Literature DB >> 32918975

Parameters predicting COVID-19-induced myocardial injury and mortality.

G D Duerr1, A Heine2, M Hamiko1, S Zimmer3, J A Luetkens4, J Nattermann5, G Rieke5, A Isaak4, J Jehle3, S A E Held2, J C Wasmuth5, M Wittmann6, C P Strassburg5, P Brossart2, M Coburn6, H Treede1, G Nickenig3, C Kurts7, M Velten8.   

Abstract

Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 affect many organs, including the heart. Cardiovascular disease is a dominant comorbidity and prognostic factors predicting risk for critical courses are highly needed. Moreover, immunomechanisms underlying COVID-induced myocardial damage are poorly understood.
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate prognostic markers to identify patients at risk.
RESULTS: Only patients with pericardial effusion (PE) developed a severe disease course, and those who died could be identified by a high CD8/Treg/monocyte ratio. Ten out of 19 COVID-19 patients presented with PE, 7 (78%) of these had elevated APACHE-II mortality risk-score, requiring mechanical ventilation. At admission, PE patients showed signs of systemic and cardiac inflammation in NMR and impaired cardiac function as detected by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), whereas parameters of myocardial injury e.g. high sensitive troponin-t (hs-TnT) were not yet increased. During the course of disease, hs-TnT rose in 8 of the PE-patients above 16 ng/l, 7 had to undergo ventilatory therapy and 4 of them died. FACS at admission showed in PE patients elevated frequencies of CD3+CD8+ T cells among all CD3+ T-cells, and lower frequencies of Tregs and CD14+HLA-DR+-monocytes. A high CD8/Treg/monocyte ratio predicted a severe disease course in PE patients, and was associated with high serum levels of antiviral cytokines. By contrast, patients without PE and PE patients with a low CD8/Treg/monocyte ratio neither had to be intubated, nor died.
CONCLUSIONS: PE predicts cardiac injury in COVID-19 patients. Therefore, TTE should be performed at admission. Immunological parameters for dysfunctional antiviral immunity, such as the CD8/Treg/monocyte ratio used here, supports risk assessment by predicting poor prognosis.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CD8; COVID-19; Monocyte; Pericardial effusion; SARS-CoV-2; Treg

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32918975      PMCID: PMC7480277          DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Life Sci        ISSN: 0024-3205            Impact factor:   5.037


Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has quickly progressed to a global pandemic health emergency, affecting various organs, and recent case reports associated myocardial involvement with poor prognosis [[1], [2], [3], [4]]. However, it has not been elucidated whether cardiac dysfunction and potential myocarditis is a primary result of SARS-CoV-2 induced cardiomyocyte damage or secondary to COVID-19 induced inflammation and the heart is the primary target or secondary bystander of disease [5]. Even though, autopsy studies have found evidence of direct myocyte assault by the virus, this was not associated with an influx of inflammatory cells [6]. Furthermore, studies investigating this potential link and identifying prognostic factors for cardiac injury and survival remain to be defined. Here, we correlated cardiac and immunologic parameters with clinical courses of COVID-19 patients to investigate potential mechanisms involved in the development of SARS-CoV-2 induced cardiac injury.

Material and methods

After approval form the Ethics Committee at the University Hospital Bonn, Germany (No. 107/20) and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and §15 of the Medical Association Nordrheins' professional code of conduct, we enrolled 19 patients administered to the University Medical Center Bonn with symptoms typical for COVID-19. Infection was confirmed by smear test for SARS-CoV-2 RNA according to WHO standards. Primary evaluation included transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), blood test and calculation of the APACHE II score (Table 2). Data were recorded by our patient data management system. Routine serum diagnostics were measured. All patients were followed up until discharge or death.
Table 2

Clinical data for APACHE II score.

The mortality risk score APACHE II and respective clinical parameters upon admission in COVID-19 patients with pericardial effusion (PE), compared to patients without PE. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney-U test. Mean and SD are shown.

