Literature DB >> 32920347

Intubation, mortality, and risk factors in critically ill Covid-19 patients: A pilot study.

Mengqiang Luo1, Shumei Cao1, Liqun Wei1, Xu Zhao2, Feng Gao3, Shengqing Li4, Lingzhong Meng5, Yingwei Wang6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32920347      PMCID: PMC7476450          DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


× No keyword cloud information.
More than 70% of the critically ill Covid-19 patients received intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) support [1,2]. Medical professionals throughout the world agree that intubation saves lives. However, there is no direct evidence attesting to the benefit of intubation and IMV in critically ill Covid-19 patients. On the contrary, a report revealed that of 32 Covid-19 patients who received intubation and IMV support, 31 (97%) died [3]. The poor outcome after intubation may be related to the timing of intubation [4]. The role of intubation and IMV amid the Covid-19 pandemic deserves investigation. As it is unethical to perform a randomized controlled trial comparing the outcomes between patients receiving and not receiving intubation and IMV, we conducted a single-center pilot study based on intubated critically ill Covid-19 patients to explore the risks factors associated with mortality. Patients who received non-resuscitative intubation in the ICU on the Guanggu Campus of Tongji Hospital (Wuhan, China) between February 10, 2020 to March 30, 2020 were included. The ICU was managed by the medical team from Huashan Hospital due to the manpower re-deployment. All patients were diagnosed with Covid-19 and reached the endpoints of either death or survival. Patients who were intubated during resuscitation and did not survive for more than 2 h after resuscitation were excluded. The study was approved by the Internal Review Board of Huashan Hospital (#2020-655). The primary outcome was the rate of ICU mortality, the differences between survivors and non-survivors were investigated, and the risk factors associated with death in intubated critically ill Covid-19 patients were analyzed by means of univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. A total of 75 critically ill Covid-19 patients were enrolled in this study. Of these 75 patients, 55 patients underwent intubation and received IMV support, 41 intubated patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. The median age of these 41 patients was 70 (60–81) years. 31 (76%) patients did not survive the ICU course, while 10 (24%) did; all three patients who received ECMO support survived. The median ages of non-survivors and survivors were 71 (66–82) and 59 (57–77) years. Of the non-survivors, 32% (10/31) were obese, while none of the survivors were obese (p = 0.039). 48% (15/31) of the non-survivors had three or more comorbidities, while none of the survivors had three or more comorbidities (p = 0.007). Comparing with survivors, non-survivors had a lower pH (7.38 vs. 7.45; p = 0.010) and platelet count (120 vs. 181; p = 0.036), but a higher hs-TnI (77.3 vs. 15.7; p = 0.009), NT-proBNP (1959 vs. 337; p = 0.001), IL-6 (68.3 vs. 17.1; p < 0.001), INR (1.27 vs. 1.11; p = 0.007), SOFA score (9.0 vs. 3.0; p < 0.001), and APACHE II score (22.0 vs. 11.0; p < 0.001) at the time of IMV initiation (Table 1). There were no significant differences between survivors and non-survivors in PaO2/FiO2 and levels of PaCO2 at the time of intubation and during the early stage of IMV support; however, the differences became significant at the time of IMV weaning for survivals or death (Table 1). The univariable analysis revealed that the odds of ICU mortality were higher in patients with a higher NT-proBNP, INR, SOFA score, and APACHE II score at the time of IMV initiation. A higher SOFA score at the time of IMV initiation was independently associated with an increased risk of death in intubated Covid-19 patients based on multivariable analysis (Supplementary eTable 1).
Table 1

Laboratory data, clinical scores, and timing and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation.

Total(n = 41)Non-survivor (n = 31)Survivor(n = 10)p value
Initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation
pH7.40 (7.29–7.46)7.38 (7.23–7.43)7.45 (7.42–7.51)0.010
Lactate, mmol/L1.8 (1.3–2.3)1.8 (1.3–2.4)2.0 (1.2–2.3)0.931
PaO2/FiO2, mmHg105 (85–143)102 (84–144)117 (90–177)0.347
PaCO2, mmHg47.8 (37.1–60.3)48.1 (37.5–65.3)42.8 (31.1–52.6)0.215
WBC, ×109/L12.5 (8.7–14.7)12.9 (9.8–14.9)10.0 (7.7–15.0)0.367
Neutrophils, utr9/L11.0 (7.9–13.7)11.9 (9.1–13.7)9.1 (7.1–14.1)0.434
Lymphocytes, ×109/L0.51 (0.30–0.73)0.46 (0.27–0.69)0.57 (0.46–0.83)0.141
hs-TnI, pg/mL67.4 (16.5–355.9)77.3 (24.5–451.6)15.7 (10.4–67.9)0.009
hs-TnI, > 28 pg/mL26 (63%)22 (71%)4 (40%)0.077
NT-proBNP, pg/mL1290 (536–3175)1959 (769–3339)337 (129–1153)0.001
IL-2R, unit/mL922 (711–1497)1215 (720–1532)754 (580–1364)0.275
IL-6, pg/mL52.2 (19.2–167.6)68.3 (34.8–278.1)17.1 (9.8–26.0)<0.001
ALT, unit/L32.0 (16.0–43.5)31.0 (14.0–44.0)34.0 (19.8–43.3)0.486
Creatinine, μmol/L85.0 (67.0–105.5)85.0 (70.0–110.0)80.0 (63.0–100.3)0.714
Albumin, g/L31.8 (31.0–33.7)31.8 (31.0–33.7)31.7 (31.0–34.3)0.911
Haemoglobin, g/L124 (111–136)124 (107–133)124 (115–140)0.544
INR1.22 (1.11–1.34)1.27 (1.15–1.41)1.11 (1.06–1.19)0.007
Platelet, 109/L148 (98–215)120 (94–198)181 (154–368)0.036
Platelet, <100 109/L11 (27%)9 (29%)2 (20%)0.575
D-Dimer, μg/ML6.2 (2.1–16.9)6.2 (2.3–20.0)3.0 (1.7–12.5)0.302
SOFA score7.0 (5.0–9.0)9.0 (6.0–11.0)3.0 (3.0–4.5)<0.001
APACHE II score18.0 (14.0–24.5)22.0 (16.0–28.0)11.0 (4.8–14.8)<0.001
Time from ICU admission to IMV, days2.0 (0.5–5.0)3.0 (0–5.0)1.5 (0.75–3.25)0.284



