Literature DB >> 32918609

The silent transition from curative to palliative treatment: a qualitative study about cancer patients' perceptions of end-of-life discussions with oncologists.

A Kitta1, A Hagin2, M Unseld3, F Adamidis3, T Diendorfer4, E K Masel3, K Kirchheiner4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study were to examine patients' experiences of end-of-life (EOL) discussions and to shed light on patients' perceptions of the transition from curative to palliative care.
METHODS: This study was based on a qualitative methodology; we conducted semi-structured interviews with advanced cancer patients admitted to the palliative care unit (PCU) of the Medical University of Vienna. Interviews were recorded digitally and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed based on thematic analysis, using the MAXQDA software.
RESULTS: Twelve interviews were conducted with patients living with terminal cancer who were no longer under curative treatment. The findings revealed three themes: (1) that the medical EOL conversation contributed to the transition process from curative to palliative care, (2) that patients' information preferences were ambivalent and modulated by defense mechanisms, and (3) that the realization and integration of medical EOL conversations into the individual's personal frame of reference is a process that needs effort and information from different sources coming together.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study offer insight into how patients experienced their transition from curative to palliative care and into how EOL discussions are only one element within the disease trajectory. Many patients struggle with their situations. Therefore, more emphasis should be put on repeated offers to have EOL conversations and on early integration of aspects of palliative care into the overall treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced care planning; Communication; End-of-life discussions; Physician-patient relationship; Qualitative research; Terminal care

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32918609      PMCID: PMC7981304          DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05750-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  37 in total

1.  Reasons why physicians do not have discussions about poor prognosis, why it matters, and what can be improved.

Authors:  Jennifer W Mack; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  End-of-life discussions and care received.

Authors:  Talha Khan Burki
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Cancer patients' information needs and information seeking behaviour: in depth interview study.

Authors:  G M Leydon; M Boulton; C Moynihan; A Jones; J Mossman; M Boudioni; K McPherson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-01

4.  Information preferences regarding cure rates and prognosis of Austrian patients with advanced lung cancer.

Authors:  Tamara Rumpold; Carola Lütgendorf-Caucig; Reinhold Jagsch; Karin Dieckmann; Herbert Watzke; Richard Pötter; Kathrin Kirchheiner
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 5.  Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  J D Tariman; D L Berry; B Cochrane; A Doorenbos; K Schepp
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Communicating sad, bad, and difficult news in medicine.

Authors:  Lesley Fallowfield; Valerie Jenkins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Does Shared Decision Making in Cancer Treatment Improve Quality of Life? A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Michael Saheb Kashaf; Elizabeth McGill
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  What Makes a Good Palliative Care Physician? A Qualitative Study about the Patient's Expectations and Needs when Being Admitted to a Palliative Care Unit.

Authors:  Eva K Masel; Anna Kitta; Patrick Huber; Tamara Rumpold; Matthias Unseld; Sophie Schur; Edit Porpaczy; Herbert H Watzke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Experiences and Opinions Related to End-of-Life Discussion: From Oncologists' and Resident Physicians' Perspectives.

Authors:  Su-Jin Koh; Shinmi Kim; JinShil Kim; Bhumsuk Keam; Dae Seog Heo; Kyung Hee Lee; Bong-Seog Kim; Jee Hyun Kim; Hye Jung Chang; Sun Kyung Baek
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 4.679

10.  'Difficult Conversations': evaluation of multiprofessional training.

Authors:  Lisa Jane Brighton; Lucy Ellen Selman; Nicholas Gough; J J Nadicksbernd; Katherine Bristowe; Catherine Millington-Sanders; Jonathan Koffman
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.568

View more
  1 in total

1.  Communication about Prognosis during Patient-Initiated Second Opinion Consultations in Advanced Cancer Care: An Observational Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  N C A van der Velden; M B A van der Kleij; V Lehmann; E M A Smets; J M L Stouthard; I Henselmans; M A Hillen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.