DataNo PE, n = 9No PE, n = 10p-Value
Age (years)59.6 ± 13.869.9 ± 14.00.1109
Temperature37.2 ± 1.337.3 ± 0.70.4373
MAD (mmHg)90.8 ± 11.790.3 ± 12.10.8376
pH7.485 ± 0.0817.413 ± 0.0330.0509
Heart rate (bpm)87.4 ± 20.987.6 ± 16.40.9672
Respiratory rate (breaths/min)14.9 ± 2.318.6 ± 5.30.0691
Sodium (mmol/l)134.7 ± 6.1134.3 ± 5.20.7123
Potassium (mmol/l)3.7 ± 0.64.1 ± 0.40.3042
Creatinine (mg/dl)0.81 ± 0.252.10 ± 2.680.4875
Acute renal failure1 (11)2 (20)0.5957
Hematocrit (%)37.8 ± 5.734.8 ± 6.10.2868
Leukocytes (G/l)5.82 ± 2.576.29 ± 2.300.8065
Glasgow coma scale (pts)15.0 ± 0.011.4 ± 5.80.0814
FiO2 (%)34.9 ± 25.351.0 ± 23.20.0193

Cardiac structure and function analyses

TTE was performed using a Philips Affiniti with a 15 MHz probe (Philips, Germany). Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was calculated using the biplane method.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed using a clinical whole-body magnetic resonance imaging system (Ingenia 1.5 T; Philips Healthcare, Netherlands). A 32-channel torso coil with digital inter-face was used for signal reception. Functional cine, T2-weighted edema and late gadolinium enhancement imaging in standard heart sections was performed. For myocardial T1-mapping, a 3(3)3(3)5 modified Look-Locker inversion recovery mapping sequence was applied. For myocardial T2-mapping, a six-echo gradient spin-echo sequence was used. Image analysis was conducted according to the updated Lake Louise criteria.

Serum analyses

Quantification of cytokines including sE-Selectin; GM-CSF; ICAM-1/CD54; IFN alpha; IFN gamma; IL-1 alpha; IL-1 beta; IL-4; IL-6; IL-8; IL-10; IL-12p70; IL-13; IL-17A/CTLA-8; IP-10/CXCL10; MCP-1/CCL2; MIP-1alpha/CCL3; MIP-1 beta/CCL4; sP-Selectin; TNF alpha was performed using the Inflammation 20-plex Human ProcartaPlex-Panel from thermo-fisher according to the manufacturer's instruction. High sensitive troponin-t (hs-TnT) was analyzed in our routine laboratory using Elecsys® electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) Roche, Germany.

Flow cytometry analysis

Blood was collected in EDTA-tubes and analyzed within 24 h. Some patients could not be analyzed at all time points due to logistical reasons. 100 μl whole blood were incubated with dried custom-designed format reagents (DuraClone tubes, Beckman Coulter) containing the antibodies CD3-AA700, CD4-APC, CD8-KrOr, CD14-AA750, CD16-FITC, CD25-PE, CD56-ECD, CD127-PC7, HLA-DR-PB. Fix- and Lyse Solution were used according to manufacturer's protocol. The CD8+ T cells/Treg/monocyte quotient was calculated by dividing percentages of CD3+CD8+ T cells by CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127− Tregs by CD14+HLA−DR+ monocytes of all circulating cells.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as scatter plot with median in figures and as Mean ± SD in tables. Statistics were calculated with PRISM (V8.4.2; GraphPad, USA). Categorial variables were compared by Chi2 test. Continuous variables between two groups were tested using Mann-Whitney U test. Survival and intubation probability were visualized as Kaplan-Meier curves and results were validated using Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*). **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. Statistics were approved by the Bonn Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics.

Results

At admission, high-sensitive Troponin T (hs-TnT) was not markedly elevated in any COVID-19 patient (12.5 ± 9.3 ng/l, mean ± SD), but TTE revealed pericardial effusions (PE) in 10 of 19 patients (Fig. 1A). Seven of these PE patients subsequently developed respiratory failure and required invasive ventilatory support within 48 h (Fig. 1B). PE patients had higher APACHE II-scores (Fig. 1C) and poorer survival (Fig. 1E). Baseline characteristics, as well as pre-existing medical conditions did not differ between the groups (Table 1 ). In correlation with APACHE-scores, PE patients exhibited impaired left-ventricular EF (Table 1). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging revealed a diffuse inflammatory pattern with myocardial edema in PE patients, but no evidence for direct viral damage such as necrosis (Fig. 1D). Cardiac inflammation was not detected in patients lacking PE. Myocardial damage marker such as hs-TnT increased only in PE patients during the course of disease (Fig. 1G).
Fig. 1

PE, hs-TnT and the CD8/Treg/monocyte quotient predict heart injury and clinical course of COVID-19 patients.