Weaning of invasive mechanical ventilation or death
pH7.26 (7.08–7.43)7.14 (7.04–7.30)7.48 (7.41–7.50)<0.001
Lactate, mmol/L2.3 (1.2–3.9)2.5 (1.5–4.7)1.2 (0.8–1.6)<0.001
PaO2/FiO2, mmHg72 (49–215)59 (45–77)336 (245–412)<0.001
PaCO2, mmHg55.0 (42.9–102.8)76.0 (52.8–112.9)38.8 (31.0–45.9)<0.001
WBC, ×109/L11.3 (7.5–15.7)12.6 (8.4–18.2)8.3 (6.6–11.6)0.068
Neutrophils, utr9/L9.8 (6.0–14.0)11.0 (7.3–17.4)6.5 (5.1–10.3)0.038
Lymphocytes, ×109/L0.59 (0.35–0.86)0.44 (0.27–0.69)0.89 (0.65–1.13)0.002
hs-TnI, pg/mL63.5 (23.0–446.4)185.7 (38.6–523.5)7.5 (5.6–39.4)<0.001
hs-TnI, >28 pg/mL30 (73%)27 (87%)3 (30%)<0.001
NT-proBNP, pg/mL4095 (879–8573)6128 (1858–11,407)377 (116–801)<0.001
IL-2R, unit/mL1299 (861–3083)2676 (1215–3360)725 (604–1036)<0.001
IL-6, pg/mL247.4 (62.1–2190)398.2 (156.0–5000)13.1 (9.6–69.7)<0.001
ALT, unit/L139.1 (9.0–3959)170.6 (9.0–3959)41.5 (10.0–100)0.569
Creatinine, μmol/L105.0 (74.5–223.5)145.0 (99.0–267.0)66.0 (55.0–80.0)<0.001
Albumin, g/L31.2 (26.2–35.3)29.6 (25.1–32.7)38.7 (35.4–44.9)<0.001
Haemoglobin, g/L96.0 (82.5–107.0)92.0 (79.0–110.0)96.0 (89.0–103.8)0.397
INR1.30 (1.18–1.55)1.34 (1.25–1.69)1.17 (1.12–1.24)0.001
Platelet, 109/L126 (60–196)108 (53–151)196 (154–225)0.003
Platelet, <100 109/L15 (48%)14 (45%)1 (10%)0.045
d-Dimer, μg/mL5.1 (2.8–9.3)5.5 (3.0–18.0)4.3 (2.2–9.1)0.414
SOFA score15.0 (7.5–17.0)15.0 (13.0–17.0)2.0 (1.8–4.3)<0.001
APACHE II score33.0 (17.0–37.5)35.0 (30.0–39.0)8.0 (6.0–10.0)<0.001
Length of IMV, days8.0 (4.0–12.5)6.0 (2.0–10.0)13.5 (9.5–16.5)<0.001

PaO2 = arterial oxygen partial pressure; FiO2 = inspired oxygen fraction; PaCO2 = arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure; WBC = white blood cell; hs-TnI = high-sensitivity Troponin I; NT-proBNP = N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide; IL-2R = interleukin-2 receptor; IL-6 = interleukin-6; ALT = alanine aminotransferase; INR = international normalized ratio; SOFA = sequential organ failure assessment; APACHE = acute physiologic assessment and chronic health evaluation; ICU = intensive care unit.

Data missing in 2 non-survivors.

