kruyt1, Jan Willem Donkerbroek1, Arie M van Roon2, Anne I van Gessel2, Saskia C van de Zande2, Coby Meijer1, Christine H Gräfin Zu Eulenburg3, Sjoukje F Oosting1, Janine Nuver1, Annemiek M E Walenkamp1, Igle Jan de Jong4, Joop D Lefrandt2, Jourik A Gietema5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Late effects of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in testicular cancer survivors (TCS) include cardiovascular morbidity, but little data is available beyond 20 years. The objective was to assess vascular damage in very long-term TCS.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32921790 PMCID: PMC7686327 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-01049-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Fig. 1Consort diagram.
The institutional database of testicular cancer patients was used to identify testicular cancer survivors (TCS) treated with chemotherapy (CT). Patients were randomly selected and screened for inclusion. Eligible CT patients were approached if they were still alive and met the inclusion criteria: <40 years of age at diagnosis, <70 years of age at inclusion in the current study, treatment for TC was ≥20 years ago and patients were treated with CT for either good or intermediate prognosis according to the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCCG). This led to screening 301 CT patients with 138 not eligible. 91 of the eligible patients decided not to participate in the study. Next, the institutional database of testicular cancer patients was used to identify TCS treated with orchiectomy only. Patients were age-matched to the CT group and approached for inclusion if they were alive and met the inclusion criteria: <40 years of age at diagnosis, <70 years of age at inclusion in the current study, treatment for TC was ≥20 years ago and patients were not treated with CT for any indication. This led to screening 268 orchiectomy-only patients with 126 not eligible and 83 patients who decided not to participate in the study. Furthermore, 70 age-matched healthy controls were included.
Patient demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics at follow-up according to study group.
| Testicular cancer survivors (TCS) | Healthy controls | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All TCS | CT | Orchiectomy only | CT vs. Orchiectomy only | Controls | TCS vs. Controls | |||||
| Characteristic | ||||||||||
| No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | |||
| Age, years | ||||||||||
| At diagnosis | ||||||||||
| Median | 27 | 28 | 27 | 0.93 | – | NA | ||||
| Range | 17–46 | 17–46 | 17–45 | – | ||||||
| At study visit | ||||||||||
| Median | 57 | 56 | 57 | 0.95 | 57 | 0.73 | ||||
| Range | 40–70 | 41–70 | 40–70 | 39–70 | ||||||
| FU duration, years | ||||||||||
| Median | 28 | 27 | 28 | 0.74 | – | NA | ||||
| Range | 20–42 | 20–40 | 20–42 | – | ||||||
| Clinical stage† | ||||||||||
| I | 57 | 45 | – | – | 57 | 100 | <0.01 | – | NA | |
| II | 41 | 32 | 41 | 59 | – | – | – | |||
| III | 7 | 6 | 7 | 10 | – | – | – | |||
| IV | 22 | 17 | 22 | 31 | – | – | – | |||
| Smoking behaviour | ||||||||||
| Never smoked | 56 | 44 | 29 | 41 | 27 | 47 | 0.37 | 37 | 53 | 0.45 |
| Former smoker | 51 | 40 | 32 | 46 | 19 | 33 | 26 | 37 | ||
| Current smoker | 20 | 16 | 9 | 13 | 11 | 19 | 7 | 10 | ||
| Pack years‡ | ||||||||||
| Median | 12 | 11 | 16 | 0.48 | 13 | 0.71 | ||||
| Range | 1–48 | 1–48 | 1–44 | 0–42 | ||||||
| GFR, ml/min§ | ||||||||||
| Mean | 129 | 125 | 133 | 0.15 | 135 | 0.17 | ||||
| SD | 32 | 35 | 26 | 31 | ||||||
| Blood pressure, mmHg | ||||||||||
| Systolic | ||||||||||
| Mean | 133 | 132 | 133 | 0.75 | 133 | 0.81 | ||||
| SD | 14 | 13 | 14 | 16 | ||||||
| Diastolic | ||||||||||
| Mean | 87 | 89 | 87 | 0.38 | 87 | 0.79 | ||||
| SD | 9 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ||||||
| Hypertension¶ | 88 | 69 | 51 | 73 | 37 | 65 | 0.22 | 34 | 52 | 0.01 |
| BMI, kg/m² | ||||||||||
| Median | 26.5 | 25.9 | 26.9 | 0.05 | 25.6 | 0.02 | ||||
| Range | 21–42 | 21–36 | 21–42 | 20–38 | ||||||
| Hip circumference (cm) | ||||||||||
| median | 102 | 99 | 106 | <0.001 | 99 | <0.001 | ||||