(A): representative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) image, asterisk indicates pericardial effusion. (B): necessity for intubation, (C) APACHE II-score. (D): Representative cardiac magnetic resonance images from a patient with (upper row) and without PE (lower row), showing a diffuse inflammatory pattern with increased markers of edema (T1 and T2 relaxation times) only in PE patients. (E) Survival of COVID-19 patients with or without pericardial effusion (PE) at admission, showing that a PE predicts poorer prognosis. (F): ratio between CD8+ T cells to Tregs and CD14+ HLA-DR+ monocytes, as a parameter for disease severity, which was higher in patients with PE, especially in those who subsequently developed a hs-TnT rise (red symbols) and those who died (red triangles). (G): hs-TnT correlates with PE and with disease severity indicated by (H) the new WHO COVID-19 classification. (I–K): Serum concentrations of the antiviral cytokines CCL2 (I), IFN-α (J) and IFN-γ (K) in patients exhibiting a pericardial effusion (PE) or not (no PE). Subsequent hs-TnT rise (red symbols), deceased (red triangle). Data is presented as scatter plot with median (line). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*). **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Table 1

Patients baseline characteristics and preexisting conditions.

Baseline characteristics, symptoms, underlying health conditions, and coagulation parameter in COVID-19 patients being admitted with pericardial effusion (PE), compared to patients without PE. For metric data, Mann-Whitney-U test was used, for categorial variables, Chi2 test was performed. Mean and SD are shown.

Pre-existing diseases and conditions at admissionNo PE, n = 9PE, n = 10p-Value
Female gender, n (%)5 (56)5 (50)0.8087
BMI (kg/m2)24.2 ± 6.329.1 ± 4.90.0724
Dyspnea, n (%)6 (67)9 (90)0.2129
Cough, n (%)8 (89)6 (60)0.1533
Syncope, n (%)0 (0)2 (20)0.1561
Nausea, n (%)0 (0)1 (10)0.3297
Fatigue, n (%)5 (56)8 (80)0.2524
Fever, n (%)6 (67)7 (70)0.8759
COPD, n (%)0 (0)3 (30)0.0734
Previous pneumonia, n (%)1 (11)2 (20)0.5957
Smoking, n (%)2 (22)2 (20)0.9056
Arterial hypertension, n (%)4 (11)8 (80)0.1087
Previous stroke, n (%)0 (0)2 (20)0.1561
Diabetes mellitus, n (%)2 (22)3 (30)0.7007
Hyperlipidemia, n (%)2 (22)6 (60)0.0959
Coronary artery disease, n (%)0 (0)3 (30)0.0734
Previous myocardial infarction, n (%)0 (0)3 (30)0.0734
Heart valve disease, n (%)0 (0)1 (10)0.3297
Atrial fibrillation, n (%)1 (11)2 (20)0.5957
Previous cardiac surgery, n (%)0 (0)1 (10)0.3297
Chronic renal failure, n (%)1 (11)2 (20)0.5957
Liver disease, n (%)1 (11)0 (0)0.2788
Chronic venous disease, n (%)0 (0)1 (10)0.3297
Peripheral artery disease, n (%)1 (11)1 (10)0.9372
Hypothyroidism, n (%)3 (33)1 (20)0.2129
Leukocytes (G/l)5.82 ± 2.576.29 ± 2.300.8065
Neutrophils (%)71.4 ± 7.6577.0 ± 10.60.3154
Lymphocytes (%)16.8 ± 6.6214.5 ± 5.460.3675
Platelet count (cells)206.1 ± 100.1173.6 ± 61.60.3072
INR1.10 ± 0.161.31 ± 0.840.8569
Quick84.4 ± 16.684.6 ± 25.70.7123
pTT27.8 ± 6.232.2 ± 9.40.2857
hs-TnT at admission (ng/l)8.12 ± 5.6617.5 ± 10.50.0719
Left-ventricular ejection fraction at admission (%)73.1 ± 4.7163.4 ± 7.610.0122
Correlation between EF and APACHE II at admissionr: −0.5826R2: 0.33940.02
PE, hs-TnT and the CD8/Treg/monocyte quotient predict heart injury and clinical course of COVID-19 patients. (A): representative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) image, asterisk indicates pericardial effusion. (B): necessity for intubation, (C) APACHE II-score. (D): Representative cardiac magnetic resonance images from a patient with (upper row) and without PE (lower row), showing a diffuse inflammatory pattern with increased markers of edema (T1 and T2 relaxation times) only in PE patients. (E) Survival of COVID-19 patients with or without pericardial effusion (PE) at admission, showing that a PE predicts poorer prognosis. (F): ratio between CD8+ T cells to Tregs and CD14+ HLA-DR+ monocytes, as a parameter for disease severity, which was higher in patients with PE, especially in those who subsequently developed a hs-TnT rise (red symbols) and those who died (red triangles). (G): hs-TnT correlates with PE and with disease severity indicated by (H) the new WHO COVID-19 classification. (I–K): Serum concentrations of the antiviral cytokines CCL2 (I), IFN-α (J) and IFN-γ (K) in patients exhibiting a pericardial effusion (PE) or not (no PE). Subsequent hs-TnT rise (red symbols), deceased (red triangle). Data is presented as scatter plot with median (line). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*). **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) Patients baseline characteristics and preexisting conditions. Baseline characteristics, symptoms, underlying health conditions, and coagulation parameter in COVID-19 patients being admitted with pericardial effusion (PE), compared to patients without PE. For metric data, Mann-Whitney-U test was used, for categorial variables, Chi2 test was performed. Mean and SD are shown. Clinical data for APACHE II score. The mortality risk score APACHE II and respective clinical parameters upon admission in COVID-19 patients with pericardial effusion (PE), compared to patients without PE. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney-U test. Mean and SD are shown. Next, we used flow-cytometry to identify inflammatory parameters that can predict at admission which of the PE patients would develop a severe disease course. This technique revealed normal frequencies of total leukocytes, lymphocytes and neutrophil blood counts in PE patients at admission (Table 1). However, among the T cells, the frequencies of CD8+ T cells, important effectors of early antiviral immunity [7], were increased, whereas regulatory T cells (Tregs), which control immune responses including CD8+ T cells [[8], [9], [10]], and monocytes, which have been reported to accumulate at sites of Covid-19 infection and simultaneously disappear from the circulation [11], were less frequent in PE patients (Fig. 2 ). We combined these 3 parameters altered in severely affected COVID-19 patients by calculating the CD8/Treg/monocyte ratio as a parameter for a dysfunctional antiviral immune response. Indeed, this ratio was low in all patients without PE and in three PE patients, and none of those developed a severe disease course (Fig. 1F). The other PE patients showed a high CD8/Treg/monocyte ratio and developed an hs-TnT increase (Fig. 1G), which correlated with the WHO COVID-19 classification (Fig. 1H). These patients also showed high serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Fig. 1I–K), consistent with the notion of a cytokine storm. Notably, an increase was seen also for the chemokine CCL2 (Fig. 1I), which mobilizes blood monocytes, possibly to counteract monopenia. Four of the patients with a high CD8/Treg/monocyte ratio eventually died.
Fig. 2

