Literature DB >> 32919581

Applying patient-reported outcome methodology to capture patient-reported health data: Report from an NIH Collaboratory roundtable.

Antonia V Bennett1, Mattias Jonsson2, Ronald C Chen3, Sana M Al-Khatib4, Kevin P Weinfurt5, Lesley H Curtis6.   

Abstract

Patient-reported health data provide information for pragmatic clinical trials that may not be readily available from electronic health records or administrative claims data. In this report, we present key considerations for collecting patient-reported health information in pragmatic clinical trials, which are informed by best practices from patient-reported outcome research. We focus on question design and administration via electronic data collection platforms with respect to 3 types of patient-reported health data: medication use, utilization of health care services, and comorbid conditions. We summarize key scientific literature on the accuracy of these patient-reported data compared with electronic health record data. We discuss question design in detail, specifically defining the concept to be measured, patient understanding of the concept, recall periods of the question, and patient willingness to report. In addition, we discuss approaches for question administration and data collection platforms, which are key aspects of successful patient-reported data collection.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic health records; Patient reported outcome measures; Pragmatic clinical trials as topic

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32919581      PMCID: PMC8018605          DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc (Amst)        ISSN: 2213-0764


  18 in total

Review 1.  Concordance of adherence measurement using self-reported adherence questionnaires and medication monitoring devices.

Authors:  Lizheng Shi; Jinan Liu; Yordanka Koleva; Vivian Fonseca; Anupama Kalsekar; Manjiri Pawaskar
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Optimal recall periods for patient-reported outcomes: challenges and potential solutions.

Authors:  Donald E Stull; Nancy Kline Leidy; Bhash Parasuraman; Olivier Chassany
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.580

Review 3.  Mode of interview and reporting of sensitive issues: design and implementation of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing.

Authors:  J T Lessler; J M O'Reilly
Journal:  NIDA Res Monogr       Date:  1997

4.  Design and analytic considerations for using patient-reported health data in pragmatic clinical trials: report from an NIH Collaboratory roundtable.

Authors:  Frank W Rockhold; Jessica D Tenenbaum; Rachel Richesson; Keith A Marsolo; Emily C O'Brien
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Evaluation of mode equivalence of the MSKCC Bowel Function Instrument, LASA Quality of Life, and Subjective Significance Questionnaire items administered by Web, interactive voice response system (IVRS), and paper.

Authors:  Antonia V Bennett; Kathleen Keenoy; Marwan Shouery; Ethan Basch; Larissa K Temple
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Comparison of Patient Report and Medical Records of Comorbidities: Results From a Population-Based Cohort of Patients With Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Fan Ye; Dominic H Moon; William R Carpenter; Bryce B Reeve; Deborah S Usinger; Rebecca L Green; Kiayni Spearman; Nathan C Sheets; Kevin A Pearlstein; Angela R Lucero; Mark R Waddle; Paul A Godley; Ronald C Chen
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

7.  Mode equivalence and acceptability of tablet computer-, interactive voice response system-, and paper-based administration of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

Authors:  Antonia V Bennett; Amylou C Dueck; Sandra A Mitchell; Tito R Mendoza; Bryce B Reeve; Thomas M Atkinson; Kathleen M Castro; Andrea Denicoff; Lauren J Rogak; Jay K Harness; James D Bearden; Donna Bryant; Robert D Siegel; Deborah Schrag; Ethan Basch
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Measuring Resource Utilization: A Systematic Review of Validated Self-Reported Questionnaires.

Authors:  Laura E Leggett; Rachel G Khadaroo; Jayna Holroyd-Leduc; Diane L Lorenzetti; Heather Hanson; Adrian Wagg; Raj Padwal; Fiona Clement
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  A Comparison of Web and Telephone Responses From a National HIV and AIDS Survey.

Authors:  Marcella K Jones; Liviana Calzavara; Dan Allman; Catherine A Worthington; Mark Tyndall; James Iveniuk
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2016-07-29

10.  Capturing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Data Electronically: The Past, Present, and Promise of ePRO Measurement in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Stephen Joel Coons; Sonya Eremenco; J Jason Lundy; Paul O'Donohoe; Hannah O'Gorman; William Malizia
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.883

View more
  1 in total

1.  Stratified care to prevent chronic low back pain in high-risk patients: The TARGET trial. A multi-site pragmatic cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Anthony Delitto; Charity G Patterson; Joel M Stevans; Janet K Freburger; Samannaaz S Khoja; Michael J Schneider; Carol M Greco; Jennifer A Freel; Gwendolyn A Sowa; Ajay D Wasan; Gerard P Brennan; Stephen J Hunter; Kate I Minick; Stephen T Wegener; Patti L Ephraim; Jason M Beneciuk; Steven Z George; Robert B Saper
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-03-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.