Literature DB >> 32919033

Estimation of COVID-19 basic reproduction ratio in a large urban jail in the United States.

Lisa B Puglisi1, Giovanni S P Malloy2, Tyler D Harvey3, Margaret L Brandeau2, Emily A Wang4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate the basic reproduction ratio () of SARS-CoV-2 inside a correctional facility early in the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS: We developed a dynamic transmission model for a large, urban jail in the United States. We used the next generation method to determine the basic reproduction ratio We included anonymized data of incarcerated individuals and correctional staff with confirmed COVID-19 infections in our estimation of the basic reproduction ratio () of SARS-CoV-2.
RESULTS: The estimated is 8.44 (95% Credible Interval (CrI): 5.00-13.13) for the entire jail.
CONCLUSIONS: The high of SARS-CoV-2 in a large urban jail highlights the importance of including correctional facilities in public health strategies for COVID-19. In the absence of more aggressive mitigation strategies, correctional facilities will continue to contribute to community infections. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Basic reproduction number; COVID-19; Disease outbreaks; Jail; Public health

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32919033      PMCID: PMC7480336          DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


Introduction

Jails are epicenters of COVID-19 transmission in the United States. Early in the pandemic, Cook County Jail had one of the largest cluster outbreaks in the country, and the infection rate at Rikers Island was nearly five times that of New York City. With 11 million new admissions yearly, jails present an ideal setting for infections to spread. Incarcerated individuals are at higher risk for infection due to unsanitary living conditions and inability to socially distance [1]. Furthermore, correctional officers rarely have public health training, and correctional health systems are chronically underfunded. The conditions making correctional facilities prone to disease outbreaks have long been present. In 1918, a person infected with the H1N1 virus caused a massive outbreak in California’s San Quentin prison. The basic reproduction ratio (R 0) for the virus was estimated to be close to three in the prison population, far higher than for the general population [2]. Yet, jails remain largely excluded from public health strategies to mitigate the spread of infectious diseases. For example, in the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, more than half of jails did not receive vaccine supplies [3]. Further, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines do not classify correctional officers as first responders, despite the fact that they come into “close contact with persons with confirmed or possible COVID-19 in the course of their work [4].” We estimate the R 0 of the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus in a large urban jail in the United States. This estimate can help inform public health policies toward mitigation of COVID-19 in correctional systems.

Methods

We used a dynamic transmission model to calculate R 0 for a large urban jail in a U.S. city with an ongoing COVID-19 outbreak. The model is a modified SEIR model and includes the following COVID-19 disease states: susceptible (S), exposed (E), infected symptomatic (I ), infected asymptomatic (I ), quarantined (Q), hospitalized (H), recovered (Rec), and dead (Dead). Individuals enter the jail as susceptible at a net rate b. Susceptible individuals become exposed at rate β due to contact with infected symptomatic or asymptomatic individuals. Exposed individuals are infected but not yet infectious and transition to either symptomatic or asymptomatic infection at rate ε. The proportion of infected individuals who are asymptomatic is represented by α. We assume that infected individuals who are symptomatic will be moved to quarantine after one day, while those who are asymptomatic will not be moved to quarantine. All infected individuals recover at rate γ. Infected individuals who are in quarantine either recover or become hospitalized with probability η. Those who are hospitalized recover from hospitalization at rate λ. Equations (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9) define the model. We parameterized our model using data from the jail and previous estimates from the literature (Table 1 ). The jail tracked demographics and location of those who were symptomatic daily, regardless of test results, and those who tested positive for SARS-Co-V-2.
Table 1