Immune cell blood frequencies in COVID-19 patients.

Percentages of CD4+ of CD3+ T cells (A), CD8+ of CD3+ T cells (B), CD14+ HLA-DR+ monocytes (C), Tregs (D) and NK cells (E) upon admission in patients exhibiting a pericardial effusion (PE) versus patients without PE (no PE).

Immune cell blood frequencies in COVID-19 patients. Percentages of CD4+ of CD3+ T cells (A), CD8+ of CD3+ T cells (B), CD14+ HLA-DR+ monocytes (C), Tregs (D) and NK cells (E) upon admission in patients exhibiting a pericardial effusion (PE) versus patients without PE (no PE).

Discussion

The present study addressed cardiac involvement in COVID-19 and provides clinical and molecular information on underlying immunomechanisms, thus supporting an association between (hyper)inflammation and myocardial damage. Myocardial involvement was evident in the form of a PE, long before serum markers of cardiomyocyte damage became significantly elevated. The PE was associated with a severe disease course, including respiratory failure and fatal outcome. Consistent with previous reports of cardiac replication with SARS-CoV-2 in autopsy cases [6], cardiac MRI revealed myocarditis in COVID19 patients with PE [12], which was followed by elevated serum parameters cardiac damage, especially hs-TnT [2]. Further, we detected a reduced EF and increased markers of edema (T1 and T2 relaxation times) only in PE-patients. A recent report showed that recovered COVID-19 patients frequently showed signs of myocardial dysfunction in cardiac NMR [13]. Our findings are consistent with that report and demonstrate that inflammatory alterations of the heart are detectable already early in ongoing infection. It has been speculated that an excessive immune response against COVID-19 might worsen cardiac dysfunction [14]. We here introduce the CD8/Treg/monocyte ratio to quantify an inadequate immune response that can target the heart. That ratio was low in all patients without PE and in those PE patients who survived, but high in patients who developed respiratory failure or died. Thus, a high CD8/Treg/monocyte ratio might serve as an early indicator for a severe cardiac involvement outcome in COVID-19, comparable to proteinuria recently shown to predict severe kidney involvement in this infection [15].

