Literature DB >> 32919634

The influence of shape and charge on protein corona composition in common gold nanostructures.

Tony Bewersdorff1, Emanuel A Glitscher2, Julian Bergueiro3, Murat Eravci1, Enrico Miceli2, Andrea Haase4, Marcelo Calderón5.   

Abstract

With increasing importance of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) in the medical field, the understanding of their interactions in biological environments is essential. It is known that the exposure to biological fluids of particles in the nanometric range leads to accumulation of proteins on the particle surface proximity, generating the so-called protein corona. This fact can completely change the properties of AuNPs, thus drastically influencing the characteristics and intended purpose of the particles. Therefore, deep insight on the formation and composition of this protein corona is of extreme importance. Between the different factors that can alter the corona formation, our study focuses on the influence of the shape and particle surface charge. In detail, four different shapes of nanometrical scale (spheres, rods, stars and cages) of comparable size were used, all of them stabilized with three different heterofunctionalized poly(ethylene glycol) thiol (R-PEG-SH) linkers (R = OCH3, COOH or NH2) to check the effect of charge as well. After incubation with human serum, abundant proteins were identified via liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectroscopy (LC ESI MS/MS) and compared in terms of their relative abundance. On the basis of statistical evaluations, the shape of our AuNPs showed a greater influence than the surface charge. Especially, cage-shaped AuNPs showed a lower amount of total corona proteins. This shape showed differences in the abundances of individual proteins like albumin, vitronectin and members of the complement system. These results indicate that nanocages could present an improved biocompatibility compared with the other shapes due to the high curvature areas and dense ligation on the flat surfaces that could hinder opsonisation and fast removal by the immune system.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32919634     DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  4 in total

Review 1.  Progress and Hurdles of Therapeutic Nanosystems against Cancer.

Authors:  Marina Martín-Contreras; Saúl A Navarro-Marchal; José Manuel Peula-García; Ana Belén Jódar-Reyes
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 2.  Surface enhanced Raman scattering for probing cellular biochemistry.

Authors:  Cecilia Spedalieri; Janina Kneipp
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 7.790

Review 3.  Biocompatible Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Targeted Cancer Gene Therapy: A Review.

Authors:  Jinsong Zhang; Tianyuan Zhang; Jianqing Gao
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 5.719

4.  Docetaxel loaded mPEG-PLA nanoparticles for sarcoma therapy: preparation, characterization, pharmacokinetics, and anti-tumor efficacy.

Authors:  Jianhua Chen; Eerdunbagena Ning; Zhijun Wang; Ziqi Jing; Guijie Wei; Xue Wang; Pengkai Ma
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 6.419

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.