Parameter estimates

NameDescriptionValueSource
bNet rate of entrance into the jail [1/day]−0.004Jail dataset
βTransmission rate [1/day]Calibrated
εIncubation period−1 [1/day]0.18, Lognormal(5.1, 0.89)Lauer et al.[5]
αProportion of cases that are asymptomatic0.405, Uniform(0.25, 0.56)Estimates from other prisons and jails[6,7]
γRecovery rate [1/day]0.1, Infection period:Truncated Normal (10, 6.25, min5, max20)Rocklov, Sjödin, and Wilder-Smith[8]
ηProportion of symptomatic infections that are hospitalized0.14Jail dataset
μRecovery rate from hospital [1/day]0.2 Length of hospitalization: Lognormal(5, 1)Thevarajan et al.[9]
dIProbability of death due to symptomatic infection0.01Jail dataset
Parameter estimates To calibrate the transmission rate in the jail, we used 1000 Monte Carlo simulations. In each simulation, we pseudo-randomly selected a value for ε, α, and γ based on lognormal, uniform, and truncated normal distributions, respectively. For the selected parameter set, we calibrated the best-fitting value of β using an exhaustive search over all values [0, 4] in increments of 0.01. We determined the best fit as the value of β which minimizes the mean squared error when comparing a five-day moving average of the incidence of symptomatic cases in the model to the daily incidence reported by the jail. Although we had thirty days of data since the outbreak began, we decided to calibrate our model using only the first eleven days of the outbreak, given that the jail implemented major interventions that may have impacted the R 0 on day twelve. To determine R 0, we used the next-generation method [10]. We define two matrices F and V. F describes the rate of appearance of new infections and V describes the rate of transfer of individuals in and out of compartments by all other means (Equations (10), (11)). R 0 is the dominant eigenvalue of the next-generation matrix, FV −1. We used the preinfection susceptible population of the entire jail.

Results

Thirty days after the COVID-19 outbreak began, 5.6 percent of those incarcerated and 7.8 percent of staff had symptomatic COVID-19 infections. The mean age of incarcerated people infected with COVID-19 was 37.9 years ±13.6 years standard deviation, and the median length of incarceration was 233 days, interquartile range 93–475 days. The mean age of staff infected with COVID-19 was 44.9 years ±9.1 years. After model calibration, the mean β = 1.79 (95%Credible Interval (CrI): 1.35, 2.22), and the estimated R 0=8.44 (95% CrI:5.00, 13.13). The effective reproduction ratio would remain above 1 until day 30 of the outbreak. At this point, the outbreak would begin to subside largely due to a decrease in the susceptible population. For an outbreak of this magnitude, we predict 5695 cases in the jail over 30 days. This would result in 3388 symptomatic infections, 474 hospitalizations, and 34 deaths.

Discussion

This is the first estimation of an R 0 for COVID-19 in a large jail system. Notably, it is of higher magnitude to that reported for other congregate settings, such as the Diamond Princess cruise ship, despite the younger age of those incarcerated [11]. Further, although they are not considered first responders by the CDC, correctional staff are also significantly impacted by and exposed to COVID-19. Our estimation has several limitations. We estimated R 0 based on a dynamic transmission model, which assumes homogeneous mixing within the population, but jails are transient and heterogeneous places. Also, parameter values and distributions may differ between a jail population and the populations of previous studies. These limitations notwithstanding, our R 0 estimate indicates that outbreaks of COVID-19 in correctional facilities will continue and community rates of infection will not decrease if jails are not a central focus of public health strategies to mitigate the spread of the epidemic. Such measures would include wide-scale testing in jails inclusive of correctional officers [12], providing protective equipment and public health education for correctional officers as first responders, and coordinating large-scale release of individuals from jails to allow for adequate social distancing prior to future outbreaks.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Lisa B. Puglisi: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Giovanni S.P. Malloy: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Tyler D. Harvey: Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Project administration. Margaret L. Brandeau: Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Supervision. Emily A. Wang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Supervision.
  11 in total

1.  Receipt of A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine by prisons and jails - United States, 2009-10 influenza season.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations.

Authors:  O Diekmann; J A Heesterbeek; J A Metz
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 3.  Infection control in jails and prisons.

Authors:  Joseph A Bick
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Estimates of the reproduction numbers of Spanish influenza using morbidity data.

Authors:  Emilia Vynnycky; Amy Trindall; Punam Mangtani
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 5.  Prevalence of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection : A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Daniel P Oran; Eric J Topol
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Asymptomatic Transmission, the Achilles' Heel of Current Strategies to Control Covid-19.

Authors:  Monica Gandhi; Deborah S Yokoe; Diane V Havlir
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Estimation of the reproductive number of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and the probable outbreak size on the Diamond Princess cruise ship: A data-driven analysis.

Authors:  Sheng Zhang; MengYuan Diao; Wenbo Yu; Lei Pei; Zhaofen Lin; Dechang Chen
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections and Transmission in a Skilled Nursing Facility.

