Literature DB >> 32918232

Parafoveal pre-processing in children reading English: The importance of external letters.

Sara V Milledge1, Hazel I Blythe2, Simon P Liversedge3.   

Abstract

Although previous research has demonstrated that for adults external letters of words are more important than internal letters for lexical processing during reading, no comparable research has been conducted with children. This experiment explored, using the boundary paradigm during silent sentence reading, whether parafoveal pre-processing in English is more affected by the manipulation of external letters or internal letters, and whether this differs between skilled adult and beginner child readers. Six previews were generated: identity (e.g., monkey); external letter manipulations where either the beginning three letters of the word were substituted (e.g., rackey) or the last three letters of the word were substituted (e.g., monhig); internal letter manipulations; e.g., machey, mochiy); and an unrelated control condition (e.g., rachig). Results indicate that both adults and children undertook pre-processing of words in their entirety in the parafovea, and that the manipulation of external letters in preview was more harmful to participants' parafoveal pre-processing than internal letters. The data also suggest developmental change in the time course of pre-processing, with children's pre-processing delayed compared to that of adults. These results not only provide further evidence for the importance of external letters to parafoveal processing and lexical identification for adults, but also demonstrate that such findings can be extended to children.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; English; External letters; Internal letters; Parafoveal pre-processing; Reading

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32918232      PMCID: PMC7870634          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01806-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  29 in total

1.  Parafoveal preprocessing of word initial trigrams during reading in adults and children.

Authors:  Ascensión Pagán; Hazel I Blythe; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Tracking the acquisition of orthographic skills in developing readers: masked priming effects.

Authors:  Anne Castles; Chris Davis; Pauline Cavalot; Kenneth Forster
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2007-04-03

3.  Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search.

Authors:  Keith Rayner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Hans Stadthagen-Gonzalez; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-12

5.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

Authors:  Dale J Barr; Roger Levy; Christoph Scheepers; Harry J Tily
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control.

Authors:  J M Henderson; F Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Predictability and parafoveal preview effects in the developing reader: Evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Rebecca L Johnson; Elizabeth C Oehrlein; William L Roche
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08

9.  Foveal processing difficulty does not affect parafoveal preprocessing in young readers.

Authors:  Christina Marx; Stefan Hawelka; Sarah Schuster; Florian Hutzler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  An incremental boundary study on parafoveal preprocessing in children reading aloud: Parafoveal masks overestimate the preview benefit.

Authors:  Christina Marx; Stefan Hawelka; Sarah Schuster; Florian Hutzler
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-07-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Parafoveal processing and transposed-letter effects in dyslexic reading.

Authors:  Julie A Kirkby; Rhiannon S Barrington; Denis Drieghe; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  Dyslexia       Date:  2022-07-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.