Literature DB >> 32920116

Indirect effects of COVID-19 on OHCA in a low prevalence region.

Jonathan Elmer1, Masashi Okubo2, Francis X Guyette2, Christian Martin-Gill2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32920116      PMCID: PMC7482609          DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.08.127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor, Mortality in the United States and internationally increased during the COVID-19 pandemic.1, 2 Effects of social distancing, reluctance to seek medical attention, decrease in bystander assistance or other barriers to care may contribute. Decreased visits for high-risk medical conditions has been particularly concerning. Reports from high prevalence regions make it difficult to disentangle the contributions of infection and indirect effects on mortality.1, 5 We analyzed emergency medical services (EMS) data from agencies serving a catchment area of 2.6 million with low prevalence of COVID-19. We compared incidence and treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) during the pandemic to historical trends. On April 13th 2020, Pennsylvania issued a bulletin regarding treatment of OHCA in patients with suspected COVID-19. Providers were to don personal protective equipment (PPE) for standard, contact and airborne protection prior to CPR. Generally, patients without ROSC were not to be transported and providers were to contact medical command after 10 min of resuscitation without ROSC to discuss termination. We compared encounters from January 2016 to February 2020 (“pre-COVID”) with those March 1st, 2020 to May 25th, 2020 (“post-COVID”). We included adults ≥18 years assessed by one of 24 regional EMS agencies for OHCA. The region had a low prevalence of COVID-19, with 2 cases per 1000 persons as of June 22, 2020. We excluded interfacility transfers and duplicate charts generated by multiple responding units. We extracted data from the prehospital electronic medical record (emsCharts; ZOLL Data Systems). We collected age; gender; arrest characteristics (medical vs traumatic etiology); automated external defibrillator (AED) use; witnessed collapse; layperson CPR; CPR duration; initial advanced airway use; and prehospital ROSC. Encounter characteristics included number of responding crews; and, time to EMS arrival, initiation of vascular access, chest compressions, epinephrine administration and advanced airway attempt. We categorized outcomes as: dead on EMS arrival (DOA) without treatment; treated with resuscitation terminated prior to transport; treated and transported. There were 794,696 encounters during the study period of which 15,779 (2%) were for OHCA and 12,935 were included. Mean age was 63 ± 19 years and 4,805 (34%) were female. There were 12,252 cases of OHCA pre-COVID (56 ± 9 cases/week) and 683 post-COVID (55 ± 9 cases/week), with fewer traumatic arrests post-COVID (Table 1 ). The proportion of cases deemed DOA did not differ pre- and post-COVID (46% vs 45%, respectively). Provision of layperson CPR (34% vs 36%), AED use (14% vs 15%) and prehospital ROSC (35% vs 38%) also did not differ. Scene times post-COVID were significantly longer. Time to first epinephrine administration was delayed by 1.2 (0.4–1.9) minutes.
Table 1

Cohort characteristics and outcomes.

CharacteristicOverall (n = 12,935)Pre-COVID (n = 12,252)Post-COVID (n = 683)Difference pre- vs post-COVID (95% CI)
Age, years63 ± 1963 ± 1964 ± 19−0.76 (−2.2 to 0.68)
Female gender4,805 (38)4,552 (38)253 (38)−0.1% (−3% to 4%)
Arrest etiology
 Trauma1,139 (9)1,099 (9)40 (6)−3% (−5% to −1%)
 Medical11,796 (91)11,153 (91)643 (94)3% (1% to 5%)
EMS-assessed only (DOA)6,631 (51)6,302 (51)329 (48)−3% (−7% to 1%)
Witnessed collapse3,697 (29)3,480 (28)217 (32)3% (−0.2% to 7%)
Layperson CPR4,371 (34)4,125 (34)246 (36)2 % (−1% to 6%)
Prehospital ROSCa1,624 (35)1,529 (35)95 (38)3% (−3% to 9%)
Transported from scenea4,273 (68)4,067 (68)203 (58)−10% (−5% to −15%)
Scene time, mina
 Transported patients26 ± 1226 ± 1230 ± 133.8 (2.1 to 5.4)
 Non-transported patients25 ± 1124 ± 1129 ± 134.2 (1.8 to 6.7)
CPR duration, mina
 ROSC18 ± 1218 ± 1216 ± 10−2.2 (−5.9 to 1.4)
 No ROSC25 ± 1124 ± 1129 ± 134.2 (1.8 to 6.7)
First advanced airwaya
 Endotracheal tube2,887 (46)2,760 (42)127 (36)−8% (−3 % to −12%)
 Supraglottic993 (26)904 (14)89 (24)10% (5 to 15%)
Airway first pass successb2,909 (75)2,745 (75)164 (76)1% (−5% to 7%)
Multiple responding crews3,243 (25)3,067 (25)176 (26)1% (−3% to 4%)
Time from arrival to, minb, c
 Vascular access7.8 ± 5.97.7 ± 5.88.4 ± 6.40.7 (−0.02 to 1.5)
 Epinephrine9.2 ± 5.99.1 ± 5.710.3 ± 7.71.2 (0.4 to 1.9)
 Compressions4.2 ± 6.74.1 ± 6.64.6 ± 6.90.5 (−0.5 to 1.6)
 Advanced airway13.5 ± 6.913.5 ± 6.913.8 ± 7.10.4 (−0.6 to 1.4)