Authors:  Melissa M Arons; Kelly M Hatfield; Sujan C Reddy; Anne Kimball; Allison James; Jesica R Jacobs; Joanne Taylor; Kevin Spicer; Ana C Bardossy; Lisa P Oakley; Sukarma Tanwar; Jonathan W Dyal; Josh Harney; Zeshan Chisty; Jeneita M Bell; Mark Methner; Prabasaj Paul; Christina M Carlson; Heather P McLaughlin; Natalie Thornburg; Suxiang Tong; Azaibi Tamin; Ying Tao; Anna Uehara; Jennifer Harcourt; Shauna Clark; Claire Brostrom-Smith; Libby C Page; Meagan Kay; James Lewis; Patty Montgomery; Nimalie D Stone; Thomas A Clark; Margaret A Honein; Jeffrey S Duchin; John A Jernigan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  The Incubation Period of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) From Publicly Reported Confirmed Cases: Estimation and Application.

Authors:  Stephen A Lauer; Kyra H Grantz; Qifang Bi; Forrest K Jones; Qulu Zheng; Hannah R Meredith; Andrew S Azman; Nicholas G Reich; Justin Lessler
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Breadth of concomitant immune responses prior to patient recovery: a case report of non-severe COVID-19.

Authors:  Irani Thevarajan; Thi H O Nguyen; Marios Koutsakos; Julian Druce; Leon Caly; Carolien E van de Sandt; Xiaoxiao Jia; Suellen Nicholson; Mike Catton; Benjamin Cowie; Steven Y C Tong; Sharon R Lewin; Katherine Kedzierska
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 87.241

View more
  13 in total

1.  The growing geriatric prison population: A dire public health consequence of mass incarceration.

Authors:  Brie Williams; Michele DiTomas; Alison Pachynski
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Prioritizing interventions for preventing COVID-19 outbreaks in military basic training.

Authors:  Guido España; T Alex Perkins; Simon D Pollett; Morgan E Smith; Sean M Moore; Paul O Kwon; Tara L Hall; Milford H Beagle; Clinton K Murray; Shilpa Hakre; Sheila A Peel; Kayvon Modjarrad; Paul T Scott
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.779

3.  Inclusive health: modeling COVID-19 in correctional facilities and communities.

Authors:  Scott Greenhalgh; Ashley Provencher
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.135

4.  COVID-19 Inspired Relational Telemental Health Services for Incarcerated Individuals and Their Families.

Authors:  Eman Tadros; Noemi Aguirre; Sarah Jensen; Julie Poehlmann-Tynan
Journal:  Contemp Fam Ther       Date:  2021-04-18

5.  Assessing the risk of cascading COVID-19 outbreaks from prison-to-prison transfers.

Authors:  Todd L Parsons; Lee Worden
Journal:  Epidemics       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 5.324

6.  Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Among Incarcerated Adult Men in Quebec, Canada, 2021.

Authors:  Nadine Kronfli; Camille Dussault; Mathieu Maheu-Giroux; Alexandros Halavrezos; Sylvie Chalifoux; Jessica Sherman; Hyejin Park; Lina Del Balso; Matthew P Cheng; Sébastien Poulin; Joseph Cox
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 20.999

7.  There are no equal opportunity infectors: Epidemiological modelers must rethink our approach to inequality in infection risk.

Authors:  Jon Zelner; Nina B Masters; Ramya Naraharisetti; Sanyu A Mojola; Merlin Chowkwanyun; Ryan Malosh
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 8.  The Risk of COVID-19 Infection in Prisons and Prevention Strategies: A Systematic Review and a New Strategic Protocol of Prevention.

Authors:  Massimiliano Esposito; Monica Salerno; Nunzio Di Nunno; Federica Ministeri; Aldo Liberto; Francesco Sessa
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-29

9.  Mitigating outbreaks in congregate settings by decreasing the size of the susceptible population.

Authors:  Seth Blumberg; Phoebe Lu; Christopher M Hoover; James O Lloyd-Smith; Ada T Kwan; David Sears; Stefano M Bertozzi; Lee Worden
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2021-07-07

10.  Prisoner's Dilemma: Ethical questions and mental health concerns about the COVID-19 vaccination and people living in detention.

Authors:  M Liebrenz; D Bhugra; A Buadze; R Schleifer
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Mind Law       Date:  2021-01-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.