Literature DB >> 32919109

Re-thinking the bone remodeling cycle mechanism and the origin of bone loss.

Jean-Marie Delaisse1, Thomas Levin Andersen2, Helene Bjoerg Kristensen3, Pia Rosgaard Jensen4, Christina Møller Andreasen5, Kent Søe6.   

Abstract

Proper bone remodeling necessarily requires that osteoblasts reconstruct the bone that osteoclasts have resorbed. However, the cellular events connecting resorption to reconstruction have remained poorly known. The consequence is a fragmentary understanding of the remodeling cycle where only the resorption and formation steps are taken into account. New tools have recently made possible to elucidate how resorption shifts to formation, thereby allowing to comprehend the remodeling cycle as a whole. This new knowledge is reviewed herein. It shows how teams of osteoclasts and osteoblast lineage cells are progressively established and how they are subjected therein to reciprocal interactions. Contrary to the common view, osteoclasts and osteoprogenitors are intermingled on the eroded surfaces. The analysis of the resorption and cell population dynamics shows that osteoprogenitor cell expansion and resorption proceed as an integrated mechanism; that a threshold cell density of osteoprogenitors on the eroded surface is mandatory for onset of bone formation; that the cell initiating osteoprogenitor cell expansion is the osteoclast; and that the osteoclast therefore triggers putative osteoprogenitor reservoirs positioned at proximity of the eroded bone surface (bone lining cells, canopy cells, pericytes). The interplay between magnitude of resorption and rate of cell expansion governs how soon bone reconstruction is initiated and may determine uncoupling and permanent bone loss if a threshold cell density is not reached. The clinical perspectives opened by these findings are discussed.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone lining cell; Bone loss; Canopy; Coupling; Human; Osteoporosis; Reversal phase

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32919109     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  14 in total

Review 1.  Micro-RNA: A Future Approach to Personalized Diagnosis of Bone Diseases.

Authors:  Giovanni Lombardi; Edgard Delvin
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 2.  Does Aging Activate T-cells to Reduce Bone Mass and Quality?

Authors:  Rajeev Aurora; Deborah Veis
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 5.163

Review 3.  Bone remodeling: an operational process ensuring survival and bone mechanical competence.

Authors:  Simona Bolamperti; Isabella Villa; Alessandro Rubinacci
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 13.362

Review 4.  Dissociation of Bone Resorption and Formation in Spaceflight and Simulated Microgravity: Potential Role of Myokines and Osteokines?

Authors:  Patrick Lau; Laurence Vico; Jörn Rittweger
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-02-01

5.  Osteoblast-specific inactivation of p53 results in locally increased bone formation.

Authors:  Nannan Liao; Till Koehne; Jan Tuckermann; Ioanna Triviai; Michael Amling; Jean-Pierre David; Thorsten Schinke; Julia Luther
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Prediction of Cortical Bone Thickness Variations in the Tibial Diaphysis of Running Rats.

Authors:  Daniel George; Stéphane Pallu; Céline Bourzac; Rkia Wazzani; Rachele Allena; Yves Rémond; Hugues Portier
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-03

Review 7.  Perspective of the GEMSTONE Consortium on Current and Future Approaches to Functional Validation for Skeletal Genetic Disease Using Cellular, Molecular and Animal-Modeling Techniques.

Authors:  Martina Rauner; Ines Foessl; Melissa M Formosa; Erika Kague; Vid Prijatelj; Nerea Alonso Lopez; Bodhisattwa Banerjee; Dylan Bergen; Björn Busse; Ângelo Calado; Eleni Douni; Yankel Gabet; Natalia García Giralt; Daniel Grinberg; Nika M Lovsin; Xavier Nogues Solan; Barbara Ostanek; Nathan J Pavlos; Fernando Rivadeneira; Ivan Soldatovic; Jeroen van de Peppel; Bram van der Eerden; Wim van Hul; Susanna Balcells; Janja Marc; Sjur Reppe; Kent Søe; David Karasik
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 8.  Osteoclast Fusion: Physiological Regulation of Multinucleation through Heterogeneity-Potential Implications for Drug Sensitivity.

Authors:  Kent Søe
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  The Pathophysiology of Osteoporosis after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Ramsha Shams; Kelsey P Drasites; Vandana Zaman; Denise Matzelle; Donald C Shields; Dena P Garner; Christopher J Sole; Azizul Haque; Narendra L Banik
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Osteosarcoma and Metastasis Associated Bone Degradation-A Tale of Osteoclast and Malignant Cell Cooperativity.

Authors:  Kirstine Sandal Nørregaard; Henrik Jessen Jürgensen; Henrik Gårdsvoll; Lars Henning Engelholm; Niels Behrendt; Kent Søe
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.