| Literature DB >> 32916841 |
Aimi Mahirah Zulkifli1, Nur Izzah Aqilah Mat Said1, Shujahadeen Bakr Aziz2,3, Elham Mohammed Ali Dannoun4, Shameer Hisham5, Shahan Shah1, Amnani Abu Bakar6, Zul Hazrin Zainal1, Hairul Anuar Tajuddin5, Jihad Mohammed Hadi7,8, Mohamad Ali Brza9, Salah Raza Saeed10, Peshawa Omer Amin10.
Abstract
In the present work, phthaloyl chitosan (PhCh)-based gel polymer electrolytes (GPEs) were prepared using dimethylformamide (DMF) as a solvent, ethyl carbonate (EC) as a co-solvent, and a set of five quaternaries of potassium iodide (KI) as a doping salt, which is a mixed composition of iodine (I2). The prepared GPEs were applied to dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC) to observe the effectiveness of the electrolyte, using mesoporous TiO2, which was sensitized with N3 dye as the sensitizer. The incorporation of the potassium iodide-based redox couple in a polymer electrolyte is fabricated for dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). The number of compositions was based on the chemical equation, which is 1:1 for KI:I2. The electrical performance of prepared GPE systems have been assessed using electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and dielectric permittivity. The improvement in the ionic conductivity of PhCh-based GPE was observed with the rise of salt concentration, and the maximum ionic conductivity (4.94 × 10-2 S cm-1) was achieved for the 0.0012 mol of KI:I2. The study of dielectric permittivity displays that ions with a high dielectric constant are associated with a high concentration of added ions. Furthermore, the gel polymer electrolyte samples were applied to DSSCs to detect the conversion effectiveness of the electrolytes. For electrolytes containing various content of KI:I2 the highest conversion efficiency (η%) of DSSC obtained was 3.57% with a short circuit current density (Jsc) of 20.33 mA cm-2, open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.37 V, fill factor (FF) of 0.47, as well as a conductivity of 2.08 × 10-2 S cm-1.Entities:
Keywords: UV-VIS study; dielectric properties; dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC); gel polymer electrolyte; impedance study; ionic conductivity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32916841 PMCID: PMC7570933 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25184115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Nyquist plot (Z versus Z) of gel polymer electrolytes with room temperature for (a) I0, (b) I1, (c) I2, (d) I3, and (e) I4 systems. It is obvious that the plot for the sample of I0 displays a semi-circle due to its incorporated with no KI salt. Subsequently, the spike region increases upon adding the KI salt, and the semi-circle was disappeared at the high-frequency regions for the samples of I1–I5.
Figure 2Conductivity versus molarity of KI salt.
The conductivity value of gel polymer electrolytes with variation molarity at ambient temperature.
| Sample | Conductivity, S/cm |
|---|---|
| I0 | 8.213 × 10−4 |
| I1 | 2.01 × 10−2 |
| I2 | 2.19 × 10−2 |
| I3 | 4.38 × 10−2 |
| I4 | 4.94 × 10−2 |
Figure 3The peak of wavelength for polyiodide for sample I3.
Figure 4(a). Variation of dielectric constant (ε′) with frequency dependent of GPE based on I0, I1, I2, I3, and I4 systems at ambient temperature; (b). Variation of dielectric loss (ε″) with frequency dependent of GPE based on I0, I1, I2, I3, and I4 systems at ambient temperature.
The values of ionic conductivity in direct current and dielectric constant for the all GPE systems with various molarity of KI/I2.
| Sample Code | Ionic Conductivity σ (S/cm) | Dielectric Constant |
|---|---|---|
| I0 | 8.22 × 10−4 | 2.96 × 106 |
| I1 | 2.08 × 10−2 | 2.90 × 106 |
| I2 | 2.21 × 10−2 | 6.40 × 106 |
| I3 | 4.38 × 10−2 | 6.75 × 106 |
| I4 | 4.94 × 10−2 | 7.50 × 106 |
Figure 5The J-V curve for the PhCh based GPE based on I0, I1, I2, I3, and I4 systems.
DSSC parameters of the GPEs based on PhCh with various molarity of KI salt.
| Sample | Jsc | Voc (V) | FF | ƞ% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mA cm−2) | ||||
| I0 | 2.46 | 0.51 | 0.14 | 0.76 |
| I1 | 0.78 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.06 |
| I2 | 20.33 | 0.37 | 0.65 | 3.57 |
| I3 | 3.96 | 0.52 | 0.64 | 1.35 |
| I4 | 2.51 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.84 |
Various GPE systems based on efficiency (η%) for the DSSCs.
| GPE Systems | Sensitizer | Efficiency (ƞ%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| PhCh:PEO:EC:DMF:TPAI/I2 | Anthocyanin | 0.56 | [ |
| PVA:EC-PC:KI-TPAI/I2 | N3 | 3.27 | [ |
| PAN:EC:PC:TPAI/I2 | Chlorophyll | 1.97 | [ |
| PEO:EC-PC-DMC:NaI/I2 | N719 | 3.6 | [ |
| PAN:EC:TPAI/I2 | N3 | 3.45 | [ |
| PMMA:PVDF:KI:I2:EC/PC | N719 | 4 | [ |
| PVDF:PMMA:EC: Imidazole:KI/I2 | N719 | 3.04 | [ |
| PhCh:EC:DMF:KI/I2 | N3 | 3.57 | This work |
Designation and composition of PhCh:DMF:EC:xKI/I2GPE systems.
| Samples | PhCh (g) | DMF (g) | EC (g) | KI/mol | I2/mol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
| I1 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0003 | 0.0003 |
| I2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 |
| I3 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0009 | 0.0009 |
| I4 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0012 | 0.0012 |