| Literature DB >> 32919589 |
Joseph A Simonetti1, Walter L Clinton2, Leslie Taylor3, Alaina Mori4, Stephan D Fihn5, Christian D Helfrich6, Karin Nelson7.
Abstract
Accurate estimates of burnout prevalence are critical for workforce planning. We assessed survey nonresponse bias and its impact on burnout estimates by linking 27,226 primary care employees to administrative data, categorized by whether they responded to a 2016 workforce survey (19.2% response). We adjusted burnout prevalence by response propensity using mixed-effects logistic regression. Thirty-six percent of respondents screened positive for burnout. There were significant differences between respondents and non-respondents (e.g.,gender, tenure), but no difference between unadjusted (i.e., respondents only) and propensity-adjusted estimates of burnout among the workforce. This provides support that workforce surveys may yield valid burnout estimates despite low response. Published by Elsevier Inc.Keywords: Burnout; Nonresponse bias; Primary care; Survey methods; Veteran
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32919589 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100451
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Healthc (Amst) ISSN: 2213-0764