Comparing with survivors, non-survivors had a lower pH (7.38 vs. 7.45; p = 0.010) and platelet count (120 vs. 181; p = 0.036), but a higher hs-TnI (77.3 vs. 15.7; p = 0.009), NT-proBNP (1959 vs. 337; p = 0.001), IL-6 (68.3 vs. 17.1; p < 0.001), INR (1.27 vs. 1.11; p = 0.007), SOFA score (9.0 vs. 3.0; p < 0.001), and APACHE II score (22.0 vs. 11.0; p < 0.001) at the time of IMV initiation (Table 1). There were no significant differences between survivors and non-survivors in PaO2/FiO2 and levels of PaCO2 at the time of intubation and during the early stage of IMV support; however, the differences became significant at the time of IMV weaning for survivals or death (Table 1). The univariable analysis revealed that the odds of ICU mortality were higher in patients with a higher NT-proBNP, INR, SOFA score, and APACHE II score at the time of IMV initiation. A higher SOFA score at the time of IMV initiation was independently associated with an increased risk of death in intubated Covid-19 patients based on multivariable analysis (Supplementary eTable 1). In conclusion, 76% of critically ill Covid-19 patients died after non-resuscitative intubation and IMV support. Non-survivors had more comorbidities than survivors. Mortality after non-resuscitative intubation in critically ill Covid-19 patients is associated with the disease severity at the time of IMV initiation. Laboratory data, clinical scores, and timing and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation. PaO2 = arterial oxygen partial pressure; FiO2 = inspired oxygen fraction; PaCO2 = arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure; WBC = white blood cell; hs-TnI = high-sensitivity Troponin I; NT-proBNP = N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide; IL-2R = interleukin-2 receptor; IL-6 = interleukin-6; ALT = alanine aminotransferase; INR = international normalized ratio; SOFA = sequential organ failure assessment; APACHE = acute physiologic assessment and chronic health evaluation; ICU = intensive care unit. Data missing in 2 non-survivors. The following are the supplementary data related to this article.

Supplementary eTable 1

Risk factors associated with in-ICU death. Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110039.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation, People's Republic of China (Grant Nos. 81730031 and 81671058 to Yingwei Wang).

Declaration of competing interest

None.
  4 in total

1.  Characteristics of Hospitalized Adults With COVID-19 in an Integrated Health Care System in California.

Authors:  Laura C Myers; Stephen M Parodi; Gabriel J Escobar; Vincent X Liu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes of 1591 Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 Admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy.

Authors:  Giacomo Grasselli; Alberto Zangrillo; Alberto Zanella; Massimo Antonelli; Luca Cabrini; Antonio Castelli; Danilo Cereda; Antonio Coluccello; Giuseppe Foti; Roberto Fumagalli; Giorgio Iotti; Nicola Latronico; Luca Lorini; Stefano Merler; Giuseppe Natalini; Alessandra Piatti; Marco Vito Ranieri; Anna Mara Scandroglio; Enrico Storti; Maurizio Cecconi; Antonio Pesenti
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Intubation and Ventilation amid the COVID-19 Outbreak: Wuhan's Experience.

Authors:  Lingzhong Meng; Haibo Qiu; Li Wan; Yuhang Ai; Zhanggang Xue; Qulian Guo; Ranjit Deshpande; Lina Zhang; Jie Meng; Chuanyao Tong; Hong Liu; Lize Xiong
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Fei Zhou; Ting Yu; Ronghui Du; Guohui Fan; Ying Liu; Zhibo Liu; Jie Xiang; Yeming Wang; Bin Song; Xiaoying Gu; Lulu Guan; Yuan Wei; Hui Li; Xudong Wu; Jiuyang Xu; Shengjin Tu; Yi Zhang; Hua Chen; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 79.321

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Risk Factors for Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with COVID-19 in a Mississippi Community Health System.

Authors:  S Ijlal Babar; Ashley E Hawthorne; Maggie R Clarkson
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 0.810

2.  Response of patients with acute respiratory failure caused by COVID-19 to awake-prone position outside the intensive care unit based on pulmonary involvement.

Authors:  João Manoel Silva Junior; Ricardo Esper Treml; Pamela Cristina Golinelli; Miguel Rogério de Melo Gurgel Segundo; Pedro Ferro L Menezes; Julilane Daniele de Almeida Umada; Ana Paula Santana Alves; Renata Peres Nabeshima; André Dos Santos Carvalho; Talison Silas Pereira; Elaine Serafim Sponton
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  Clinical characteristics and risk factors for mortality among COVID-19 hospitalized patients in UAE: Does ethnic origin have an impact.

Authors:  Salah AbuRuz; Ahmad Al-Azayzih; Sham ZainAlAbdin; Rami Beiram; Mohammed Al Hajjar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Clinical outcome of bronchoalveolar lavaged COVID ARDS patients.

Authors:  Zablon Mesfin Anbessie; Dawit Kebede Huluka; Zelalem Abdisa Kenea
Journal:  Respir Med Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-17

Review 5.  Airway Pressure Release Ventilation With Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilation (TCAV™) in COVID-19: A Community Hospital's Experience.

Authors:  Philippe Rola; Benjamin Daxon
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Association of Tracheostomy With Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Among Health Care Professionals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Phillip Staibano; Marc Levin; Tobial McHugh; Michael Gupta; Doron D Sommer
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 8.961

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.