Reported only for EMS-treated patients (i.e. excluding those DOA).

Reported for those patients in whom the procedure was attempted.

Excludes EMS-witnessed arrests.

Cohort characteristics and outcomes. Reported only for EMS-treated patients (i.e. excluding those DOA). Reported for those patients in whom the procedure was attempted. Excludes EMS-witnessed arrests. We did not find an increase in overall OHCA during the COVID-19 pandemic in a low prevalence region despite lower ED volumes for acute conditions. We also did not observe a difference in key treatment metrics that might reflect public (layperson CPR and AED use) or provider (proportion of EMS-assessed OHCA that were resuscitated) anxiety about infectious exposure. Multiple small but significant differences in patient care, including airway management and time to epinephrine administration, are of unclear significance but merit further systematic investigation.

Funding

Dr. Elmer’s research time is supported by the through grant 5K23NS097629.

Conflict of interest statement

Nothing declared.
  18 in total

1.  Association of the COVID-19 pandemic with bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a population-based analysis in Tokyo, Japan.

Authors:  Keita Shibahashi; Hiromitsu Kawabata; Kazuhiro Sugiyama; Yuichi Hamabe
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.814

2.  [Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during lockdown].

Authors:  T Grübl; B Plöger; M C Sassen; A Jerrentrup; B Schieffer; S Betz
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 0.826

3.  Bystander CPR in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Janet Bray; Susie Cartledge; Andrea Scapigliati
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2020-10-19

4.  Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on bystander interventions, emergency medical service activities, and patient outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Osaka City, Japan.

Authors:  Chika Nishiyama; Kosuke Kiyohara; Taku Iwami; Sumito Hayashida; Takeyuki Kiguchi; Tasuku Matsuyama; Yusuke Katayama; Takeshi Shimazu; Tetsuhisa Kitamura
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-01-29

5.  Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in London during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Rachael T Fothergill; Adam L Smith; Fenella Wrigley; Gavin D Perkins
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2020-12-21

Review 6.  The Influence of COVID-19 on Out-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Karol Bielski; Agnieszka Szarpak; Miłosz Jaroslaw Jaguszewski; Tomasz Kopiec; Jacek Smereka; Aleksandra Gasecka; Przemysław Wolak; Grazyna Nowak-Starz; Jaroslaw Chmielewski; Zubaid Rafique; Frank William Peacock; Lukasz Szarpak
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Variation in community and ambulance care processes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yoshio Masuda; Seth En Teoh; Jun Wei Yeo; Darren Jun Hao Tan; Daryl Lin Jimian; Shir Lynn Lim; Marcus Eng Hock Ong; Audrey L Blewer; Andrew Fu Wah Ho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Evaluation of a revised resuscitation protocol for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients due to COVID-19 safety protocols: a single-center retrospective study in Japan.

Authors:  Kenji Kandori; Yohei Okada; Wataru Ishii; Hiromichi Narumiya; Ryoji Iizuka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  [Executive summary].

Authors:  Gavin D Perkins; Jan-Thorsten Gräsner; Federico Semeraro; Theresa Olasveengen; Jasmeet Soar; Carsten Lott; Patrick Van de Voorde; John Madar; David Zideman; Spyridon Mentzelopoulos; Leo Bossaert; Robert Greif; Koen Monsieurs; Hildigunnur Svavarsdóttir; Jerry P Nolan
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 0.892

10.  Impact of COVID-19 on Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Singapore.

Authors:  Shir Lynn Lim; Nur Shahidah; Seyed Ehsan Saffari; Qin Xiang Ng; Andrew Fu Wah Ho; Benjamin Sieu-Hon Leong; Shalini Arulanandam; Fahad Javaid Siddiqui; Marcus Eng Hock Ong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.