| range | 90–124 | 90–124 | 95–119 | 85–119 | ||||||
| Waist circumference (cm) | ||||||||||
| Median | 98 | 98 | 98 | 0.53 | 95 | 0.004 | ||||
| range | 77–144 | 80–126 | 77–144 | 76–133 | ||||||
| Obesity | ||||||||||
| 25-30 | 54 | 43 | 27 | 39 | 27 | 47 | 0.32 | 21 | 30 | 0.68 |
| >30 | 16 | 13 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 14 | 7 | 10 | ||
| Total cholesterol | ||||||||||
| Mean | 5.4 | 5.5 | 5.3 | 0.23 | 5.5 | 0.47 | ||||
| SD | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.0 | ||||||
| Lipid-lowering medication | 25 | 20 | 19 | 27 | 6 | 11 | 0.02 | 5 | 7 | 0.03 |
| Serum glucose, mmol/L | ||||||||||
| Median | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 0.21 | 5.8 | 0.40 | ||||
| Range | 4.7–15.1 | 4.7–9.3 | 5.0–13.8 | |||||||
| HbA1c, % | ||||||||||
| Median | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 0.42 | 5.4 | 0.17 | ||||
| Range | 4.5–11.3 | 4.5–11.3 | 4.6–7.4 | 4.8–8.0 | ||||||
| Known Diabetes Mellitus | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0.68 | 1 | 3 | 0.64 |
| Metabolic syndrome# | 33 | 26 | 16 | 23 | 17 | 30 | 0.40 | 11 | 16 | 0.15 |
| Total testosterone, nmol/L | ||||||||||
| Median | 13.5 | 12.2 | 14.2 | 0.28 | 15.4 | 0.01 | ||||
| Range | 2.9–35.8 | 2.9–26.5 | 5.6–35.8 | 7.2–46.0 | ||||||
| Serum LH, U/L | ||||||||||
| Median | 8.0 | 10.5 | 7.3 | <0.01 | 4.8 | <0.01 | ||||
| Range | 2.9–47.0 | 2.0–46.6 | 2.9–47.0 | 1.3–12.4 | ||||||
| Testosterone therapy†† | 9 | 7 | 8 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 0.03 | – | – | 0.03 |
| Hypogonadism | 21 | 17 | 14 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 0.23 | 2 | 3 | <0.01 |
TCS testicular cancer survivors, CT chemotherapy group, FU follow-up, GFR glomerular filtration rate, SD standard deviation, BMI body mass index, HbA1c glycated haemoglobin, LH luteinising hormone.
†According to Royal Marsden classification.
‡Including only smokers.
§Measured through two 24-h urine samples.
¶Hypertension defined as systolic >140 mmHg and/or diastolic >90 mmHg or use of antihypertensive medication.
#Definition according to NCEP ATP III criteria.
††Using testosterone for previously diagnosed hypogonadism.
‡‡Hypogonadism defined as either using testosterone therapy for previously diagnosed hypogonadism or serum testosterone <8 nmol/L.
Supplementary patient characteristics including chemotherapy regimens and medical history of cardiovascular disease.
| Treatment | No. of patients | % | Total no. of cycles | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemotherapy regimens | ||||
| BEP | 19 | 28 | 4† | |
| EP | 14 | 20 | 4 | |
| BEP + EP‡ | 9 | 13 | 4 | |
| PVB | 12 | 17 | 4 | |
| BEP/PVB§ | 9 | 6 | 4 | |
| BEP + VIP | 4 | 6 | 6 | |
| VIP | 3 | 4 | 4 | |
| Cardiovascular events (in CT) | Year of diagnosis | Regimens used | ||
| AMI | 3(3) | 2 | 2006, 2014, 2017 | EP (2x), BEP |
| PE | 3(2) | 2 | 1993, 1998, 2012 | BEP, BEP/VIP |
| PAD | – | – | ||
| CVA | 3(2) | 2 | 1994, 2004 (2x) | PVP (2x) |
| DVT | 5(3) | 4 | 1995 (2x), 2006, 2015 (2x) | EP, BEP, PVB |
BEP bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin, EP etoposide, cisplatin, PVB cisplatin, vinblastin, bleomycin, Vbl vinblastin, VIP etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, CT chemotherapy group, AMI acute myocardial infarction, PE pulmonary embolism, PAD peripheral arterial disease, CVA cerebrovascular accident, DVT deep venous thrombosis.
†One patient received three cycles of BEP chemotherapy.
‡Patients received three cycles of BEP chemotherapy followed by 1 cycle of EP chemotherapy.
§Patients received alternating BEP and PVB chemotherapy regimens.
Fig. 2Pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) for all TC survivors (TCS), controls (CO) and for separate study groups.
Pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) as biomarker for vascular stiffness for all TC survivors (TCS), controls (CO) and for separate study groups. Bars represent median values and interquartile range. Corresponding geometrical means are reported. P values were obtained by students T-test of the logarithmic transformation.
