Literature DB >> 32919406

Regulation of risky decision making by gonadal hormones in males and females.

Caitlin A Orsini1,2,3, Shelby L Blaes3, Caesar M Hernandez4,5, Sara M Betzhold3, Hassan Perera4, Alexa-Rae Wheeler4, Tyler W Ten Eyck4, Tyler S Garman3, Jennifer L Bizon3,4,6, Barry Setlow7,8,9,10.   

Abstract

Psychiatric diseases characterized by dysregulated risky decision making are differentially represented in males and females. The factors that govern such sex differences, however, remain poorly understood. Using a task in which rats make discrete trial choices between a small, "safe" food reward and a large food reward accompanied by varying probabilities of footshock punishment, we recently showed that females are more risk averse than males. The objective of the current experiments was to test the extent to which these sex differences in risky decision making are mediated by gonadal hormones. Male and female rats were trained in the risky decision-making task, followed by ovariectomy (OVX), orchiectomy (ORX), or sham surgery. Rats were then retested in the task, under both baseline conditions and following administration of estradiol and/or testosterone. OVX increased choice of the large, risky reward (increased risky choice), an effect that was attenuated by estradiol administration. In contrast, ORX decreased risky choice, but testosterone administration was without effect in either ORX or sham males. Estradiol, however, decreased risky choice in both groups of males. Importantly, none of the effects of hormonal manipulation on risky choice were due to altered shock sensitivity or food motivation. These data show that gonadal hormones are required for maintaining sex-typical profiles of risk-taking behavior in both males and females, and that estradiol is sufficient to promote risk aversion in both sexes. The findings provide novel information about the mechanisms supporting sex differences in risk taking and may prove useful in understanding sex differences in the prevalence of psychiatric diseases associated with altered risk taking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32919406      PMCID: PMC8027379          DOI: 10.1038/s41386-020-00827-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  60 in total

1.  Decision-making deficits, linked to a dysfunctional ventromedial prefrontal cortex, revealed in alcohol and stimulant abusers.

Authors:  A Bechara; S Dolan; N Denburg; A Hindes; S W Anderson; P E Nathan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 2.  Sex and estrogen influence drug abuse.

Authors:  Marilyn E Carroll; Wendy J Lynch; Megan E Roth; Andrew D Morgan; Kelly P Cosgrove
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 3.  Why sex matters for neuroscience.

Authors:  Larry Cahill
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 4.  Sex differences in drug abuse.

Authors:  Jill B Becker; Ming Hu
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 8.606

5.  Differences in impulsivity and risk-taking propensity between primary users of crack cocaine and primary users of heroin in a residential substance-use program.

Authors:  Marina A Bornovalova; Stacey B Daughters; Gustavo Daniel Hernandez; Jerry B Richards; C W Lejuez
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 6.  Altered risk-related processing in substance users: imbalance of pain and gain.

Authors:  Joshua L Gowin; Scott Mackey; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Male and female Wistar rats differ in decision-making performance in a rodent version of the Iowa Gambling Task.

Authors:  Ruud van den Bos; Jolle Jolles; Lisette van der Knaap; Annemarie Baars; Leonie de Visser
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Sex differences in animal models of decision making.

Authors:  Caitlin A Orsini; Barry Setlow
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  Dopamine and Stress System Modulation of Sex Differences in Decision Making.

Authors:  Polymnia Georgiou; Panos Zanos; Shambhu Bhat; J Kathleen Tracy; Istvan J Merchenthaler; Margaret M McCarthy; Todd D Gould
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Sex differences in a rat model of risky decision making.

Authors:  Caitlin A Orsini; Markie L Willis; Ryan J Gilbert; Jennifer L Bizon; Barry Setlow
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effects of the psychoactive compounds in green tea on risky decision-making.

Authors:  Anna E Liley; Haleigh N Joyner; Daniel B K Gabriel; Nicholas W Simon
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  Chronic cocaine causes age-dependent increases in risky choice in both males and females.

Authors:  Shelby L Blaes; Kristy G Shimp; Sara M Betzhold; Barry Setlow; Caitlin A Orsini
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 2.154

3.  Influence of the natural hormonal milieu on brain and behavior in women who smoke cigarettes: Rationale and methodology.

Authors:  Reagan R Wetherill; Nathaniel H Spilka; Melanie Maron; Heather Keyser; Kanchana Jagannathan; Alice V Ely; Teresa R Franklin
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2021-02-20

4.  Adolescent Alcohol Exposure Results in Sex-specific Alterations in Conditioned Fear Learning and Memory in Adulthood.

Authors:  L Judson Chandler; Dylan T Vaughan; Justin T Gass
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 5.988

5.  Lateral Orbitofrontal Cortex and Basolateral Amygdala Regulate Sensitivity to Delayed Punishment during Decision-making.

Authors:  Anna E Liley; Daniel B K Gabriel; Nicholas W Simon
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-08-29

Review 6.  Sex differences in vulnerability to addiction.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Quigley; Molly K Logsdon; Christopher A Turner; Ivette L Gonzalez; N B Leonardo; Jill B Becker
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 5.250

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.