Literature DB >> 32919778

Role of delayed interval debulking for persistent residual disease after more than 5 cycles of chemotherapy for primary advanced ovarian cancer. An international multicenter study.

Helmut Plett1, Olga T Filippova2, Annalisa Garbi3, Stefan Kommoss4, Mikkel Rosendahl5, Carrie Langstraat6, Saurabh Phadnis7, Mustafa Zelal Muallem8, Thaïs Baert9, Dennis S Chi2, Giovanni Damiano Aletti10, Florin-Andrei Taran11, Jan Philipp Ramspott12, Oliver Zivanovic2, Andreas du Bois12, Yukio Sonoda2, Ginger Gardner2, Alexander Traut12, Kara Long Roche2, Philipp Harter12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standard of care in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) is upfront surgery followed by chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) is an alternative in selected patients. Most data exist with IDS following 3-4 cycles chemotherapy, however, some patients experience a delay of IDS. So far, the impact of a "delayed" interval debulking surgery (DID) is poorly defined.
METHODS: We analyzed data from eight international gynecology-oncology referral centers. Patients were included if they had newly diagnosed AOC and were prone to DID (minimum 5 cycles of NACT) between 2011 and 2017.
RESULTS: 308 patients underwent DID. 89.6% had a high-grade serous ovarian cancer. The median number of pre-op NACT was 6 cycles (range 5-9) and 6.1% of patients received additionally bevacizumab. The majority of patients had stage-IV disease (51.3%). Median duration of surgery was 210 min (range 34-561), the median surgical complexity score was 4 (range 1-16). Complete resection was achieved in 60.1%. The median number of post-op chemotherapy cycles was 2 (range 0-5). The rate of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo£3°) was 9.7% and 30 days post-op mortality was 0.3%. The median PFS and OS in patients with complete resection was 19.5 and 49.2 months compared to 14.8 and 33.0 months in patients with incomplete resection (p = 0.001), respectively. We did not observe any survival benefit for patients with cytoreduction to small residuals (1-10 mm) compared to residual disease >1 cm.
CONCLUSION: Our data may suggest that offering surgery to patients with persistent disease after 5+ cycles could be associated with favorable outcome if a complete resection is achieved. Patients who had residual disease postoperatively may experience rather peri-operative treatment burden than any benefit from DID.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Debulking surgery; Interval debulking; Neo-adjuvant; Ovarian cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32919778     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  5 in total

Review 1.  Primary or Interval Debulking Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: a Personalized Decision-a Literature Review.

Authors:  Delphine Hudry; Stéphanie Bécourt; Giovanni Scambia; Anna Fagotti
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 5.945

2.  Timing of surgery in patients with partial response or stable disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Roni Nitecki; Nicole D Fleming; Bryan M Fellman; Larissa A Meyer; Anil K Sood; Karen H Lu; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 3.  Surgery in Advanced Ovary Cancer: Primary versus Interval Cytoreduction.

Authors:  Mackenzie Cummings; Olivia Nicolais; Mark Shahin
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-14

4.  Survival impact of bowel resection at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Blair McNamara; Rosa Guerra; Jennifer Qin; Amaranta D Craig; Lee-May Chen; Madhulika G Varma; Jocelyn S Chapman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-09-25

5.  MiR-149-3p promotes the cisplatin resistance and EMT in ovarian cancer through downregulating TIMP2 and CDKN1A.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Lingxia Liu
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.234

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.