| Literature DB >> 32916920 |
Xianshao Zou1,2, Guanzhao Wen1, Rong Hu3, Geng Dong4,5, Chengyun Zhang1, Wei Zhang1, Hao Huang6, Wei Dang6.
Abstract
Y6 is a new type of non-fullerene acceptor, which has led to power conversion efficiencies of single-junction polymer solar cells over 17% when combined with a careful choice of polymeric donors. However, the excited state characteristics of Y6, which is closely correlated with its opto-electronic applications, are not clear yet. In this work, we studied the excited state properties of the Y6 solution and Y6 film, by using steady-state and time-resolved spectroscopies as well as time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) calculations. UV-Vis absorption and fluorescence simulation, natural transition orbitals (NTOs) and hole-electron distribution analysis of Y6 solution were performed for understanding the excitation properties of Y6 by using TD-DFT calculations. The lifetimes of the lowest singlet excited state in Y6 solution and film were estimated to be 0.98 and 0.8 ns, respectively. Combining the exciton lifetime and photoluminescence (PL) quantum yield, the intrinsic radiative decay lifetimes of Y6 in the solution and film were estimated, which were 1.3 and 10.5 ns for the Y6 solution and film, respectively. Long exciton lifetime (~0.8 ns) and intrinsic radiative decay lifetime (~10.5 ns) of Y6 film enable Y6 to be a good acceptor material for the application of polymer solar cells.Entities:
Keywords: Y6; excited state; organic solar cells; photoinduced luminescence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32916920 PMCID: PMC7570483 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25184118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1(a) Molecular structure and electron density contours of (b) LUMO level and (c) HOMO level for Y6 with dielectric constant of 4.7113 (Chloroform solution) by TD-DFT with B3LYP/Def2-TZVPP. The isosurface value was set at 0.01 a.u.
Figure 2(a) Experimental measured (solid lines) and simulated (dot lines) absorption and fluorescence spectrum of Y6 in chloroform solution; the simulations were conducted by TD-DFT with B3LYP/6-31G*, and the vibration contribution was not included in the calculation. A Gaussian function with a full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of 0.11 eV was employed for the simulated spectrum. (b) Experimental measured (solid lines) absorption and fluorescence spectrum of Y6 film. The excitation wavelength of experimental measured fluorescence of Y6 solution and Y6 film was 600 nm and 700 nm, respectively.
Figure 3(a) Transient absorption spectra of Y6 solution at indicated delay times after photoexcitation at 700 nm with an excitation fluency of 2 × 1015 photons cm−2. (b) Comparison of time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) and transient absorption (TA) kinetics in the Y6 solution.
Figure 4TA kinetics of Y6 in chloroform solution at the indicated probe wavelength after photoexcitation at 700 nm with an excitation fluency of 2 × 1015 photons cm−2.
Figure 5(a) TRPL kinetics of Y6 film at indicated excitation fluence after photoexcitation at 775 nm. (b) TA kinetics of Y6 film at a probe wavelength of 870 nm after photoexcitation at 700 nm; the excitation was 2 × 1015 photons cm−2. The solid lines after fitting curves using exponential decay functions; the fitting parameters can be found in supporting information (Tables S6 and S7).