Explaining variance of cf-PWV: multiple regression models for 10log [cf-PWV] per study groups.
| Study groups | Standardised coefficients | Model R | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SE | ||||
| All | 0.67 | |||
| Constant | 0.541 | 0.036 | <0.01 | |
| Age | 5.638 × 10−3 | 0.951 × 10−3 | <0.01 | |
| Metabolic syndrome (Y/N) | 6.780 × 10−2 | 1.909 × 10−2 | <0.01 | |
| Smoking (pack years) | 1.077 × 10−3 | 0.752 × 10−3 | 0.015 | |
| Chemo (Y/N) | 4.402 × 10−2 | 1.019 × 10−2 | <0.01 | |
| TCS | 0.72 | |||
| Constant | 0.492 | 0.043 | <0.01 | |
| Age | 6.508 × 10−3 | 0.761 × 10−3 | <0.01 | |
| Metabolic syndrome (Y/N) | 5.999 × 10−2 | 1.361 × 10−2 | <0.01 | |
| Smoking (pack years) | 0.973 × 10−3 | 0.502 × 10−3 | 0.055 | |
| Chemo (Y/N) | 4.705 × 10−2 | 1.178 × 10−2 | <0.01 | |
| CT | 0.66 | |||
| Constant | 0.475 | 0.070 | <0.01 | |
| Age | 7.590 × 10−3 | 1.220 × 10−3 | <0.01 | |
| Metabolic syndrome (Y/N) | 6.079 × 10−2 | 2.006 × 10−2 | <0.01 | |
| Smoking (pack years) | 1.272 × 10−3 | 0.684 × 10−3 | 0.07 | |
| Orchiectomy only | 0.78 | |||
| Constant | 0.559 | 0.053 | <0.01 | |
| Age | 5.353 × 10−3 | 0.951 × 10−3 | <0.01 | |
| Metabolic syndrome (Y/N) | 7.386 × 10−2 | 1.909 × 10−2 | <0.01 | |
| Smoking (pack years) | 0.233 × 10−3 | 0.752 × 10−3 | 0.76 | |
| Controls | 0.55 | |||
| Constant | 0.627 | 0.069 | <0.01 | |
| Age | 4.035 × 10−3 | 1.230 × 10−3 | <0.01 | |
| Metabolic syndrome (Y/N) | 8.319 × 10−2 | 2.520 × 10−2 | <0.01 | |
| Smoking (pack years) | 1.657 × 10−3 | 0.875 × 10−3 | 0.06 | |
Multiple regression models per study group with standardised coefficients (β) and standard errors (SE). Positive β corresponds to a positive correlation. Proportion of variation in cf-PWV explained by each model is shown as R (0.55–0.78). Models based on the logarithmic transformed cf-PWV. Note that receiving chemo is an independent predictor when the total study population was modelled as well as when only TCS were modelled. Furthermore, note the difference in coefficients β for age in the CT group and control group.
Fig. 3Pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) as biomarker for vascular stiffness as a function of age for the chemotherapy (CT) group and the control group.
Orange line represents the CT group and blue line the control group. Corresponding linear regression lines were based on regression coefficients for age calculated in the multivariate model correcting for other predictive variables. ∆cf-PWV at age 70 amounts to 2.03 m/s. For CT: 10(0.475 + (7.590 × 10–3 × Age)). For CO: 10(0.627 + (4.035 ×10–3 × Age)). Slopes differ significantly (p = 0.03).
Fig. 4Raynaud Phenomenon tested by cooling digits.
Mean number of digits with perfusion at each time point during PPG-test. The first 36 min represent the cooling period. Next, 10 min of recovery time at room temperature is shown. Mean ischaemic and recovery times for each study group are reported in Supplementary Table 3.
Biochemical markers for vascular damage per treatment group.
| Testicular cancer survivors (TCS) | Healthy controls | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All TCS | CT | Orchiectomy only | CT vs. Orchiectomy only | Controls | TCS vs. controls | |||||
| Characteristic | ||||||||||
| No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | |||
| vWF | ||||||||||
| median | 107 | 110 | 106 | 0.78 | 96 | 0.16 | ||||
| range | 35–256 | 59–250 | 35–256 | 32–208 | ||||||
| No Albuminuria | 96 | 78 | 50 | 72 | 46 | 85 | 0.09 | 63 | 97 | <0.01 |
| Albuminuria‡ | 27 | 22 | 19 | 28 | 8 | 15 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Fibrinogen | ||||||||||
| median | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 0.70 | 2.8 | <0.01 | ||||
| range | 1.8–6.1 | 1.8–5.3 | 2.0–6.1 | 1.9–4.0 | ||||||
| PAI-1 | ||||||||||
| median | 31 | 35 | 26 | 0.59 | 23 | <0.01 | ||||
| range | 8–151 | 12–149 | 8–151 | 7–87 | ||||||
| tPA-antigen | ||||||||||
| median | 14 | 15 | 13 | 0.90 | 12 | <0.01 | ||||
| range | 4–75 | 4–26 | 5–75 | 4–24 | ||||||
| F-VIII | ||||||||||
| median | 163 | 160 | 167 | 0.40 | 157 | 0.81 | ||||
| range | 11–536 | 81–316 | 11–536 | 75–281 | ||||||
| CRP | ||||||||||
| median | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 0.26 | 1.0 | 0.047 | ||||
| range | 0–45 | 0–29 | 0–45 | 0–13 | ||||||
vWF Von Willebrand Factor, PAI-1 plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, tPA tissue plasminogen activator, F-VIII factor VIII, CRP C-reactive protein.
†Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables, χ2 for dichotomous variable.
‡Defined as either micro-albuminuria or macro-albuminuria. Micro-albuminuria defined as 20–200 mg/L urine and macro-albuminuria as >200 mg/L. Measured by 24-h urine samples.