Limitations

Our results should be substantiated in a larger patient cohort to increase predictive power. Furthermore, our patients were enrolled upon admission and therefore disease state may be different. Nevertheless, the severity of their symptoms necessitated, justifying the admission date as a reasonable the start-point for our study. Also, patients with cardiac involvement are likely to feature affection of other organs as well, which may also affect disease-progression. Finally, future studies are warranted to clarify whether and how much the antiviral response against SARS-CoV-19 contributes to myocardial injury.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our findings indicate that a PE predicts imminent cardiac injury in COVID-19 patients. Thus, echocardiography should be performed at hospital admission as it identifies patients at risk, as already propagated [16]. Immunological parameters for disease severity, such as the CD8/Treg/monocyte ratio used here, supports risk assessment by predicting poor prognosis. Notably, myocardial inflammation preceded heart injury in our patients, supporting the notion that antiviral immunity contributed to myocardial damage [17]. Finally, the presence of a PE, together with the CD8/Treg/monocyte ratio and hs-TnT may also serve as progression parameters.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.
  15 in total

1.  Immunological Study of Combined Administration of SARS-CoV-2 DNA Vaccine and Inactivated Vaccine.

Authors:  Ziyan Meng; Danjing Ma; Suqin Duan; Jingjing Zhang; Rong Yue; Xinghang Li; Yang Gao; Xueqi Li; Fengyuan Zeng; Xiangxiong Xu; Guorun Jiang; Yun Liao; Shengtao Fan; Zhenye Niu; Dandan Li; Li Yu; Heng Zhao; Xingli Xu; Lichun Wang; Ying Zhang; Longding Liu; Qihan Li
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10

2.  Interferon-γ-induced protein 10 (IP-10) and serum amyloid A (SAA) are excellent biomarkers for the prediction of COVID-19 progression and severity.

Authors:  Riham Abdel-Hamid Haroun; Waleed H Osman; Asmaa M Eessa
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 6.780

Review 3.  Cardiovascular protective properties of oxytocin against COVID-19.

Authors:  Stephani C Wang; Yu-Feng Wang
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 6.780

Review 4.  SARS-CoV-2 infection: The role of PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 axis.

Authors:  Parisa Shiri Aghbash; Narges Eslami; Ali Shamekh; Taher Entezari-Maleki; Hossein Bannazadeh Baghi
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 6.780

Review 5.  Monocytes and macrophages in COVID-19: Friends and foes.

Authors:  Sepideh Meidaninikjeh; Nasim Sabouni; Hadi Zare Marzouni; Sajad Bengar; Ahmad Khalili; Reza Jafari
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 6.780

6.  A meta-analysis on the role of pre-existing chronic disease in the cardiac complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors:  Jane E Sinclair; Yanshan Zhu; Gang Xu; Wei Ma; Haiyan Shi; Kun-Long Ma; Chun-Feng Cao; Ling-Xi Kong; Ke-Qiang Wan; Juan Liao; Hai-Qiang Wang; Matt Arentz; Meredith A Redd; Linda A Gallo; Kirsty R Short
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-03-05

Review 7.  The role of CD4+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in the immunopathogenesis of COVID-19: implications for treatment.

Authors:  Yifei Wang; Jingbin Zheng; Md Sahidul Islam; Yang Yang; Yuanjia Hu; Xin Chen
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 6.580

Review 8.  Clinical variants of myocardial involvement in COVID-19-positive patients: a cumulative experience of 2020.

Authors:  Maya Guglin; Kareem Ballut; Onyedika Ilonze; Mark Jones; Roopa Rao
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 9.  Pharmacological agents to therapeutic treatment of cardiac injury caused by Covid-19.

Authors:  A Vitiello; F Ferrara
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 5.037

Review 10.  DNA vaccines against COVID-19: Perspectives and challenges.

Authors:  Marcelle Moura Silveira; Gustavo Marçal Schmidt Garcia Moreira; Marcelo Mendonça
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 6.780

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.